ML20137Z103

Audit Rept OIG/96A-17, Review of NRC Implementation of Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act for FY96

ML20137Z103
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/31/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137Z108	List: ML20137Z103 ML20137Z346
References
OIG-96A-17, NUDOCS 9704230358
Download: ML20137Z103 (10)

Text

I OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REVIEW OF NRC'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL MANAGERS' FINANCIAL INTEGRITY ACT OlG/96A-17 March 31,1997 i

1 AUDIT REPORT

{

/g8REGy b*+#

{ O r -

I m g1 2 S e

i g I

\ %+**/ fod I

~

7 423 58 9 1 lllJgjg]gjgll((g;lg PDR

Review of NRC's Implementation of the FMFIA for 1996 1

1 REPORT SYNOPSIS Continuing disclosures of Federal waste, loss, unauthorized use and misappropriation of funds or assets associated with weak internal controls and I accounting systems resulted in the passage of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA)in September 1982. The FMFIA requires Federal managers to establish a continuous process for evaluating, improving, and reporting on the I internal controls and accounting systems for which they are responsible.

In 1995, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) redesigned and streamlined its management ccatrol program in accordance with the National Performance Review recommendations and the Office of Management and Budget's 1995 revision to Circular A-123. The redesigned program required < fices designated as the highest risk to submit management control plans and i. asonable assurance letters to an Executive Committee for Management Controls. The Executive Director for Operations (EDO) is' Chairman of the Executive Committee.

To assist NRC in evaluating its management control program, the Office of the inspector General annually reviews NRC's program. Overall, we believe that NRC has complied with the requirements of the FMFIA during Fiscal Year (FY) 1996.

I Although our work did not identify any matena, weaknesses in FY 1996, the former EDO identified a concern as a potential material weakness to the Executive Committee on January 2,1997. The concern involves the adequacy of NRC's program to ensure lic.snsees' compliance with their licensing and design bases.

Although NRC preliniinarily determined that the concern was not a material weakness, NRC is evduating the need for additional action. We plan to monitor I NRC's actions on this issue.

I I

I

[

[ OlG/96A-17 Pagel L ,

F

)

Review of NRC's implementation of the FMFIA for 19E6 l TABLE OF CONTENTS 1

REPORT SYNOPSIS . . . . . ... . . . . i j i

INTRODUCTION ..... .. .. . . ...... . .. .. . . .1 l l

BACKGROUND . . . .. . . .. . .1 FINDINGS . .... .. . . .. . . . . . 2 FOLLOW UP ON PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS . ... 3 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .... .. . . .... .3 l RECOMMENDATIONS . .. . .. . . .... . . . . . .. 3 APPENDICES i Objectives, Scope, and Methodology I 11 Major Contributors To This Report ill Glossary: Office of the inspector General Products I  !

I I

I

(

k

[ l Review of NRC's implementation of the FMFIA for 1996

(

INTRODUCTION The Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) was enacted on September 8,1982, in response to continuing disclosures of waste, loss, unauthorized use, and misappropriation of funds or assets associated with weak internal controls and accounting systems. Congress felt such abuses hampered the effectiveness and accountability of the Federal Government and eroded the public's confidence. The FMFIA requires Federal managers to establish a continuous process for evaluating, improving, and reporting on the internal controls and accounting systems for which they are responsible.

[

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Revised, " Management Accountability and Control," is the implementing guidance for FMFIA. The term "intemal controls," as envisioned by the FMFIA, is synonymous with " management

{ controls" and encompasses program and administrative areas, as well as the accounting and financial management areas. OMB defined management controls in Circular A-123 as the controls used to ensure that (1) organization, policies and procedures are reasonable to ensure that programs achieve their intended results; (2) resources are used consistent with agency mission; (3) programs and resources are protected from waste, fraud, and mismanagement; (4) laws and regulations are followed; and, (5) reliable and timely information is obtained, maintained, reported and used for decision making.

I See Appendix I for the objective, scope, and methodology of our review.

BACKGROUND The FMFIA requires that by December 31 of each year, the head of each executive agency subject to the Act shall submit a report to the President and Congress on

[ the status of management controls and financial systems that protect the integrity of agency programs and administrative activities.

