ML20137L017
| ML20137L017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/1985 |
| From: | Wooldridge R TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC), WORSHAM, FORSYTHE, SAMPELS & WOOLRIDGE (FORMERLY |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#485-347 OL-2, NUDOCS 8512030340 | |
| Download: ML20137L017 (12) | |
Text
- gg a
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
[El.ATED CORRESPONDENCh NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DolMETED BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARbWC
'85 MV 29 P2 :40 In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-445 TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC 50i4467 Mc y,
50-445-2!~ "
50-446-2' '
(Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)
APPLICANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO CASE'S INTERROGATORIES RE: THE MAC REPORT AND ISS.UES RAISED BY THE M AC REPORT Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Sections 2.740b and 2.741, Applicants hereby provide their supplemental responses to CASE's Interrogatories in connection with the MAC Report and Issues Raised by the MAC Report dated June 24, 1985.
Applicants' supplemen^al responses are governed by the Memorandum and Order entitled " Memorandum (Motions Relating to the MAC Report)" dated July 22,1985, and by the Memorandum and Order entitled " Memorandum (Status of Pending Mctions)" dated October 29,1985.
1.
On page 2 of Applicants' 5/29/85 cover letter, it is stated that the MAC Report was discovered "in gathering data for a prudence audit being performed for TUEC," and other relevant details are given.
Provide the following regarding such prudence audit:
(d)
Provide the name (and organization and title) of each individual with each of the organizations p (c) preceding who is primarily or actively involved "in being audited" in such prudence audit.
Answer: As indicated in the response to 1.(c) in Appi: cants' submittal dated August 12,1985, the audit is being done solely for Texas Utilities Electric Company and only Texas Utilities Company subsidiaries are l
l By Agreement between Ms. Ellis and Mr. Horin, the time for filing additional supplemental responses is December 6,1985.
2 Language of Interrogatory modified per Board Memorandum of July 22,1985, described above.
8512030340 851127 PDR ADOCK 0b000445 SQg G
being audited. Company individuals who have a primary management role in the audit are identified in the response to Interrogatory 1.(f) which follows.
(f)
Who (name, organization, title) determined the purpose and scope of such audit?
If such individual (s) consulted with others, provide the name, organization, and title of each such person.
Include in your answer a brief discussion of how it was decided that such an audit was to be performed,- the scope of such audit, what role each individual played in making such decisions, etc. (i.e., how the whole process evolved).
Answer: After amendment's to PURA in the 1983 legislatue and the 1984 TUEC rate case, it became apparent to TUEC regulatory wrvices Vice Presidents Messrs. E. L. Watson and T. L. Baker that prudence would become an issue. Through senior management discussion, M. D.
Spence, President of TUGCO, and E. L. Watson determined that a Project Audit Team should be formed within TUGCO to assist in preparation and conduct of a prudence audit. A senior management group was formed to oversee the prudence audit. 'Ihis group presently consists of Messrs. M. D. Spence, T. L. Baker, W. G. Counsil, Executive V. P., R. L. Gary, Executive V. P., Joe B. George, V.
P., and R. A.
Wooidridge, Legal Counsel for TUEC. Mr. H. C. Schmidt, Manager of Nuclear Services, was appointed director of a Project Audit Team. The Project Audit Team, with assistance from Richard Metzler and Asso-ciates, a consulting firm, developed the general scope of the prudence audit.
A copy of the work specification will be made available for inspection.
(m) Which other audits, reports, analyses, etc., were reviewed or will be reviewed by prudence auditors in connection with the prudence audit?
Answer: Attached are two lists (List A and List B) of audits, reports, and analyses known to have been made available for review by the prudence auditors in connection with the prudence audit.
(s)
Provide copies of all documents (in the broad sense of the word, as defined en page 2, item 3, of this pleading) regarding your answer to items (a) through (r) preceding.
Include copies of all drafts of the prudence audit, as well as the final prudence audit itself.
I Answer: There have been no drafts of the prudence audit report, nor is there.a final prudence audit report at this time. The other documents referred to in previous answers, including those in List A, attached, will be made available to CASE for inspection and copying at a time mutually convenient to CASE and the undersigned counr,el for the Applicants at the offices of Texas Utilities Generating Company, 400 N. Olive Street, Dallas, Texas.
