ML20137P647

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests That Brief Listing of Missed Opportunities Be Submitted Re Milhoan Presentation of St Lucie $50,000 Enforcement Discretion for Agreement to Taylor
ML20137P647
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/27/1995
From: Meyer G
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Landis K, Palla R
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20137P228 List:
References
FOIA-96-485 NUDOCS 9704090291
Download: ML20137P647 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- .6 s From: Gler. . Meyer To: . KDL tlLP2 }{Y(GQM) ECO,2[/2.fdd.$& Ns6C Date Friday, October 27, 1995 10:37 am Subjects. Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr ~ Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet).. Taylor had a range of. technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed, to imply that FP&L had-performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required of . the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME. Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc.

     -(I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.)

f Thanks. Glenn CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 l l 1 l I I h l O g 97949, I BINDEh6-485 PDR - ~

                             .                             .6
   ?

Frouts . Glen W. Mey (G )/ E~Od To: Date KDL, RLP2 /2./.T Friday, October 27, 19}95 10:37 am M[d/ 4/M i

Subject:

Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for I agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet). Taylor had a range of technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed to imply that FP&L had ) performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required l of the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. (I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) Thanks. Glenn CC: EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 / w w e- a. ff 6 A A 44,e a

        -{tiw- atc Clml /SME Valv4 -

0

                                                       % - M    uu14h.
                                                            % am,
                                      $4              do M Y CodL N J              T

( __ e

     ~Q9()LlVWL ~)i         Iu

m .

                                                                           )

1 From: Glen W. Meyer (G M)jEA() To: KDL, RLP2 d' ,/ClZ (( 4.y /f/44_., Date: Friday, October 27, 1995 10:37 am

Subject:

Taylor's Questions on St Lucie Enf Discr Milhoan presented the St Lucie $50,000 enforcement discretion for agreement to Taylor this morning, but Taylor does not agree (yet). Taylor had a range of technical questions related to the " multiple missed opportunities", which seemed to imply that FP&L had performed the " reasonable" maintenance & testing expected / required of the facilities. Accordingly, for Milhoan to readdress the issue, we need a brief listing of the missed opportunities that provides enough detail to demonstrate the failures. Also, to address numerous Taylor questions, we need an explanation of the ASME Code background - applicability, testing, results, etc. (I'll be in this morning and Monday morning.) Thanks. Glenn CC: ' EWM, JEB2, BXU, LJW2 1 pay,edb b ' ,,,aA) CL 'l00* ,, (, e n - d/ 6I 7 og g,htt P t" (n e a~7 L ,saa, tw v pit ~>~ g/s pik9 f r.: k b G 'n n L tsp 1 l h ., m,_ ,o e A}}