ML20138N962
| ML20138N962 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/1985 |
| From: | Gucwa L GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 0183C, 183C, GL-84-14, SL-122, TAC-59751, TAC-59752, NUDOCS 8512240229 | |
| Download: ML20138N962 (18) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:#Nmm ( Georgia Power Cornpany 331 Piedmont Avene A1:anta. Georg<a 30308 Tele 3riore 404 526 6326 Ma. Lng Address. Post Off.co Box 4545 Acanta, Georgia 30302 0 GeorgiaPower L. T. Gucwa U*'S & ' " & & W'?C'" Mar,ager Nuclear Safety and December 17, 1985 Ocensing oepartrnent SL-122 0183C Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. D. Muller, Project Director BWR Project Directorate No. 2 Division of Boiling Water Reactor Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES DPR-57, NPF-5 EDWIN 1. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - REQUALIFICATION TRAINING Gentlemen: Georgia Power Company's letter of September 24, 1985, provided, for NRC approval, a description of the re-established License Requalification Program for Plant Hatch. Your letter of November 14, 1985, provided comments resulting from NRC review of the program and identified areas' TUQU1 ring submittal of additional information. The requested information is hereby enclosed. provides responses to the NRC comments. is the License Requalification Program description, as amended to incorporate NRC comments. Please contact this office if furthar information is desired. Very truly yours, 0512240229 051217 PDH ADOCK 03000321 PDR gy g V L. T. Gucwa g nwn - t/nc's 7tcH surront REB /lc \\n (traw) Psn (L. Hut *AN) > ' 8C5" ( 5"I"'Vd5^N ) Enclosure lHSH(ACTING) Fon (VAssALLo) c: Mr. J. T. Beckham, Jr. Ao - c. uinis (ttr onty) Mr. H. C. Nix, Jr. D OI Dr. J. N. Grace (NRC-Region II) Senior Resident inspector Qg Ol83C
b bh, L = ~ m e? 's y ). 'k 4. "/', 4 4 ~ ,,,,C, n y w .K y, -n
- ?
g.*' W M. A 4 - o, ATTACllMENT 1 4 m RESPONSE TO NRC COMMENTS'ON LICENSE REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM T _j GENERAL COMMCNTS: W[0"Upon completion of ' resolution of our comments GPC should submit the k program as the program of record as described in Generic ' Letter 84-14. }- Th9 program should be in accordance with the Plant Hatch Administrative ' V/f Quality Assurance Procecures, contain applicable references and be N
- ,tviewed and approved by designated personnel.
1 '/j ~ O Several1 Sections of the program contain significant requirements in one paFagraph. These requirements can be more readily understood if each individual"re were identified. For example, Section 3.2.1 Act lve Status,quirement identifies the method to remain on active status. Sections 3.'2.2.2, 4.2, 4.3, and-4.4 could be made more clear if they were rewritten using the style in Section 3.2.1. r m r. 'RESPOESEl' / t .~ ) - 'The, Licenso requalification Program has been revised to address initial ? 7 nnpaents and is hereby submitted as the 'Pragram of record. After your J apieroval, this prooram will be proceduralized and fully implemented per our. administrativo procedures within approximately 120 days of receipt of your approval. In the interim, the' intent of this program as submitted, o is being followed. Paragraphs with several requirements have becn rewritten for clarity. SPECIFIC COMMENTS:' ' COMMENT: 0.1 Individuals who are exempt from pa/ticipating in portions of the program should be. clearly identified - in the program or in a suitable administrative procedure. For example: 0 The number of is'tructor[eho prepare and administer examinations. }'=l; ej licensechangesas@describedinSection3.3oftheprogram. Penannel who p are notice of procedure, design and 0
RESPONSE
ReviIed0.0and.added0.1.1forclarity. >i
my_ W V 8y 1 c ( COMMENT: 0.2 The staff recommends that license candidates become enrolled in training described in Section 3.3, " Plant Changes", at a suitable period in the initial training program. They should continue to participate in this portion of the program after administration of license examinations.
RESPONSE
Pertinent. plant changes are presented to license candidates prior to their license = examination. However, this does not fall within the scope of the License Requalification Program. Revised 0.2 to provide for enro'1 ment in 3.3. l COMMENT: O.3 Senior operator Upgrade Program candidates should continue to participate in training described in Section 3.3, " Plant Changes". We. have not been able to identify the qualification and requalification requirements of instructors in this program. GPC should refer to the H. R. Denton letter of March 28, 1980, contained in NUREG-0737 and include instructor criteria and requalification requirements or reference an administrative procedure in this section of the program.
RESPONSE
Revised 0.3 to require section 3.3. Revised 0.0 and added 0.1.1 to address instructor requalification and clarify items. Department procedures (71TR-PQL-001-05) require instructors to demonstrate a knowledge greater than that which trainees are expected to obtain in appropriate subject area. For License requalification, this requires SRO certification. 71TR-PQL-001-0S further provides that license instructors participate in the requalification program. This requirement is added here to clarify applicability. - COMMENT: 2.0 Lectures 0 The September 24, 1985, letter and section 4.2, Written Evaluations, refer to a four segment lecture series. .Therefore, the lecture series description should be contained in this section.
~ -m-, n. n y
- f.p::j y p;,
Q g f.j;G? h y >s . g: m:: s w r + v gw q w, ,,if^~~'^ . a ~, n :; n. .y v e 1~ /N* + .g, Q ~ - , e< v. g. m N. I',l,"'"~. ' ' 'w wx M.% e _ < > ~ _ ' acm$
- s =
Q ' y \\' a
- .fy 1
- Y y;
7; ,,~ e u% J - /.' m' k
- -8 %
- !RESPONSED E}., m+ a ~ w h. m + : e-2 - m s V W-,s ' V RevisedL2.0ftofadd,ress,c~ise.gments.r 9 n n 'T
- D[
iD.,, 1._m r.k~,-, 3 Y u ~ 4:W CO M NTim O' m if }. ~ . e ,.... *y7 i~ _~ hpy M" 101 N,iSince. segmentitraining, evaluation,. and 'the exemption::- request 11nd thei 4 $.M.w A lx.. AMSeptember ? 24,71985, lettere represents ainew training and evaluation: 4 7 7p] 7,," M process Ja"11dpersonnelimu'st-attend the-lecture: series for the)first12-i - g years ;of 3the.Jprogram., - ProvisionsntoD" test, out" portions Eof, the' y > y' jprogram will be considered;after; completion of.the'2 year.perios.. n ?,,;' v 4'RISPONSE-w e .,i J"4 a . C3 A - ?s 4W.-e....~, q...,.. m F% + g)%.T.esting o~ut1f.s'egmentNn'ot'provided for;in this submittal.= y + +i
- COMEEN* ;M
~ s ~+
- 4..
x x ~
- q w s.
~ C. m - 101 - 1GPCTshodidFevalka~tei 3-the' review 3 of. operating - experience -Jand : Plant: " ~ @X ,,g:n g a Changes as additional: subjects in the lecture series.' m .;x. ,b 'ma g _,s- ~Y" -- N % RESPONSE:' M q. m> yg w. - x .~. c p%
- p..
