ML20137H452

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-255/85-24 on 850930-1004 & Notice of Violation.Violations from Insp Rept 50-255/85-03 Remain as Issued.Requests Response to Violations Discussed in Confirmatory Action Ltr 85-15
ML20137H452
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/27/1985
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Dewitt R
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20137H456 List:
References
CAL-85-15, NUDOCS 8512020396
Download: ML20137H452 (2)


See also: IR 05000255/1985024

Text

..

- - ._ - .

---

- . .

- . - . - - -

- .

-.

h170

i

.

,.

NOV 2 71985

,

Docket No. 50-255

i

Consumers Power Company

'

ATTN: Mr. R. B. DeWitt

i

Vice President

i

Nuclear Operations

212 West Michigan Avenue

Jackson, MI 49201

i

Gentlemen:

,

This refers to the special safety inspection conducted by Messrs. A. L. Madison

and T. T&ylor on September 30 through October 4,1985, of activities at the

Palisades Nuclear Plant authorized by NRC Operating License No. OPR-20 and to

!

the discussion of our findings with Mr. J. Firlit and members of his staff at

]

the conclusion of the inspection.

The inspection was intended as a followup to the March 1985 Maintenance Team

Inspection (IR 255/85003(DRP)) to review your progress in addressing the issues

identified in that report and determine the need for additional measures. The

,

inspection covered a broad spectrum of maintenance related areas. Within these

areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and

.

representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel. Certain

'

a

of your activities appeared to be in violation of NRC requirements, as specified

'

in the enclosed Appendix. A written response is required.

{

Your response dated June 3,1985 to Inspection Report 255/85003(DRP) was

q

received by this office on June 5,1985 and was reviewed by my staff.

i

Although we did not provide you our position in writing regarding your

j

response, telephonic discussions between my staff and Mr. VandeWalle of your

staff between June 5 and August 6, 1985 confirmed our position that the

,

,

i

violations remained as issued. While we regret any miscommunication resulting

{

from the lack of a written documentation of our position regarding your

i

response, the corrective action you committed to in your June 3,1985 letter,

to be completed by September 30, 1985, should have prevented the violations

1

identified during this followup inspection.

,

'

!

While we recognize that improvements have been made in your control systems in

'

.

I

the maintenance area, we are concerned with the repeat violation in the area

'

of inadequate corrective actions and with the less than adequate progress in

i

reducing the number of outstanding maintenance work orders. To address these

concerns, we issued Confirmatory Action Letter CAL 85-15 detailing the

corrective actions you are taking.

,

,

We request that, in addition to responding to the specific violation set

!

forth in the Appendix, you describe the action you have in place or planned to

l

resolve the items addressed in the Confirmatory Action Letter, specifically

i

f

B512O20396 051127

!

PDR

ADOCK 000

S

i

s\\

. ! I". 0 f

. . _. . . . .

_ _ _ _ _.

_ __ _ _ __. _ _

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

__ _

_

,

'

O

NOV 2 7 1%5

-

Consumers Power Company

2

'

1

the concerns of trending and reduction of outstanding maintenance work

4

requests.

Include any milestones you have established to measure progress

,

i

and proposed completion dates.

We will closely follow your actions in this area, and we plan to conduct

i

additional followup inspections to review the effectiveness of your actions.

We have determined that escalated enforcement action is not appropriate at

j

this time; however, continued poor performance in this area may warrant such

action.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

J

this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC

1

Public Document Room.

i

l

The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are not

.

,^

subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budged as

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

!

Sincerely,

!

1

i

!

C. E. Norelius, Director

'

Division of Reactor Projects

i

Enclosures:

'

1. Appendix, Notice

of Violation

2. Inspection Report

'

No. 50-255/85024(DRP)

i

cc w/ enclosures.

,

j

Mr. Kenneth W. Berry, Director

j

Nuclear Licensing

ll

J. F. Firlit, General Manager

j

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

t

Resident Inspector, RIII

I

Ronald Callen, Michigan

Public Service Commission

,

Nuclear Facilities and

!

Environmental Monitoring

l

Section

i

!

RIII * r

RII

dIII

RIII

RII

t

l

dd(shnf; N

(wtsns

CRssotimos

Nore ius

i

11/21/85

W

4 af

.

i