( In Fiscal Year (FY) 1995, NRC redesigned and streamlined its management control program in accordance with the National Performance Review recommendations and the 1995 revision to OMB Circular A-123. The redesigned program required

[ offices designated as the highest risk (with respect to programmatic and administrative activities) to submit management control plans and reasonable assurance letters to the Chairman, Executive Committee for Management Controls.

[ The Executive Director for Operations (EDO) is the Chairman of the Executive Committee.

{ NRC is one of six pilot agencies granted permission to streamline financial reporting pursuant to the Government Management Reform Act (GMRA). GMRA permits the Director of the OMB to consolidate or adjust the frequency and due dates of certain olG/96A.17 Page1 I

1 l

I' l Review of NRC's implementation of the FMFIA for 1996 i

1 statutory financial management reports after consultation with Congress. For FY 1995m, NRC streamlined its reporting requirements by issuing its first i

" Accountability Report," which included NRC's FMFIA reporting requirements.

1 To assist NRC in evaluating its management control program, the Office of the {

Inspector General (OlG) annually reviews NRC's program.

FINDINGS i We found that NRC has complied with FMFIA requirements for FY 1996. Although our work did not identify material weaknesses in FY 1996, the former EDO identified l a potential material weakness to the Executive Committee for Management Controls I in a January 2,1997 memorandum. The concern involves the adequacy of NRC's program to ensure licensees' compliance with their licensing and design bases. .

NRC has preliminarily determined that the concern is not a material weakness in management controls, in its FY 1996 Accountability Report, NRC notes that it has corrective actions underway to address this concern. To determine the extent of the problem, NRC l requested design basis information from all nuclear power plant licensees. NRC  !

states that its evaluation of licensees' responses will aid in determining " significance and the need for additional generic follow up actions." We plan to monitor NRC i actions on this issue.

l l

l II l

I 1

(1) OMB required that NRC's " Accountability Report" be due by March 31 each year. Ii olG/96A-17 Page 2

Reviewof NRC's implementation of the FMFIA for 1996 FOLLOW UP ON PRIOR YEAR RECOMMENDATIONS in response to the recommendations contained in our FY 1995 report, NRC revised and clarified the criteria for management control plans. In addition to addressing our recommendations, the revisions provide reporting flexibility for NRC offices. We are satisfied that the corrective actions address our concerns, therefore, we consider these recommendations closed.

I CONCLUSION l Overall, we believe that NRC has complied with the requirements of the FMFIA during FY 1996. We also believe that continuing management attention is needed to address the concems expressed in the EDO's January 2,1997, memorandum I to the Executive Committee for Management Controls. When completed, NRC's review of licensees' responses should form the basis for a final conclusion about the former EDO's concerns.

RECOMMENDATIONS Because NRC has already initiated corrective actions with respect to the former EDO's concerns, we are not making recommendations.

I I

I

[

[ OlG/96A 17 Page3 F

[

Appendix I Review of NRC's implementation of the FMFIA for 1996 OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY Our objective was to determine whether the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

[ (NRC) complied with the provisions of the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act, which requires Federal managers to establish a continuous process for evaluating, improving, and reporting on the internal control and accounting systems for which they are responsible.

{

We conducted our review at NRC Headquarters between April 1996 and January 1997. We reviewed applicable laws, implementing guidance, and the management

[

control plans and reasonable assurance letters submitted by NRC offices in 1996.

Our review included discussions with the Executiva Committee staff and other NRC officials.

{

Our review was conducted in accordance with generally accepted Government auditing standards and included such tests of the data and records and other

[ auditing procedures as we considered necessary.

[

[

(

{

{

[

OlG/96A-05 Page 1 of 1 I

L

Appendix il Review of NRC's implementation of the FMFIA for 1996 l

MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS REPORT I

Anthony C. Lipuma Team Leader Gary S. Janosko I Audit Manager I

I I

I l

l l

l l

[

OlG/96A-05 p,g, q og 9 r

App ndix lil

)

[ Rsvisw of NRC's impitm:ntition of ths FMFIA for 1996

[ GLOSSARY: OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL PRODUCTS INVESTIGATIVE

{

1. INVESTIGATIVE REPORT- WHITE COVER An investigative Report documents pertinent facts of a case and describes available evidence relevant to allegations against individuals, including aspects of an allegation not substantiated. Investigative reports do not recommend disciplinary action against individual employees. Investigative reports are sensitive documents and contain information subject to the Privacy Act restrictions. Reports are given to officials and

[ managers who have a need to know in order to properly determine whether administrative action is t-warranted. The agency is expected to advise the OlG within 90 days of receiving the investigative report as to what disciplinary or other action has been taken in response to investigative report findings.

