ML20137R958
| ML20137R958 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/31/1986 |
| From: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| TASK-PII, TASK-SE SECY-86-001A, SECY-86-1A, NUDOCS 8602130497 | |
| Download: ML20137R958 (99) | |
Text
--
a f
v"%
~
5~ c i ;i
\...../
POLICY ISSUE January 31, 1986 SECY-86-1A (InfOrmation)
For: The Commissioners From: Victor Stello, Jr.
Acting Executive Director for Operations
Subject:
STATUS OF STAFF ACTIONS REGARDING TVA
Purpose:
To provide the Commission with a status report on staff activities in response to issues associated with TVA. This is the second status report on this topic.
Background:
On December 13, 1985, Chairman Palladino directed the staff to prepare periodic written reports summarizina the major NRC plans, schedules, and organizational assignments related to all TVA plants. The first of these reports was provided to the Commission as SECY-86-1 dated January ?,
1986. This report is the second monthly report.
Discussion: The staff has identified a number of major TVA issues requiring resolution prior to the restart of any of the TVA reactors. The staff briefed the Ccanission on these issues on January 7, 1986 and stated that Sequoyah Unit 2 was expected to be the first reactor ready to resume operation. TVA briefed the Commission on a number of TVA activities on .lanuary 9, 1986 and noted the appointment of Steven White as the new Manager of Nuclear Power. Because of this significant management change, TVA requested a 30 day period for Mr. White to reevaluate the ongoing TVA efforts to address the safety concerns needed for the restart or licensing of TVA facilities. TVA is not expected to provide details of Mr. White's evaluation before February 18, 1986.
The staff has developed a listing of issues identified for restart of the Sequoyah Units together with a lead office assignment for each issue (Enclosure 1). Also included
Contact:
H. Thompson, NRR 492-9595 8602130497 860131 PDR SECY 86-OO1A PDR
,s-The Comm'issioners in Enclosure 1 is a preliminary schedule chart which displays the staff approach for resolut1on of these issues. This schedule is based almost exclusively on staff estimates of the time when TVA submittals will be-received or when the Sequoyah facility will be ready for inspection or audit. While the schedule has been informally discussed with the TVA staff, TVA has not taken a position recarding Sequoyah readiness for re-start.. If TVA schedules support an earlier restart of the Sequoyah reactors, the staff schedules and approach can be reevaluted in order to achieve an earlier decision date.
As indicated on the attached schedule charts the staff has been reviewing a number of ongoing TVA activities.
In addition to numerous visits as part of the inspection program the staff has completed site visits to review equipment qualification status, resolution of the issues brought forward through the employee concerns program, review of the methods used by TVA to verify electrical system design and portions of the welding review program. Enclosure 2 is a summary of completed ma,ior items for Sequoyah. In all cases, preliminary results of these site reviews are provided to TVA when the review or inspection team leaves the site. Additionally, signifi-cant concerns that arise during staff review of TVA activities are provided in writing to TVA in order that i resolution of these issues can be promptly initiated by -
TVA.
Although the staff has not received TVA's response to the 50.54(f) letter of September 17, 1985 or TVA's schedule for licensing readiness of Watts Bar, a listing which identifies known items for the Watts Bar facility and lead office assignments is provided as Enclosure 3. Enclosure 3 also contains a preliminary schedule chart developed by the staff.
Although the NRC has not received TVA's response to the staff's 50.54(f) letter of September 17, 1985 or TVA's schedule for the restart of any Prowns Ferry Unit, a listing of known items necessary for restart of the Browns Ferry facility has been developed. This listing which
'l;
i k The Commissioners !
l identifies the items and lead office assignments is provided as Enclosure 4 Preliminary schedules for the review of these items are being developed by the staff and i will be discussed with TVA at the Browns Ferry site during l the week of February 10, 1986 TVA has identified ongoing activities at each of its sites in order to ensure that staff activities are properly coordinated. This activity summary is included as Enclosure 5.
The staff is currently conducting normal construction inspection activities at the Bellefonte site and intends to augment these activities as necessary based on identification of issus that may be applicable to
.Bellefonte. More detailed information on Bellefonte will
! be included in subsequent status reports.
The staff is currently finalizino systems for tracking resources expended on the TVA effort. Resource estimates are or.ly partially developed, as shown in Enclosures 1 and 3. The report of resources expended together with a i more complete summary of projected future resources to be allocated to TVA' issues will be included in the next status report.
/'f . _\ ,._
ictor'Stel'I'o , sie -
Acting Executiv Director for Operations
Enclosures:
- 1. Sequoyah issues List and Preliminary Schedule
- 2. Summary of Ccmpleted Sequoyah Items
- 3. Watts Bar Issues List and
. Preliminary Schedule
~4. Browns Ferry Issues List
- 5. TVA Ongoing Activities DISTRIBUTION:
a-1 Index Topic Pace Issues Sunnary For Seouoyah (Enclosure 1) El-1 Seoucyah Integrated Schedule El-3 Sequoyah: Employee Concerns El-4
~
Allegations. El-8 Pelding Problems El-10 Design Control ~ El-13 Electrical Design Calculations El-15 Equipment Qualification El-17
. Operational Peadiness El-20 Cable Tray Supports El-38 Technical Specification Revisions F1-40 Wrongdoine, Intimidation and Harassment El-41 NSRS Concerns El-43 Corporate Activities El-45 Ouality Assurance El-49 6
Status of Significant Completed Activities E2-1
, (Enclosure 2 )
Issues Summary for Watts Par (Enclosure 3) E3-1 Watts Bar Integrated Schedule E3-2 Watts Bar: Employee Concerns E3-3 Allegations E3-5 2
NSRS Concerns E3-7 Quality Assurance E3-9 Welding E3-12
- Equipment Oualification E3-15
, TVA Organization E3-18 i
License Items E3-20 Wrongdoing, Intimidation and Harassment Issues E3-31 Operational Readiness E3-32 Browns Ferry issue Summary (Enclosure 4) E4-1 Site Activities Summaries From TVA (Enclosure 5) ES-1 1
'1 J
=w-,. -- . ,,, rom..m.,~,, , ,m-.,_,_ . .,,_.,,,,-. , _ . , , , , , , . _ . . .._,...emm _,, . . _ _ . . , #. .,_._-,,.mm,. -
y-., ,- c..---,- .--,m-, ,, _ . ..c-,._,.
. y: i EPCLOSURE 1 ISSUES
SUMMARY
FOR SE000YAH
- ISSUE' -LEAD ^ RESP.
SEQUOYAH
- 1. . Employee Concerns Program NRR
- 2. Allegations NRR
- 5. Flectrical Design Calculations NRR 6 .' Equipment Oualification IE-j' 7. Operational Readiness- ,PII l
- 8. Cable Tray Supports .
-RII
- 9. Technical Specification Revisions NRP
- 12. Corporate Activities 'NPP
- 13. 0A Program Implementation RII l
a' l
o P
i l
El-1
~
o o
SEQUOYAH " PERT" CHART. NOTES
- 1. The following pages provide a preliminary
" PERT" chart for major regulatory activities at Sequoyah. The first page is an integrated schedule showing major issues and milestones.
Subsequent pages provide subroutines, showing
,. detailed steps for each major issued identified on the integrated schedule.
- 2. The key to individual items is shown below:
Title of issue Indicates detailed subroutine for this item WEL ING Lead responsiblity for issue (office -
- NRR 48 : Workdays-to complete or individual) task 01-11-86 3-21-86 t i Star.t Date Finish Date
- 3. Dark lines connecting individual items indicate the critical path.
El-2
- e. 9 414 GPS K40 Melle e mat 305115
.o o . - . .in a ei.u4 .>2 i. ern*
- it n
.. "_- .. . SE0.00YAH - INTECRATED SCHEDULE-
- u. ut mci .. ..
H-n e .>.n 14 . ....
. ^^t ! .. .
.. ELECTettat CALC . .- ... . . .
.. .. eul 13 .. .. .. .-
. . 44-88 4 63-34 Os . .. . . . ..
.. . .. .~ . . .. . 417
.. .. 42:
.. .. att NiaIAIN
. .. .. ALLEEoith$ . .. . . 80 0
. . 80 62 .. . . H-24 06 M-244
. 44-88 et M-844 . . . . . .. .
.. . . .. .- .. . H ee
. . 412
. -. .. . .~. .. to H
.. ... . IWLlett CWGlas .. . . . . . et e4
.. ... . GB 64 ... .. . . es se
.. . . .48-144 M 4&ShHestetet . . . . es. H
. . .. HH oss ete4Hete ,..... et ... et etese Hee 40eeteH ~,. . 4!! 483 4!I le
. . . . . Hoot afL3Ba6 Hoosetoe(Int $5tm Partt flatL LIC asfMt (sunilsla M6 ett 3 Milatt hg
., . Heese SR So m 3 e88 2 e eht i HH IW 8
. seHe 44-88 4 03-34 4 . 46-$$4 M-21-th H-22-On M-234 H 244 M-244
. .. .. sette M-2)hte 25 96[
. .. . eestes . . . . . . ..~.. 4-eetet . , . Silah CEnlGE . . . ... . . . . 0 oHet ... IIl 33 . . . .. . . . . .. e
. . . . . estete . . . . 49-II* 83-20 to ,
.. .. .. On
. . . . . eteet . . . . .. .. .. sti I PEP $
Hete ' " '
. . . . . . .. . . IW $4 eteest . to Nette .. .. 04-25-06 85-05 06 ITI
, 46e64. .. . . . II 43 . . . .- .. .
e ^^: 69. . . ..41-114 43-84 en .. ... . . e b.3 Mam!a6 .. ... . O al55 Ben 4 "M -
. . 6 el-se St 01-44 ts __ CSALI Itse $1rPG . . . 3
.. . All 43 . . 6
. el-il4 03 H-6s . . 6
., .- . t ei! . . e IMPtb84 KI ..~ . , e
.. 85 41 . .
.e-un e>n . . /.E n i nsi.i I,
.. .. . 433 8 . . 0518 et SS-ee en
.. ... 48 M5&st tu . .
.. .. 88 62 .
.. . . . et la4 ee-16 th ,
.. C4 .
. MM e
.. Sil 33 .
.. 68-18-46 42-Den
- g
- g. a N ES!$
At 62 M-la en 40-84 On
r 6,
SEOUOYAH Subject Area: TVA Emplovee Concerns As a result of a lack of confidence by TVA employees in their supervisor / manager willingness to address perceived safety
' issues, numerous (greater thar 4,000) employee concerns have been identified which encompass potentially safety related, non-safety related and intimidation / harassment / wrongdoing issues. TVA has been requested via the 50.54(f) letter of 9/17/85.to addrcss the root cause(s) of this problem, their actions to resolve the problen, their actions to monitor the effectiveness of these actions and their actions to deal with all of the individual concerns.
~ Lead Responsibility: NRR - B. V.. Singh Major Tasks: Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resocnsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Review and Categorize K-forms FRC* 1/1/0 involving safety related issues and enter in data base. (1/31/86)
- 2. Sort data base ~to provide groups NRR (Singh) 3/0/0 of employee concerns by major issue heading. Provide initial listing (and supporting information) to office havina lead for particular-issue. (2/7/86) - Note: . supplemental listings and information may be expected.
- 3. Issue a Temporary. Instruction (TI) IE (Hooks) 0/1/1 '
to inspect the implementation of the licensee's actions and plans to address employee concerns as discussed in Task, 4 and 8, below 4 Conduct inspections at TVA RII (Weisei //
corporate, Watts Bar and Sequoyah to evaluate the adequacy of the implementation of TVA's actions and plans to address and resolve employee concerns that are specific and generic to Sequoyah. Several inspections will be conducted to ensure that (1) concerns are properly classified (2) concerns will be resolved at the proper time relative to unit startup (3) concerns are thoroughly evaluated / investigated,and El-4
n
-?-
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibilitv NRR/IE/RII (4)correctiveactionare adequate, including implementation.
(Inspections should factor in relevant allegations, NSRS concerns and other
. concerns. NRR to' provide supporting information) Prepare and issue draft SER and inspection report (s). (2/14/85)
. Note: specific technical concerns such -as welding, electrical calculations, design control,~ etc, will be addressed under separate tasks.
- a. Welding NPR (Liaw) ?/4/1?
- b. . Configuration Control RII (Weise) 0/0/d
- c. Operational Readiness RII (Weise) 0/0/6
- d. Supports / Anchors RII (Blakel 0/0/12
- e. Miscellanecus RII (Verre111) 0/0/1
- f. Envirnnmental Qualification IE (Hubbard) 0/1/0
- g. Electrical Cables RII(Conlon) 7/14/16
- h. Cable Tray and Conduit Hangers RII (Liu) 0/0/4
(2/7/86)
- 8. Conduct inspections at TVA RII (Weise) 4/8/9 corporate, Watts Bar, Browns Ferry, and Sequoyah to verify on a sampling basis that TVA has implemented those actions and plans to address the root cause(s) of the employee concerns problem, including the methods for evaluating
-El-5
F? . 1
.w Pesources I
(Man' Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RIT their effectiveness. Several inspections will be conducted.
Prepare and issue draft SER input by 3/28/86 and inspection reports.
- 9. Verify reviews complete (3/31/86) NPR (Singh) 1/0/0
- 10. TVA 50.54(f) response (s): evaluate NRR (Singh) TPD /1 / TRO to determine (1) the acceptability of TVA's actions and plans to address-the root cause(s) of Employee Concerns problem and TVA's methods for evaluating the effectiveness of. their actions, and (2) the acceptability of TVA's
' actions and plans to address and resolve the individual employee concerns prior to startup of an operating reactor (Sequoyah 2 is .
lead plant) or licensing of Watts Bar 1. Prepare SER (4/10/86)
Specific list developed by NRR. Will also be based on sort of all concerns by Franklin and provided by B. K. Singh.
- $150,000 has been allocated for contractor support on Sequoyah El-6 ,
v i .
! E:1PLOYEE C0'lCE9ftS I
I:
l Projects EMPLCYEE.PJ l- PERT Chart 01-31-06 09:26 Revision: 17
[-
+.