. Revised:2.01to-include.n nlf JETS mg.- m,- _ y. ~ s-p N ib d N COMMENI!- _-["' -og u m.m ' w __ . The'u_seL offself-study, as stated sin: Item-2. of Appendix A, s56ald be. x .t yym \\ 7 0.- 7 20 %..S,i ncl uded ' injl11mi tati ons i of.: the~. program. s 99 <, m E h _ iRESPONSE:- ~ U %b gn . - (Revised:210 toilimit'use of!self_-study.. This s'ection also revised to ~ $,,larify exte.nt of participation.- Jc _ xjA wn w r. le
- l((f,
-[_ d -,C-s J A .y - g -: 4 ' JCOMMENT:!
- b _
~ p c; y -Q [ L W 4 &_7 _ 13;1X iMactivity. controls.. W % 4 m ~ y t0 i. TIf'JcreditJfor' maqfpulations ;may[be: granted for thoseLwho direct. or. + if~ ^ ^ C evaluate 6 licensed 1 personnel; ? GPCf should iindicate~ how the~seipersonnel " y g; + -darei'evalua.ted.m (Referi to1 Item :C.3, - Enclosure 1,- of the ' March 28,n a:' rug ,' - 11980p HER.lDentonLLetter). _w a -r N, d. Y RESPONSE b-n 1-sg,, g s ..vv-s s t .M
- g -
i
- V
^ l Supe' vision Lor pe'rformance :of manip 014ionk1,n segment ' training 'and r 1 c,m Tannuall ; examinations?. is ? ' ev'aluated s. ass prcvided-in' departmental e ~ instructions.'. DRivisedi3.-1, to 11mit' useiof evaluations' in lieu of' ^ %,J ~ .g+ n: 2 O performance /sup.a r..ervisioni Tnis'will ensure periodic evaluation = of ther E'. performance'orfsupervision'of items. 0 :- J ~,.. ~ ~,., c -i.s 3 ,.,er p [E' -[- 4 ? ,.gms w " -m '- mT:c, ~ ,L -8 ~ ,~ Wh C W 's t M s s,... 3,, - h, y.~ hd.g; ; _g n _,_ _, _ _,_ _ i t' C i,___ _,__ _ _ J ((3 Y l.h'Q1 N
y 7, ~ ".e .Y \\ y ^ e / ' COMMENT:- v p' 0 -L" Loss;of.;feedwater~(normal 7andl emergency)" shouldLbe a " Starred". item. . int. lieu f of ~ " loss. of normal'.fe'edwater - or normal feedwater system failure" (refer - to. Enclosure 4 of-the ~ March 28, 1980, H. R. Denton le_tter).c A r[de(RESPONSE:. s
- Typo;correctionmade.
0- ' COMMENTi:: ^ 10 7With L regard...to the' Plant. Hatch simulator, GPC <should commit to implementation of Regulator Guide 1.149, " Nuclear Power Plant- . Simulator:for:use in Operating Training".
RESPONSE
. Sinc'e [ implementation. of Regulatory Guide 1.149 affects all operator 111 cense : programs,--including but. not limited to Requalification Training, this ;is a separate issue. Currently Plant Hatch maintains - i
- an updated. simulator, that accurately. reproduces the. operating L-
- characteristics and ~panelllayouts of. the
- Plant.
Modifications are: - controlled : by. DI-TRN-24" to require simulator - fidelity.7 While the: litemsL specified in' ANSI 3.5 are being used as guidelines, the impact of committing ~to Regulatory. Guide'1.149.is being considered.- ^ - 7-COMMENT: [ [0[ ' GPC. should Jalso -' consider introdu~ction, review and ~ evaluation of chargesi described in Sectionc 3.3 ~ as part of the reactivity control ' portion of the_ program. ~ RESPONSE:: 1 Revised'3.l and 3.3 to'inclu'de. ~ y ~ jh 7~ ~, COMMENT:. L L 3. 2' ' Knowledge.of: Systems' .i 1 9,.[ !GPCEshould~ indicate how'.this' segment is evaluated and how the -evaluation is documented. ~
- RESPONSE:-
~ Evaluations 'are' defined in. Section 4.0. Documentation is specified kin'Section5.0. ist 4 .d' Au m. ~ a m'a w
y yy[: m.g7_,7 . x [?N.yf. 'w' 3"' 's M 8*e,
- ,~
+ >J' s p Y--" A;; m; r a- ,[IU s s ;.: ~ + 4~ ? a.g; s y 4;g ; T p:My. -1 7.; k,y;y,. u s ~ a V P (T ik -e (j.7.,[ w, C j.'
- t s
5 t 7 j3;/ W,- 4~,+
- L m
.. h 7
- ms
.p. (Revisedl3.221i.ito irequire< 32 hours:!per. four ' months; to be; consistent
- e n..
.Ofwith: lanticipated_? < NRC 4. - requirements. , Also modified enotification- _ m ~m s +. requirements... s.- e, 4 .~ o .\\.,n; ;.. y- _3 z ~ s c' e 5: ~ S@ COMMENT: , c ,9 j_ ~ &'*< 4 M. s4 4 s. d /3.2.2.'2 2In'actiye : Stat'us2 7
- 77,- M _ j l0h ^
[RefektoGeneralComments. ~~ J 5 & Z; ': RESPONSE:, 1-i . 6+W N ~ lib "lRiwrote paragraph- ~~ f a, y w k.g.l; , ~,'. ::. s, t-
- COMMENT
- ;
I.~ iG,PCS.h'ouldLr'e'ference;10CFR55.31(e)inthissection"oftheprogram. ~~0~ m z.a. r1 2 - ' RESPONSE:' V H ~ y,.. s
- 7..,
- Revised;to refer ~ence 10 CFR 55.#31(e) y mq-
~ s . ~ x uw . x ~
- COMMENT::
A' .., z. a-- 2%F -, :;-; ~ ~. ~ ~ - e N g ; ^ 30J - : Before Cinactive Clicensees ; are, evaluated c by ' managements the j program ishouldirequire:..'reviewf of 711censei changesiand L any ? other.; required e
- . J ~.,,
q .J , treading; reviewiof;the7 materialipresented4in the. segment lecture and. m H% R i examination. - onithat" segment;iperformance fofithe : rea'ctivity r controll g j e g. , manipulations which/were, missed'duringjthe previous segment (s).- - w, 6 c' y i.' P' ,a. d'/' L f 5 L '..ti JRESPONSEb ,% - e',
- e. -e r t c
-' w, wa, y;vn, e;x:~;. a; M+, _ cRevisediparagraphLtolinclude.;,
- ,i 3,
H,;.. * .r s-t..- f.O p ,w a - : :.. J a F u y ^ a
- C0pmENT
- W
~ m+.o , ma .x n g n:6 ' ~ 10 t - 2 Inactive j:1 f.censees - shouldi also perform a; p'eriod of:'licensedi Rd,
- acti vi t. ies Lunder.- supervi s ion'. -
c : r _s m 9 iRESPONSE: y
- 3 3
- w
$u -.:sf a.. Revise'd toiincludet
- s. m -
a ~:w, w._ ~ w-m, 3_a .: :e -.JCOMMENTi. ~ 4 x O. ,;_aN 73:3 H ':P ~~ m.. & u
- a. i 2.laht?chanlges?