The docurr.ents identified in List B, attached, and described in answer to Interrogatory 1.(m) above, are believed by the Applicants to be outside of the scope of the " legitimate purposes" as described in the l __. __
Board's Memorandum and Order of July 22,1985 (at page 2). Consistent with sucn Order, it is Applicants' understanding that interrogatories are to be answered "to the extent that they relate to the circumstances leading to the discovery of the MAC Report, the extent to which Applicants' employees knew about that report,- the root causes for failing to divulge the report, and the possible existence of other reports that may not have been revealed in response to discovery requests."
The documents described in List B, in Applicants' view, do not relate to any of the matters which remain in issue in the licensing proceedings.
This material would be " relevant only to CASE's... appearance before the public utility commission"(see page 2, Board's Memorandum of July 22, 1985, as described above). Such being the case, Applicants do not believe it is appropriate to make these documents available for inspection and copying. Should CASE desire further explanation of the items on List B or question Applicants' position on this matter, the undersigned counsel for the Applicants is agreeable to consider this matter further with CASE at any reasonable time.
Respectfully submitted, 1
Nicholas S. Reynolds William A. Horin BISHOP, LIBERMAN, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 857-9800
~
Thomas G. Dignan, Jr.
R. K. Gad, III ROPES & GRAY 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 (617) 423-6100 l'
Roy P. Lessy, Jr.
l MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 872-5000 l
l Robert A. Wooldridge L
WORSHAM, FORSYTHE, SAMPELS
& WOOLDRIDGE 2001 Bryan Tower, Suite 3200 l
Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 979-3000 l
By l
Robert A. Wooldridge }/ X Counsel for Applicants s
i
! L.
AFFIDAVIT THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS Before me, the undersigned authority, a Notary Public in and for Dallas County, Texas, on this day personally appeared ROBERT A. WOOLDRIDGE, who, after being by me first duly sworn, upon his oath stated that he is attorney for Applicants, is authorized to reply to CASE's Interrogatories Re: The MAC Report and Issues Raised by the MAC Report on behalf of the Applicants, and further stated that, to the extent the supplemental responses to these Interrogatories refer to statements made by others, he has relied upon such stateme +~, and that he has no reason to believe that any of the statements are untrue an.nat insofar as the supplemental answers to Interrogatories refer to actions taken by him personally, said answers are true and correct.
c-
~
ROBERT A. WOOLDRIDGEf X
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me by the said ROBERT A.
l l
WOOLDRIDGE on this, the 27th day of November,1983.
M l
Notary IUsblic in and for Dallas County, Texas My Commission Expires:
l R- \\ -%%
_4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cotggrge Usuc BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
'85 NOV 29 P2:40 In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-4457F g 0; 3E,3, C
50-446"3Cn ifG A SE.e w TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL.
50-445-2
'*WICH 50-446-2 (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " Applicants' Supplemental Responses to CASE's Interrogatories Re: The MAC Report and Issues Raised by the MAC Report" in the above captioned matter were served upon the following persons by Federal Express (*) or by Express Mail (**) or by hand delivery (***) on the 27th day of November,1985.
Mr. Peter B. Bloch, Esq., Chairman
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom*
Dean, Division of Engineering, Architecture and Technology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 Elizabeth B. Johnson
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory P. O. Box X, Building 3500 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Dr. Walter H. Jordan
- 881 West Outer Drive Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 l
Mrs. Juanita Ellis**
President, C ASE 1426 South Polk Street Dallas, Texas 75224 Renea Hicks, Esq.*
Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 __
Nich::lis S. Rtynolds, Esq.*
William A. Horin, Esq.
Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Mr. W. G. Counsil***
Executive Vice President Texas Utilities Generating Company Skyway Tower,25th Floor 400 N. Olive Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Mr. Thomas G. Dignan, Jr.*
Mr. R. K. Gad, III Ropes & Gray 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Mr. Roy P. Lessy, Jr.*
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 Robert D. Martin **
Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Lanny A. Sinkin*
3022 Porter Street, N.W., #304 Washington, D.C. 20008 Chairman
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Mr. William L. Clements*
Docketing & Service Branch U.S. Nuclear Regu': tory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Stuart A. Treby, Esq.*
Office of the Executive Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Chairman
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
. Washington, D.C. 20535 Ms. Ellen Ginsberg, Esq.*
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1
4350 East / West Highway,i h Floor i
t Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
Billie Pirner Garde
- Citizens Clinic Director Government Accountability Project 1555 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Suite 202 Washington, D.C. 20036 Nancy Williams
- Cygna Energy Services, Inc.
