ML20137X572
| ML20137X572 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 09/16/1985 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137X559 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8510040541 | |
| Download: ML20137X572 (2) | |
Text
..
. [p u:
i o
UNITED STATES E
~,'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT N0. 40 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-75 PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY DELMARVA POWER AND LIGH1 COMPANY, AND ATLANTIC CITY ELEGIRIC COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATION STATION, UNIT N0. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-311 Introduction Public Service Electric and Gas Company submitted an amendment request on October 15, 1984 that corrected a referenced specification in LC0 3.1.2.la and 3.1.2.lb.
These limiting conditions for operation referenced LC0 3.1.2.7a and 3.1.2.7b which do not exist.
The correct LCOs to be referenced are 3.1.2.5a and 3.1.2.5b respectively.
Evaluation and Sununary This change is purely administrative in nature, correcting a typographical error. As such, the change introduces no increase in the probability or consequences of any previously evaluated accident, does not create the possibility for any new accident and does not effect any margins of safety. The staff concludes that the change is acceptable.
Environmental Consideration This amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public coninent on such finding. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eli for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Sec 51.22(gibility criteria c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
1 8510040541 850916 PDR ADOCK 05000311 p
.=
s
-2 Conclusion i
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated: September 16, 1985 i
Principal Contributor:
D. Fischer OM i
.