~pm.pg.3 gy;p:w-- L ~.ll, JN L~+; ~ +- y.g m. Ny ,+ +^' e ~ r;." s n z,g.g $.? ~;" hx.... ~ .h '~ L' m# %; 4 m .w r w- . \\ ~
^ e.M WM~ ,,,2, w ~ ~, = wg g
- j, 3 :
7,-,- gs,
- g.,,,
@Y% g ' ~', ',~L, -'L co' = a
- l,
$.N Y + E $ ~ 1 % '- ' ~" ~ w : w,.m - - -,n n a ~ h W :el ,v, ~ J3 ~-L9: ~ ^: -, 5 ^ Q2W s 7 3 $4 f' 1 f
- ; a;( '
we - y ,;p ,x4 R ~
- M
{ _ + s s% n-, r. ~ _ e .. =. _... a + JGPCLshould evaluateiwhetheriorrnotia reviewfofu operating experience. J$ ~ 4 f(Item:I.Q.5JorlNUREG-0737)[shouldo beiadded:;to1this segment Lof nthe: w a 'i s * .A N.,- program.:_ c w> ar f 3, 4 - ~
RESPONSE
2 w n m.? L?N .: Revised,2.0?tolinflude.1 ~. %::Mh:2 Jn; + T ymy-w - 3 y ; -- ~ e; s + g. 4 > um s - s-
- 5 f
+ CONNENTi x my
- w.
" ' ~. a. + ~ -.y s.' a m .,,.gn-.m
- .i,
J c'421 m.sA; Annual Diagnostic Examinat' ions: } vg n,r., +, w Mx; ' j% A _. lDiagnosticfexaminatioris: mayE bei administiredy atlany' time 7during the +- a + c - ^' - ' Grequalification cycle.1. Diagnostic examinations are aisuitable. device ^ g ;y ~ n c to; determine; strengths :and.w'eaknesses-liniretention and application 1of r 1,J ~ 4 ',1 g ^ 1 knowledge.O However, Jdiagnostic examination's,f atethis time, do not t _ < ? substitute!for;the s Annuals Examination g required by Appendix--~A of :10 wew
- CFR:55.;
hi^j'} RESPONSES < - '.) ~ ~ 1 ~ ,ww ,~ ~ A T' T' ~ iRevised 4;1 30 clarif k The-intent ofiannual' diagnostic examinations ~ /yy n j p : 'a isstol meet 10 CFR:55,iAppendixiA,.4.a. j 2 7 c..,. y * *: o j e:7;m e .a. = ; .t .1 f 2 COMENT: c ' - m @m : up ,..,..y. x s .*z g ,;-, :14. 2 :- (WrittenEvaluationsi w s + -vw,,, ~ u -c u {j% w iThe segment;exa'mination 1doesJnot include' category or:' subject areas, ~ 9: ; EL; dand therefore,ydoesTnot appearyto comply; with criteria contained Tin ~ L ?Section C.2,nEnclosureil "of;the' Marchx28,a1980,~ H.1R ADenton. letten - f:S SNL W iGPCEshould ; explainb howi category / subject t are s a. re$ evaluated in?the - a @t 4s e.segmentedprogramhT(Referito;Sectionl4:4)4 mv w ' ~ ~ g" Y ( _, f1RESPONS'E:' _ 1,[ v
- w p '
y ~ ~ . d f a, ", l SThei; scope'[of Ks'egment:itopics jis" addressed fin Section 2.0,' whichc am ~ e
- encompassesf all subjects (required -by 101CFR 'Appendixi A and the -Denton = ~
1 &sn s .r ' letter.u While { each Isegment Edoes O not " correspond to eachicategory - M Econtained.cin>NUREGjl021, -(0perator clicensing Examiner' Standards). W4 7 3 eachf segmentMis J broaderf anditherefore a better11ndicatort of' an. T, GO./ m x > operatorj s c overall 7 knowledge 7 onia i periodic 1 basi s. The criteriaEoff: <C, l Item-C.2?of the'Denton31etter:is met 11n.that :700 per segmentfand 80% ..w m q:' eoveralliisjequil valent?to:?70% per_ category and 80% overall.n It ' is 7 4 c y : y pq f ,?feltithat majorJweaknessesfin.a~particular subject:wil1~be identified-i through7 failure to meett the criteriafestablished in -Section 4.2,L.as ~ 41 Y V Y well y ashor. better 1than could - be. met ;by ' requiring each Esegment= to WZ y, [ g :corres'ponditoonesubject(category)' area. ~ ^ m .w ^,. ~. y* m. s M2.M fiLMVhiMP C " + V -W3 ght l[s " 9% ' ' ' 7 %.' ?.Q l ' tr if $UW'M ? .Is ~ ', s, - h % x m,.',. < +n ,.v._ " ~. - ~ .~ W I
wwr, 2 %.,.
- .m;w 2 1 x.;
,e, ~,,, J -,u .:,. m ,,m- }lu W:Q 'i 9yw-yng' y, _... -{v'; J '.J b Q- .f x 7:n m rn 2 '- mee - y m ~- TM(4 W')G ' +-; <.. y '.- l ~ ~
- p g ; + 4 i, 1.-...t %,
s ..'.,1 N r .y- -m Ipi e ' h,f. 1 ^ ^ 4 1 j C-a ~.,.. - e y-s sy, w m a y u QMll [hy '[ l-y,- cpgy; g
- COMENT
- '
2.. _. s: ? z:: ~ m ~ ,.-r. , w;... f4 3 ~< 60b'servationiand Evaluation. l k , h y U b Annual examina'tionsLshould inSludefsimulatorDand. oral-operating.- 'E2' L' examinations. f Exceptionsf may. be L granted :Jif.c the ~ simulator is L n'ot{ g g3.. J ' Ff *. 3available. T i%Ww ahz : & q ' w 6 4 RESPONSE: V - c~::e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J: ' '.,. .., n ~'. ~ . ~ 4 r. s .y 77 .en - y,iRevisedparagraph;tojinclude.~ w .g n, / Ir,'. ],7,_ s, '.., 8. p x< ~ w at , COMENT:?. ww-m u-i t {
- q f
J0) 1Since51mul Ator fexercis~es -:are jinclu'ded5 in the isegmented program,iGPC. ~ m> :n. - 1s.hould < include.-evaluation;of.each segment's exercisesL t(Refer:to -our g&,n , ~ n ~ u m -' La m R comments in section:3.1)e a ..]H }_H RESPONSEU & i vs a.
- W l 7 _ '.
92 m. iRevised.for clarity.:. .m, 2 1 :; _. 7:.-, 3 ,7-
- COMENT::'
M, m + _a e s ,1:lSuspensiohfrom" licensed duties 5due. to unsdisfactory performance'oni - 40 K 7 c.c .a
- actualievents ;should.be - clearlyDidentifiedlin this section. 4 (Refer '
- fg".