401 414 r002 REV L SORT KFORM J50RTED TO REVIEW l vtRIF. DEVNS COM si e it i, si m 0 iii e iiiiiiiiiiiHiei st a it 01-!!-56 02 4 7-96 02 03-17 4 6(03-31-66 1 86 0247-86r i i 403 sei INSP/ TECH REVW i
'eie hPR/IE!RI! 35 e
! *H 02-1046',03-3146 i 04 405 410 ese 415 4 19 ST.;,T EMPL CON: l EVAL. PP06.' DR WT SER E!M . CONC. SER CCm PreER WUT l $lil6H . 0 ...... SIN 6H 7 ..... $!!1GH 13 ....................... $1h5H 8 eH.HeliiH He foegelcod 2 01 01-1546(01-2446 01-2146(02-1446 044146(04-104 04-1146(04 14-86 3 96 01-!!-967 420 1 .
. 51TE IN5PS.
pSERluPUT l .
. WEISE 36 .... WE15E 0 .
02-03-86(03-25-86 03 .
3 -2846(03-28-86p 407 12 417 0'STOTVA pTV4RLEP l '
EVAL. RLSP SINGH 10 .................. TVA 0 ........ $th6H 10 01-27-16(02-07 4 6 034346(03 1 46 30341-86(03-01-16p i
r
.... (Llaki HH (Critical linkl g (Taski g (Critical taill l
s SE0tl0YAH l Subject Area: Seauoyah Allegations Allegations which have safety significance have been made directly to the NRC concerning the-Sequoyah Nuclear Plant.
Lead Responsibility: NPR - T. Alexion Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resconsibility NRP/IE/RTI
- 1. Assign allegations to reviewers NRR 1/0/0 (1/21/86)
- 2. -Interview allegers, as necessary RII/01/IE/NRR 5/0/4 (2/28/86) (Alexion - crord.)
- 3. Perform technical review and RII/01/IE/NRR 10/1/9 prepare evaluation on allegation (Alexion) merit, and provide results to NRR (2/28/86)
- 4. Verify reviews are complete. NRR (Alexion) 1/1/2 Correlate results of review of ERT concerns, NSRS concerns, and other concerns with reviews of these allegations and define corrective actions (3/10/86)
- 5. Prepare responses to allegers NRR (Alexion) 2/0/1 (3/25/86)
s- , .
tg.]
- c
.:( -
ALLEcATIO !S l
Ptti Enst - . Pre 3etts AdEl.el
!- el-21-k 09:18 ' te.istet I e.
66 401 Alleg. 50 Carrel. ResJts - 4:eston 12 Alessen 6 03-26-h ot-tHe L 03-01-h(03-10-te i to tot I il 96 44 et 96 et le it
' il 944 000 ott ett et le . 94 46 tot et 94 I. 96 40! tot E
$1 402 test, le Alleg.
.31787 L57 70 afy [ . tett hisees eleinen it Finip l-Alesign 0 telt Wellt/t!! 29 43-it-h(03 25-h _
01 11-le(01-21-04 41-21-h 02-29-h 04-lHe 64-14-hr i I.
I i et to .. ...
44 to ... ...
til ite .. ...
l te 64 .. ...
let it .. ..
A06 M1 ww. Reves Ceep. Coas. Peter Inst Alessen 4 foungelsed 11 4:41-h(03-16-h 01-26-h C44H6 L
i 1
'i t
L l e **
l ... 1LinH . tell (Critstal laatl q (ftsti n (Crittell tat 0 El-9 i
!=
SEQUOYAH Subject Area: Welding problems at Seauoyah
- 1. As a result of an investigation of employees' concerns con-ducted by a TVA contractor at Watts Rar, more than 400 issues were identified that are related to welding of safety related steel structures at TVA facilities. There were also some allegations by employees made directly to the NPC. The issues concerning welding at Watts Bar can be categorized as follows:
- improper or falsified inspections;
- inspectors and welders cualification;
- welding filler materials (weld rod) control; and
- regulatory commitments to certain industry codes governing structural steel welding.
- 2. Approximately 50 of the Watts Bar concerns were identified to be applicable to Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 and, therefore, need to be resolved for the restart of Sequoyah units.
Lead Responsibility: NRR - B. D. Liaw The NRC Task Group on Weldina at TVA funder NRR lead) will have the overall lead responsibility. The Task Group
' consists of the following:
B. D. Liaw - NRR representative and the Overall manager; R. L. Spessard - I & E rapresentative A. P. Herdt - Region II representative D. E. Smith is responsible for internal NRR review for Sequoyah.
Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Meeting with TVA 1/7/86 NRR/IE/RII 1 (total)
- 2. Conference call with TVA on NRR/IE/RII staff's suggestion of some sample physical reinspections of welds. 1/9/86 El-10
y -
m
- w. 3x s Resources *
(Man Weeksi l Item Resoonsibility. NRR/IE/RII~ !
-3. Staff to provide comments to NRR/IE/RII 1/0/0
~
- TVA of draft' inspection plan . '
within 2 days ~of. receipt -
receipt scheduled 1/14/86.
- 4. Special inspection team-to do RII (Lead) ,
2/2/6 ., ) I a inspection at Sequoyah
'(1/21-2/28/86). Inspection of ,
Aptech's work for TVA, Pechtel '
, special team's work for TVA
plan for Sequoyah, submitted 1/17/86, and staff questions on plan to TVA (2/13/86)
-6. TVA implements reinspection RII (Herdt) 1/1/6 (1/20-31/86); staff will monitor and provide conrent; to TVA i
. completed (2/15/86).
- 8. Identify NDE Van Support needs to RII (Herdt) I 0/I/1 TVA. Identify welds, weld access needs (scaffolding, ladders,'etc) to TVA (2/13/86)
- 9. Review a sample of employee NRR //*
concerns related to welding at Sequoyah to insure that they, have been properly accounted ,
i for in TVA'a program, including dispositicn. (2/28/86)
- 10. Evaluate I & H issues related to OI welding at Sequoyah (?/28/86)
- 11. NRC Independent Verification NRR/IE/RII/RI 3/3/3 Regicn I NDE Van for one week (also 8 man and inspection (2/18-28/86). weeks from RI inspectors)-
~
- Manweeks shown under employee concerns. ,
El-ll L
+
- 3
$e6 B ".3 u.- t . R A.
3 3 3
.~
4 .A A. A.
W ........................ E 3 g 3 w A
=.
U., w-* A.E_. .a
- M t : ;.
2 3
3
. . 2' .
4.
- :. 3 .
- : 3 M'
- . ugzA :
s -
2
= 5 3 .
- g.2 : :
. . A. .
. . 3 -
- ..e ! :
- : s s W w =e : .
O : : : :
Z: : : : :
o I 3) .
. . w. .
J .
W
= = 0 A :
- 2: :
2
'g 5 3
) av e.
3 M% -
3
= = . :
=
e.9 5 g j
= "
=. I 5 I
3 * } :
n.,e
- : T
- : : : g3 :
3 u6.- :
.U i !.
I. I. 3 6 3 :
2 : 5
- : =-%
3 -v
=. =.
2 I3A
- 5313 3 *a $ E E g 3- :
- * .. 3 A
- bi as!!* s 's* =' ~ss~ :
- : . . EwOE .
- . . : 1 I I 3 I.* ! !
- - 'S 3
. 3 :
"I" s" A -
a s :
o 3 c-~ :
e.
a+3
.- Inn.s
..sv ge-, . s 3 C w 2 h ans - . g.a
&u*- 3 3 : =g~,2 .
s
[ $ w - - %% I3 =
.1 g 4 lia!=: Ifv .!
i.
- =
- . n. E u .s
.= L Ew.8=. :
=
ne :
. 3 .
.. .2
. ,n v .
- u.. w ,. : ... .,
. : . : .- =
- ,. U
- 3, . .
w v. .
s 9 .s.
.ss 5 4.!? 3 *'- I
=4 El-12 .
SE00DYAH Subject Area: Design Control Questions have been raised regarding the adequacy of the existing design control process as well as the adeouacy of the previously implemented design process.
Lead Responsibility: R. Architzel, Technical Lead, IE Major Tasks:
Resources ,
(Pan Weeks) l Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Itemized verification by direi.t RII Complete inspection of all Design Centrol related commitments contained in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performancs, ,
Plan. Part 5 of the Plan is dedicated to Design Control.
(12/16-20/85)
- 2. Assessment of tha implementation RII Complete l and adequacy of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Design Control Program as
- upgraded after June 1985.
[ (12/16-20/85 and 1/21-24/86)
- 3. Determine Gilbert / Commonwealth's IE/RII 0/1/1 i scope of review associated with their review of Sequoyah's histori al I design control process at Region II and Sequoyah jobsite. Identify Region II's and NRR's related activities associated with design control assurance for Sequoyah.
controls (est. response by 2/14/86)*
- 6. inspection plans to IE/RII 0/6/1 Develop assess (1) Gilbert / Commonwealth's design control review, (2)
TVA's actions resultino from Gilbert / Commonwealth's' efforts; and (3) TVA's three-system re-view of partially completed /
incompleted ECNs.
El-13
l-L .p.
i Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resoonsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 7. Conduct onsite inspections to re- IE/RII 0/24/6 view adequacy of Gil.hert/ Common-wealth's efforts, review ECN's for '
1975-85 on Feedwater and Auxiliary Feedwater systems, TVA's actions !
in response to Gilbert / Commonwealth's {
findings, and TVA partial ECN review.
- 8. Assess adequacy of Gilbert / Common- IE/RII TBD wealth and TVA partial ENC review for. coverage of relevant allegations, employee concerns, open NSRS reports, L OIA referrals TVA QA Audit results, and INPO results.
- 9. Issue inspection' reports and SER. IE/RII 1/12/5 l (3/25/86)
- Note: Completion of this effort dependent on TVA submittal (reouested in NRC letter of 1/15/86. Estimate TVA response by 2/14/86.
El-13a
h~
DE W U CTiTROL t
i PERf Chart Project: M116eCO.PJ 41-20-h 16:45 Revistans 14 e-41!
E!LNt1 P806 C3t l fu . 24 01-11-04 02-14 4
. 407 ... '
. (9tCYllCMCDs ...
.. IE 7 ..
.. 02 4 7 4 (42-11-06 ...
.. HHe ...
. 06H ~ 06He ...
.001 -402 466H ^^i 35tMT Milm l EWL $0.!W IESP FELOW !stPECT MCh!TIEL 0' .... MCn!TILL 24 ............... JE!M $ 6 301-t!-N 91-!!-hp 01 !!4 02-14-h 02-194(02-25-h
. ... ... OH
^^*
. - 404 40'
. !!ft IslPECT104 13 CMt touttPI Et !aPUT 01
. MIM 4 . JE!M !$ JULIM 10
. 01-21 4 (01 24 4 01-274(02-14-h 02-26-06 43-it-h
. let
^0' 10 4it H 413 414-
' buF0 MM57 l TV4 MSPault l Evat Mit Mt ItPUT 02 ' Cass! PoPit 14PG1 Y0uu80LD08 0 ... TM 0 ...... MCHITIEL 9 ......................... MCHITIEL to 8 70bu60L0ct 1 01 302-144(02-14-hp 02-it-h(02 20-06 . . . . 03-12-h $3-25-h 03-26-46 M-01-h 3 h'01 1 47 ... . . . . . . .
.. 412 .........
a06tf M1105 MV ....
MCuli!!L 14 02-II-h(0347-h
.... ftiet) eles (Critical liHi n (fasti ~ n (Critical testi El-14
SEQUOYAH Subject Area: Secuovah Electrical Design Calculations Documentation Issue
- 1. The licensee has not maintained adequate documentation of many electrical calculations which were performed to support plant design changes. Involves nost AC and DC power systems.
- 2. Question as to the adequacy of station onsite electrical distribution system design and the safety implication as a 'esult of unconfirmed design changes.
- 3. Can the present onsite distribution system configuration meet all the requirements for safe'startup/ operation and accident nitigation.
4 INP0 identified the problem Lead Responsibility: NRR/EICSB - J. Knight Major. Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. ConductSiteVisit(1/16/86) NRR (Knight) complete
- 2. Review adequacy of licensee's NRR (Knight) 1/0/0 program submittal of 1/28/86 (2/14/86)
- 3. Inspect results of licensee's RII (Conlon, Vnight) 3/3/3 studies including resolution of employee concerns and implementation of changes or modifications. (2/14/86) 4 . Review follow-up actions regard- NRR (Knight) 2/0/1 ing identified deficiencies (design changes). (2/28/86)
- 5. Review TVA submittal (to be. NRR (Knight) 3/0/0 provided 2/28/86) regarding electrical design change program and prepare SER input. (3/14/86)
- 6. Complete SER regarding adequacy of NRR (Knight) 2/0/0 licensee's reanalysis program (address allegations and employee concernsasappropriate).(3/21/86)
El-15
ELECTRICAL DESIGil CALCULAfl0!!S Preject ELICfWIC.PJ Pit? Dart 61-29-86 !!:20 hvisient 16 M! 4C6 407 415 001 r005 Jin 5lJMIT P905. L #Evite ICHITTAL $[R ln#Ut (OpH PF[lt 14Pyt IPit ELEt CAtt$ l $1TEVil:1 9 seIpt 3 TWA 0 tull!ti 13 ............................... au! pt ! eHHous vieGILCC: 5 64:5mf .... .... . . .
61 ' 01-29-le'.02-to H 03- 17-Be r 03-2:-le CM4 86'0;-:1-h 201-11-96 01-!!-96 01-le-h43-1646
! I I 96401 Il46[. _
4 .... .... ... .. 6' 4 6 4 4 ... ... .... ..
- 6 to ... 41^ ..
- 6 .... TRIP DEPORT 2 .. t t t 4 t ... R416H1 2 ..
to .... 01-17-h 01-21-86 .. t 0-t ... .. t 6 6 .... .. t 6
.. 6 6 6 ...
