ML20137J794

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Addl Info Re Response to Notice of Violation from Insp Repts 50-254/85-21 & 50-265/85-24 Concerning Alternative Grab Sampling Procedures Replacing Continuous Monitoring Required by Tech Specs
ML20137J794
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/1985
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8512030042
Download: ML20137J794 (2)


See also: IR 05000254/1985021

Text

(

_.

..

.

.-

Docket No. 50-254

Docket No. 50-265

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN:

Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2

RESPONSE TO INSPECTION REPORT

NOS. 50-254/85021 AND 50-265/85024

NRC DOCKET NOS. 50-254 AND 50-265

Reference (a):

Letter from W. D. Shafer to Cordell Reed dated July 31, 1985

(b):

Letter from D. L. Farrar to James Keppler dated August 27, 1985

Your response to the Notice of Violation associated with the inspection

conducted by Mr. L. J. Hueter on July 9-12, 1985, of activities at

Quad Cities Station does not appear to be adequate in that it fails to

address the underlying cause of the violation, namely, the continued reliance

on alternative grab sampling procedures in place of continuous monitoring

called for in the technical specifications.

The need for new monitors

meeting the sensitivity requirements of the new RETS technical specifications

beginning on December 19, 1984, was well known in advance of that date.

The intent of these authorized alternative measures is to allow continued

plant operation for a reasonable period of time while equipment is being

repaired / installed and returned to service.

However, your ongoing (nearly

a year) reliance on alternative measures, rather than expeditiously

~

Vok

O

1

G512030042 851127

PDR

ADOCK 05000254

G

PDR

.

.__

_ _ _ _ _

"

..

Commonwealtii Edison Company

2

NOV t, t 1985

establishing operability of the new monitors, appears to be an improper use

.of the technical specifications.

Therefore, please provide additional

response to address this concern, including a commitment date for operability

of the monitors.

Sincerely,

" Original signed by U.D. Shafer

W. D. Shafer, Chief'

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

cc:

D. L. Farrar, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

N. Kalivianakis, Plant Manager

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Phyllis Dunton, Attorney

General's Office, Environmental

Control Division

RIII

I

RI I

RII

'

l

H@uetar/jp

O[I r

g

,

Schumacher

Lane man

T

  1. [

11/20/85

t

-