ML20136E073
ML20136E073 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 15000005 |
Issue date: | 03/07/1997 |
From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20136D993 | List: |
References | |
15000005-96-01, 15000005-96-1, NUDOCS 9703130103 | |
Download: ML20136E073 (8) | |
See also: IR 015000005/1996001
Text
.
9
ENCLOSURE 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ;
'
REGION IV
Docket No.: 150-00005
License No.: 580-01 (Colorado)
Report' No.: '150-00005/96-01
Licensee: Western Colorado Testing, Inc.
Facility: Grand Junction, Colorado
Location: Grand Junction, Colorado
Dates: July 19,1996, through February 3,1997
Inspector: Jeffrey Cruz
Radiation Specialist l
Approved By: Linda L. Howell, Chief
Nuclear Materials inspection and
Feel Cycle / Decommissioning Branch
Attachment: Supplemental Inspection Information
9703130103 970307
PDR STPRC ESGCO
. - , ., . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
- . . . . ~ . . . - - - . - -- . . ~ , .. -,
$
-2-
,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
'
Grand Junction Office
NRC Inspection Report 150-00005/96-01
This special, unannounced inspection included a review of portable nuclear gauge activities
performed by Western Colorado Testing, Inc., (WCTI) a Colorado licensee, in Idaho and
Wyoming, both non-Agreement States. The inspection included a review of the
administrative aspects of the licensee's radiation safety program, including the filing of an
-
NRC Form 241, " Report of Proposed Activities in Non-Agreement States," and interviews
with licensee personnel.
Filino NRC Form-241. "Recort of Proposed Activities in Non-Aareement States"
The inspector identified an apparent violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(1) involving a
,
failure to file an NRC Form 241 prior to performing activities in non-Agreement
! States in 1995 and 1996 (Section 2).
J
j_ Trainina, Retrainina, and Instruction to Workers
f *
A violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(4) and Condition 12 of Colorado Radioactive
Material License 580-01 was identified involving a failure to ensure that radioactive
materials were used only by individuals who had successfully completed a training
'
course accepted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission or an Agreement
State. Two WCTl employees who conducted licensed activities in non-Agreement
'
States during calendar years 1995 and 1996 had not completed an accepted
training course (Section 3).
1
+
d
4
.
&
l
i
r!
.
.
- .. -- . - . . - - - - . . - . . - --,. . . -..-.-. . - -.-. - -
. ,t
'
3-
'
>
l
i
4
Report Detaik j
i
d
I
- 1 Organization and Scope of the Licensee Program (87100) j
i
+ l
4
Western Colorado Testing, Inc., (WCTI) holds a' radioactive material license l
(Colorado 580-01) issued by the state of Colorado which authorizes WCTI to
'
e perform work with portable nuclear gauges at temporary jobsite locations
i
throughout Colorado. WCTIis a family owned and operated business consisting of l
l - approximately 20 employees during the construction season and approximately
i- 10 employees during the winter months. WCTl possesses 13 nuclear gauges
- including Troxler Model 3400s, Troxler Model 3241s and Campbell Pacific Nuclear
[ MC series devices. At the time of the inspection, WCTI employed 10 individuals as -
gauge users who performed work on daily frequency. . The current radiation safety
"
i officer (RSO) for the company had held his position since December 1995 and also
L performed as a field test supervisor. The RSO's field dutier required that he spend
between one-third and two-thirds of his time at temporary jobsite locations.
}
l By letters dated June 20 and June 25,1996, WCTI submitted two NRC Form 241s
- to report proposed activities involving use of byproduct materialin the states of
i Idaho and Wyoming under the authority of a generallicense pursuant to
- _10 CFR 150.20. WCTI had previously filed an NRC Form 241 in both 1992 and
! 1993.
i
.2 Filing NRC Form 241, " Report of Proposed Activities in Non Agreement States"
'
l (87100)
I
j 2.1. Insoection Scoce
! The inspector's review of the administrative aspects of WCTI's activities in
.
i non-Agreement States included interviews with licensee personnel and a review of
, licensee records.
2.2 Observations and Findinas
On June 18,1996, an NRC inspector conducting routine inspections in Idaho Falls,
. Idaho, observed a WCTl vehicle parked at the Idaho Falls airport. The inspector
, made inquiries with individuals in the area as to the lccation of WCTI personnel and
j equipment, but was unable to make contact with any WCT1 employees. The
$
inspector was unable to confirm if licensed activities had been conducted by WCTI
at that location.
'
WCTI filed an NRC Form 241 dated June 20,1996, detailing work to be performed
4 November 1,1996. During a follow-up conversation with WCTI, NRC Region IV
j staff members were advised by WCTI's director of operations that the dates
.
A
.