{togeneralcomments).- gw4 : y = u
- i A
.P C -1 b i < h ! RESPONSE: We ?~ ~ =. - w- , w - 4# " r. - FRevised;to clarify. ~ [.. W,4 '. ' .c e pegh t.' * ' C Vf;;, *MT * ' _ t i ~ .y 1. Ne- + 1 COMMENT:-- X_ .m l .,sw. ,' s /Acceleratedfrequalificationprogram (414\\ 7 j} .8
- lClarifyj whether1 re-examinations. are administered: in sections orJ one;
.. ~. 'M0;7 y-gw 'N .. - 1 comprehensive examination without= sections.- - n-- u 'S .~ e - -.s 1, jj.~ J.J , 90 L. 1.Inylieu ofhthe; minimumJnu'mberTo'f' questions ~ for. ~ re-examinations, _ w: =examinationx. questions;;should be-based con eth'e objectives 'of the' s ry c, ', acceleratedstraining program." wo g .j m g4 i f RESPONSE:: ~ 2 w J e 4 ~ d y " " lRevissdJparagraph L o.. clarify. i Also' revised - passing criteria-for a-t s W~ 'ssegment reexaminationito 70% to be consistent with other criteria.. , 4.W.. f h' x .=.. ym e g~ ,,7 3 .y .s ~ "lY' .? l$*J Y$f,'y '~~ < - '
- ~ ' ^
j, - %]. ~4 .. s W_ '?a - w - u 2 <1: r -h' fu_ s.+ } i \\ r'
- 3 ~m 7 3,
. - :_L,y'-Q n L =e ,. ~ 2 _a_L, y,0 ~ s & c
- r g' z' ai '.~, '
<a' k... s. r % 'w' n'* 7 ~ e 2 - - e $ ;yi Q ;c d,m. w~ o - m
- m-
,;;g, r ~ Q< v +. ~ n.: Q: 7.ym t a v, s yyy 3L r. ~ w 4 Ag - c } /;y - <.a y a- __ T ss ' [( n I g 1 i sy x - ~ w.. - * *.w ' y sm. .g .% g, = _, _f, - e(; Lv ,_.i... ~ l-Al, S;l_ ^ c
- COMENT:1 i
~ .m r,--- -ytj(g, - j.' 5 p ---4 - c524:..,, u. e.n 6 Individual file's4 4 .g .t 4 .c ~. - ', 3. ,.. u '~. e no. ; - w 7 , J N. E WOL w e Individual fi. les ;should 7 alsolinclude /. waiver.s ~ and -'justificationifor.
- i. par.ticipatio' 1 in _ the L program.,
.@m, - s n .y g g g g @ g; RESPONSE:24j m ,,.mam - t....-. 70AC-TRN-001, ' PlantiTraining - Program, requires - Revised paragraph. : L ncY ' ' ~ a F %.. ' MN
- justification for waivers.
- r 5
N '- 5 2, ' .,.,..4 9 i JCOMENTi; + + 91 y- , + -
- TheD rdcordsl.must 11nclude: the training: - admin'istered ' during an i u <=
0: ~ /, .~.. s J-t l' 5 accelerated J p'rogram.1 (Refer to ? Section D 5, - Appendix. ~ A, 100 CFR : part ~_ ~ iSS)._ 5 r
- 7--
y w , m .~cc - m. - 7 RESPONSE:: w~ ~ + .p g .:Programifi. lese alsoT apply. to ;the ; accelerated ~ requalification. program. -'M .o m p q-, . Where J only.1 onehindividuall:is' ' enrolled,. - this program file.. may - be. 2:*.. n . : contained in.LhisLindividual: file.,TSection 5.0 rev.ised to clarify.- r, m - c a 2: -
- 4 L.'t _ 1 3
y 'm My_E 3 a 7 r r +,, E h' . rm,, / l-i:': i M ~ _3. 3 'l$ o '[', l#- n, 5 + l ._2 s s ] ..r. - xx - - m .,7,]X65.M ~ ,. E,- 1 &, + - n m -n. c. w,e e -p ^, N.
- -' i%
2 ^ ~ ~ _'j'j_ ' y ~' --l ~
- f
- Y
+# L~ ..g-[ _ .-v -a S h ',y4 j& 'u 4sa %v 5.c h-, mq '.OS,, ._.Q % k l q '.', "'sh 4 Y v., 4 1 - y s, ss. '~' ,f l : ~ y. -, 4 s 7 -,W e 'f f M 4 P 4 .e ,I j ( LJ.s, s 4 % ']_ ;' 4 1,.,-. y v. + + ,a.: &-V f ,.,f j .+j '. +74 4.- m; O.. 4 .y j, y y . r,X + f4~e s s 3 " ' ' *-'~ 'Y Y Y r __.,,'['tes { ~' f' -i g s 7 7 h'6: e ',' .-l Jii + t s - y 3 .%.c ,w
?
- E~
. m m v-sw m ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ' ,-l >f [. ~.S K~:,', m7 f l @3,_ L% Q:glQ.;$- t'. a 'gh 3; 'TR i: T T < i" 1 p w. ; ~ , - a m S N. f'- . + ^ ma g~, y: % a. g :L,
- - :: ~
r g jn~ '1 ~@" ^, s: ~ x -x 7 ', :33, g. i t 4.s n. yg ~ f , as - +: m A-
- 3; p
- 3. ;
x" JATTACIMENTf2: .O,3i,2 3 ~. -1 ~ LICENSE REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM- %5Wi- - a ,,.,, ~ ..x =.. .~' .cp J '40.0: i Applicability' JThel-program appliesElto'allj(NRC licensedhreactorf ~.x_, _ Ooperatorsaand Jseniorioperators _ in the plantf organization; including '~ C s staff f members, ? Technical Advisor's.-iSenior' Reactor 0perator certified instru s ? N,. T s: certified Shift 9 .N0TE M~~., m, _ s R n ~ MF" WendorL Sen'iork Reactor Op'eratdr certified instructiors will. be allowed ;to teach 1: license and requalification programs : upon A'1 j ~ < f;presentingidocumentation( to the utility. that: they are, certified-- s ys; f z ,,,?"_. ~
- andf meet th_e requirements 1of an approved Jvendor requalification 7
c, :; (program.:- (Such vendor instructors 'are exempt f from this;procedu're', gj' ~ except' that attendance.or' presentation of Section 3.3 topics;will: - y% lbe = requiredifor;those! vendor instructor' 1 assigned to the Training. 4,y s 1 ,m ~ ~ dDepartmentiforfaiperiod of^ greater than on quarter:(3 months).. y - >,m i t..0il; ', ' Individuals whofmaintainloperatorioriseniorfoperatorilicensed for the - m 10 purposeyof providingibackup capabilityJto theloperating-staff sh'all % g% T - ' y eparticipatetin"theiprogram: except4to thec extent that-their normal c PCC c J. l dutie_siprecluds the.'need for specific retraining in particularfareas.~ sqp - .m .A 10.1.1 3WaiversifroinD specifici protions? Tof"ithe; ~ Licensed Rsqualification t ' pg ; s ' - iProgramnmaySbeEgranted.lin1:accordance~ with ' -70AC-TRN-001,- " Plant .. ~ ~ p- : iTraining: Program",;fortthe following reasons: 4 h%hh ! Licensed andicertifiedlperso'nnelf OiW$opresentfl'ectures,5forthose-lectureswhichthat! individual-has: s f , [ presented.; = ' ((
- +,
w ,y m p% , F Zi. O lLicensed1and certifiedLinstructors who prepare or. grade' segment or-. i 4 diagnostic ~- examinations' fortthat segment, : limited to no 0 greater ~ " '~ H -;lthan:two{instructorspersegment. ,s- ~ m# -m 10 H Performance 4:; evaluation: : during :;aH ; segment may be.: waived - for m' ~! 1 MinstructorsJwho conduct ^ evaluations ofsall. manipulations: scheduled CCfy ' ' - Efori that ? segment. However,. the~ annual ' simulator and oral Jexamination'may not:be waived.. 7 n;p;f, ', ; - ( 0! J Personnel Fwho) preparef notice 1of E procedure,7 design, - and ~ license ,M !. ~ l' / T ,d-changescasidescribed in'Section 3.3 . ~ ?"^ 5 ) r v' s--4 '.'4,^ '4 ~ f _m L. l-l 6 5 -, -M' Q, ;7*, e e ~.. ., n - -c _7 .M N e -F' 9
mm n y-g ~w ~ p" RWdW. G~ n e 2 + >; y ,gm-y n n w. r c s-- e m_ tv.. %.x *
- '
- :t,
~. nyt. - x:. 4@ V:r .~. ~ ~ A,'s - p,; a,w
- =
' n:, ~ ..s + "- y: m, s .f ^ ,. '..,r X, -, ._s gw 1 ' 1..,.. ..m x r
- g m,
s g@h __ ~ ;l ~
- 0.2% ~ Newly Elicensed ' Tindividuals (
- shall. be: ' enroll _ed - - in - this : program?