101 CLlifornia Street Suite 1000 San Francisco, California 94111 David R. Pigot*
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 600 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94111 James E. Cummins*
Resident inspector Comanche Peak SES c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 38 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Herbert Grossman, Alternate Chairman
- Atomic Sefety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Anthony Roisman, Esq.*
Executive Director Trial Lawyers for Public Justice 2000 P. Street, N.W., Suite 611 Washington, D.C. 20036 Joseph Gallo, Esq.*
Isham, Lincoln & Beale 1120 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Suite 840 Washington, D.C. 20036
. q'
.m Robert A. Wooldridge
)
LIST A NUMBER 000UMENT DESCRIPTION 1
S & L REPORT: "SELF-INITIATED EVAL. OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF CPSES' 2
LO9 BIN REPORT: ' REVIEW 0F QA FROG. FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CPSES" 3
B&R MONTHLY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORTS 4
CPSES STATUS REFORTS S
SER AND AI.L SSERS 6
NUREG-0030, VOL. 1 NOS. 5-12: VOL. 2 NOS 1-3: VOL. 3 NOS 1-3: VOL. 5 NOS 1-4 7
GIBBS & HILL STATUS REPORTS 8-PSAR 9
QA SERVICES ENGINEER. STAFF REPORT ON FSAR COMPLIANCE VERIF. PROG. FOR VARIOUS SYSTEMS 10 SEPT. 18 LETTER FROM EISENHUT AND TRT REFORT 11 NRC INSPECTION REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS 12 TUGC0 QA AUDIT REPORT. QA AUDIT FILE TCP-101 13 TUGC0 QA AUDIT REPORT. 0A AUDIT FILE TCP-103 14 TUGC0 QA AUDIT RESPONSE EVALUATION. QA AUDIT FILE TOR-1 15 TUGC0 QA AUDIT RESPONSE FVALUATION, QA AUDIT FILE TCF-105 I6 COPYOFKAHLER/SPANGLER/KEELEYQCINSFECTORINTIMIDATIONREPORT 17 SPECIAL REVIEW TEM REFORT 10 SAMPLE GROUP AUDIT REPORTS 19 COMANCHE PEAK REVIEW TEAM REFORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 THI INVESTIGATION ENGINEERING COMMITTEE REPORT 21 REPORT FROM TECHNICAL S'JPPORT GROUP RE THI RELATED ITEMS 22 THE PROGRESS REPORTS
- 23 SECOND AND FOURTH QUARTER CA TREND REPORTS FOR 1981-1984 24 FSAR 25 FINAL REPORT--REVISED PROCEDURES FOR DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER 26 CPSES FSAR VERIF. ACTIVITIES STATION SERVICE WATER SYSTEM
SUMMARY
REFORT 27 PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REFOR,T FSAR COMMITMENTS 28 FSAR COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION STATION SERVICE WATER PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ASS. REPT.
29 PRELIMINARY SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REPORT FSAR COMPLIANCE OF SERVICE WATER SYSTEM 30 FSAR COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION PROG. STATION SERVICE WATER SYSTEM ASS. REPT.
31 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR SIR CA ACTIVITIES ON CPSES. MARCH 1979 32 QA SERVICES SURVEILLANCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT. FEB. 1934 33 SITE SURVEILLANCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT NOV. 1920 34 WEErLY AS-BUILT STATUS REPORT 35 BACIFIT AND CONDUIT SUPPORT STATUS 36 STATUS REPORT ASME DOCUMENTATION BACILOG 37 FSI SURVEILLANCE INTERIM STATUS REFORT 33 FIRST QUARTER 1931 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT 39 CORP. CONSULTING & DEVELOPMENT CO. REFORT RE EVALUATION OF NON-CONFORMING WELDS 40.