"~a. - , ~ ~ . m . . -, , -- , -. -- -
,-
_ . . . . . _ . _ _ . ._ . . _
.
1
,
4
reflected on the Form 241 were nct accurate because a nuclear gauge had been
stored in Idaho possibly as early as February 1996 and had been used in Idaho on
May 21,1996. WCTI submitted a corrected Form 241 dated June 23,1996, to
address this inaccuracy.
A special, unannounced inspection was initiated on July 19,1996, to review
WCTl's ongoing activities in Idaho and Wyoming. During the inspection, the
inspector reviewed WCTI's nuclear gauge utilization logs and identified four entries
indicating that work had been performed in Idaho and Wyoming during 1995.
During subsequent interviews conducted on October 8-11,1996, both the company
president and a former RSO indicated that WCTl had performed licensed activities at
the Dixon, Wyoming, airport during the summer of 1995. The company president
also identified a period of time not recorded in the utilization logs, from ,
August 17-22,1995, during which a nuclear gauge had been stored, but not used, l
at the Rock Springs, Wyoming, airport. Licensee representativos also stated that it
was common practice for nuclear gauges used and stored at temporary jobsites
located in northern Colorado to be transported into Wyoming for one-day jobs.
WCTl's president indicated that he was aware of NRC requirements to file an NRC
Form 241 when working in non-Agreement States because he had served as the
RSO for the company prior to 1993, and he had previously filed the required '
,
documents in 1992 and 1993. The president indicated that after naming a new
RSO in 1993, he transferred the responsibility of filing NRC Form 241s to the new
RSO and believed that the RSO had taken care of filing the forms. Since no
problems were brought to his attention, the president had assumed that all of
WCTl's responsibilities were being met. The president indicated that he had
followed up with the RSO in regard to work scheduled at the Idaho National
Engineering Lab (INEL) and was advised by the RSO that filing a Form 241 was not
necessary for INEL projects due to a "high security exemption." It was both the
RSO and company president's belief that security issues at a Department of Energy
facility exempted WCTI from filing an NRC Form 241 for work performed at INEL.
When questioned about why WCTl had not filed an NRC Form 241 to report other
licensed activities performed in non-Agreement States in 1995, WCTl's president
had no explanation. The president stated that he believed that the RSO had taken
care of all regulatory requirements and he did not follow up to ensure that all
requirements had been met. WCTI's president also stated that he believed that it
was nothing more than " sloppiness and negligence" that prevented WCTI from filing
an NRC Form 241 in 1995. The president also indicated that WCTl probably would
not have filed a Form 241 in 1996 had an NRC inspector had not observed the
WCTI vehicle at the Idaho Falls airport.
A former employee who served as the RSO during 1994 and 1995 also stated that
he was aware of the requirements pertaining to an Agreement State licensees
conducting work in non-Agreement States. The former RSO recalled contacting the
NRC Region IV office regarding WCTI's work at INEL and based on that
conversation, it was his understanding that it was not necessary for WCTI to file an
-
.
<
-5-
NRC Form 241 for work at INEL WCTl also assumed that since INEL
representatives did not ask for this document, the Form 241 was not necessary.
The former RSO also indicated that WCTI may have worked at locations in Idaho
and Wyoming other than those listed in the utilization logs. The former RSO
indicated that gauges assigned to locations in northern Colorado may have been
used for work in Wyoming and that utilization logs may not have identified all
locations of work in Wyoming. He also stated that gauges were often removed
from, and returned to, the Grand Junction office without his knowledge.
The current RSO was also interviewed regarding WCTI's failure to submit a
Form 241 early in 1996. The current RSO noted that he had completed training
required to designate him as the RSO in December 1995 and assumed RSO duties
shortly thereafter. The RSO noted that it was at this course that he first became
familiar with NRC Form 241 requirements. The RSO stated that he should have
filed an NRC Form 241 to report proposed work activities for 1996, but he had
assumed that the former RSO had already done so and failed to look into it any
further.
10 CFR 150.20(b)(1) requires that any person engaging in activities in
non-Agreement States under the general license provided in 10 CFR 150.20 shall,
at least 3 days before engaging in each such activity, file four copies of NRC
Form 241 and four copies of an Agreement State specific license with the Regional
Administrator of the appropriate Regional office, unless that Regional Administrator
waives the requirement for filing additional forms during the remainder of the
calendar year following the receipt of the initial NRC Form 241. Failure to file an
NRC Form 241 in 1995 to notify the NRC of activities performed in Idaho and
Wyoming and to file an NRC Form 241 prior to conducting activities using
byproduct materialin Idaho Falls, Idaho, during calendar year 1996 was identified
, as an apparent violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(1)(150-00005/9601-01).
2.3 Conclusions
The inspector identified an apparent violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(1)ir:volving a
f ailure to file an NRC Form 241 to report proposed work prior to conducting.
activities using byproduct materialin non-Agreement States in 1995 and 1996.