(beginning,withithe -subsequent? training. segment. zHowever,; enrollment! r e' 1 rin a Sectionk 3.3 /wil10 begini upon freceipt; of ? license. /An J individual " w- -m rec ~eivingihisslicense withinksixsmonthsiofs ths annual dimulator ~and; ~ le + ~ # ^ 'ioral:Eexaminationmis-exempted from taking this exam.'- f A- ,s s h~'[;# 1023': /ReactorMoperators ; enrollediini /Seniorh ReactoF. 0perator-Lupgrade-o h as A: 3 - > program mayabe exempt?from:the requirements 1off this procedure,1with' r 1 ng ' ( V l the sexception ofiSection 3.3,DwhileJso enrolled. =However,: if the - 2 y.-
- individuali does not obtain -a'n FSR0 alicense, he 'will? pass ;a Lsimulatori m
jy~ Y ' : and Vcomprehensive < written 1 examination f and : meet ' the requirements fof w < Section>3.2.2.2 priorf to resuming licensed ? duties.EasD a reactor. 4 . s GM_ T .fKoperator.
- w '
a, .; ' f fli0h i S$edu'leMThefprogram will run continuouslyJon an annual' basis ;during- ~ m ia two year. cycle., q. ~ ; , o [ + ' b f2.05 ' ? L' cturesMThe tequalification program.shall; include plannedilec.tures' e onta: continuing; segmented basis over a-periodJofftwo years c b $? ein, those' areas : where' -diagnostic..and 1other written; w g: - -l .? ~ 1 examinations' indicate that. emphasis in; scopeiand depth ~ of' C < coverage is^needed in the following subjects: m. .,..h ' d e 7' '^ 1 (Theory;and 'princip1es of operation. la.1.: g w, k c-~. A Ginera<l and specific' plant operating chara'cteristics. Gjf. m b 7.- (w -Q~ . ~ Plant: Instrumentation and control systems. c.' i P Plant; protection systems, rd.: hp ; ;. e , N ~ ~ , : e.'.-
- Engineered safety; systems.
^ pj ; i f.
- Normal,' abnormal,JandEemergency operating procedures.
ec - m .m 'j{ fT. g'. e ~ Radiation control and' safety. - s
- q M
,!h.. _.TechnicalfSpecifications. ~ e-h' I ti.. Applicable portions of. Title 10, ' Chapter--I, Code ~ of Federal c;.wcu ' += v ' Regulations. . 7 -ww y y u- .c y f6 ', 7 0j.; ' Quality ~ assurance for operations. ~ -skL Major upcoming events.(necessary personn'el only). ,c s c a M 1.1 . Heat; transfer, fluid flow, and thermodynamics.
- e. _ A.n '
.~ '2 m.~ Mitigation of' accidents involving a degraded core. .e u: o Ys e e[.y' a:fu ' 7y*K^ -4,a m -, y + - gw --qw _ ~ h._ a,, 1,, ( I y. ,,.,n y,
p% "'_, W,~ -,..-CT . W i :. W >i a c + 19 1
- f. e.7.r. % m g g'% ~
w 4 m , c. ,z m s, s ~
- 4 W
.G' Mk. % u t v.. ; n' m "v1 m ~ 3 W o Lw v. 4,, 2 w: w z ^ ^ Ox4 L: ^ A g.g s
- .n s
a4 s 0 Z w" ~ n . s ~ a s. m > y,w
- .. ?
e n r ' -~ ? M3 f %~ @d 2 4 W F M z n y7rq ,W i Jn.' m (Operating experience , ~, .c ~ 4s: .qq1 r1 -
- o;,
iPlant' ch..anges- _-{,
- / -
/Thellecture seriesdisipr~esented primarilyf by.LPlant. Hatch Training y C J ' " WJ M
- Staff. iA minimumfofL20 contact hoursiperisegmentwwithna~ minimum"of a
2: ifour > segments periyearf will be ? scheduled :for 'the -lecture series:wh'ere cy, 3' ~ L2G6. A n Maicontractih6uriisidAfined.~ astpresentation L or self study with:.an - Pl M ~ '. 'f77'c tudijwill. not-exceed 50 percent _of the'.minimiJm time.Use?ofifilms, vide i ?M 71nstr'uctor' immediatelysavai1able. ~ ~ y g
- 1, s
~ -;,u _ w-r + 'Tr MkOne4 hundredlpercentiparticipation_ cin theelecture series is. required lunlessiotherwis'ei.specified in_ thisiprogram fand with the _ provision-E ~ u 6 w M; - - 2 Lthat; lectures mi.ssed (due: to l dnexpected J absences are made up 'with --m , c # ', . instructorJ contacti;oridocumented self study L prior to. completion-.of 7 , f >n - Jtheisubsequent~ segment. em n. ~ i' ' > Y310 l0A-ThNobiTr'ain'ing y%, ~;~,_ r7,( ?3.11_ - : Reactivity " Controls 'Each _ licensed operatorxmanipulates Hthe plant 3 controls -and_ each.-licensed senior., operator Leither manipulatesf the-r'--,. , _, : controls, Lor. directs: the ' activities E of: individuals tduring plant i~d"_ ! control'manipulationsi-during the tdrmifof ~their = licenses. ~For / % sm". reactor operators anda senioro operators, Lthese? manipulations 'shsll consist /[of.at leasti10' reactivity manipulations;in any combination of' A. M (reactor:startupsb reactor shutdowns,: orL other. control' manipulations- .M~ Ewhich" demonstrate tskill. and/ ore familiarity. with. reactivity 7 control - ,5 system. ~
- 9 ~
~ -W u + e f. y r sThe pfollowingl icontrol'- manipulations add plant' evolutions are-l - 4 ?. 1 f acceptablenfor meeting t thef reactivityD control: manipulations-- required - [ ,% - ;byi AppendiMA,3 Paragraph 3.a ofJ10 CFR>Part! 55. The starred' items T y4y4 ', shallgbelperformed ;on an. annual ' basis;1 all. Other; items 'shall be ,Le! _T 7 . performedloverla' twofyear cycle'. - Each in.fividual,shall perform or: (M g-; t . M participatelin na (combination"ofireactivity control 7 manipulations _. y ~ m m ,~
- based) onf the eavailability of aplant ' equipment. or a fplant specific
~ W ,; simulator.' Theiuse of M P1 ant Hatch Technical Espe'cifications willybe cc<' ~ -
- maximized !during ? the1 man 19ulations' - l Personnel %ith senior license's i
- Yare' credited ~with theserac'tivities if?they' direct or evaluate control f~
~ + d a.. ? manipulations has 1theyi - are performed. _ The V use - of : evaluating '
- ik J ' Cmanipulations' should 5 bel limited to no l more, than fifty, percent - of -
'A Q*E..