QA/0CSTAFFINGSHORTFALLSANALYSIS 41 BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB REPORT ON FROTECTIVE C0ATINGS 42 SOUTHERN ENGINEERING REPORT FOR TEX-LA AND BRAZ0S 43 COPY OF 1973 MAC REFORT ON CA 44 WESTINGH0USEPMSAUDIT(10-31) 45 EMERSON CONSULTANTS FINAL REPORT OF 4/79 & 00 SAMPLING STUDIES 46 SAMPLE OF QUANTITY ANALYSIS REFTS FOR 76. 73. 00. 02 AND 04 47 000 FILE CUST0DIAN QUARTERLY AUDIT REFORT 48 CYGNA IAP FINAL REPORT 49 SIT REPORT S0 INF0 RE TUGCa 0A AUDITS 51 MEH0S & ANALYSIS JUSTIFYING AUTOMATIC WELDING FROGRAM
l 52 SALP REF0RTS 53 TNE DRA'JINGS UFDATE ACTIVITIES REPORT 54 TRTREPORT9/04 55 TRTREPORT1/85 t
J
LIST B NUMBER DOCUMENTDESCRIPTION 1
CHASE ECONOMETRICS REPORT ON TU LONG TERM ECO ACTIVITY FORECAST SYSTEM 2
TASK FORCE ON ENERGY DEMAND AND ENERGY FORECASTING 3
URBAN ENERGY ASSESSMENT REPORT 4
TP&L FOR0ECASTING MODEL S
INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY FOR FORECASTING ELECTRIC SYSTEM ENERGY & DEMAND 6
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND STUDY 7
BUILDING ACTIVITY ANALYSIS TP&L AREA 3
TP&L SERVICE AREA ECONOMIC OUTLOOK 1930-1990 9
TP&L OPERATING COST AND !!!H ANALYSIS 10 METEOR 0 LOGICAL ASSOCIATION SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT TO TP&L 11 CPSES ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT 12 PRELIMINARY STUDY: NUCLEAR & LIGNITE PLANT ADDITIONS 1971-1976 13 TUSI ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATE FUELS 14 CPSES DEVELOPMENT--NUCLEAR VS FOSSIL UNITS, JUNE 1976 15 CPSES DEVELOPMENT--NUCLEAR VS FOSSIL UNITS, DEC. 1976 16 ECO ANALYSIS OF EST RATEPAYER IMPACT OF SALE OF PORTION OF CPSES TO TEX-LA 17 GIBBS & HILL PL ANT EVALUAT!0N STUDY (VOL.1.
SUMMARY
V0L. 2)
IS TUGC0 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM 19 MANAGEMENT
SUMMARY
" PLANNING FOR NUCLEAR POWER
- 20 LOBBIN REPT: ' EVAL. OF THE ORG. L PLANNING FOR S/U AND OPERATION OF CTSES*
21 IN-H0USE EVALUATION OF TUGC0 CORPORATE NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION (OPERATIONS) 22 REVIEW 0F TUGC0 CORPORATE NUCLEAR ORGANIZATION (OPERATIONS) 23 IN-HOUSE NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT STUDY 24 NUREG-0775. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR UNITS 1 & 2 25 NRC OUARTERLY REPORTS FROM 82. 83 AND 34 26 DELOITTE HASIINS & SELLS AUDITS FROM 1979.1934AND1985(FINANCIAL) 27 GILBERT /COMMONWEALTHORGANIZATIONSURVEYOFEDPOPERATIONS 23 REPORT OF TU COMPUTER STUDY TAST TEAM RE CPSES COMPUTER APPLICATIONS.
2?
REPORT OF TU FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS STUDY 30 TU SYSTEM DATA PROCESSING TASI FORCE STRATEGIC PLAN REPORT 31 REPORT RE STANDARDI7ATION OF TP&L, DP&L AND TESCO MATERIAL STOCK NUMBERING 32 COMPUTER SERVICES SURVEY AND REPORT FOR TU COMPANY SYSTEM 33 DP&L REPORT ON BUSINESS SYSTEMS PLANNING STUDY 34 TP&L REPORT ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS PLANNING STUDY 35 TV COMPANY SYSTEM COMP!!TER STUDY REPORT 36 DATA PROCESSING COORDINATING COMMITTEE REPORT 37 S. M. STOLLER REPORT TO TUSI ON EVALUATION OF FUEL BIDS
~3 IU ANNUAL REPORTS AND 10-K FORMS FOR 1971-1983
?
