ML20136H335

Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-346/85-19 on 850715-18.No Violation Noted.Weaknesses Requiring Corrective Actions Summarized in Encl App

ML20136H335
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/06/1985
From:	Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20136H338	List: IR 05000346/1985019 ML20136H335
References
TAC-59702, NUDOCS 8508200270
Download: ML20136H335 (3)

See also: IR 05000346/1985019

Text

e

'

.

'AUG 0 6 885

Docket No. 50-346

Toledo Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.

Vice President

Nuclear

Edison Plaza

300 Madison Avenue

Toledo, OH 43652

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. T. Ploski and

others of this office on July 15-18, 1985, of activities at the Davis-Besse

Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-3, and to

the discussion of our findings with you and others of your staff at the

conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this

inspection.

However, several weaknesses were identified which will require corrective

action by your staff. These weaknesses are summarized in the appendix to this

letter. As required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that

are identified must be corrected. Accordingly, please advise us within 45

days of the date of this letter of the corrective actions you have taken or

plan to take, showing the estimated dates of completion.

The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance

procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act, PL 95-115.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document

Room.

/

b'd b

ib

sensa

G

smpDR ..

,

,

o

Toledo Edison Company 2

AUS 0 6 G85

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

f V

W. D. Shafer, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

Enclosures:

1. Appendix, Exercise

Weaknesses

2. Inspection Report

No. 50-346/85019(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosure:

L. Storz, Plant Manager

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

Resident Inspector RIII

HaroldW.Kohn,OhIoEPA

James W. Harris, State of Ohio

Robert H. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

D. Matthews, EPB, OIE

W. Weaver, FEMA, RV

ll g [ Ips

t

08/02/85 ju ~

'

.

APPENDIX

EXERCISE WEAKNESSES

1. Differences between offsite geographic subareas depicted on large scale

EPZ maps and those depicted in procedure AD 1827.12 contributed to the

failure to include all areas within about a two mile radius of the

station in the initial offsite protective action recommendation. ,

(346/85019-01)(Paragrpah 5.d)

2. The failure to consult the station's EALs for applicability prior to [

'

downgrading from a General Emergency and later from an Alert, plus the

incorrect procedural guidance that emergencies classified as at least ,

an Alert must be downgraded below the Unusual Event class before

commencing recovery activities, together resulted in inappropriate  !

emergency declassification. (346/85019-02) (Paragrpah 5.d)  !

l

ii

!

,

\

r

f

L

!

r

i

I

,

I

l

!

l

!

.