ML20138B442

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Confirmatory Reviews Conducted Under 10CFR70.32 to Allow Licensees to Make Changes W/O Prior NRC Approval, Provided That Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Licensee Programs for Public Protection
ML20138B442
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/23/1997
From: Weber M
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:
NRC
References
NUDOCS 9704290172
Download: ML20138B442 (4)


Text

(X0 o

April 23, 1997 MEMORANDUM T0:

FCLB Staff

}

l j

FROM:

Michael F. Weber, Chief Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS l

SUBJECT:

CONFIRMATORY REVIEWS CONDUCTED UNDER 10 CFR 70.32 Over the last couple months, Mary Adams, George Pangburn, and I have been reviewing the Licensing Branch's procedures for reviewing changes made by licensees to Material Control and Accountability programs, security plans, safeguards contingency plans, and emergency plans under 10 CFR 70.32.

Part 70 allows licensees to make these changes without prior NRC approval provided that the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of licensee programs for public protection.

Procedures for conducting reviews of such changes are described in the attachment.

It is important to point out that no license amendment is required for licensees to make changes under 670.32, as long as the "no decrease in effectiveness" test is met and NRC is promptly informed of the changes in accordance with the requirements. Nevertheless, FCLB needs to review the changes to confirm that they do not decrease effectiveness.

In addition, inspectors in the Operations Branch and Regional offices need to be aware of the program changes to inspect effective implementation of the changes.

FCLB project managers should inform lead inspectors about licensee changes under 670.32 and coordinate confirmatory reviews with the inspectors.

i Pam Shea will incorporate the attached procedures in the next update of the FCLB Licensing Manual, which should be completed in June 1997.

If you have any questions, please contact Mary, George, and me.

Attachment:

FCLB Licensing Manual Insert on 70.32 Reviews DISTRIBUTION:

Central file FCLB r/f NMSS r/f PTing FCSS r/f RBellamy EMcAlpine GShear BSpitzberg FWenslawski PUBLIC!

Path and File Name:

OFC FCLB M

NAME kHWeber DATE 04/0/97 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 91-rs' u

5,)

?, T._.. O h3 9704290172 970423 PDR ORO NOMA M _ l f].

PDR OW

l e G7og a

p 4

UNITED STATES y

~

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E

f WASHINGTON, D.C. 205Soo01

\\*****/

April 23, 1997 MEMORANDUM T0:

FCLB Staff W( 2 h f' W FROM:

Michael F. Weber, Chief Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

CONFIRMATORY REVIEWS CON 00CTF0 UNDER 10 CFR 70.32 l

Over the last couple months, Mary Adams, George Pangburn, and I have been reviewing the Licensing Branch's procedures for reviewing changes made by licensees to Material Control and Accountability programs, security plans, safeguards contingency plans, and emergency plans under 10 CFR 70.32.

Part 70 allows-licensees to make these changes without prior NRC approval provided that the changes do not decrease the effective..:ss of licensee programt for public protection.

Procedures for conductirig reviews of such changes are described in the attachment.

It is important to point out that no license amendment is required for licensees to make changes under 670.32, as long as the "no decrease in

~

' effec,tiveness" test is met and NRC is promptly informed of the changes in accordance with the requirements. Nevertheless, FCLB needs to review the i

changes to confirm that they do not decrease effectiveness.

In addition, inspectors in the Operations Branch and Regional offices need to be aware of the program changes to inspect effective implementation of the changes.

FCLB project managers should inform lead inspectors about licensee changes under 970.32 and coordinate confirmatory reviews with the inspectors.

Pam Shea will incorporate the attached procedures in the next update of the FCLB Licensing Manual, which should be completed in June 1997.

If you have any questions, please contact Mary, George, and me.

Attachment:

FCLB Licensing Manual Insert on 70.32 Reviews

A ff aM_

~

FCLB LICENSING MANUAL INSERT ON 70.32 REVIEWS March 14, 1997 i

NRC regulations in 10 CFR 70.32 allow licensees to make changes to certain J

plans without prior approval by NRC provided that the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of licensee programs for public protection ("no decrease changes").

Specifically, l

6670.32(c)(1)(iii) allows licensees to make changes to MC&A programs, if70.32(d) allows licensees to change physical protection plans fo-special nuclear material in transit, i

ll70.32(e) allows licensees to change security plans, 6570.32(g) allows licensees to change safeguards contingency plans, and

)

5570.32(i) allows licensees to change emergency plans.

In each case, the licensee is. required to inform the NRC of these changes i

within a specified time period along with the determination that the changes i

do not decrease the effectiveness of the plan or program.

The period allowed i

for reporting the changes ranges from 2 to 6 months depending on the program and special nuclear material characteristics.

If changes are requested that j

would decrease the effectiveness, then licensees are required to request the 1

changes by filing an amendment application in accordance with s70.34.

When "no decrease changes" are reported to NRC, FCLB will consult with the Lead Regional Inspector and conduct a limited review to confirm the licensee's determination that the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the plan or program.

The LA will assign a TAC number for the review and it will be entered on the status log for FCLB licensing actions.

However, the review will be fee exempt and will not result in a change to the license.

FCLB will confirm acceptance of the licensee's "no decrease change" determination in a letter back to the licensee typically within 30 days of receipt of the change notification.

In no case, however, will FCLB " approve" the change, for such an approval would be tantamount to an amendment, which is explicitly not 3

required by 670.32.

FCLB will, for NRC's convenience, amend the license at the time of the next license amendment to ensure that the license reflects the most current version of the physical security, FNMC, contingency, and emergency plans.

If FCLB's review does not confirm that the changes do not decrease the effectiveness of the plan or program, then FCLB will inform the licensee in 1

4 writing of the conclusion and request that the original program or plan be restored (without the offensive changes).

Failure to restore the plan or program could result in enforcement action in accordance with an 0GC opinion (Memorandum from Robert Fonner to Russ Rentschler, November 9, 1978).

FCLB

-will consult with FCOB and tho Regional office on whether a violation occurred in conformance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (see NRC Enforcement Manual, NUREG/BR-0195).

If enforcement action is warranted, FCOB or Regional Office, in consultation with FCLB, will initiate the action.

FCLB will provide

. support to FCOB or the region as needed to process the enforcement action.

)

In addition, if the licensee wishes to pursue the changes,-the licensee may submit a request for an amendment to the license in accordarce with s70.34.

If an amendment request is submitted at a later date or if the licensee j

requests NRC to act upon the original change submittal as :f it were an amendment request, the case will convert to fee billable status.

In the j

latter instance, staf f review hours that have already been invested in the review will be back chargen to the licensee as part of the amendment review because this effort directly supports the amendment review.

The TAC and case will remain open on the FCLB tracking system until (1) NRC

~

confirms acceptance of the "no decrease determination" by writing to the licensee, (2) NRC determines the change does decrease the effectiveness of the 9rogram and issues a letter to the licensee to restore the original program, (3) the licensee withdraws the change, or (4) NRC completes action on the change by issuing or denying an amendment request.

FCLB will not review draft submittals of "no decrease changes." The onus is on the licensee to make the initial determination in accordance with 670.32.

In addition, the FCLB project manager will coordinate reviews of "no decrease changes" with lead inspector;> in FCOB and regional offices to ensure that they are aware of the licensee's changes.

This is intended to facilitate inspection planning so that implementation of the changes can be promptly reviewed through inspection and so that inspectors remain cognizant of licensee programs as part of their preparations for inspections.

I i

i i

2 4

..