ML20138G006

Partial Deleted Memo Detailing Review of Records Re Hazardous Waste Disposal by DOE Contractor on 920504-07

ML20138G006
Person / Time
Issue date:	10/16/1996
From:	NRC OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG)
Shared Package
ML20138F923	List: IA-96-348, Partially Deleted Rept of Interview Re Case 92-33I ML20138F918 ML20138F969 ML20138F999 ML20138G006 ML20138G012
References
FOIA-96-348 NUDOCS 9610180139
Download: ML20138G006 (2)

Text

.. __ - --

' / 4,, UNITED STATES

! a '

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2015E

\.....M OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL q

MEMORANDUM FOR: File 92-31I FROM:

SUBJECT:

HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL BY DOE CONTRACTOR On Ma 4-7 ewed records i 'e possession of spa Office of Inspector General, ment of Energy Oak Ridge, TN. The records examined consisted of six xero,x paper boxes containing shipping documents, purchase sheets. requests, contract documents and laboratory analysis

, The folders contained the files from both Martin Marietta Energy Systems (MM) and Rollins Environmental, Baton Rouge (REM) on hazardous wasta. shipped from DOEs Y-12 plant in Oak Ridge.

Also reviewed were all reports of interview conducted by DOE IG and any other documentation relatin to the REM investigation that had been assembled by Specifically, the shipping documents were compared wi the tsbles prepared by y-12 personnel to verify the total amouht of Special Nuclear Material (SNM), in phis case U235, in each shipment to REM Baton Rouge,

u. -

For those shipments I'or which a Laboratory Analysis existed, subsequent to 1986, the calculations were verified. No inconsistencies with the amounts of SNM represented in the Y-12 calculations were found. The total for which verifiable amount were available, for all years, 1986-1991, was 76.8 grams. For the years 1984 and 1985 no laboratory analysis is available and no estimate of how much SNM was contained in each shipment to REM is available or can be reconstructed. No information contained in reports of interview or other documentation contained information which would indicate any regulatory interest in MM or REM.

I't t 0R.olG-9610180139 961016 c e nez-o a N s n

• Pz ct I v : e o ae *e I 's O PDR FOIA GOURLEY96-348 PDR

a,a r ae m-~4 --ww-<^us 2 -e. 6 e e. - e r n4A- AALM----a s --sin, a--+ M-aO=- m nm ns-Aa-- on ----e,s --

t e

4 j I

e

(

0 .

M b

J i

-6 en I

d DOCUMENT 202 W

v J

4 b

e e

'I l ',' I l lI q h f f I)f I ,f gl t'=,

4','. J ** ' I l4  %* 1 a , a

• f,a . a. p. .r ,: . .., . .2 . [...

(b5 W --. -- -,

d h)

.