( 2. EVENTINQUIRY- GREEN COVER The Event Inquiry is an investigative product that documents the examination of events or agency actions that do not focus specifically on individual misconduct. These reports identify institutional weaknesses that

( led to or allowed a problem to occur. The agency is requested to advise the OlG of managerial initiatives taken in response to issues identified in these reports but tracking its recommendations is not required.

3. MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS REPORT (MIR) - MEMORANDUM MIRs provide a " ROOT CAUSE" analysis sufficient for managers to facilitate correction of problems and to avoid similar issues in the future. Agency tracking of recommendations is not required.

AUDIT

[ 4. AUDIT REPORT- BLUE COVER An Audit Report is the documentation of the review, recommendations, and findings resulting from an .

r objective assessment of a program, function, or activity. Audits follow a defined procedure that allows for

[ agency review and comment on draft audit reports. The audit results are also reported in the OlG's "Semiannua: Report" to the Congress. Tracking of audit report recommendations and agency response is required.

5. SPECIAL EVALUA TION REPORT- BURGUNDY COVER A Special Evaluation Report documents the results of short-term, limited assessments. It provides an initial, quick response to a question or issue, and data to determine whethcr an in-depth independent audit should

[- be planned. Agency tracking of recommendations is not required.

( REGULATORY

6. REGULATORY COMMENTARY- BROWN COVER

[ Regulabry Commentary is the review of existing and proposed legislation, regulations, and policies so as to assist the agency in preventing and detecting fraud, waste, and abuse in programs and operations.

Commentaries cite the IG Act as authority for the review, state the specific law, regulation or policy examined, pertinent background information considered and identifies OlG concerns, observations, and

[ objections. Significant observations regarding action or inaction by the agency are reported in the OlG Semiannual Report to Congress. EP:h report indicates whether a response is required.

[

L 01G/96A 05 Page 1 of 1

h'h. M.6V,r*U&  %*;A'* **'.'. Q : ? ..,'.;h '

5.<%-'I"'"'- ' D ~.1.

b'

- '- ' 'l

3?TT +

?."$E: Y .1.: ~+YN W . :E.',#*~' '&l'* AYN.

. .c$?

.gV.' ,) .?

'\ '

h ' *t - ' ^

. -N

.!,'.  : 9% .f@b, '.:' - . . ' ..:. .. -..:...' . - *

f. a n..,, : -L.

.:.< p' ., .

• s:::- ..

f

.'.cn,,;N 4;W.h'*+:.:k'.% ...:. N.m

.t' C

.'N

. ' .': . :..;'.'  :;r, ,n.L'C * ' '. .; " Y ' * '.. ; e:: - L:

1,

.o..

M*:%'.

cm..- - . -

1 p'fW" . . o ,.:) y. 7..:; '..' ,.

. . 2:: :: n. . t--.-

q' o

.L.  ;.

' ^ '; -

_..'.'.v..

';f.' _ ':. :

..:,..'...~.n.

'?

2 - r

, :- ~Q.,~p-

• " ' .. .. . " . - '.: . .' . ..v.'..

~-M W.5:K:e :

y%;  ;;o.,e/p.n ' .. : . . .. -

' g.gi; ..i e.-. .;, e. . . . . ' -

n . . - . . - . .

g l.

9 ~ ;. .'a, -

46 . -

- * - ' .. . . . .. ~ "*'

3r' y;;y;:w,.;: . )_:  : .': .

yis :. ,. . . '

.s,

.: q . %. g ,

t c. . g , ~ .. , ;.. ;

4 . . . . .

3

. ,, We'.-g .,..,i;_;4p - .' . ._- ...

- 3

• g

.',./.>. .

