ML20138B331

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-440/85-82 on 851118-21.No Violation Noted.Written Response to Commitment Made to Develop & Implement Program to Compare FSAR & Tech Specs Requested
ML20138B331
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/1985
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Edelman M
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
Shared Package
ML20138B334 List:
References
NUDOCS 8512120268
Download: ML20138B331 (2)


See also: IR 05000440/1985082

Text

. .

-

p,, e

DEC 6 1985

Docket No. 50-440

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company

ATTN: Mr. Murray R. Edelman

Vice President

Nuclear Group

Post Office Box 5000

Cleveland, OH 44101

Gentlemen:

This refers to the special safety inspection conducted by Messrs. S. Stasek,

J. McCormick-Barger, R. Evans, R. Larson, and N. Spang, of this office during

the period of November 18 - 21, 1985, of activities at Perry Nuclear Power

Plant, Unit 1, authorized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-148 and to the

discussion of our findings with Mr. M. Lyster and others of your staff at the

conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

,

interviews with personnel.

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this

inspection. One item of potential significance, however, was identified which

involved a discrepancy between the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and the

i draft Technical Specifications as referenced by the open item in paragraph 2.f

of the enclosed report.

At the conclusion of the inspection, a commitment by your staff was made to

,

'

develop and implement a program to further compare (on a sampling basis) the

FSAR and Technical Specifications in similar areas to ensure that the

discrepancy identified during the NRC review was an isolated instance.

4

A written response on this matter is requested. Please include a description

', of your sample program, as implemented, with a discussion on sampling criteria

chosen, results so far achieved, and projected completion date.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790, of the NRC " Rules of Practice", Part 2 Title

10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosure will

be placed in.the NRC Public Document Room.

.

8512120268 851206

PDR

O ADOCK 05000440 I k

PDR L

o

Nel

- -- .

-

.

-

. .

Cleveland Electric Illuminating -2-

Company DEC 6 1985

The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance

procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

d'or!9In31 SMcd b'. C7 Nrcitus" _

Charles E. Norelius, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure: Inspection Report

No. 50-440/85082(DRP)

cc w/ enclosure:

J. J. Waldron, Manager, Perry

Plant Technical Department

M. D. Lyster, Manager, Perry Plant

Operations Department

L. O. Beck, General Supervising

Engineer, Nuclear Licensing and

Fuel Management Section

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA

Terry J. Lodge, Esq.

James W. Harris, State of Ohio

Robert H. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

,

4

RIII RIII

ccos 6

RIII

& gp / RIII

rcm)

RIII

Stasek 1 McCormick-Barger Knop Warnick N 'us

12/6/85 P/6 Jt,

-n