41! 6 16 H 402 ..
e anstir ti$n:t insn:t nPant .. # [r:n:td L DiLDE 9 ............................................................. 0 e CDnL0s t ...
to 02-it-9H02-to-te 02-15-h 02-29-lo .. 6 303N-h(63-28-hp e .. t 0 . ... .. I
^^^ 40' -t
}ivA CALC CDRP l REV CORR ((I ACT 4
- T4 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . anIpf 27 9 01-22-h 42-29-86 4 301-22-OF01-22-hp 4 4 6 6 6 4 4
e '
6 8
4 4
420 422
$21 Mt*GE ptPCtf - J5; PIT nPoti l $tAFF#fV!!a BA 25 HtHHHHHHHou TVA 0 HHHoulutHHtHHH initi to Ot-23-lM02-27-h 03-01-h(03 to-te
{294M42-29-067 L i/ . ..
! .... (t.nt i litt (Critical innt) n lianti g (trattcal tasti 1
El-16
SE000YAH Subject Area: Eauipment Qualification TVA's implementation of the Equipment Qualification Rule, 10 CFR 50.49, at Sequoyah 1 and 2 does not comply with the regulations.
Lead Responsibility: IE - Zech Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Conduct an audit of the NRR/IE/DII Complete documentation packages of selected pieces of equipment.
(complete 11/18/85)
- 2. Conduct inspection of TVA's IE/NRR/RII 4/16/4 program to implement 10 CFR 50.49 Contractor $25,000 (conplete 1/13/86)
Subtasks:
- a. Followup on audit findin
- b. . Review all packages (91)gsfor completeness
- c. Review program to maintain qualification status
- d. Physical verification of as-installed condition
- e. Review corrective actions for Westec findings
- f. Review internal procedures for implementing 10 CFR 50.49
- g. Review resolution of employee concerns on EQ
. issues that. remain as potential enforcement items / unresolved items /open items (2/6/86)
- 4. Site inspection at Sequoyah. IE/NRR/RII (Hubbard) 2/4/2 (2/10-2/14) to review Contractor $12,000 additional packages
- 5. Reinspect corrective actions IE/NRR/RII (Hubbard) 1/4/2 and perform final review of Contractor $8,000 related documentation packages (2/24-28/86)
. Subtasks:
- a. Review proposed resolution of technical issues and schedules for completion
- b. Review documentation and assess impact on previously completed packages
.6. Evaluate TVA 10 CFR 50.49 NRR (Shenanski) 2/1/1 certification submittal (2/20/86)
El-17
Major Tasks: Continued' Re nurces (Man Weeks)
Item Resocnsibility NRR/IE/RII
- proposed corrective actions on technical issues, e.g., super-heat steam impact on valve vault equipment. Dates for TVA to resolve these issues are unknown.
- 8. Write, final inspection report. IE/NRR/RII 2/4/2' Identify systems and components either modified or replaced by TVA as corrective action to meet 50.49. (4/15/86)
-Subtasks: On a selected basis:
- a. Determine whether original systems' design basis is maintained.
- b. Review licensee's program to verify that system and equipment operability requirements are met (e.g., M0 VATS testing of Limitorque actuators that were rewired).
Note: The staff assumes TVA will resolve high energy line break and rockbestos issues in time to support completion of E0 matters in early March.
El-18 m
d W
- 7.
4 2
- (5 a,?,
.~
g 4 .
M
- 9. vi n.
.w g= . -
3 2 Ce' e
C. . A. . .
H
.c - .
O 2 e-o L.
.. g a n .n .. .
d ,
- ) .
C. . g - .
. - 2 : .
- 2 .:. :. :.
H . 8~. .
a .i vet * .
O S, *
.C..
3 .
ge2 : :
C* .
w A* .
LJ *
= == 2,
- . w12 : i. :.
. . . ~
e . .
2 .
3
..A ti 2 : . :. : . .
, , . 2 .
- e. .M. .. .
% 3 . ee 2 .
. 2 . .
2
- :. : " c/
a2 2 e
. . ee .
. 2 .
e?- C.
. 2 . .
.- . . . , e, 2
- c. . .. .
.5 2 . .
- S I g- ll:
. e. .
T g
A 2 . :
. - t:
- I* -
A .a .- :. : 2 2 .
M. W" *B . . .
ue-
. c. . . c. -
- E * : J c .
2 . .
b - - .
.n . .
- 4. :. : 2
- 2 :.
e.
e.
32 -
2 .
> . ~ c. .- .c ve.
SW .- .
2 M- c .. .. ..
- e. u . . . a.
2 . . .
J 3 - .-
- n. u we n e 2 .2--
4 .
~
C c. M e 1. .
e.
.e 2 e - . . .
~- . .
2 ..
eW2 .
9 um P
. e.
., . - 2 *1 W e m
en
. N.
e
.e-Q m e
- e. .
h e
. e
. . . w nn.d h 2 .
M 99 .
= , g *
= .
c .
. . p..
.,. t %.#. - .
- 2 e 2 .;
.=
El-19
O SE000YAH Subject Areai Operational Readiness To assess TVA's management and implementation of programs, corrective actions, and commitments described in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plan to assure the plant is ready to resume cperations. In particular, the areas of regulatory improvement, management involvement, operating experience,-
and plant readiness for startup will be assessed and accepta-bility verified.
Lead Responsibility: Region II - Verrelli Major Tasks: 1. Verification by direct inspection of operational readiness i commitments contained in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plan.
- 2. Assessment of TVA resources allocated to implementation of the operational readiness Program.
- 3. Assessment of the implementation and adequacy of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Operational Readiness Program in the following areas:
- Regulatory Improvement
- Emergency Planning
--Operating Experience Improvements
- Maintenance
- Pipe Supports Management Involvement
- Training The major tasks, responsibility, and resource estimates are described for each of these items in the following pages.
e El-20
OPEPATIONAL READINESS p g g ,, p ,, ,,,
~01-28-B6 09:23 Redston 21
+
404 8 RE6 IMFROVEMENT WE!!E 47 01-11-B6 03-20-86
. 402 t< ...
.. EMER6ENCY PLAN ...
. COLLINS 24 ...
. 01-11-86 02-14-86 ....
.. ... 08 411 ..... ....
. .. OP EIP IMP INS b SER INPUT .... ...
.. ... WEISE 0 .. utiSE 33 .... ...
. .. 01 01-11-B602-28-86 ... ..... ...
p
- 01 START OP READ b ...... 3 86 01-It-86 409 8 VERRELLI 0 .... MAINTEllANCE INSP ........ 07 01 .... JULIAN 43 .......................... . SER INPUT COMPL b 3 86 01-II-86p
. 01-11-86 03-14-96 ........................ VERRELLI 0 03
. It .....
........ 3 66 03-21-86p
. t4 .... ............. t666Ii
. 6i . 415 .............. 6i4666 .....
. ti PIPE SUPP INSP .......... t664e16 ....
. It BLAKE 19 eletti ....
. 66 02-01-86(02-28-96 9464444 .....
. 64 tilitti ....
. 46 tittti ....
. 405 8.tititti .....
. MANA6E INVOLV ....
. WEISE 48 ....
. 01-11-8603-21-B6 .....
410 8. .
TRAINING JULIAN 43 01-11 86 03-14-86 4
El -21 .
.... (Link) titt (Critical link) g (Tast) g (Critical task)
i Sequoyah
-Subject Area: Regulatory Improvement TVA committed to strengthen TVA regulatory improvement by identifying unsatisfied commitments; implement a Corporate Commitment Tracking System;
-Upgrade;the quality of LER's and assigning project engineers to major projects.
-Lead. Responsibility: RII - Weise Status:
. Inspections were conducted as follows:
Dates IR No.
10/28 - 11/1/85 65-37 11/18 - 22/85 85-40~
12/9 13/85 85-46 Conduct additional inspections of regulatory improvements and prepare SER
- input by 3/14/86.
El-22
RECUL1 TORY IMPPSVEE*!TS Project: REEL'!P.PJ
' PERT Chart -
01-22-66 09:26 Feviuon: 13 -
+
408 SURV INST INSP ,
isEISE 9 02 19-86(02-29-86 H 6 46 4
. itt t 44 i H 406 46 H EMPLOYEE HANDB00 t il COLLINS 24 6 646 01-11-66 02-14-96 6 H I Ii .... ... 6e H
.... 410 .. 6 H ... PROCED TIERING ... I 6H .... NEISE 24 .. I H .... .. 01-!!-B6 02-14-86 .. I el .... ........ ..... ... I4 01 . .. 409 4 16 -
START RE6 IMP b.......... SER INPUT Com PAPER INPUT mEiSE O H lH Hi He H H i H Heie H H H H H ,H e H H H H H i ur$E 10 i 10uhutcon 4 01-11-96 01-11-84 .. 03-01-86 03-14-B6 03-15-86 03-20-86
..lH HH ........ 411 ..... Hi 0.
..H ttH .. FUNCTTESTPR06 H e.
. H tlH NEISE 5 it H .
.. H IH 02-10-96(02-14-86 6H e .
. 4H HH H e .
.. H HH GH 6 .
. H 407 9 .
.. Hi APPEND!! R REVIE I- .
.. I6 CONLON 33 6 .
. H 01-11-86 02-28-96 4 .
.. tH t .
. H t .
.. H H .
.. 40 0 .
. lH i .
.. 412 . .
. SECURITYIMPROV .
.. MC6UIPE 33 .
. 01-11-8602-22-96 .
( 005 l ASSSN PACJ ENG l
EISE 5 02-10-Bo(02-14-96 El-23 l
o 0^ [
Subject Area: Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) - Sequoyah Evaluate the effectiveness of the emergency preparedness items described or committed to in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plan including implementation of the revised Sequoyah Nuclear ~ Plant Radiological Emergency Plan -and an evaluation of the program enhancements included in the areas' of emergency organization and emergency' facilities and equipment.
Lead Responsibility: RII - T. Decker Major Tasks:
Resources Item Responsibility (Man Weeks)
- 1. Review the 9/30/85 RII Completed Revision to the Sequoyah Emergency Plan
- 2. Review regulatory significant items identified in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plans as enhancements to the REP program as follows:
'a) Emergency Organization / Accident Assessment Consolidation of Dose
~ Assessment Staff into the Central Emergency Control Center.(CECC)
(1) Review of the effect on RII -Completed the emergency plan (See 1 above)
(2) Review the effectiveness RII 7 (Total exercise) of the new dose assessment (2 - RII) staff during the annual (4 - Contractor emergeny exercise - (Not Support) required for restart) (1 - IE) b) Emergency Classification System - RII Completed Review adequacy and completion of corrective actions committed to by licensee in response to violation 50-327, 328/85-13-02 El-24
~-
i 2
c) Emergency Facilities and Equipment:
(1) Review of modifications RII 75% complete made to satisfy the criteria .5 following plant of NRC bulletin 79-18, restart
" Audibility Problems Encountered on Evacuation of Personnel from High-noise Areas"
-(2) Review of the SPOS NRR To be determined by description and NRR documentation via SER of findings d) Training and Drills - Review the RII Completed changes made to the REP training program e) Annual emergency exercise P.II Resources identified in 2.a(2) above
- 3. Conduct a pre-appraisal of RII 3 emergency response facilities (ERFs)
- 4. Conduct an appraisal of ERFs to RII 6 determine acceptability using (1 - RII)
.Suptlement 1 to NUREG-0737 and (1 - IE) the draft TI (2 - NRR)
(2 - Contractor Support)
- 5. Complete SER input to RII .5 document acceptability of findings s
El-25
9 EMERGE:lCY PLANNING PERTEhart ,
Proje:t EMEREENC.PJ 01-22-86 09:32 Revision: 10
+
406 INSPECT REPORT DECFER 21 01-11-86 02-!!-86 ........... 5 01 - 02 ......... FINISH b fSTARTEMERPL. bpINSPECT10NSER b...... 0 DECKER 0 t DECKER 0 02 01 01 3 86 02-14-86{
3 06 01-!!-86 p 3 86 01-II-86p til telt 403 404 SER INPUT COM PAPER INPUT DECKER 14 6 YOUN6BLOCD 10 01-11-86 01-31-86 02-01-06 02-14-96 El-26
+ +
.... (Litk) till (Critical linkl g (Tast) n (Critical tast)
SUBJECT AREA: Operational Experience Feedback Inspect. and evaluate the licensee's program and management controls associated with the feedback of operational experience.
LEAD RESPONSIBILITY Region II - Operational Programs Section - B. Debs RESOURCES NEEDED: 10 man weeks (3 Region II, 7 other)
MAJOR TASKS:
Resources Item Responsibility (Man Weeks)
- - 1. Inspection will involve an integrated look at RII 6 all functional areas which will include, but are not. limited to the Operations Department.
Maintenance Department, Training Department, Engineering Department, and TVA Corporate. The effectiveness of information dissemination and responsiveness to operational experience information will be evaluated.
- 2. SER input to be completed RII 2 3.
~
Complete inspection report, RII 2 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA / LICENSING ACTION: NUREG 0737 Item I.C.5 GENERIC IMPLICATIONS: To be perfctmed at all TVA sites prior to restart.
SCHEDULE DETAIL: . 2/17.- 3/7/86 . _
One week of preparation time is needed. One week of on-site inspection will be performed 2/24 - 28/86. An additional week of effort will be needed by all team members to write report and SER.
4 El-27
.,-.--,..,,.,~,...,....n~
- _ , . , , . . , , , , _ . , _ , - . , , , , , , , - ., .,, _. -. ,,,--..._,,-.,_.,.,a- . , , , , . , . - ,.-,,,9.-,, , ,
W s
3 SE000YAH Sub,iect Area: Maintenance Prooram Follow up on open items from previous maintenance team inspection performed in December 1985.
Lead Responsibility: Region II -' Operational _ Programs Section - R. Debs Major . Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Respo'nsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Inspect the functional areas of RII 0/0/6
--preventative and corrective maintenance with special attention paid to the licensee's. actions taken as a result of the previous Reginn II~ maintenance evaluation. 'This effort includes the inspection of '
the maintenance organization and activities of the plant staff, backfit' and modifications staff including contract assistance.
(Onsite inspection 2/17-21/86)
~
- 2. The adequacy and implementation RII 0/0/4 of maintenance procedures will be evaluated as well as requisite training. An overall assessment of the licensee's maintenance program and the effectiveness of-nanagement controls will be determined.
- 3. Final SER input, to be done by RII 0/0/2 March 15, 1986.
