ML20137W267

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re Staff Proposal for Allowing EPA to Invoke NRC-EPA MOU Procedures W/Respect to SECY-97-046A, Final Rule on Radiological Criteria for License Termination, (SECY-97-008)
ML20137W267
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/11/1997
From: Vietticook A
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Callan L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20137W254 List:
References
SECY-97-008-C, SECY-97-046A-C, SECY-97-46A-C, SECY-97-8-C, NUDOCS 9704180068
Download: ML20137W267 (2)


Text

-- .. ,- .- . . . = _ . - - . . -. . _ - .- - .

.i I'<

[p aa"4 UNITED STATES 6'

p" , NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g g WASHINGTON,0.C. 20555-0001

~

g ....y April 11, 1997 SECRETARY I

i MEMORANDUM TO: L. Joseph Callan i

Executive Director for Operations FROM: riei i -C o ting Secretary

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - COMSECY-97-008 - STAFF PROPOSAL FOR ALLOWING EPA TO INVOKE NRC-EPA  !

MOU PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO SECY-97-046A, j FINAL RULE ON RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR LICENSE TERMINATION l

l In a memorandum dated April 4, 1997, you requested that the

Commission delay voting on the proposed final rule on

! radiological criteria'for license termination at least until l April 28, 1997. The request was made to allow time in the schedule for EPA to review the document, an opportunity for the

! NRC and EPA staffs to meet to discuss areas of disagreement, and time for the staff to report to the Commission on the results of the NRC-EPA discussion.

l The request has been approved subject to the following conditions:

1) the staff may meet with the EPA but the staff shall

! prepare an agenda for the discussions in advance of the meeting.

2) if there is a meeting between the two staffs, it should be held only for the purpose of clarification of i

l staffs' views and to present data and views on matters i that have not been the subject of past consultations or discussions. Any such meetings must be held on or i before April 25, 1997; l

.3) such meetings and interactions with EPA must be  !

accomplished in a public process, documents exchanged between the staffs should be placed in the PDR, and meetings between the NRC and EPA shall be noticed and i open to the public-

4) The staff should respond to EPA concerning EPA's request for additional meetings, consistent with the ,

j conditions noted here. The letter to EPA reporting the '

l  !

1 l 9704180068 970414 "Y

PDR ORG EUSEPA i

PDR -

m_

i -

o  ;

i Commission's decision on EPA's request should reflect the long history of EPA /NRC interactions and consultation on the cleanup standards issues and note that the Commission does not believe the meetings to which it is agreeing are required under the NRC-EPA MOU. Rather, the NRC is agreeing to the meetings in ,

view of EPA's request for additional meetings _and in ,

furtherance of agency cooperation. The letter should be submitted to the Commission for expeditious approval .

prior to dispatch.

5) the NRC staff report to the Commission on the results of the NRC-EPA discussions should include an i identification of the areas of disagreement. The

. report should be provided to the Commission by April 28, 1997.

(SECY Suspense: 4/28/97)

(EDO)

In addition, the Commission will support a public meeting between the Commission and EPA in which an EPA policy level Presidential appointee addresses the Commission on EPA's concerns. The I Commission will endeavor to hold such a meeting.before May 9, 1997 so that the Commission's vote on the cleanup rules will not be further_ delayed.

t cc: Chairman Jackson Commissioner Rogers l Commissioner Dicus j Commissioner Diaz l Commissioner McGaffigan l OGC i CIO l CFO l OCA l OIG l I

u_ - . _ . . _ . . _ -- _

.