ML20138A398

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Radial Peaking Factor Limit Rept for Cycle 1
ML20138A398
Person / Time
Site: Catawba Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/1986
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8603140222
Download: ML20138A398 (3)


Text

G~

l DUKE POWER GOMPAhT P.O. BOX 03189 CHARLOTTE N.C. 28242 IIALH. TUCKER TELEPHONE

,4 =l===g g (704) 073-4NH w

February 26, 1986 Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 l

Atlanta, Georgia 30323 i

Ret Catawba Nuclear Station Unit 2 Docket No. 50-414 Technical Specification 6.9.1.9 l

Dear Dr. Graces i

Pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.9, please find attached the Radial l

Peaking Factor Limit Report for Catawba Unit 2 Cycle 1.

l Very trul'y yours,

/

9

< fra_

Hal B. Tucker WLHisib l'

Attachment l

cc Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 l

l Attention:

Carl Berlinger Reactor Systen Branch NRC Resident Inspector l

t Catawba Nuclear Station

(

l k

,B6031_.0222mm.

4.aszc L

M M**A

o Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report This Radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with

' Paragraph 6.9.1.9 of the Catawba Unit 2 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.

The F limits for RATED THERMAL POWER within specific core planes for Cycle *[ shall be:

1.

F less than or equal to 1.73 for all core planes c5Xtaining bank"D" control rods, and 2.

F less than or equal to 1.57 for all unrodded c5le planes.

These Fxy(s) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot channel factor F (z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of:

q 2

F (z) < [ 'p ] (K(z)] for P > 0.5 and, q

F (z) ;c (4.64) (K(z)] for P < 0.5 q

assuming the most limiting axial power distributions expected to result from.the insertion and removal of Control Banks B, Q, and D during i

operation, including the accompan;ing variations in the axial xenon and power distributions as described in the " Power Distribution Control and l

Load Following Procedures" WCAP-8403, September, 1974. Therefore.

l these Fxy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria cf 10CFR50.46.

See Figure 1 for a plot of (Fq* pre] vs. Axial Core Height I

l l

l l

t I

f

(

e ;.'

2.4

-.-w

~

3 N

- 2 2.2 A

=_

r v-s

=

=

~_

w_

_=

7 2.0 u

~

i t.s i

2 u;

I EC l

1.s H

u.a L-J E

l-3 1.4 %

_E.

1.2

=-

8 1.0,-

.y.

0.8 ---

?

=

0 2

4 6

3 BOTTOM 10 12 CORE HEIGHT ( FEET)

TOP FIGURE 1 T

MAXIMUNI F

P A

AL HEIGW g

REL DURING NORMAL CORE OPERATION

.