- 4. Issue inspection report by RII 0/0/3 March 31, 1986.
El-28
MiliTEllA' ICE FERT Chart froircts MAlyy,p; 01'29-86 01::s hvisions a
+
404 406 407 IDCCRRECTACT!D REINSPECT MAINT INSPECT REPORT JULIAN 14 liitt JULIAN 4 titel Jul,IAN 15
~
01-11-96 01-31-96 02-17-86(02-21-86 02-23-06(03-14-96 let .. til litt ... 66 INTENANCE'!NSPb '403 h03 ISH b JULIAN. -0 .. SER INPUT CCMM PAPER lhPUT . O JULIAN
_ 301-11-66 01-11-86p .. 14 ......................... YOUN6 BLOOD 9 03
.. 3 86 03-14-26p 01-11-86 01-31-86 02-22-9603-06-96 402 INSPECT REPORT JUllkN 14 01-11-86 01-31-86 El-29
+ +
.... (Link) till (Critical link) g (Task) p _(Critical talk)
'SEQUOYAH Subject Areas: Pipe Support Inspection And Installation Issues As'a result of-Region II Inspection on December 16 - 20, 1985, Report No. 50-327, 328/85-49, a violation concerning pipe support
. inspection and installation was identified.
Lead Responsibility: Region ~II
~
Resources Major Tasks: Responsibility (Man-weeks)
. ITEM
- 1. Issue Region Inspection Report RII 2-with Violation to Licensee
'2. Evaluate Licensee's Response ~RII 1 to Violation
- 3. ' Inspect Licensee's Corrective RII 5 Actions and Evaluate Generic Considerations as it Relates to hardware installation
- 4. Inspect Design Controis and IE 6-Sample Piping Calculations
- 5. Prepare SER Inputs RII/IE 4 El-30 c_ _
^
6 l
/
SEQUOYAH Subject Area: OPERATIONAL READINESS - MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT Increased management involvement needed to enhance operational readiness of the Sequoyah facility.
Lead Responsibility: RII - S. Weise Major Tasks:
Resources
, Item Responsibility (Man Weeks)
- 1. Conduct an inspection / review RII (Weise) 1 of the performance monitoring
~
program established to reduce personnel errors and procedural noncompliance. (2/28/86)
- 2. Conduct an inspection / review RII (Weise) 2 of the modification program which includes reduction in outage w'orkloads and ECN backlog. .(2/28/86)
- 4. Conduct an inspection / review of RII (Collins) I the chemistry lab improvements, - .
includint; QC and housekeeping.
i (2/28/86).
- 5. Conduct an inspection / review of RII (Weise) 1.5 the corrective actions taken to improve the effectiveness of PORC.
,(2/28/86)
- 6. Conduct an inspection / review of RII (Belisle) 1 procurement improvements.
(2/28/86)
- 7. Conduct an inspection / review of RII (Hosey) 3 the radiological health program including contamination area control and ALARA improvements.
(2/28/86) ,
El-31
9 G
Subject Area: Radiological Effluents and Water Chemistry Inspect and evaluate the effectiveness of the radiological effluent controls and water chemistry control described or committed to in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plan.
Lead Responsibility: Region II - Radiological Effluents and Chemistry Section - W. Cline Major Tasks:
. Resources Item Responsibility (Man Weeks)
- 1. Inspection will involve RII .4 review and evaluation of effluent and process radiation monitors, especially those monitors which have previously given spurious alarms. Emphasis will be placed on monitor set-points, adjustments, placement / location and calibration.
- 2. Inspect Post Accident Sampling RII .4 System modifications. In addition to physical modification review, test and records and staff qualifications and training will be reviewed.
- 2. Inspect and evaluate RII 1.0 modifications of the design of the secondary water system and review implementation of improve-ments to the water chemistry program. Determine the adequacy of the management control system for the chemistry program.
- 4. SER input to be RII 1.0 completed
- 5. Complete inspection report RII 1.5 El-32
.4 SEQUOYAH Subject Area: Health Physics Comprehensive assessment of TVA's management and implementation of the Sequoyah Radiation Protection Program ~ and verification of TVA's radiation protective related commitments contained in the Sequoyah Nuclear Performance Plan.
Lead Responsibility: RII - C. Hosey Major Tasks:
' RESOURCES ITEM RESPONSIBILITY (MAN-WEEKS)
- 1. 'Verificati.on by direct inspection of Region II 0.7 the effectiveness of the radiation protection items described to or committed to in the'Sequoyah Nuclear
. Performance Plan (1/31/86)
~
- 2. Prepare SER input on the acceptability Region II 2 of radiation protection commitments (2/14/86)
- 3. Assessment of management and super- Region II 0.1 visory resources to administer radiation protection program (1/31/86)
- 4. Review of nonroutine events (1/31/86) Region II 0.1 Followup on allegations (1/31/86)
~
- 5. Region II 0.1
- 6. Followup on noncompliance and inspector Region II 0.1 identified items (1/31/86)
- 7. Perform portions of selected IE Region II 0.8 inspection procedures (1/31/86)
- 8. Assess effectiveness of corrective Region II 0.1 action for licensees identified audits and review findings (1/31/86)
- 9. Prepare inspection report for all HP Region II 1.0 items (2/7/86)
- 10. Reinspect to confirm corrective actions Region II 1.0 for any item opened during initial inspection (3/15/86)
El-33
c RMAGEME.'IT iip!0LVE'ENT
' 797 Chart D294e 15:01
- e l
.two mite ioym nem s . .... . . . . . .. . . . it
- n
.2-i wi2-ie4. 02-is* :-i34
. . 41!
.. . 1&EU EP9f I .
. . to .
. . , . . . 82-15 to 03-1340 ..
447 . . .
. 400 P905 le . 41! 41'
. at!M 5 . CLCMthi pK4 W ePet ...-.
. 82-19-Se'82-le-te .. O!! .3 . Ott 2 . . .
.. .01-104 ti 24-te $1-25 00 ti-29-te . ...
. ~ .. . ^?" .. . . . .
("
. . 3:99 CIAR ET .. . tuGPf*f MP9Bf l',-
.. ... EIM 5- .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . On -9 ... . ..lillA Little 81-t!-te 81-174 .. . 81-10 4 91-34 4 ..
CII I .- !
I
. .. .. . .. . SIu461-u-6.l - .
- 417 . t' CDs Partt trJT 814:54
$1dBf Ef luulL k. CE9 L80 IEP90s Et IWWf g QW 9 . eeHeeHeeMeestetes *tLL14 23 ... (!M 10 .. . .dhaam we 9 ,, . . . . . .
... , , , ,to 03-tW $3-lHe 01~:1 4 01-11-06 91-11 4 42-12 4 62-15-Io 62 29-te 13414 43-134e et essesse....
teH . . . .
eHeeen . ... ...
ee*** . ***e4444e .....- . . .
.. 4 Hee . etese* ** ...... . . . . .
.. .. e**e teHHoH .. . ..
.. .. eteet Hoteesee .. . . . .
.. eese 48HHe t . . .. ..
. . es 41" esseneet .. . .
!srtt! DEPyf en . ..
. . .. . . W:E 25 . . ..
. . 62134e 03-st-te ... ..
. . ^^! . . 42' . .
. . PIRC CIIst:t act .. .
IngPtti atPWT . ..
. . WIN 5 . . . . . . E!M 17 . ..
. . 82-16-Ge<82-le-te . . 62-19 4 (83-12 4 .. ...
. . 421 ..
. PagCWiMet !ar . '
Impt:1 Itetet .
. ML 1LE 4 ....... . MLIILE 2".
. 91-11 4 41-11 4 ti-!!-te'92 le-te
- 412 000 dalfu IWW !sIPf*T Mpgf utKt 9 . . . neste 20 gli-!!-te(St 314 4341 4 42 29-96 El-34
SUBJECT AREA: To inspect the effectiveness of Sequoyah Licensed and Unlicensed Operator Training LEAD RESPONSIBILITY: Region II - Operational Programs Section - 8. Debs RESOURCES NEEDED: 11 man weeks (4 Region II, 9 other)
MAJOR TASKS:
Resources Item Responsibility (Man Weeks)
- 1. Inspect the licensed and unlicensed operator RII 6 training program in accordance with existing routine inspection procedures. This inspection
, will also look at the licensee's on-site E* -
requalification program and TVA training center assistance and involvement. Although
~'
this inspection will be conducted under the -
routine inspection program, all TVA plants will be inspected in short succession after Sequoyah, since deficiencies found at any plant may be indicative of deficiencies at other plants within the TVA structure.
Recent Browns Ferry license examination results will be used, in-part, to identify deficient training areas.
- 2. SER input to be completed RII 4
- 3. Generate Inspection Report RII 1
~~
ACCEPTANCE-CRITERIA / LICENSING ACTION:
Contained in Inspection Procedure 41400, 41701 GENERIC IMPLICATIONS: To be performed at all TVA sites prior to restart.
SCHEDULE DETAIL: 2/10 - 28/86 One Region II inspector and three others from IE, or contractor will be needed.
Team will prepare for one week, conduct on-site inspections week of 2/17 - 21/86, and write report and SER one additional man week. One additional RII man week will be needed for report completion.
6 El-35
,,--v-,,, - - - - - . , , - , , , , - , - , , - - . - , - - -.,c,-., -n,-~ -- - + - - - , - - . - , - - ,
SUBJECT AREA: Ensure the Sequoyah Requalification Program has been successful in maintaining the competency of licensed personnel for the restart and safe operation of the facility.
L LEAD RESPONSIBILITY: Region II Operator Licensing Section - 8. A. Wilson RESOURCES NEEDED: 14 man weeks (6 Region II, 8 other)
~
MAJOR TASKS:
Resources Item Responsibility (Man Weeks)
- 1. Conduct audit of TVA administered written RII/0LS 2 requalification examinations. Five sets of written exams were adninistered by TVA in
- the Fall of 1985.
Schedule: Review quality of TVA written R0 .
"" and SR0 examinations. Regrade at least six (three RO and three SRO) examinations. Both to be performed at Sequoyah Training Center week of 1/27/86.
~
Resources: 2 man weeks (audit plus documentation of findings - SER input).
i
- 2. Conduct simulator examinations for approxi- RII lead 10 mately 50 percent of Sequoyah licensed personnel. _
Schedule: Weeks of 2/17/86 and 2/24/86. One Region II Examiner plus 2 other NRC Examiners each week. i Resources: 6 man weeks (2 man weeks each; Region II. Region III, and Headquarters.OLB). 4 man weeks preparation.
- 3. Complete SER and examination report. RII ,
2
' ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA / LICENSING BASIS:
Results are acceptable if they meet the standards of Examiner Standard ES-601 for an acceptable requalification program.
GENERIC APPLICATIONS:
Requalification exams _ have been performed at Browns Ferry with ursatisfactory 4
results. Requalification exems must be performed at Watts Bar prior to licensing.
El-0C
_ _- . _ . _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ . - - . . _ . . . _ - _ _ . - _ . , _ - - . . . . _, , , . , , . . _ _ ,-__----..r m ..-. , , _
TRAI!!ING PERT Chart Project: TRAIN.PJ 01-31-S5 08:4B Revision: 11
+
408 SER INPUT WEISE 10 03-01-86 03-14-86 404 407 ...
STA QUAL SPLS INSPECT REPORT ...
WEISE 33 ..... WEISE 9 ...
01-!!-96 02-28-86 03-01-8603-13-96 ..
01 402 405 ...... ...
START TRAININB OP SIMUL REEIAM EIAMREPORT 10 JULIAN 0 b'.... WILSON 5 ..... WILSON 14 .............
...pFINISH b 01 02-17-86(02-24-86 02-25-86(03-14-86 ........... 0 3 -!!-86 01-!!-86p 03 iii6 ....
....... 3 86 03-20-85p tii ... ....... 4i9 403 409 ....... 6ei6 TRAIN ASSESSRENT SER INPUT .. t6i DEBS 4 ..... DEBS 14 469 02-17-86(02-21-64 02-25-86 03-14-86 titt til 669) 6666 669 til 406 INSPECTREPORT DEBS- 19 02-22-86 03-20-86
, El-37 .
.... (Link) itti (Critical link)- g (Task) g (Critical tasti
SEQUOYAH Subject Areas: Cable Tray Supports
- i Followup on cable tray seismic support issues identified in Inspection Report No. 50-327, 328/85-29.-
s.
Lead Responsibility: Region II (Blake).
Resources Major Tasks: Responsibility (Man-weeks)
- 1. Inspect Licensee's Corrective RII Complete Actions and Evaluate Generic Considerations as it Relates '
to Cable Tray Seismic Supports.
. 2. Issue' Region Inspection Report RII 2
- 3. Prepare SER Inputs (2/21/86) .RII 4 s'
, 7, 9 ,
N
\
s
.9 .
/
s N i
i
\
El-38
PERTChart CABLE TRAY SUPPORTS .Proje:t:CABLESUP.PJ 01-28-26 09:59 Revision: 14
+
410 INSP. REPORT BLAFE , 25 01-12-86(02-16-26 09 01 403 405
- START CABLES b pINSPECTICNCOMP b SER !NPUT CCMM PAPER lhPUT BLAKE- 0 .
... 0 ................ BLAKE 13 . YOUNG 2LOOD 5 01 3 96 01-!!-86p 01 02-04-86(02-21-86 02-22-86 02-26-86 .. 7 3 26 01-11-96p ill 0 il 03 3 86 03-14-86p 409 404 406 66 SAMPLE IDENT SITE INSPECTION INSPECT REPORT-BLAKE 5 666666996666664666666 BLAKE 5 6 BLARE 15 02-07-06(02-13-86 02-14-96 02-21-86 02-22-86 03-14-86 El-39
+ . +
.... (Link) till (Critical link) g (Task) g (Critical task)
SEQUOYAH Subject Area: Technical Specification- Revisions Technical Specification Revisions are in process. One is related to the proposed organizational changes at TVA and Seouoyah facility.
The remaining are routine in nature.