REPORT REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ANTITRUST REVIEW 10 INFORMATION FOR ANTITRUST REVIEW 0F OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION 41 PAPERS SUPPORTING Ai1ALYSIS OF EXXON RENEGOTIATION 22 MALYSIS OF NUEXC0 SWU SWAP PROPOSAL 43 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL FOR SALE OF EXCESS CONVERSION It ANALYSIS OF NEED FOR U308, 1931
- 5 ANALYSIS OF NEED FOR U308. 1933 to NiltEM FY 04 AGREEMENT ANALYSIS 47 90ASSESSMENTOFPROJ.MGNT. CONT.SYSTEMFORLARGECONSTRUCTIONPROJECTS(1979) 40 IUCS FEMECTED !?34 FXF:NDlIURES (SAMPLE PRINT 0VI)
- 9 NAC UFT::ARE TRADF6FF STUDY I
9 Gi!ES & HILL Sil!DY OF CONTAINMENT 9PTIONS St INTERNAL AUDIT REPORTS (FINANCIAL)
- 52 REPORT ON " EVALUATION OF LIGNITE UTILIZATION
- 53 -
WEEILY TRACXING REPORT 54 TERA CORP. STUDY, ' ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION COST REPORTING' 55
- SUM. REPTS: H. FUNCT. HYDRO: INTEG. LEAK RATE: C. HYDRO: ECCS TEST: ANNUNCIATOR 56 SAMPLE PRE 0P TEST PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT TRACKING REPORT 57 CPSESWORKSAMPLINGANALYSIS(SAMPLE) 53 CPSES WORK SAMPLING ANALYSIS--1984 YEAR-END SAMPLING REPORT 59 BUDGETVARIANCEREPORTSUMMARIESFROM3/77TO12/84 60 TUGC0 BUDGET VARIANCE REPORTS BY ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT FOR 12/80-12/34 61 YEAR ENDING COST COMPARISON REPORTS FROM 12-76 TO 12-84 62 SITEPROCUREMENTREPORTS2/77.3/77ANDMONTHLYFROM3/73TO7/03 63 CPDPURCHASEORDERSBYDATEANDAMOUNT 64 PNGBdYER'SREPORT 65 PNG EXPEDITING UPDATE REPORT 66 PNG BUYER'S
SUMMARY
REPORT 67 PMG WEEKLY BUYER'S
SUMMARY
REPORT 63 ANNUAL GPERATIONS QA STATUS REPORTS FROM 1980-1984 61 TUGC0STARTUP/TURNOVERSURVEILLANCEREPORTDSR-82-023ANDRELATEDDOCUMENTS 70 STATUS REPORT TO TU MANAGEMENT--0VERVIEW 0F PMCS
'71 BUDGET, PAY AND OVERTIME REPORT 72 THREEMILEISLANDCOSTANALYSISPREPAREDBYS.S00!ANANDATED5/6/85 73 GISBS&HILLCOPESREPORT1980(PAYROLL) 74 GIEBS&HILLCOPESREPORT1982(PAYR 0LL) 75 -
PMGEIPEDITING.PURCHASINGANDSUBCONTRACTSWEEKLYSTATUSREPORT2/15/05 76 QASTATUSREPORT31-09 SEPT.1931(OPERATIONS) 77 REPORT ' LIGNITE RESOURCES IN TEXAS
- BY KAISER. AYERS 1 LARRIE 73 TEXAS INTERCONNECTED SYSTEH INSTALLED RESERVE CRITERIA STUDY 79 COPY OF 1985 ECONOMETRIC FORECASTING MODEL REPORT 30 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ' LIGNITES OF THE TEXAS GULF C0ASTAL PLAINS' REPORT 81 TENRAC REPORT ON LIGNITE AVAILABILITY
- 32 J. T. B0YD LIGNITE REPORTS 83 WESTERN C0AL REPORT 84 BIG' BROWN LIGNITE CONSULTANTS REPORT 65 GERMANREPORTREGARDINGCROSSPITSPREADER 36 LIGNITEREPORT(1924) 87 LIGNITEREPORT(1947) 83 STUDIESRELATEDTOTUECRESERVEMARGIN(1971-1985) 39 THINSEAMLIGNITEMININGSTUDY(1975) 90
'NEASURING AND COMPARING INTERNAL AUDITING ACTIVITIES
- REPIS FROM 76, 78. 80 & 32 91 HISTOPY OF TP&L. 1940 92 TFLIL 1954 C0FFIN AWARD ENTRY 93 GILBERT MANAGEHFNT/ PRICE WATERHOUSE STUDY (1976) '
94 TUM00/TUGC0FUELAUDITBYE&WANDSWMININGANDFUELS(1935) 95 ANALYSIS OF RATES UNDER ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY SCENARIOS & FUEL ASSUMPTIONS 96 STONE & WEBSTER REPORT RE DEVELOPMENT OF A HIGH RELIABILITY CONDENSER 97 APPLIED DECISION ANALYSIS REPORT RE DENTING i
93 KWU CPSES SECONDARY SIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT 99 TV'S ANALYSIS OF KWU RECOMMENDATIONS RE CONDENSERS 100 GIBBS & HILL CONDENSER TUBE STUDY 101 REVIEW 0F CPSES UNIT 2 SECONDARY SIDE BY IWU 102 ESASCODESIGNREVIEW0FEXTRACTIONSTEAjfPIPING 103 (GENDA FOR TUSCO STUDY OF KWU RECONMENDATIONS ON CONDENSERS 10 IWU EXTRACTION STEAM PIPING REPORT 105 FIRST PMG REPORT 106 REPORTS ON SUSC0NTRACTOR ACTIVITIES USED PRIOR TO PM REPORT 107 SAMPLE COPIES OF 70. C0 AND 32 COPES REPORTS (PATRtLL)
- e 103.
