ML20137P647
| ML20137P647 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1995 |
| From: | Meyer G NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Landis K, Palla R NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137P228 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-485 NUDOCS 9704090291 | |
| Download: ML20137P647 (1) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- .6 s }{Y(GQM) ECO,2[/2.fdd.$& Ns6C From: Gler. . Meyer To:. KDL tlLP2 Date Friday, October 27, 1995 10:37 am Subjects. Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet).. ~ Taylor had a range of. technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed, to imply that FP&L had-performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required of. the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME. Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. -(I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) f Thanks. Glenn CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 1 l h O g 97949, I BINDEh6-485 PDR ~
.6 ? Frouts . Glen W. Mey (G )/ E~Od /2./.T M[d/ M 4/ To: KDL, RLP2 19}95 Date Friday, October 27, 10:37 am i
Subject:
Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet). Taylor had a range of technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed to imply that FP&L had performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required l of the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. (I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) Thanks. Glenn / CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 ff w w e-a. 6 A A 44,e a -{tiw-atc Clml /SME Valv4 - 0 % M uu14h. - % am, $4 do M Y CodL N T J ( e ~Q9()LlVWL ~)i Iu
m ) 1 From: Glen W. Meyer (G M)jEA() To: KDL, RLP2 d' ,/ClZ (( 4.y /f/44_., Date: Friday, October 27, 1995 10:37 am
Subject:
Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet). Taylor had a range of technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed to imply that FP&L had performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required of the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. (I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) Thanks. Glenn CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 1 b ' (, e n - d ',,,aA) pay,edb CL 'l00* / 6I 7 g,htt P t" og (n e a~7 L , s a a, g/s tw v pit ~>~ f pik9 r.: k b G 'n n L tsp h A ., m,_ , o e}}