Lead Responsibility: NRR - C. Stahle
{
l ffajor Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeksi Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Organizational Revisions NRR/ FOB 2/0/0 (a) Review offsite oroanization for facility management and technical support (b) Review facility organization (c) Prepare SER for the issuance of TS (d) Issue amendment package by 2/7/86
- 2. Acoustical Monitor Devices NRR/EICSB 1/0/0 (a) SER Completed for issuance of T.S.
(b) Issue Amendment Package by 2/7/86
- 3. Positive / Negative Trip Meter NRR/RSB 2/0/0 Revisions (al Review proposed T.S. changes ,
(b) Prepare SER (c) Issue Amendment Package by 2/7/86 s
- 4. Containment Penetration Devices Table Deletion and Radiological Effluent T.S.
Revisions completed (1/4/86)
'A
=
- El-40 s-
SE000YAH Subject Area: Wrongdoina, Intimidation and Harassment Issues To Be Provided by 01-I l
1 l
l L
El-41
OFFICE OF INVESTI%TI?is
" PDT Chart Project: SESCI.PJ 61 ^9-h 10:07 levistant 7 e
412 C1421T 31 37 OMB-96 04-02-86 i i
60 He
. ^^i Ho 66 418 ET Cant REVIEW DelEF SET WORSE 11 MYE5 2 01-11-h 02-07-h 4H 411 40 04-03-h 0444-h H 06C A@li H6 4 0 06C 37 till H 02-08-84 04 4 2-96 HH t Het it Het i Het
^^' 419 6 401 4 14 -
il O! 03 DOC PEVIEe InfERv!Eu 3RIET STWF C0Fut PAPER input 14 HHe votSE 42 title NAVE $ 2 4HHHtHHHHillH VOUREBLOCD 4 r020 H
i VORSE -
01-11-h 01-!!-H 0241-M C44246 04-03-h 0444-h 04-05-h 0410-06 etHlHHHHetHe JFinISH l 4
0 H 4H He i 30410-86 04-10-hp i telt titt i till GHtH
. 1 START INVEST l f2
'ti 41 RE8EST 407 STAFF EWOR ACT
- 14
!RTL STWF ACTIO l 9 H 421 5fMF ACTION V055E . 0 .... MRSE I4 ..... TAYt0R It .................. 1111 0 HeHH6HeH4 mRR 4 tell-86 41-31-h C241-36 02-28-86 04 et 0445-86 0410-h 301-11-k 01-II-hp 3 86 04-0446p i etH le i 6 GH H H t 40, . 41? 9 0 0! 02 DOC REVIEW INVESTIG4TIBI 3RIEF SiWF 6 6 VOR$E 14 , HHf VCR$E 19 HH6 h4YE5 25 H e 01-114e 01-31-h 02-01-M 02-21-M 0341-h 04-04-h e 6 e i H I '
e 405 410 415 417 O! 04 REG' JEST REi1CN !! M5P04 80C NVlft lufERVIEW YORSE 14 HHI lELI!LE 19 HtH VORSE 23 4HH VORSE 2 01 l!-h 01-3146 02-0144 02 it-16 0341-M 0442-86 04-0!-86 0444-M
+
.... EinH HH (Critical lant) p (fad) q (Critical tanH El-42
_.J
t
/
SE000YAH Subject Area: Concerns in NSRS Reports The NSRS reports contain information gernaine to issues raised by the ERT program, allegations and H. Myers' concerns. Therefore,
'these reports are being reviewed to provide additional information for the review of the issues raised on TVA facilities. There are approx.imately 67 NSRS reports that have been issued on Sequoyah or are generic in nature. NRR has lead responsiblity for 13 of these and RII, 01, and IE has lead responsibility for 54.
-Lead Responsibility: NRR - R. K. Singh Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resoonsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 2. Review and prepare evaluation RII/NRR/IE/0I (Singh) 7/1/4 for applicability. Provide re-sults to NR . (2/28/86)
- 3. Correlate a#nd review NSRS reports RII/NRR/IE/0I 7/1/4
.with employee concerns, allegations, and other concerns to assure technical reviews are complete and corrective a actions are identified. (3/10/86)-
- Note: TVA must provide final investigation reports on Sequoyah-specific employe' e concerns by 2/14/86 to support this effort.
. El-43
I NSRS CONCERi;S FERT Chart 01-29-86 10:11 l 403 Correl. Results l
Singh 6 l 03-01-96(03-10-66 l
4.. ..
il it lit let j 46 it i 84 til Ol' 402 405 406 STAR,TAssgReywsb Tech Reviews NSR S SER Cosa. Paper Inpu 4
Sin'gh 0 till NRR/IE/R!! 28 Sin gh 11 litli Youngblood 12 01 01-21-B6 02-28-86 03- 11-E6(03-25-06 03-26-86(04-10-96 l 86(01-21-96f _
et ett il it fit iil 66 il
. 404 il 404 Veri Reves Ccap!
Singh 6 03-01-86(03-10-86 i
El-44 4 ft
.... (Link) .titt (Critical link) n (Task) g (Critical task)
SEQUOYAH Subject Area: Corocrate Activities Certain corporate issues must be resolved prior to the restart '
of Sequoyah. These issues include: establishment of a conmit-nent tracking. system, increased involvement of the TVA Board, management changes, and changes to the program of QA audits.
I. Board Actions The TVA Board of Directors and Board nembers are not sufficiently~
informed and involved .in nuclear plant performance to provide corporate oversicht, direction and support of nuclear activities.
Lead Responsibility: NRR - L. Crocker Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Review the following NRR ?/0/0-proposed actions that were submitted on 11/1/85 as well as anticipated
-revisions to the Board actions.
al Review the employment of a Senior Nuclear Advisor to the TVA Board.
.b) Review the methods of increased reporting to and control by the TVA Board c) Review the increased intensity of oversight and reporting by the Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) d) Review increased level of support from either
.TVA resources e) Review establishment of an Office of Inspector General f) Review other Board support adjustments
El 45
\
_?.
Resources
'(Man Weeks)
Item' Resoonsibility NRR/IE/RII
II. Management Changes Management changes are needed to strengthen TVA regulatory oer.formance, including retaining additional experienced personnel to upgrade TVA's corporate performance.
Lead Responsibility: -NRR - L. Crocker Ma.ior Tasks:
Desources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Review the proposed NRR 1/0/0 changes to strengthen
. regulatory performance -
and the qualifications of additional key personnel to the TVA organization.
(2/28/86)
(3/6/86)
III. Commitment Tracking Systen TVA lacks a integrated commitment tracking system that provides assurance that NRC camnitments are tracked and responded to. Plant operational offices and sites have individual tracking systems but they do not assure
. integration of all regulatory commitments. -
f Lead Responsibility: RII - S. Weise Major Tasks: Resources (Man Weeksi Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Conduct corporate and site RII(S.Weise) 0/0/2 inspections to evaluate commitment tracking system (2/14/86) El-46
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RTI 2.. ~ Prepare SER. input RII (S. Weise) 0/0/2.
-(2/28/86)
~
IV. 'QA Audits TVA lacks a program for escalating QA Audit firdings to the~acoropriate levels of management to assure timely resolutien of those findings.
Lead Responsibility: .RII - A. Belisle Ma,ior Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Conduct onsite inspection and RII (Belisle) 0/0/3 evaluate TVA program for escalation of QA audit findings
-(2/21/86)
- 2. Prepare SER input (3/5/86) RII (Belisle) 0/0/4 El-47
ua . ., n 406 416 COM!i IRACK EVA Con!! TRACK SER CORPORATE ACTIVITIES WEISE 22 ..... WEISE 01-15-86(02-16-86 02-15-86 02-28-86 1 ..
i .
J 2 410 403 405 - A13 E0RP ACly SER JFINISH L
. 5. W11E HSR b IVA REPT 10 I6RC EVAL All CMuGES 5 O WITE 24 MR/Ril/IE 12 ......................... SIAHLE ....
0 .. TV4 0 .. .
02-19-66 03-06-86 03-07-8 6 03-13-86 03 01 01-14-86 02-19-86 3 86 03-14-86[
A 401
..... 3 86(01-13-86[
Co 50.55F EVALUAT ........
417 it CROCKER I ........
407 .... .
SA AUDIT SER .. It GA AUDIT EVAL 01-11-86 01-13-86 ...................................
26 KLISLE 8 . te tiettl ........ BELISLE .....
02-22-86 03-05-86 66 eie 6ieieie 01-15-86(02-21-06 ..
.. It til tellet 40B
, 6 til 90ARB ACTS SER
.. Ie 064 CROCKER 32
.. to il 01-16-86 02-28-86 400 it ett 66666664 .
.. It lll tiliitti ellettet . to ill 409 litellit 411 412 -
n6MT C M n6ES SER 66 BRAFT SE REVIEW Com PAPER INPUT CROCKER 32 466666666666666666664666446666664ttll IEIRII 3 4 YOUH6tLOOD 7 01-14-86 02-29-86 03-01-86 03-05-86 03-06-86 03-16-84
m
. g .I SE000YAH' Subject Area: Ouality Assurance ,
Evaluate TVA's Quality Assurance. program enhancements at Sequoyah and TVA corporate offices.
Lead Responsibility: Quality Assurance Progran Section DRS, Region II A. Belisle Major Tasks:
< Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resoonsibility NRR/IE/RIT
- 1. . Itemized verification by direct RII / /5 inspection of 25 selected QA related commintments contained in the Sequoyah Nuclear Perfor-mance Plan.
- 2. Itemized verification by direct RII / /2 inspection of 13 selected QA
.related commitments contained in the. Corporate Nuclear Perfor-mance Plan.
- 3. Assessment of the adequacy of 'the RII / /5 management resources allocated to the administration of the Corporate and Sequoyah Nuclear Plant QA Program.
4 Prepare SER Input RII / /2 5.. Complete inspection report RII -/ /?-
I t -
l
(.
I El-49
4 ENCLOSURE 2 Status of Significant Completed Activities at Sequoyah
- Electrical Design Calculation: The staff reviewed TVA's' electrical design calculation effort during a Sequoyah site visit on January 13-14, 1986. The staff preliminary conclusions were that the calculations were being performed properly. The staff did identify that testing should be considered in order to validate.the calculational models. The recommendation for such testing is being identified in writing to TVA.
Equipment Qualification: An inspection of the equipment qualification status of the Sequoyah facility was coordinated at the Knoxville office and Sequoyah site during January 6-17, 1986. The inspection revealed that approximately 62/91 of the qualification documentation packages had been completed.
- Additione.lly, hardware modifications remain to be completed on 30/62. Of the packages that were reviewed, the staff identified no major programmatic concerns. However, the staff did note their concern that numerous issues, some of which could impact qualification packages that had been completed, still had to be resolved. Also of concern is resolution of the qualification of certain rockbestos cables and an issue regarding the harsh environment due to a postulated high energy line break. These concerns are being transmitted in writing to TVA.
Employee Concern Program: The staff conducted a review of the employee concerns program during the week of January 13, 1986. The staff is developing additional information requests for TVA in order to resolve issues raised during the review.
E2-1
- 1 Enclosure'3.
WATTS BAR TSSUE
SUMMARY
ISSUE LEAD RESP.
- 1. Employee Concerns (applie. to Watts Par) NRR
- 2. Allegations -NDR
- 3. Concerns in flSRS Reports f!RR Quality Assurance 4 NRR-
-5. Welding NPD
- 6. . Equipment Qualification NRP
- 8. Licensing items .
- 9. Wrongdoing, Intimidation and OI Harassment issues
.10. Operational. Readiness RII E3-1
- UATTS Bid - IflTEGPATED SCHEDULE
!RT Chart .
1-2H. Ik22 '
E LittuK l't4
= m
+2.+c.i.+
r ...
. u n:. e,t. ..
. m2 6i + .
. . = . ..
. . na:. . .
. . m .
. ei.:.- c.i.* .
.g .... . . .
.. . - m . .. ...
. . ... .i.2.* *rs. . a. . , . .
- .a. .w .... . . .2 -
..taw:M ,.
cm t.
.=[u .cmr
.. ... . . . .. . . . ..... . . . . . . . . s
. . .i.2.+ -i +.. .. .au ... .a n- * =*+. lwn* win.
. . . . . .. . . ....a.....a a .. . .* ....
, 422 . . . . ~ . . ..
u ,.t:1 .. - .., ..........
p=
5 . 1 ..... .
MM.1 !34
.1-2.- 61.1. . 21.L M.
fl E n.1334. .
.1-14 4 ..- . . - -
.. .. 4. -.
W./.l.l/18
.?*l& W .1. 14 -t34 t34 a
... ... .. t2 .
.... .w
. e L8?tt C3Ett . ....
.1-1.-
1
-l.1. -
.!? 11
..ea F;n.L LIC fftl Z
. .s u,. f.. .. ;. j".L :., n. .. .. . i , .uM.I.*t, f.4 . 3 . .M ?! . .. .. s.-.6- . 4 l igw .ig
. 42-.14 2-.1- .. .242W.2464 92-.14 5 tH. . .Dd.11 l.- . .5 28- .
. I 0 .. ..
. H H H.
H
. N' g H H.
8.
.. H.
H
'N
.. H
. . ... p.
.H M
. .l! .
. W ETIM .. .M
- s. 16 ..
- i. .3-1 4.M.6 H H.
. .. H.
. H 8
. H.
.!?
W. steigt. Il.tal :f3
.!! 2 15 M-154.I l - i .un .f-l !! .-er 4.-
E3-2
WATTS RAR Subject Area: Employee Concerns There are approximately 1600 safety related employee concerns that have'been received through the ERT program. Specific lead responsibilities will be assigned after completion of FRC sort.
General areas of concern are listed below:
- 1. Welding 12. Materials Traceability
- 2. Cable / Electrical Calculations 13. Material Problems
- 3. Instrumentation 14. ERCW
- 4. Operational Events /Qualificaitons 15. Design Calculations
- 5. NCR Problems 16. Hangers
- 6. Construction Control 17. Expansion Anchors
- 7. Document Control 18. Other Civil
- 8. Personnel Qualifications 19. Miscellaneous Equipment
- 9. Procedure Revision Control 20. 0A Program
- 10. Paint and Rust 71. 0A Records
- 11. Fire Barrier Penetrations 22. Intimidation and Harrassment Lead Responsibility: NRR - B. K. Singh Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. NRC review progress of ERT RII/NRR/FRC 1/0/1 resolution (1/16/86)
- 2. FRC complete sort of K-forms FRC **
enter on data base (2/3/86)
- 3. NRR assign responsible NRR (Singh) 2/0/0 reviewers on basis of FRC sort (2/7/86) 4 Conduct inspection per TI IE (Spessard) 10/24/20 2512/15 and issue inspection reports. Factor in relevant K-forms, investigation reports allegations, NSRS reports, and H. Myers' concerns. (5/30/86)
Note: NPR to provide supporting information.