- f T?.ethosefmanipulations performed in a segment.
w e a s u - 'M~'- .iWhere appropriate',nitems.that-fall under Section 3.3 will b'e included 7:? "in ~ segment simulator training. 7 .mn 9:# E h: ~
- W Tfrom: Enuclear ~ heat ' addition is noticeable and :heatup rate is
~~ established. u.u-c m y .a.... [ M k [0f ~ [ Plant 3hutdown.: knyq:ijW, % <> % ~ ~ (L k,, Y 4 .p . ;. ?!g %l k > n i ~.A T -~
~ 3 -:w.. -
- F ji ?~1
- mcg m g P b k ,P / q ^' - g ~ ~ .{.- L
- h f:
4 3 ~ +0) LManual control of feedwkteriduring startup and' shutdown. 7 ~. T*LO ' ' "Any sign'ificant -( );10 Percent) power changesL in-manualf rod control, or recirculstion flow. ja s p r y*'O'~ " Loss of. coolant including: ~ .n.__ d a 4:#., - - Inside'and outside primaryLcontainment, ,7 u W' x e-X eiand small,, including' leak-rate determination. i ~ .0 Loss of instrument. air'- 2::
- Ldss of electrical power (and/or degraded power l sources).
e-
- 0f
~ L l c*-0._ -Loss of' core coolant flow / natural circulation. ~ ~ v. 0:
- Loss-of-' condenser-vacuum.
0 Loss of' service water'.-: (0: 'Lossiof. shutdown cooling.. 1) 16ssl of'. component l cooling ' system or -cooling. to an individual ~ 0 3 component. 10' ~L'oss of'normalifeedwater or' n'ormal feedwater system failure.
- 2
- J
^' f
- 01 Loss-of:all feedwater_'(normal and emergency).
' 10
- Lo'ss - of: p'rotective -system channel.
!1 ~ w-s b ~ ,O Mis'positione'd control rod or..r'ods:(or rod-drops). Inability)to.drivecontrolrods. Oi 20. Conditi.ons. requiring use of standby liquid control systems. vi 10-Fuel cladding 1 failure ork high activity in reactor coolant or off-gas. ~ ~ 7 ?'
- 0i iTurbine or generat'or trip.
~
- .~
50- ' Malfunction ~of! automatic controll system (s).which affect reactivity. '10: . Malfunction of reactor coolant pressure / volume control system.- 'O. Reactor trip.- y,... .: 0, . Main.. steam;line break -(inside or outside containment)..
- [
60 1 Nuclear [instrumentationfailure(s). ~ u.y v3: _~ r-- '^ n g ,.4.- n
QQy
- p }q j, y > " W f' Li" m
- m 4 ..~~ s g gg% ~- a ~ g. ~ g -a ~. y +, < w.. s ?, cX S ~ 'Vn .., ~, -m. n ~ 1 , y,[ Q '} -m Q ._l r 2 ~ ~" i.L l J - ? ~
- G
.i- ~ %;g y; % s #;. j p ,J2K, R.,p ' ? 3.2M, Knowledge of ? Systems ~ r y,gy 7,, ; 1 Each Llicensed reactor o'peratorf or. senior, reactor operator 11s srequ' ired s to ' demonstrate,5 in the : performance"of ~his duties, 'his; satisfactory. _'W' , iunderstanding.ofithe r op' rationL1.l of ' systems. and apparatus?andEhis _ e ,e s -lknowledget ofi. operatin'g-procedures' in 1 each area": for ;which The ^is: m~ licensed.: a;:se s ~ ' undWw ~ 2 Active Sfatus' v"T yp p 3.'2:17 J5 4 my 1 F" XToiremain$onl activeit'atus;for. the ; purpose of1 performing' licensed - 3;'~_} J uties, a reactor. operator _or senior' operator must: d N W(( y g. <LO)ParticipateOntheLicenseRequalificationl Program,and ^ w " 'T 03 Perform 11 censed' duties _forJthirty_ two : hours during the preceding. 1 L w f _ .:fourimonths. _ Department 4 Managers are. responsible for notifying &., # 4 n - theJTraining; Department when this' requirement-has'been-met. .- ;. I ~ ._k % I a 3 [ License) duties shallibe< considered = to ;be; those. duties;performedion F m_ "m, yN '
- L ',
c shif t - by 10perationsj Supervisors,~ Shift / Supervisors, ' Plant 10perators,'. 'W ind t;AssistantlPlant10perators, duties : involving s fuelc handling,1 and : +- si J K ' duties + involving on' site 111neL respon~sibility, for directing; day-to-day. f4 7 m control room activities. y Di' J3;242. 7 ? Inactive" Status ~ ~ i F GJ3 2:211.MAny; individual? who. fails to meet,the'_ requirements-of ' a'etivet license - a a Jactivitiesiasidefinedfin'Section:3.2.1 or whoLis; removed from license ak ' N f duties 1asi required. els;ewhe~re 1 in 'the ? requlalification: program -~shall bel - s W9 ~ ,; N _L
- designatedrias-inactive. iThis will be. documented 1with' writtsn f'
- inotificationfto - the ; individual H and to ~the; appropriate ? Department 1 a NM, J - LManager. iInactives license maintenance: will require participation ein UN- _..: k 1 lslicenseireoualification program.- Wd%l: . the ~
- ?