3 Training, Retraining, and Instruction to Workers (87100)
3.1 Insoection Scopjt
This portion of the inspection included interviews with licensee personnel and a
review of licensee records.
i
r
-6-
Observations and Findinas
43.2:
in a letter to the NRC dated September 10,1996, WCTI identified five locations at
-which licensed activities had been conducted in non Agreement States during 1994,
1995 and 1996. This letter also identified the WCTI technicians who performed
work at the specified locations using portable nuclear gauges. The inspector
reviewed the training records for each of the employees listed in WCTl's letter and .j
. identified two technicians who had not completed a radiation safety / gauge user
course approved by the NRC or an Agreement State.
in 1994, WCTl submitted a license renewal application to the Colorado Radiation
Control Division. In its renewal application, WCTI requested that it be allowed to
provide "in-house" portable gauge and radiation safety training to meet the
requirements of Condition 12 of the Colorado license. Following a review of the
license application, the Colorado Radiation Control Division did not approve this
request. WCTI failed to recognize that the request had been denied and instituted a
nuclear gauge training program to qualify WCTI employees as radioactive material !
users. This in-house program consisted of lecture presentation and self-study of the
"Troxler Nuclear Gauge Safety Manual." WCTI employees were then required to
pass a 25 question, multiple choice examination prior to becoming qualified as
. gauge users.
A technician who conducted licensed activities in the state of Wyoming had been
qualified through completion of WCTI's training program. The technician had not
completed an accepted course prior to performing nuclear gauge activities in
Wyoming, a non-Agreernent State, on August 17-22,1995. A second technician
who worked at the Afton airport during June and July 1996 also did not complete a
training course approved by the NRC or an Agreement State. WCTl representatives
stated that because this individual had completed a bachelor's degree in engineering l
'
and was working on an advanced degree in Hazardous Waste Management, WCTI
decided to waive his radiation safety training requirements. WCTI also believed that
since the individual had previously received some basic radiation safety training
during indoctrination training at INEL, a waiver was justified. The technician did
receive training in the use of the nuclear gauge from WCTl prior to conducting
licensed activities.
.
10 CFR 150.20(b)(4) states that any person engaging in activities in non-Agreement
States under the general licenses provided in 10 CFR 150.20 shall comply with all
terms and conditions of the specific license issued by an Agreement State except
such terms or conditions as are contrary to the requirements of 10 CFR 150.20.
License Condition 12 of WCTl's Colorado Radioactive Material Licent.e requires that
radioactive materials be used only by individuals who have successfully completed a
'
training course in the safe use and handling of portable gauges which has been
accepted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission or an Agreement State. The
use of byproduct materialin portable nuclear gauging devices by individuals who
.
.
,
4
5
4
a
. . ._. . . - - _ . - . . . _ .- . . - -
,
.
3
7-
.
had not completed an accepted training course was identified as a violation of
10 CFR 150.20(b)(4)and License Condition 12(150-00005/9601-02).
3.3 Conclusions
The inspector identified a violation of 10 CFR 150.20(b)(4) and Condition 12 of
Colorado Radioactive Material License 580-01. The violation involved the failure to
ensure that radioactive materials were used only by individuals who had
successfully completed a training course in the safe use and handling of portable
gauges which has been accepted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission or an
Agreement State.
Exit Meeting Summary
Region IV staff presented the inspection results to licensee management via
telephone on February 3,1997. Licensee representatives acknowledged the
inspector's findings and confirmed that no proprietary information was reviewed
during the inspection.
- .- -- - .- -
i
i
ATTACHMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORM ATION
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED
Licensee
James R. Fife, Owner / President
David W. Fife, RSO
Shawna K. Lofquist, Director of Operations
Gary L. Hamacher, P.E., Senior Geotechnical Engineer / Technical Director
Armand Marquez, Laboratory Manager
Kyle Alpha, Laboratory Manager
Richard S. Bailey, Former RSO (no longer Employed by WCTI)
INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED
87100 Licensed Materials Programs
83822 Radiation Protection
86740 Inspection of Transportation Activities
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Ooened
150-00005/9601-01 APV Failure to file an NRC Form 241 to report proposed
work in non-Agreement States in 1995 and failure to
file an NRC Form 241 in 1996 prior to conducting
activities using a nuclear gauge in a non Agreement
State.
150-00005/9601-02 VIO Failure to ensure that radioactive materials were used
only by individuals who had successfully completed a
training course in the safe use and handling of portable
gauges accepted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission or an Agreement State
Closed
None
Discussed
None
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
APV Apparent Violation
INEL Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
RSO Radiation Safety Officer
VIO Violation
WCTI Western Colorado Testing, Inc. '