E3-3
- ~ - . . .- .. . ..
~
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibilitv NRR/IE/RII-5.'SER inputs issued upon completion RII/NRR/IE 2/2/2 of review (4-weeks after final
-investigation report
- issued by TVA)
.6. Review TVA Report (6/30/66)~ RII/NRR/IE 1/1/1.
- Note: TVA must provide final investigation reports on employee concerns by 6/1/86.
- $150,000 has been allocated for this support effort.
L i
I
! E3-3a
9 EMPLOYEE C0tlCERf4S l
PERT Chart Project:EnFCON.PJ 01-28-86 11:28 Revision: 7 tv 406 -
COMPL. REVIENS hRR/IE/ Ril 20 06-03-8 6(06-30-86 GH lit fit ill ill 666 01 402 '3 404 5 00" s1ARTEMPL. CON.L Rev i s0Ri ur0Rei s0 RTE 8toRcvuRsL itCn. REviEus rinAt invest Rei l JEnPt. Cont. sER l m SIN 6H 0 liet $!N6H 11 6666 s!NGH 0 6666 W R/IE/RII 79 1666 TVA 0 SINGH - 0 01-24-86(02-07-86 02-07-86(02-07-86 02-10-86(06-02-86 06
)01-24-86(01-24-867 p ]%-02-B6(06-02-867 3 86(06-30-86p lit 666 til 146
.let til 407-VERir REVuS ConP slN6H 20 06-03-8 6(06-30-86 L
s 5 $ , . 0l
- - = .
'UATTS BAR L
-Subject Area: Allegations received by NRC concerning the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Lead Responsibility: NRR - T. Kenyon There are 75 open allegations as of January'13,1986 carried in the Allecation Management System and 14 allegations received in D. Hick's November 77, 1985 letter which are related to the Watts- Bar Nucle'ar Plant. NRR has the lead review responsibility for 24 of these'and RII and OI has lead review respons-ibility for 65. These are functionally broken down as follows:
l- 1. Harrasment and Falsification
- 2. Electrical f 3. Piping
- 4. Structural
~5. Equipment
- 6. Welding
- 7. Other (Management, QA, Quality, etc) i 8. Dallas Hicks' November 27, 1985 letter -
- ' Intimidation and Harrassment
- Management Technical Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. Assign remaining allegations to NRR(Kenyon) 1/0/0-reviewers (1/24/86)
- 2. Interview allegers and evaluate NRR/RII/IE 10/1/20 significance of allegations.
- 3. Review and prepare evaluation NRR/RII/01/IE 2/1/TBD based on allegation merit (4/21/86) 4 Correlate results of review of NRR/RII/01/IE 2/1/3 ERT concerns, NSRS concerns, and H. Myers' concerns with reviews of these allegations and define corrective actions (5/9/86)
- 5. Verify Reviews completed NRR (Kenyon) 1/0/0 (5/9/86)
- 6. . Prepare responses to allegers NRR (Kenyon) 2/0/0 (5/30/86)
E3-5 l
l l
L:
ALLEGATIONS PERT Chart Project:ALLE6.PJ 01-28-86 11:19 Revision: 10
+-
403 C00 RELATE RESULT NRR/RII/IE 14 04-22-86 05-09-86
.itt 66 44 le 660 666 66 64 64 H 01 402 405 406 LISTTOREVIEWRS b TECH. REVIEWS RESP. TO ALLES. ALLES. SER KjNYON 0 666666 NRR/IE/RII 61 KENYON 14 66664 KENYON 10 01 01-24-86(04-21-86 05-10-86(05-30-B6 06-02-86(06-13-86 3 86 01-24-86p H te
, H H IH GH 66 64 H6 H
- 404 VERFY REVWS CMPL KENYON 14 04-22-86(05-09-86 o
+ E3-6 +
.... (Link) llH (Critical linkl n (Task) g (Critical task)
^
P
,j -
.p .
' WATTS BAR. ;
L$ubject Area:. Concerns'in NSRS Reports The NSRS reports contain information germaine to issues raised by.the ERT program allegations, and H. Myers' concerns.
Therefore, these reports are being reviewed to provide additior.al' information for the review of the issues reaised on TVA. facilities. -l
- There are approximately 32 NSRS reports that have been issued on-
!- OI,- and IE has . lead responsibility for 24.
Lead Responsibility: NRR - T. Kenyon ,
Resources (Man Weeksi Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 1. - NRC assign resp nsible NRR (Kenyon) 1/0/0
-reviewers (1/24 86)_
2.. FRC canplete sort of FRC **
NSRS reports and enter on data base (2/7/86) !
L l
- 3. Correlate and review NSRS RII/NRR/IE 2/1/10
, reports with employee ~ concerns, OI i allegations, H. Myers concerns,-
l and other concerns to assure <
technical review is complete and i corrective actions are identified.
(5/9/86)
I
- 4. Prepare SER input upon completion RII/NRR/IE 2/1/1 ,.
of review (4 weeks after 01' :
final related ERT investigation '!
report
- issued by'TVA)
- 5. Review TVA Report (6/30/86) RII/NRR/IE 1/1/1
- Note: TVA must provide final investigation reports on employee concerns by 6/1/86. *
- Total allocation for this effort listed under employee concerns.
l, l
! E3-7 l
- flSRS CONCERNS PERT Chart Project: NSPS.PJ L 01-28-86 11:34 Revision: 6 L
+
404 406 CORREL. RESULTS VERIFY REV COMPL MR/IE/Ri! 14 IH64 FENYON 35 04-22-B6405-09-86 05-10-86(06-30-86 ott 664 644 til til ett 1 402 403 $08 -
JNSRS SER b ASSN. REVIEWERSFRC b SORT TECH. PEVIENS HIH WR/IE/R!l 50 VEMYON 0 FENYON 0 lHe FRC 11 02-10-86(04-21-86 0 01 3 -J4-86(01-24-96p 01-24-86(02-07-B6 g6-30-86(06-30-86p T ... ...
' ~ ...
05 407
[FIMLINVESTRPib COMPL REVIENS
.- TVA 0 .... WR/IE/R!! 20
.~ 06 06-02-86(06-27-B6 l
3 86(06-02-86p l
l l
+ - E3-8
.... (Lint) HH (Critical linti n (fask) g (Critical task)
WATTS RAR Subject Area: Ouality Assurance
- 1. On May 30, 1985, the staff requested TVA to demonstrate that the Watts Bar facility meets its licensing commitments.
The September 17,198510 CFR 50.54(f) letter requested TVA to provide a compilation of the 3rd party reviews that demonstrate the adequacy of the design and construction of the facility. .
- 2. In addition, the recent ERT program, allegations, and NSPS
-reports have cast doubts on the adeouacy of the design and
, construction of the facility'which must be resolved prior to issuance of the operating license.
- 3. The staff has not completed its review of the Watts Bar IDVP.
- 4. The staff is waitina for TVA responses to the September 17, 198510 CFR 50.54(f) letter on Watts Bar and the January 3,
, 1986 letter on "NSRS Perceptions of Watts Bar Status" in order to determine the extent of work required to close this issue.
Lead Responsibility: NRR - T. Kenyon Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resoonsibility Reviewer NRR/IE/PII
, 1. Review acceptability of NRR/RII IDVP DRG 3/0/1 10 CFR 50.Sa(f) response (2/28/83)
! of January 3, 1986 (3/31/86)
- review applicable allegations, NRR/RII IDVP DRG 3/0/1 NSRS reports, and emplo g
concerns (on IDVP only)yee d
- conplete IDVP SER input and NRR/RII IDVP DRG 3/0/1 revise as necessary due to above concerns (4/30/86)
- 5. Review resolution of allegations, NPR/RII/IE IDVP DRG
- NSRS reports, employee concerns, etc. on OA (4/18/86)
- Resources allocated in allegations and NSRS sections.
E3-9
.,, . - - _ - . . . . - . . . - . - - . . ~.
Resources
-(Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility Reviewer NRD/IE/RII
'6. Review acceptablility of CA IE 0/1/0 organizational changes, as '
necessary (4/21/86)
'7.
Write SER confirming NRP/RII IOVP ORG 1/1/1 acceptability of 0A proaran and required field modifications -
(5/1/86)*
- Note: TVA must provide final reports regardina resolution of applicable '
NSRS and employee concerns on QA and the B&V IDVP by 3/21/86.
m Y
}.
r l
E3-10 l
PERT Ch a t QUALITY ASSURAfiCE 01-29-B6 11:31 e
2 M3 II ERPt. CDut. L en EnPt. cent.
sinew 0 .... FENVON 50 02 02-07-B6(04-19-86 3 N(02-07-86 1 ... ... 407 51AA1 OA L uViE. 50.541 nESP to i,3 tin L uv en Peas. GA SER INPUT FENYM 0 .... ERRIRII 16 .... TV4 0 .... ukR 21 ..... NAR/Rll 7 02 02-06-86(02-28-36 03 03-02-8&(03-31-86 04-21-86(04-29-86 3 M(02-05-8&p 3 86(03-01-86p H .. ... ... ...
4 . ... .. ...
H .. .. ... ..
t . ... ... ...
^^"
H 411 413 --- 15 H l.
l 6 V IBVP uPi b 04 INSPEtitDNS ACRS GA Sumoful FINISH GA b m i TVA 0 Ill 21 NRR 11 . HH 0 H
t 03 3 B&(03-21-B67 03-02-86(03-11-86 05-01-86(05-15-B4 05 3 8&(05-15-067 H H. 4H 4 4. til H H. lH 409 410 412 ISVP KVIEu COMPL. IDVP K W IBVP SER INPui IIVP IRE 31 HH4 IBVP DRS 12 4H4HtHHHHHHtH4H4H4 IIVP BR6 17 02-05-96(03-20-86 43-21-86(04-07-86 04-08-86(04-30-B6
.3 e
WATTS BAR Subject Area: Welding
- 1. Over 400 welding concerns have been raised through the ERT program, allegations, and during the Region II's inspection of the plant. The staff has established a welding review effort with contract assistance to establish a staff position with respect to the licenseability of Watts Bar.
- 2. Concerns raised include welder cualifications and training, upkeep of adequate welding records, weld material control, use of improper welding techniques, etc.
- 3. TVA is still in the process of determininq extent of welding problems and establishing a proposed plan to resolve issues.
Lead Respcnsibility: NRR - B. D. Liaw The NRC Task Group on Welding at TVA (under NRR lead) will have the overall lead responsibility. The Task Group consists of the following:
- 8. D. Liaw - NRR representative and the Overall manager; R. L. Spessard - I & E representative A. R. Herdt - Pegion II representative C. Czajkowski - BNL representative to ccordinate consultant team Major Tasks:
Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Resoonsibility NRR/IE/PII
- 1. Meeting with TVA on 12/12/85 - NRR complete general discussion on areas of concern TVA should address in their program plan
- 2. Meeting with TVA on 1/7/86 - NRR/IE/RII 1/1/1 o' the overall program plan (complete)
" paper chase" on 1/15/86.
(received 1/21/86)
- 5. TVA to provide staff with TVA definition of populations for reinspection with justifications on (2/21/86 est.)
E3-12
WATTS RAR Resources (Man Weeks)
Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 6. NRC staff prepares and meets with NRR/IE/RII 6/1/1
. NRC consultant team to review plan and supporting information on (2/28/86)
- 7. Meeting with TVA Welding Office NRR/IE/RII/BNL 2/1/1 Pro,iect on 3/7/86 to discuss staff comments on program plan details and population definitions. NRC consultant team to attend.
- 8. NRC consultant field trips in 2 NRR/IE/RII/BNL 4/2/2 to 3 groups, accompanied by NRC staff (3/1/86 to 4/30/86).
- 9. TVA to complete welding program TVA implementation audit, physical reinspection of welds in accordance with staff approved plans, engineering evaluations of defects found, and to determine the scope of additional reinspection, if necessary (2/24/86 to 5/23/861
(5/23/86)
- 11. Inspect deficiency resolution. RI! 3/3/3
- 12. TVA to issue final report two TVA weeks after final reinspection, if no deficiencies identified and agreed to by NRC (estimated by 6/6/86).
- 13. NRC consultants to complete NRR/9NL 4/2/2 review of TVA's final report 3 weeks after receipt of report.
(6/27/86)
Note: Contractor resources expected to be approximatpiv $300,000 for this effort.
E3-13 w
a A.
i s-: *---!:.-.s i
a s 8% -$
I E .......... d 8
- f 84
.Esf h m:s -g!*_
g f
= :
f.
i.
s s a esa b.h.
deu.
............ = ! .......... E. !s 3
u i a s i! in A
E4 wet
-Iws s ll(Ewn * .
) #
- I -
f
! k: U
- ! -3 i
- i
- . e n g a.
- 3 9 : :
O a f -
w a
C S
=* E.4 ~
3 .......... M g
s .g E f 3
- 1
- ,wff mus q. . = 3 9 a f .
- .i com .
EzA a
! ! . s* -
6 : : 3a -
!a
.i i
i
. .: s *6
==:
a :
su u i a.a6 .
~ -
sa a 3a i e.n gas .I A l 3 6 34n 8 6 3Lif u, .
W4 ! ii_IE 6-
, N*gx Is.:, j
- g i
- 8 s .a a
I. s.A e a Ir
- i
- ! I-4 -
- iis!4 gA 3
- i. n'w'!f. -
l l .
w-&. ~..= .
n a it ja -E!$
W-
.k E3-14 3i l
4 .
?
