ML20137P922

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Encl Memo to TE Murley Re GI 82, Beyond Design Basis Accidents in Sfps, Has Been Resolved & Requires No Backfit
ML20137P922
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/24/1989
From: Beckjord E
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
To: Stello V
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML20137P926 List:
References
REF-GTECI-082, REF-GTECI-NI, RTR-NUREG-0933, RTR-NUREG-933, TASK-082, TASK-82, TASK-OR 1199, NUDOCS 9704100053
Download: ML20137P922 (1)


Text

_ . . ._ _ _ . -

  • k f&$W f

t>A MEG y h, UNITED STATES y 7, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

$?

.,...# APR 2 41989 P yQ MEMORANDUM FOR: Victor StcIlo, Jr.

Executive Director for Operations FROM: Eric S. Beckjord, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

SUBJECT:

RESOIMrION OF GENERIC ISSUE 82,"BEYOND DESIGN HASIS ACCIDENTS IN SPENT FUEL POOLS" As stated in the enclosed memorandum to Dr. Murley, the subject generic issue has been resolved and requires no backfit.

Based on the Regulatory Analysis (NUREG-1353) and its supporting documentation, we conclude that no cost-effective alternatives exist which, if implemented, would result in a i substantial safety improvement. Hence, Alternative Resolution No.1 "No Action,"is adopted as the appropriate resolution of the generic issue in accordance with the Backfit Rule,10 CFR Part 50.109(a)(3).

Althou ;h these studies conclude that most of the spent fuel pool risk derives from beyond design basis carthquakes, this risk is no greater than the risk from core damage accidents due to scismic events beyond the safe-shutdown carthquake. Therefore, reducing the risk from spent (O) v fuel pools due to events beyond the safe-shutdown carthquake would still leave a comparable risk due to core damage accidents. Because of the large mherent safety margins in the design and construction of the spent fuel pool, the recommendation for the approval of Alternative 1 -

"No Action"is reasonabic.

Resolution of this generic issue has been accomplished in accordance with the procedures contained in RES Office Letter No. 3, Revision 2," Procedures and Guidance for the Resolution of Generic Issues," dated March 27,1989. The ACRS has reviewed the Regulatory Analysis and its supporting documentation and concurs with our recommended resolution.

NUREG/CR-4982, NUREG/CR-5176 and NUREG/CR-5281 have been issued to provide a record of the technical findings on the safety significance of the subject issue, which is considered resolved. NUREG-1353 is in the process of being issued to complete the technical findings record. Generic Issue 82 will be removed from the hst of active generic issues, and the section of NUREG-0933 dealing with GI-82 will be revised accordingly.

. )

Eric S. Beckjord, Dir tor Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research 1

Enclosure:

Memorandum to T.E. Murley from E.S. Beckjord, dated April 24,1989 l a po:um;5us 100010 -

9704100053 090424 PDR NUREG 0933 C PDR y3