ML20138B331
| ML20138B331 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/06/1985 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Edelman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138B334 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8512120268 | |
| Download: ML20138B331 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000440/1985082
Text
p,, e
-
.
.
DEC 6
1985
Docket No. 50-440
Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
ATTN: Mr. Murray R. Edelman
Vice President
Nuclear Group
Post Office Box 5000
Cleveland, OH 44101
Gentlemen:
This refers to the special safety inspection conducted by Messrs. S. Stasek,
J. McCormick-Barger, R. Evans, R. Larson, and N. Spang, of this office during
the period of November 18 - 21, 1985, of activities at Perry Nuclear Power
Plant, Unit 1, authorized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-148 and to the
discussion of our findings with Mr. M. Lyster and others of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
,
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection. One item of potential significance, however, was identified which
involved a discrepancy between the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and the
i
draft Technical Specifications as referenced by the open item in paragraph 2.f
of the enclosed report.
At the conclusion of the inspection, a commitment by your staff was made to
'
develop and implement a program to further compare (on a sampling basis) the
,
FSAR and Technical Specifications in similar areas to ensure that the
discrepancy identified during the NRC review was an isolated instance.
4
A written response on this matter is requested.
Please include a description
of your sample program, as implemented, with a discussion on sampling criteria
',
chosen, results so far achieved, and projected completion date.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790, of the NRC " Rules of Practice", Part 2 Title
10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosure will
be placed in.the NRC Public Document Room.
.
8512120268 851206
ADOCK 05000440
I k
O
L
Nel
o
-
--
.
-
.
-
.
.
Cleveland Electric Illuminating
-2-
Company
DEC 6
1985
The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
d'or!9In31 SMcd b'.
C 7
Nrcitus"
_
Charles E. Norelius, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
No. 50-440/85082(DRP)
cc w/ enclosure:
J. J. Waldron, Manager, Perry
Plant Technical Department
M. D. Lyster, Manager, Perry Plant
Operations Department
L. O. Beck, General Supervising
Engineer, Nuclear Licensing and
Fuel Management Section
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Terry J. Lodge, Esq.
James W. Harris, State of Ohio
Robert H. Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
,
4
/
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
RIII
cco 6
& gp
rcm)
s
Stasek 1
McCormick-Barger
Knop
Warnick
N
'us
12/6/85
P/6
Jt,
-n