WATTS BAR I ,
Sub,iect Area: Eouipment Qualification
-t 1. Problems with the Watts Bar EQ program are similar to those 3
sdiscussed on Sequoyah by Westec, Inc. TVA has indicated
% hat, upon comoletion of tha work being performed on Sequoyah's E0 program, the applicant will correct similar ,
problems with Watts Bar equipment qualification. ..
- 2. Problems uncovered by the Westec, Inc. review involve in-suffici'ent. documentation of oualification of equipment and possible lack of oualification of installed eouipment.
- 3. The magnitude of the problems with the Watts Bar E0 program has not yet been determined due to TVA's and NRC's attention to the Sequoyah issues.
Lead Responsibility: NRh,EICSB 'F.
t Rosa Major Thsks *: ,,
~
. 6'i Resources .;
'~
i (Man Weeks)
Item 7, ,
, Resconsibility NRR/IE/RII l
input (4/30/86) x
- 2. Review resolution of NRR/IE/RII 2/ /? \' '
applicable allegations, NSRS_ reports, and employee concerns for acceptability (4/30/86)
- 3. Conduct Onsite Inspections NRR/IE/RII 2/ /8 (4/1-30/86)
- 5. Audit documentation at TVA NRR/IE/RII' 1/ /2 Engineering Offices and re-view rodifications at Watts '
l Bar site (6/20/86)
- 6. Identify E0 employee NRR 2/0/0 concerns / allegations,etc.
l and evaluate as part of onsite inspections }
E3-15
?-
Resources (Man Weeks)
, Item Responsibility NRR/IE/RII
- 7. Write SER and complete in- NRR 2/2/4 spection report regarding acceptability of Watts Bar EQ for fuel loading (6/23/86)
- Notes:
a) :TVA must provide the following submittals to support NRR review:
- 1. Revised NUREG-0588 submittal (4/1/86)
LP . Verification that E0 work on Watts Bar is complete (4/16/86)
- 3. Final investigation reports of applicable employee concerns (4/16/861 b) $100,000 has been estinated for EQ contractor support 4
E3-16
s I EQUIP!1ENT QUALIFICATI0il s
'j i PERTChart- Project: E;8EVW.PJ 01-29-86 11:16 Revinen 5
+.
04 405 409 f pEQSulM!!TALl REVIEW SutM. SER INPUT fElSERCOMP. l TVA 0 .... ROSA 11 ..... ROSA 10 .... RCSA 0 04 04-02-86(0416-B6 04 17-96(04-30-86 3 06 q 86(0441-66{ -2346(06-23-96p
... l
... 4 L ... 407 410 4 402 13 CCF.R. ACTS. W IFY SYSTS. 6 l
LEV. INSP. PLAu TVA 16 ie4ei TVA 14 6 I 1E 21 C5-02-86(C5-23-86 C5-26-06(06-13-86 t 03-01-86(03 31 86 i til 666 i I til till 666 til 4 i
)
til fit til til 6 l
', til 40i 411- l
@ l ONSlit th5P. FINAL INSPS. !
- h JSTART EG IE 23 HlH tHt HH it ell H H ell e t H Hl4 H6H4 HHilllHit H 6 l
!_ ROSA
- 0 0441-B6(0541-66 06-16-8 6'06-23-26 l .;. , 03 3 -0 kB6(03-01-96p
_ !H H l f 6 til H t
_ t H6 IH I ty -
i Hi He 0 H 403 4
'- 0 E2EMPL.CChC. H
~ l $!N6H 21 6 9 H 03-01-86(03-31 4 6 6 l
'- - 6, 6 IS e I
i H I
"i H t 6 i c i 4 0 0 412 EQALLESSICOnc.
ROSA 21 63-01 4 6(03-31-86 l
+- +
.... flink) llH (Critical linkl p ifast) g (Critical tasH E3-17
WATTS BAR Sub.iect Area: TVA Oroanization
- 1. The Watts Bar specific review of TVA's site organization is required to be completed prior to licensing. Items to be reviewed include site specific organization, job de-scriptions, management personnel qualificatiens, personnel training, etc.
- 2. Chances made to TVA's mcnagement as a result of corporate concerns raised in the September 17, 1985 10 CFR 50.54(fl i letter will be reviewed on the Secuoyah docket, and shculd require little review effort on Watts Bar. J Lead Responsibility: NRR/F0B - L. Crocker Major Tasks *: NRR Resources Item Responsibility peviewer (Man Weeks)
- 1. Review changes made by S. White NRR/FOR Crocker 2 cnd Followup review of Corporate l changes made under Seouoyah Docket (3/24/86)
- 2. Review resolution of applicable NRR/F0B Crocker 1 allegations, NSRS reports, and employee concerns for accept-ability (partially complete 1 (3/31/86)
- 3. Complete Watts Bar specific NRR/FOR Crocker 1 review (4/7/86)
- 4. Write SER confirming accept- NRR/F0B Crocker 1 ability of organizational changes (4/14/86)
- 1. Final changes to Corporate Organization (initiated by S. Whitel (3/10/86)
- 2. Watts Bar specific FSAR/T.S. organization changes (3/10/86)
- 3. Final investigation reports of applicable employee concerns (3/7/86)
E3-18
O CORPORATE ACTIONS PERT Chart Project:CORPAC1 01-28-86 !! 37 Revisions M2 M4 CORP. REVIEW W8AR M6T.
CROCKER 11 66666 CROCKER 10
, 03-10-B6(03-24-86 03-25-B6(04-07-B6 lit ett ill 166 til til 01 405
'pCORP.CHAN6ES l CCRP. SER INPUT TVA 0 CRCCIER 5 03 04-08-86(04-14 86 3 10-86(03-10-86 .....
403 ......
CORP. EMPL.' CONC CROCFER 15
_ 03-11-86(03-31-86 s.
, E3-19
.... (Link) 6666 (Critical link) g (faski g (Critical taski
WATTS BAR Subject Area: Other License Items and Technical Soecification Issues
- 1. There are approximately 20 open issues / Technical Specifi-cations for which a final SER has not been written.
- 2. There are approximately 50 open/ confirmatory issues for which an SER has been written but never issued. These SERs are not to be issued until the staff has deternined the effect of the ERT program and allegations on these issues.
- 3. FSAR Amendment 56 and the Technical Specification certifi-cation letter were received in late 1985. The impact of these documents on the FSAR/ Technical Specification review has not yet been determined.
- 4. Additional modifications to the FSAR and Technical Specifi-cations are expected as a result of the ERT prngram. The impact of these changes has not yat been deternired.
Lead Responsibility: NRR - T. Kenyon Major Tasks: Specifics assignments can be found in Attachment NRR Resources Item Responsibility (Man Weeksi
- 1. Complete review of remaining NRR 40 open/ confirmatory items (in-cluding FSAR 56) and write SEDs (3/14/86)-
- 2. Complete Peview of Technical NRR/F0B 8 Specifications (4/14/86)
- 3. Correlate and review all NSRS, NRR 10 TVA employee concerns, and other concerns and allegations with all completed open/ confirmatory items to assure technical review is complete, corrective actions are identified, and SER does/does not require updating. (6/13/86)*
4 Review additional FSAR amendments / NRR 20 Technical Specification changes, as appropriate (schedule to be determined upon receipt of changes) (estimate completion by 6/30/86) '
- Note: TVA must provide final investigation reports on employee concerns by 6/1/86.
E3-20
- Attachment i
i Page 1 E WATTS BAR STATUS OF CASEWORK l
i 01/06/86 DIVISION OF PWR LICENSING-A 4 R: view TVA nER SSER Subject Branch Reviewer
- input Received Issued Comunents EB/MES TBD Technical Specification Rec'd .CRGR approval rec'd; i Rothberg(F) re: PIV. leakage criteria new criteria to be incorporated into TS
, ER/MES TBD Inservice pump and valve 3/27/85 SSER 5' requires update
- Rothberg (F) test program 4/12/85 due to recent submittal 4/29/85
!O 10/3/85 1 h i " EB/MES Pulsipher Technical Specification Rec'd Filtration analysis (Chu) re: Annulus inleakage 2
EB/MES TBD MSLB (Inside containment) Rec'd SSER 5 requires update Palla (F) due to work by Duke Powe t EB/MTES Elliot Pressure / Temperature limits Rec'd Not req'd for F.L -
on Unit 2 Unit 1
- (F) designates fomer reviewer
Attachment s Page 2 WATTS BAR STATUS OF CASEWORK L 01/06/86 DIVISION OF PWR LICENSING-A Review TVA SSER SSER
- Branch Reviewer
- Subject Input Received. Issued Comunents 4
RSB Jensen a) Natural Circulation TBD Awaiting input from tests TVA; not req'd for licensing b) Charging pump flow TBD ~12/13/85 submittal w/ mini flow valves open under review; telecon needed 9 c) Uncontrolled rod with- TBD 12/13/85 submittal y .drawal w/ pumps operating under review; telcon and breakers closed needed PSB TBD MSLB outside containment TBD Awaiting info from i
Hearn (F) TVA Fire Protection PSB West Rec'd Need final concurrence Kubicki (F) re: deletion of NFPA paragraph 1
~
- (F) designates former reviewer
Attachment Page 3 WATTS BAR' STATUS OF CASEWORK E
01/06/86 DIVISION OF PWR LICENSING-A Rzview TVA SSER SSER Branch Reviewer
- Subiect Input Received Issued Comments E!CSB Gill (?). a) Tech Specs re:
Knox (F) 1)- Inverter connnected Rec'd 12/13/85 submittal to emergency power under review supply
- 2) MOV Thermal Overload Rec'd 12/13/85 submittal under review b) 5th Diesel Generators Rec'd 12/16/85 submittal review under; TVA
[] has requested review p'.-ior to F.L.
g F0B Crocker. TVA reorganization TBD 11/1/85 submittal under review for Sequoyah. Awaiting Watts Bar specific submittal.
- (F) designates former reviewer and/or branch
m Attachment Page 4 WATTS BAR STATUS OF CASEWORK
.c 01/06/86 DIVISION OF PWR LICENSING-A Review TVA SSER SSER Branch Reviewer
- Subject Input Received Issued Comments EQB_(F) LaGrange (F) Equipment Qualification TBD a) Awaiting con-Garg (F) firmation that certain equipment has been replaced prior to F. L.
b) TVA to revise EQ i m submittal; audit i may be required Sf prior to F.L.
EQB (F) Bagchi (F) Seismic EQ TBD 4/30/85 submittal under review; awaiting i info from TVA I
i
- (F) designates former reviewer and/or branch
l 1
i' Attachment Page 5 WATTS BAR STATUS OF CASEWORK E
- 01/06/86 ,
DIVISION OF SAFETY REVIEW & OVERSIGHT R: view TVA SSER SSER Branch Reviewer * -Subject Input Received Issued Comments l
RRAB TBD PORY ! solation System Rec'd Awaiting concurrence (II.K.3.1 & II.K.3.2) w/SER MISCELLANEOUS C3 EB/PWR-B Rajan IDVP Rec'd Rec'd Awaiting input frne k EICSB/BWR Trehan Rec'd RII
"' EICSB/PWR-A Gill Rec'd RII Weise TBD RII Blake TBD NOTES: 1) FSAR AMENDMENT 56 SUBMITTED 11/27/85; new items / concerns may be raised
- 2) T.S. CERTIFICATION LETTER SUBMITTED 12/13/85; new items / concerns may be raised i
I
Attachment Page 6 WATTS BAR STATUS OF CASEWORK r.
01/06/86 0FFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT
. Review TVA SSER SSER Branch Reviewer
- Sub,iect Input Received Issued Consnents DQASIP/QAB Spraul Changes to QA program due 11/1/85, TBD Submittal under review to TVA reorganization 11/27/85 12/27/85 DEPER/EPB - Gaitaints Emergency Planning Rec'd Generic plan under review; FEMA report requires incorporation i into SER C
.; g
Attachment Page 7 WATTS BAR STATUS OF CASEWORK 01/06/86 0FFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY.8 SAFEGUARDS R: view TVA SSER SSER Branch Reviewer
- Subject Input Received Issued Consnents DFCMS/UFLB TBD Tech Specs re: Criticality Rec'd Submittal under review Monitor Exemption DS/PRSLB - Gaskin Physical Security Plan TBD TVA to augment system, input from TVA not scheduled C
b
Attachment WATTS BAR STATUS SSER 5 ITEMS Staff review of the following items is complete and a final SER has been written for each item. The SERs will not be issued until the NRC staff has determined the effect of TVA employee concerns on these issues.