!.v.l.>; -l'. .. . _ ..,y. .

p'[:4,..  ! * .-

) f 7,. .. ..:-

Aw l . , E, .

o

);..

p. ' : . . .

r e., , L . . '-

, :; ';** . .[.

. . . - .. 1:

. . ; ,,, _....;.s*_- , .

g j  ;,E - ..- ,l '

, l -

..?. -

= '

Q,f. . . ;. . '

.e -

_i _ . '

o . .

,.n. . , -

' ' - - t ) .

. 8 -

e 4,y , I - *' . ' p .~,

• ' \ ,#

K. . [.,

.:.;, C r >** . . e e ,,,

-- .w,.. d_ , ;, ;.. . . , .

~ , so

,:j I

- _~

, )

~.. s s v-  : .. . . . - - . /

/_ .. , . . %g *

. . { j. . .- - -

. o  % ,

f u

m

, a. e 3 .h _ , .

1

-a - " - - r.m.s . . . . - - w\ - .

}'

} , 'l .' - -

U  ; V

m ,

g : g.w*' {J J . o k a :. h

.1 ) ' .. " -

~

.- . =: ,n.:, ,; yy3 m ' -

J ' U l.' T o . W %) D .)

~., _ ; _- .

., . .. J. "

<s g ,

-nk['q q M y -

I* -- -** -..h g .

v ,w .. .,

. 3

. . . . et 'A .'s ' .' . .,j 2. ' $_ )

- U ,(

'g.o.._. l':.-.....-

2 1 g, . ,/ , h

' ^

. u. . . . . g .. y; M P ; M 39w -

!I 4

.g*'.-m.. m . ,

i n -d s . . . ,

.s

,1

'l

. 5 s-. .' .  % ~- '-

. , _ _ 4

,_ ' ,L .- ' . , , ' '

rw-m ---o e.,-

-l[ k.,... - -

.4 '

(

.jv ' .;,

, g - .' :

<_.*,,,-:e,

_.y .

,v ,  : '

f.) l'z , 5,q . 8

.f:p L . ._ 'e .

f..'q:- ; ,. 7 4s"- g.- ,

3;g.g- 0 .: -

g, t

.J. ;i".x '. . .

~

~

? V.',;  ; ..'. ,.; .y >.y :- .. -

• . ee g 7, q g ..

j g . o (g'. , ' .- _- ' -'

d 6 ,p s VVs,y f

(;_ ', . , * . -

e T

,'ll G. "..a

,, ja - ' O

' = ((s.

[ . es,

.y .

q

^ *

~,. .' (1

.[9:; ?;'. f.. ',..'

k, . p. . _- .. ;: . :.- p_._

p&. ..:.' q.Q.:,, .. . . :';. ',: . , , . . . , ,

s. -

p..MQ:Q. * *.* ll" , .

'*'_' ._q'

. ..,;,. .. g* ,'U. .,- ,, l

. . 'n R _ , M .. , , ' " . _ _ . ,,

.;.,, ,' -37 y':Q]!, L;;..* a- j: -* - 'q '" '

.."...--e;

p .. . . ';

f;.~. *: -

,... c g *. '".-

_'.',-- :. A , 'L ,f

. s- : 7, -

.: L . ' '

2 .'

a q. Y l.':?. ,..N. . '. '.. .f. .

1., . ..

' . . ' . . . ' . -' ~.' _. . . . . .. ..

. y, ; * .-

• 'f'.'.. ' .: .: . .. ... ..h.+fe

.. . . ?,:~. v

.'4: . . .

hM .{Wwj U.h.  ;.. . f. C'. l-2. ..',.]7 . ,.'.- ,= .

', _ '.I .,..: [ . , [ [J I'

~

1 -

3. ,. Y , .

,[ i.

.q.,, , , , , , .t. .....; 'j. . . , ' ; yY. 's ' ',' ;4. S . S.

p.  : _' ,..^S.*,,

,,'l[g'[";[h$$' .s. ,- - ':A, .'. . . ., . M. .I .

c.4.' ,. a . m n..n 'h,( ,

a.,..q. n"p.g.4%" . . 'w. .w..s

• ~

(, * -- k

+'a....,,,'e,'.w.: ~ w.s w m ..m,. ,.

, *I - -

. . ,. == . r . 4 g

.w.jfdwweswwwd%:kMWw -