PRELIMINARY TUSI PMCS SPECIFICATION PREPARED BY MAC AND TUSI TECHNICAL. SERVICES 109 STUDIEST0EVALUATEMAKEVS.'BUYPIPEFABRICATION 110 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY AUDITS BY TV INTERNAL AUDIT 111 ANALYSIS OF CPSES UNIT RATES 112 SAMPLE BUDGET VARIANCE REPORT 113 SPECIFICATIONS STATUS REPORT 114 FIRST/LASTDRAWINGANDSPECSTATUSREPORTATTACHEDTOG1HPROG.REPT.
-115 BALA_NCEOFPLANTDESIGNCRITERIA--PRELIMINARY (1972) 116 0FF-SITE POWER STUDY 117 CONTAINMENT STUDY 113 PLANT LAYOUT STUDY 119-TURBINE MISSLE CRITERIA 120 CIRCULATING WATER PIPE STUDY 121 SITE LAYOUT STUDY 122 PRODUCTION CONTROL REPORTS 123 COPIES OF NEGATIVE FLOAT REPORT 124 LIST AND SAMPLES OF REPORTS PREPARED BY PROCUREMENT 12S G4HDRAWINGSTATUSREPORT(1934) 126 MARCH 1084 COMPARISON OF CPSES REVENUE REQUIREMENTS & SAVINGS VS GAS & C0AL 127.
SAMPLE PMCS REPORTS 123 EXCERPTSFROMINTERNALAUDITREPTS(FINANCIAL / ACCOUNTING)RE.CPSES 129
- TUEC CPSES DELAY / CANCEL SCENARIOS:COMPARIS0N SUMMARIES PRESENT WORTH OF REVENUE RE0S.
130 GOV'S ENERGY ADVIS. COUNCIL TECH. REPT: POTENTIAL FOR ENERGY CONSERV. IN TX 131 TUCS LONG RANGE FUEL STUDY 1973-1979
'132:
FUEL REQUIREMENTS STUDY FOR DP&L. TESCO & TP&L 1971-1979 133 JOINT COMMITT. ON ATOMIC ENERGY REPT: UNDERSTANDING THE NATL ENERGY DILEMMA 134 BUREAU OF HINES, US DEPT OF INT. REPT: US ENERGY THROUGH THE YEAR 2000
-135
-LBJ SCHOOL REPT: ENERGY IN TEXAS V0L I--ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION 136 LBJ SCHOOL REPT: ENERGY IN TEXAS. V0L II--POLICY ALTERNATIVES 137 STONE & WEBSTER EVAL. OF SITES FOR POT. NUC. GEN. STATION FOR TUSI
-133 NUS STUDY
- PLANNING FOR NUCLEAR POUER' AND RELATED MATERIALS
. 139 TUS RELIABILITY EVALUATION OF 1980 NUCLEAR TURBINE GENERATOR BY GE 140 ENGINEERING WORT STATUS REPORTS 3
141 ANALYSIS OF CONVERTING LIFC TO AFC CONTRACT FOR UNIT 1, 1979 142 ECO ANAL GF BREAK-EVEN SALE PRICE OF NUCLEAR FUEL FOR 1985 SWU SALES 143
SUMMARY
OF ANALYSIS OF 1982 SYSTEM FUEL INC. DEAL 144
SUMMARY
OFINTERNALAUDITFINDINGS(CPONLY) 1983-84(FINANCIAL) 14S
SUMMARY
OFIMPACTOFINTERNALAUDITSRECPSES(FINANCIAL) 146-CPSES PAY & OVERTIME REPORTS 147 VARIANCE REPORTS TRACIING G1H BUDGET PERFORMANCE 143 FIRST AND SECOND INP0 NT0L EVALUATIONS OF CP 149 GIBBS&HILLAUDITREPORTS(INTERNALAUDIT--FINANCIAL) 6
-