ML20137P647

Requests That Brief Listing of Missed Opportunities Be Submitted Re Milhoan Presentation of St Lucie $50,000 Enforcement Discretion for Agreement to Taylor

ML20137P647
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	10/27/1995
From:	Meyer G NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To:	Landis K, Palla R NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20137P228	List: ML20137P226 ML20137P236 ML20137P391 ML20137P440 ML20137P509 ML20137P533 ML20137P565 ML20137P589 ML20137P595 ML20137P609 ML20137P624 ML20137P631 ML20137P647 ML20137P675 ML20137P686 ML20137P700 ML20137P714 ML20137P719
References
FOIA-96-485 NUDOCS 9704090291
Download: ML20137P647 (1)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- .6 s }{Y(GQM) ECO,2[/2.fdd.$& Ns6C From: Gler. . Meyer To:. KDL tlLP2 Date Friday, October 27, 1995 10:37 am Subjects. Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet).. ~ Taylor had a range of. technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed, to imply that FP&L had-performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required of. the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME. Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. -(I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) f Thanks. Glenn CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 1 l h O g 97949, I BINDEh6-485 PDR ~

.6 ? Frouts . Glen W. Mey (G )/ E~Od /2./.T M[d/ M 4/ To: KDL, RLP2 19}95 Date Friday, October 27, 10:37 am i

Subject:

Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet). Taylor had a range of technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed to imply that FP&L had performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required l of the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. (I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) Thanks. Glenn / CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 ff w w e-a. 6 A A 44,e a -{tiw-atc Clml /SME Valv4 - 0 % M uu14h. - % am, $4 do M Y CodL N T J ( e ~Q9()LlVWL ~)i Iu

m ) 1 From: Glen W. Meyer (G M)jEA() To: KDL, RLP2 d' ,/ClZ (( 4.y /f/44_., Date: Friday, October 27, 1995 10:37 am

Subject:

Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet). Taylor had a range of technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed to imply that FP&L had performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required of the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. (I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) Thanks. Glenn CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 1 b ' (, e n - d ',,,aA) pay,edb CL 'l00* / 6I 7 g,htt P t" og (n e a~7 L , s a a, g/s tw v pit ~>~ f pik9 r.: k b G 'n n L tsp h A ., m,_ , o e}}