- e: 43.2.2.2 EAny. licensed! reactor operatoE or senior' reactor operator placed inian ' inactive. status-pursuant. to :10 ' CFR : 55.31(e) is-' required -to gA ~ 4 ~ (demonstrateO that DhisOknowledge Lof;- current ' plant operations and tadministration is' satisfactory bylthe following stept: i E;f ~ ~ 0 kRa Mll 7pplicable ' plant',: procedurei and license Jchanges. y#
- during)the aperiod;the license,was sinactive,
- and' review of 3 missed imaterial; presented.during: segment) lecture:and examination, and R
na f ~ . J " _. %
- 0SSatisfactoryj performance of all reactivity manipulations. required Ls*'^['
by:section 3.1 which were missed during the previous segment,-and-s E ~ ^,' JO ; Satisfactory performance-of fourishifts under supervision, and ',,:; - Q ,77 "0. Evaluation ~ bylthe(Manager-0perations, Deputy General' Manager, or 1,S - 4 un GeneraliManager-Plant Hatch, or + T'~ ~ Sjff
- @W:l%=RQW
_1 . m f& 'o-l.. >+. 'e '3 =- ~ s w Lu
ps @@ - xx ' ~ n r'. /g 4;%g ~,, _ w>+ ~ - <v +=, w; ' . wm x. f ', 't .u, $fP Sb"** hjf., 7', Dj s m.nr L,r, y ^ .; 4 ;; y ~ m. , n ., ~ ~ V ,ll 1rb T^
- J,
\\ ici. # m 4 y (,.y M M J :; h [ _ 7 [' _* ~ _ . l.A - l A 'l ~ 9 s c; w'
- C'
._ _ ~. .-r. n ' g q e ~' - r MO: Satisfactory;completiion of written, sisiO1'ator and oral /walkihrough-a x_ W up a-T 7 examinations,1the: extent of which willibe based on the length of a v, _ 1,J. i Hinactivity. ,, w, w, w w ~ W,2 vs- +, mQ2 alAnTunsatisfactory result:onf thenevaluation1 requires Lthe; operator to X&.W - Jhav'e 'On-The-Job training Lin -areas. determined as weak. until. either the: C,.?, # @ "- i lManag'er-0perations, -Deputy : General; Manager, / or. Generals Manager.-P1 ant %ar d.. _ i_M i n i Mm.tchLnisO satisfied
- that 1he'~ha's adequate; knowledge of current Ha 1
m - --m n x - v operations.x. - ~- m,un,.wy j, (7 ~ 3.3$ " 2 Plant' Changes w.. ~ 73;;, ,q (Each jeactor~ operator;and _senio(reactor operator is: kept. informed.of- .g % ~ 0 4%t Lall (plant), designs changes,._ procedure changes, and.1 license ; changes. , p :;M, e JThis fis? accomplished ; byl written -notice ~ of these, changes ; to ' each m "f m : holder Jofian ; operator or seniorioperator olicense'. - Cha'nges of.a 3, Hm m s N,L ig*g. ^ : magnitudel ^requiringidetailed Lexplanation are reviewed byflectur.e or ~ Tsimulator?as-lappropriateJwith 100 percent attendance :: of licensed y - ~ y;. _ 1
- per_sonnel4 m
\\m N b e g,.,j3.'4? " JProcSddr'e'RAviews. I ~ ~ 4 e.:+; F,m_~ Eachilicensed Loperator, andH s'e'niori operator; re' views the contents of Nm ~ L f, falllapplicableJ abnormal;and: emergency -procedures on an. annual basis @^_ P E.as ischeduled in 2 the ; requalification program., A. delinquency of-~ 30 p idays onLa;procedureirev.iewl cycle fr~equires that the licensee 1shallDbe ( Tremoved from: license' duties until such a review is complete? vm
- M '.
z' ~ C. p y f4;03 4 Evaluation! y 3 g .:e. - ~ s M a> ; 24. lQ. LAn'nual' Diagnostic Examinations:._ ~ ~ t u a x.. e,: - M' c Annual writtenfdiagnostic' examinations %hich l serve ~ to -determined areas YL.M minLwhichtretraining isineeded to upgrade-licensed' operator andLsenior-L Em m.. semi 'operat.or_ knowledgeiwill be administered to all.ilicensed: operators ~ and - H -m - cm m ~ NW X
- seniori; operators.: :Since these examinatio'ns -are diagnostic,f no m j" O
m; ;minimumf passing 1 grade Twill;ibef established.. and they.. may u not i be? lp^^^^a zsubstituted L for. examinationso required.under section 4.2.
- However, it ndividuali scores J1essi thanD701 percent _ of-the averagefscorelwill MJ L a m 123 :d A ~ _requireLthe s individual Jto bdi removed ' from license duties until: he FM N ci
- attends iaccelerated f retraining. and passes ' 1a simulator _ and/or oral
~ e 4 n examinationb w a n_ a gn ~ _ b u G LJ, >~>7 ,;a-- -e ~ ',. m.- y. s s = Y 4 I a v a .s, 1 Ohl s G:l ^ M; / ~. ; f z_ .- j _ g iq _., ~&l CY ~. ~ L
- , _ <, ' yr
-~1 s 2 h + I - s ' '+ 9-Y.C $[ M E I N.5 OO -. e s d
.n: 9 xx w =, : x, .~ w.. z l % +% }. 3 tv 't , m ,,1 s*4 e .~ m a 4 s - I ;$' 7 c ~ [.' h p
- r,
_ + > ^ ran w , g., < i. 'x + .-w v 3 _m g g* w-ark ~' _,*G*3 , w' ~ g y,; ' ;' 7, '., L^'Q, Om .au ).h ~y - 4,- yrf 1 34-q, 1 s lp;., ' R-'~ s ~~ Rn a v^t
- .m i
M;;_ 'b ^ j it g_ a a ws J ' 'y' ? u 4f22 ?;~ Written 'Evaluat'ionsi ( ?';.,,..~., ,u, -m % j 01 Writtenn examinations,.which 3 determine flicensed ' operators' and .1 ~ ~ ' 1
- seniors licensed 4 operators S knowledge - of i subjects J covered iin the
.. -?' trequalification fprogram land provide.;.a :basisL for. evaluating! their ^ l ' "~ l14 MknowledgeDof ; abnormal (;and ; emergency- ' procedures. will.. be. wdL 2aa.m m c- ~ administered onta.: segmented basis. ~ gyzwm w + ' ^ 'y ~ f^ = 0 JScores ionitheisegmentiexaminations : administered duringian annual C, n, ~ 5 cycle will1be -averaged to.' determine an overall annual examination :, o t score.. ~. - ~ 2 ,- a & 'X. y (0 JIndividual ? segment 7 scores of lessi than 70 -. percent Lor Loverall-uiA~ ~ iscoreslofiless _ than -80, percent =will.. require' that;an individual be ' NF
- N Tremoved from ulicensed-duties-and: enrolled ~'in an iaccelerated
%f f Ti,jrequ'alification; program.. q.,, 1* r. s - s, m; 7 "T+ "7' 0f "Iff anj in'dividualiisL.adm' inistered a segment:re-examination, the new 4 i - _,.i, +. - gn; 7 y c ny j zq iscore may be used.in' determining lth~e final;overalliscore.< g
- Wf LO, Examinations ?willIbe prepared -by.eitheri Plant; Hatch Trainingi
@p y,,, l Department Pe~rsonnel or an outside agency.' 1-Q-#6 Joi:l Evaluation 3 of? examinations 4.will be cbmpleted f wkthin yt'hirty L (30)
- , 7 f' ng. -
, ' + - 1 days (thisE period 1may--be Lextended by -thirty,=(30) days.under J ' ' -punusualconditions;andwithcorporateofficeappro_ val). x w . 0bservati5nandEvaluation1 = g7 T ' ' ' T4.3J " 407 e, mv 4 96[ #' ' 104 l Systematic l evaluation ofs the' 'performancei and competency; of -
- fi _
Jf licensed?Loperatorsi: = and seniorJ jlicensed operators..iby' ^ 4 .E: T
- supervisors 3and/or; training ' staff members = will be' accomplished _
m X
- ~ Nas:follows:
- a. m x
- ~%m J A' [ ' ' 33 LOl Evdludion2 4during-r'eg'ul arly' scheduled segmentL simulator - I = "= - m; training. v: m g0I ! Conduct' of.faul annual 7( s'imulator and. oral examination'. Thet , simulator / portion 7may be waived only. if the plantEspecific ca l__ w (simulator isinot:available.
