ML20136H335
| ML20136H335 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/06/1985 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136H338 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-59702, NUDOCS 8508200270 | |
| Download: ML20136H335 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1985019
Text
e
'
.
'AUG 0 6 885
Docket No. 50-346
Toledo Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.
Vice President
Nuclear
Edison Plaza
300 Madison Avenue
Toledo, OH 43652
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. T. Ploski and
others of this office on July 15-18, 1985, of activities at the Davis-Besse
Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-3, and to
the discussion of our findings with you and others of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection.
However, several weaknesses were identified which will require corrective
action by your staff.
These weaknesses are summarized in the appendix to this
letter.
As required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that
are identified must be corrected.
Accordingly, please advise us within 45
days of the date of this letter of the corrective actions you have taken or
plan to take, showing the estimated dates of completion.
The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act, PL 95-115.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document
Room.
/
b'd b
ib
sensa smpDR..
G
-
-
-
-
. .
-
-
-
.
,
o
,
Toledo Edison Company
2
AUS 0 6 G85
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
f
V
W. D. Shafer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Exercise
Weaknesses
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-346/85019(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosure:
L. Storz, Plant Manager
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector RIII
HaroldW.Kohn,OhIoEPA
James W. Harris, State of Ohio
Robert H. Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
D. Matthews, EPB, OIE
W. Weaver, FEMA, RV
[
Ips
t
ll
g
08/02/85
ju ~
'
.
APPENDIX
EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
1.
Differences between offsite geographic subareas depicted on large scale
EPZ maps and those depicted in procedure AD 1827.12 contributed to the
failure to include all areas within about a two mile radius of the
station in the initial offsite protective action recommendation.
,
(346/85019-01)(Paragrpah 5.d)
2.
The failure to consult the station's EALs for applicability prior to
[
downgrading from a General Emergency and later from an Alert, plus the
'
incorrect procedural guidance that emergencies classified as at least
,
an Alert must be downgraded below the Unusual Event class before
commencing recovery activities, together resulted in inappropriate
!
emergency declassification. (346/85019-02) (Paragrpah 5.d)
!
l
ii
!
,
\\
r
f
L
!
r
i
I
,
I
l
!
l
!
.