Subject Section Upgrading ERCW system to seismic Category I 3. 2.1 ~
Seismic classification of structures, systems, and 3.2.1 components important to safety Flow measurement uncertainties 4.4
-ICCI 4.478 Installation of RHR flow alarm 5.4.3
, Installation of RCS vent system 5.4.5
-Ice condenser ice weight 6.2.1 Installation of containment pressure monitors 6.2.1 i
Installation of containment water level monitor 6.2.1 Modifications to chemical feedlines 6.2.4 Containment isolation valve designation . 6.2.4 ,
' Containment purge / vent valve operability (II.E.4.2) 6.2.4, Apps. I, J, and K Insta11at4cn of containment hydrogen monitor 6.2.5 Cegraded core H2 6.2.5, App. C Leakage bypass system 6.2.6 ECCS system (SER corrections) 6.3.2 Chlorine detector 6.4 Filter efficiencies (R8PVs) 6.5.1.3-Installation of acoustic monitors 7.8.1 Power systems concerns 8 E3-28
Attechment Subject Section Relocation of component cooling booster pumps 9.2.2 i
. Performance testing of communications system 9.5.2 l D/G reliability (NUREG/CR-0660) 9.5.4.1 Quality classification of D/G auxiliary 9.5.4.1 system piping and components Missile protection modifications for diesel generator 9.5.4.2 vent lines 0/G fuel oil storage and transfer system 9.5.4.2 Temperature alarm for D/G room 9.5.5 D/G crankcase explosion 9.3. 7 Turbine overspeed protection 10.2 Turbine bypass valve 10.4.4 H2 /02 monitoring system 11.3' II.F.1 11.7.1 Primary Coolant Outside Containment 11.7.2 Health physics program 12.6 Installation of high-range in-containment monitor 12.7.2 Initial test program 14 Noncrit,ical systems test program 14 Leakage bypass system 15.4.1 Technical Specification issues 16 Control room design 18 I.C.7 13.5.2 Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737 13.5.2 E3-29
LICENSIt1G ITEMS PERT Chart Project: LICITMS.PJ
'01-29-86 11:21 Fevision: 4
+
403 OPENliEMS NRR 29 02-03-86(03-14-86 01 402 404 406 400 START LIC ITEMS b~ASSN. REVIEWS TECH. SPECS. FINAL LIC ITEMS SER INFUT FENYON 0 6664 KENYON 5 ..... NRR/F0B 50 ..... KENYON !! 16666 KENYON 13 01-24-96 01-30-B6 02-03-86(04-14-B6 06-14-86(06-30-96 07-01-86(07-19-96
.}01-24-86(01-24-86p f- too e,i e
e
~
144 4 5 407 FINAL INVET RPT b CORREL. LIC ITMS TVA 0 tHe KENYON 10 06 06-01-86(06-13-86 3 86(06-01-86p r
. E3-30 ,
.... (Link) litt (Critical linkl n (Task) g (Critical task)
I
WATTS BAR Sub,iect Area: Wronadnina, intimidation and Harassment Issues To Be Provided by 01 E3-31
WATTS 8AR Sub.iect Area: Operational Readiness To Be Provided by Region II E3-32
I Enclosure 4 BROWNS FERRY ISSUE
SUMMARY
Review Issue Responsibility
- 1. Site Management Organization .NRR(Crocker)
'2. Operational Readiness Program RII(Cantrell)
- 3. Maintenance Improvement Program RII(Debs)
- 4. Site Master Schedule No Specific Action
- 5. Integrated Schedule for NRC Required Modifications NRR(Clark)
- 6. Seismic Issues RII(Blake) 6a. Seismic Oualification of Cable Trays RII(Blake) 6b. Piping and Supports RII (Blake)
Sc. .HVAC RII (Blake) 6d. " Torus Piping NRR (Liaw)
- 7. Design Control IE (Spessard)
- 8. Disposition of Contractor Recommendations NRR(Clark) i
- 9. . Environmental Qualification Program IE (Zech)
- 10. Independent Safety Engineering Group NRR(Crocker)
- 11. Fire Protection Program NRR(Hulman) l
'12. Shift Staffing NRR(Vassallo)
- 13. Employee Concerns Program NRR(Singh)
- 14. Emergency Response Capability RII (Decker)
- 15. Pipe Inspection / Stress Relieving / Repairs NRR (Liaw)
E4 -1
~
. s' 2
BROWNS FERRY ISSUE
SUMMARY
CONT'D.
Review Responsibility Issue
- 16. Appendix J Program NRR (Hulman)
- 17. Secondary Containment Isolation Damper = RII (Cantrell)
- 18. Diesel Generators RII (Cantrell)
- 19. Regulatory Performance Improvement Program RII (Cantrell)
- 20. Operator Reexamination RII (Wilson)
- 21. Quality Assurance Program RII(Be11sle)
- 23. NSRS Reports NRR(Singh)
- 24. Licensing Issues NRR (Grotenhuis)
,- Unit 2 Reload / Modification Amendment NRR Appendix R Exemption NRR Appendix J Exemption NRR
.- Amendment on Organizational Changes HRR Pipe Inspections (GL 84-11) NRR RHR Crossties Amendment NRR RETS Amendment NRR ,
PASS NRR/RII
- NDT Nrve111ance Specimens NRR ATWS Rule Modifications NRR E4 -2
~
s.
3 BRDWNS FERRY ISSUE
SUMMARY
CONT'D.
+ Review Issue Responsibility SPDS NRR DCRDR NRR
' Appendix R Fire Hazards Analysis NRR Amendment on Smoke Detectors NRR
- Inservice Pump and Valve Test Program NRR/RII ECCS Logic Test Interval Amendment NRR
- Clarification of Tech. Specs. NRR -
- 25. Limitorque Valve Motor Opertor Inspections RII (Debs)
- 26. Restart Test and Inspection Program RII (Cantrell)
- 27. ) Modified Design Review RII (Blake) i
\
o I
1 E?-3
___ - . . _ . . - - _ . , _ = _ - - , . _ . - - - - - _ - . . _ - . - _ _ - . . . _ . _ . . . - _ . - - -
ENCLOSURE 5 1
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT SITE SIGNIFICANT ACTI.VITIES FOR PERIOD ENDING 2/7/86 I
The following significant activities are scheduled to start or inish .
during the next two weeks. They are not listed in order of significance. i n
Unit 2 ?
l
- 1. Removal of last identified cable sample for environmental ' '
quellfication testing - pending 3C diesel outage. All other cable samples have been removed. -
- 2. Environmental qualification-related maintenance and modification work on identified limitorque valve continuing (59 valves /
0 completed).
- 3. Finish piping and electrical modifications on scram discharge
~
-;, Instrument volume. '
- 4. Start work associated with Installation of the high-density fuel storage racks in units 2 and 3.
- 5. Finish replacement of "C" SRM dry tubs.
.: 6. Start major reactor water cleanup system outage.
- 7. Finish storad cable reels inspections for acceptablIity.
- 8. Start Section XI valve Internals inspections. .
- 9. R'esolve minimum bend radius requirements for condult.
Ofber items, I. INPO annual site evaluation team here for two weeks beginning January 20, 1986. Exit schedule is for January 31. 1986.
. 2. Site will continue reorganization. task force reviews with the Site Olrector.
- 3. Hiscellaneous licensing issues meeting on January 30, 1986, with NRC in Bethesda, Maryland.
- 4. Procedura review for modification-related work:
Oraf t of NQAM changes that affect. modifications reviewed and forwarded to Chattanooga, t
- 5. The procedures upgrade program will start on Monday, January 27, 1986.
JDl: Kell 1/24/86 0534h ES-1
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT I HAJOR ACTIVITIES &
JANUARY 27-FEBRUARY 9, 1986 '
Cable Pulling Cable pulling was released on 1/23/86.
Instrumentation Tubing rework has begun on unit 1.
Intake Pumping Station Continuing work on ERCH and HPFP pumps Rotopeening Rotopeening is continuing on unit 2 steam generators. Eddy current testing to begin on all four steam generator hotlegs on unit
_ 1.
. Reactor Coolant Pumps Continuing repair / modification to all 4 RCP motors Stone.& Webster Evaluation Evaluation continues of current design control problems to scope / define any needed actions to achieve licensability 3=
Environmental Qualification Continuing activities stallar to SQN. Fleid verification of exact location for all equipment in harsh environment will continue (including cables). Continuing installation of Raychen cable splices. Scheduled to replace cables with excessive voltage drop-Main feedwater Modification Installation of motor-operated Isolation
, y valves on main feedwater headers i
1 ES-2
- - . , - - . - , . . . . - . - - - . , , . , , . , - , - . . - , , - -e
HAfiS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 SAFETY-RELATED NORX JANUARY 27 THROUGH TEBRUARY 7, 1986 I
Engineering Deslan #
Hangers and Civil Zero Period Acceleration (ZPA) Analysis of Piping System
, Rigorous. Analyses (Hinlaal)
Lateral Seismic Load Analysis on C4t. I L Supports HVAC Duct Analysis Criteria Support Design Review of Pipe Support Designs for Stability of Pin Connected Components Electrical various Electrical Studies, i.e., Undervoltage and Degraded Voltage Penetration Short Circuit 9- -
Incore Thermocouple Upgrade Reg. Culde 1.97 Electrical Task Force (Application of Instrumentation "tessons Learned")
Environmental Qualification
' . Radiation Calculations Operating Times and Category of Equipment '
Identification of items To 8e Quallfled (WBEL)
(( Verifying Adequacy of Documentation Miscellaneous Resolution of Employee Concerns hCRs (CAQs)
Equipment Seal Qualification (Ice Condensers)
~
ERCH Pumping Station Problems
, Resolution of Q-List items Helding Review Project CONSTRUCTION Hangers Hanger Installation On Various. Piping Systems in the R8, A8, and TB Electrical Equipment installation on Systems To Support Near-Term Transfers Side Wall Pressure Calculations In Support of Cable Pulling Taking Cable Samples In Support of OE Making Inventory of All Gnsite Cable for Environmental Qualification Recalculation of. Values To Support Cable Pulling Oue to Revised OE Information ES-3
. I Nechanical System Hydrostatic Testing of Chemical Volume Ct t. System a Rotopeening of Unit 2 Steam Generator By Westinghouse 5 Instrumen ta tion Investigation and Correction of Employee Concerns As Related to Unit 2
- lastallation Scaling and Inspection Procedure Review and Rewrite instrument Welding In Support of Hanger Installation Reviewing Historical files and Maintaining Melding Update Program Startup Testing and Coordination
- Coordinating Preventive Maintenance Program Investigating Work Release Audit Deviation
- . Training CEO, H58; and H00 on As-Constructed Drawings
. Conducting H3C-912 Halkdown
~
0534h' JDZ:KEH 1/24/86 -
N m
9 e
e E5-4 i
~
l 1
- - ._ . . . - - _ , . . . . . - _ , . _ _ _ _ _ s-. . _ _ _ - . _ - _ _ . __ , . , , -
BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT &
ACTIVITIES '
January 26 - February 9. 1986
- l. Nuclear Operations:
equipmen t. working on r.alntenance and long-term preservation of
- 2. Design: a) compling safety related data to perform cable sidewall pressure calculations.
3~.
b) performing piping enalysis and hanger design, and c) working ECNs.
- 3. Cons truc tion: a) pulling safety related cables and performing sidewall pressure calculations, b) installing safety related hangers,
_r c) working on safety related HVAC systems in control and auxiliary buildings, and d) working on fire protection System in auxiliary and turbine buildings.
0634h r
~ !
. l ES-5 1
S 180L/O Yst// A/JCLfAk (f.8A)T-Week of January 27, 1980 ENPLOYEE CONCERNS
[
_S.iPe Specific All information safety related. based on current status, 200 total concerns - 124 Approximately 40 required for starcup.
Reports on 10 o( 40 concerns issued and' reeviveel onsite with 3 reports havlng 6 PI recommendations.
Approxleately 6 new concerns not yet evaluated for factoring into progree.
~'
Expecting reports on 25/40 concerns t.n he issued by I/31/86.
- Generte Prorrag - 30 total lasues.
30/30 issues preparation. have been evaluated and reports arc in finat j{ 3 reports are tied to site specific concerns. !
7 reports have 15 recommendations.
for rastste. I recommendation is required Working on recommendations.
20 pro jec r.
Sinder work continJing - roleasing approximarcly 6, making 7t/95 released at end of week.
Evaluacing to date. 4 SCR4 for inciusion into EQ program. 51 have been issued Rockbestos personnel willcable resting--Cc.b to has complet.ed aging poction--EQP inspect 1/24/86 and evatunte results. Info will be forwarded to MAC week of t /27/86 1/25/86 for approximately 2 weeks. LOCA chamber testing will start gelding Program NRC inspection exit 1/24/36 Phase 2 part 2 is ongoing. We are inspecting approximately 600 c.o 1,000 welds wh(ch include both piping and structural wa tas. Will be complace required. approximately 1/31/34 provided co additional inspections arc The Phase I report will be submitted i.o NRC by 1/2'> /66.
E5-6 e
v A
2
\
Desinn Control Survey Tha 1/24/86 and has resulted in approxieestcly 20 of,ucevations andse technical issues.
These aro under rnview for determination of whar.
actions will coinplace by ?be required for stattup. This ovaluat Lon 'till be
/31/86.
ovaluations will be completeResolut. ion of all issues by 2/s5/86, t/SQu 1/31/86.
yndervolteno Celeular. ion
.r Calculation e f forts completed 1/22/86. 3.SCtts have been issued as a result of the calculations. The SCR4 will remutt in additional cable pulls, tosting, and calcularlons. One SCR has ber.n evaluated for reportability .and determined not reportable.
%e t.wo additional SCRs should be evaluated next week in the da tined SCll process.
. A TVA/NRC telecon is scheduled for i/27/86.
_-- _0 pen NSRs Reporte Sequoyah has eiraluated all NSRS reports excluding pc.rsonno t concerns and has identified one eetion r.har should be taken prior r.o searcup.
The NSRS has been requested to perform an evaluarion of .all reports, responsea, and open teems and identify a t 1 iresis resquired for starto >.
Tliis informiar. ion will be forwarded to NRC when N:;RS completes their review.
t
+
HR Backlop Review As-indleaced in the TVA Nuctoar Performance Plan, a reviraw of .
- outstanding MRs will be completed prior t.o startup. Wie review will make sure no unworked items wiH degrade eqstipotenr. or oporar. ion.
ThcTe has been one review already conducted, hur hrs aru continually l
being added and coinpleted and a final seview prior t.o startup is sr.ill plannod.
l l
ES-7 l
g _ _
J 4
I
.t Week o[ February 3, 1986 e
r Xmployee Concerns I
Site Boecifie /
Expecting to issue all reports on all concernt required for startup by 2/13/86 y .
Investigations and report preparat ion ony,oing.
Generie Prenram Working recommendations.
I~ '
EQ Proicet !
- Sinder work continuing, releasing approximately 8 making 79/95 reloosed at and of week.
All identlfied binders scheduled to be complete 2/25/S6.
e
,= All (dentified onsite modific.itions due to EQ Progrum are schedulnd to be completed by 2/37/96. Ibtorial receipt problems may de lay. -
All identilicd QMDS work sehcduled to be completc by 2/17/86.
Rockbestos Cable--LOCA approximately 2/7/86 chamber f.esting continuing. Shou til complete dB Welding Program Bechtet will compter.e final written report on phase 2 independent
~
audit approximately 2/3/86 By approximately 2/15/86, we will hava all audit and.inspeerion activities complete and in evaluation by the welding pro.iect.
Besian Control _ Survey Evaluating . .. resolving all finJinas.
Undervolteve Calculations Additional calculstions, resting, and SCit evaluations concinuing as needed. "
E5-8
. , , , , _ . . , - . , - , , . . , . - - - - - - - - -. , -. -