- n;O p
- 73.
- c M
~ p LOL
- The ? evaluation -will' include actions taken during _- actual or 6
1-- Lsimulated,; abnormal and emergency conditions. . ' y;. w.=
- -1__
10
- Anhunsatisfactory evaluation by1 any of the "above' methods 'or M n, iunsatisfactory performance during-an actual-event --while - on-a s
shift,fwill -require that. the cindividual 'be ' removed from j bE W - ;' - 1.
- program.:
m - Llicensed duties ~ and enrolled in 'an accelerated requalification ~ j , ;- ~ m -(y < Z hf W i ^N ^ h &x.yyw$aWagg;;g=_;:gg,;.,.,,.na, ;L,,,,.,,_,,,,, _ m,_._, ow
- ~ d
, w._ _. z "~ _,_s,...
k-,N ;,7; ;;,s % y% w.m2 o, - .m a 3 4L . ;" -&_no
- m S:
x.h!< :C ' W: ' R gt --- L ~~ J:V ' '? , l. Mdh, ' _4 '.. ~ $j C.fff(-" /,j
- E MO M,..
~ 'A s 3 3py - 7 7,, yg. ~ 4;3 % 4 QW > %, 1 m; - .; mw ~ 1 x. '-'n f f' k W3"[, f > S; -7~ 2 'w y a, N., %@O i V ~ Y
- 4.45 V ' h C ;
J L. a Mn - < 1 2 ~
- Accelerated Requalification" Program m ~
m w.. 4 m oi C C Mi/ l021EUnia'tisfactory _peffsrmance Las ideterminedL in: Sections' :4.1 , a7 m.g e - 1.'through~ 4.3 shallJ require that the individual be tremoved from - pg g 7. : +".. ? licensed. duties andienrolled-in :an accelerated requalification1 't a 7c 7, < rate s w u.a u = & ~,, _ rprogram. e
- x.-
a ~~ TGF "T 735 0,Jexisting - cDepartmental. 'InstructionsEThisFprogram - 5 hall -:b O' 'evalu'ationianalysis'. :. for " examination.and/or
- g n y.m.
7,, o' ,' Unsatisfactory performance,as defined in Sections 4.1 and 4.3~ w ;. = mg e- " 0 94,,'@ V ;shallerequire'successfulicompletion of a simulator and/or oral ~ .%,i i .~ examination.. + y _ ?- .Un'satfsfictory - performance ; on a a segment rexam as - define'd! in w - E01 -1J-Section.4.2;shallt requiretsuccessful completion of La written @ 1 ? y,_ segment examination withla minimum score of 70% pwe ex g
- A.
- 01; lUris'atisfactoryl performance based.on an overall annual'scoretof
- 'c
~ 6 Fw. R f i v,:. m ;1essi~than' 80% ?on the _ segmented' examin' tion will' require _ w a
- successful 7 completion 1of-a - comprehensive L 14 i category, q;.
- 7m Texamination L with a -score of 80% overall ~ and. 70%
- ini;each 4
7
- category.:
c M*, n 7(, 4 *Mju-l01.j Acceleratedireq~ualification program lectures require a minimum - ?off two 11nstructor. contactihours.: for each ; segment 'or1 category ~ ^ Mik$ M7 i -below:705. am n-~ 2 2TC( 1 01 JAcceptable fre-examinationsw'ill_ be based.,on :the program + MC f-; cobjectives for weakness'.' identified. .. r y; .ne, c.c ru%2Ng a j4;5r ... -Nuclear' Regulatory'Co'mmission:Requalific'ation Program Evaluation ~
- xna K, *v :: x.
,s. ._ y ~m -,p '7 " ti ' W %Evalu?segmentGof j training,j prior ' tol-a; Requal.ification '. Program VThei +1 ' s ationL tmay 'consistL of 'a., preparation ' period. - When the 4_ m J. ? evaluation is!not. scheduled: sufficiently in advan.ce of the segment, t iJ c -1 ^ previously1 scheduled topics' for that segment may be deferred until < !after:the evaluation.- m? w + ~ !Recordh zThe following' records are : required f to be : maintained to lm,, u C ~5.0 4 ~ 5 ' 1.7 '.w. (document;theJparticipation',of each licensed -and - senior operatorj in : .J s E thel. requalification pg# y, - J jprogram.~
- program, and - accelerated ' requalification
~- 2 A.s i, %wg, 15 6 -Lessodplans. ~~-G +. 'gt q- ^ i ,7 g_ j F 3r y - , ; r e4e
- v_
g, , $" ;La * &l%., Y ? ~Y-- } ' ' ' ' ' f:;h
- n
'Y l n f' r
~ .== ~". m-y'
- -]-?'
+ + .z a. T.3 , 3 r p ~
- .t.
'k' ';~ 's v ^ a ~-. h.- u g;F. g_ Q. m
- p u
n w .n
- .~
o ~.,,. ~. . 5. 2.-
- Program File:
p
- 3;,
' Master / key of?all:writteniexaminations' ~ ^ ? a.. s ~ ~ b.- Summary of; exam;results ?cb 4 Curriculum? u_ W .d. ' ' Attendance records.
- a a t
a:. .~3727 5.'3", ' ' iDist' rib'ution coverf sh'eets o'f. design, procedure and license' changes, ~ i "' L5;41
- 1. Individual files:'
"'8 ,,T ~ ~ Examination'. answers /results.~. a. b. Results of all evaluations. -c. Observation results.- r ~- - :d... TReactivity control manipulations. -e'.; Accelerated Requalification attendance.
- f.. iDocumentation' related to individual's license status.
g.1 Waivers from specific portions.' 4 ~ f. A E 4 j 2 J n i.- ) -'C' 1 P 4 ,jo, - - = e i, O g, .,::- yl' 1 a- +
- .g
',.4, %e* .~.') I-- .M ,n v -N,- I p 7y I 5 5 A -Yb 7 4 r ~ g -.~ / 4 L t gz. F a+ '_,k ,~ ,~ y r 5 Y @t.g :p;. ~ f ~ s e y v. 6
- --i..
,}}