ML20136D243

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs of Actions Taken Re 851211 Notification That Six of Eight Personnel Failed 851112 Requalification Exams. Personnel Who Failed Removed from License Duties & Grading of All Requalification Exams Completed
ML20136D243
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 12/23/1985
From: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
LIC-85-576, NUDOCS 8601060097
Download: ML20136D243 (3)


Text

,

Omaha Public Power District h h i U []Q/j 7f f

~

1623 Hamey Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 4

402/536-4000 j) p 1

December 23, 1985 f

g g 2 6 E_n_

LIC-85-576 LuL

. _, }\\jh l

( c

~

Mr. Robert D.

Martin Regional 7.9ministrator U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, D.C.

76011

Reference:

Docket No. 50-285 Dea r Mr. Martin:

Fort Calhoun Station Operator License Requalification Program On Wednesday, December 11, 1985, the Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) was notified by members of your staff of the results of NRC license requalification examinations conducted on November 12, 1985.

Of eight OPPD personnel examined by the NRC, six failed the NRC written examination.

Promptly following this notification, OPPD took the following actions:

(1)

Removed those who failed the NRC examination from their assigned license duties, in accordance with OPPD's operator license requalification program.

(2)

Completed grading all OPPD requalification examinations ad-ministered by OPPD during the current refueling outage.

A total of fifteen OPPD requalification examinations were so I

administered.

l (3)

Dispatched an OPPD management team to your offices.

This management team met with you and members of your staf f on December 12 and 13, 1985.

As a result of item (2) above, one of the fifteen individuals administered the OPPD requalification examinations failed the examination.

This individual has also been removed from licensed shift duties, in accordance with OPPD's operator license requali-fication program.

d2/

-l'0 B601060097 OL12PM y{

PDR ADOCK 0000

'5 V

4s si24 Empioyment wirn Equai opportunity Male * 'emale

Mr. Robert D. Martin December 23, 1985 Page Two As a result of our meetings on December 12 and 13, 1985, OPPD presented a corrective action plan to members of your staff on December 13, 1985.

This corrective action plan consisted of the following elements:

Actions Planned for Remedial Group * (to be completed prior to March, 1986)

(1)

A detailed review of examination failed with each indivi-dual.

(2)

Accelerated training to be provided in identified weak areas.

(3)

Frequent quizzes will be provided during training to ensure mastery of learning objectives.

(4)

Training on written examination skills will be provided to each member of remedial group.

(5)

An audit examination will be provided to each member of remedial group by a qualified consultant to check overall readiness for recertification.

Actions Planned for OPPD's Requalification Program (1)

Improve attendance at scheduled requalification training sessions.

(2)

Provide performance-based training materials to licensed personnel and to the NRC.

(3)

Address the need for improved on-the-job training (OJT),

especially for senior operator licensed personnel.

  • Remedial Group - Consists of those individuals who failed the NRC requalification examination (six) and the individual who failed OPPD's requalification examination.

This is also the group who will be provided accelerated requalification training in identi-fled weak areas, in accordance with OPPD's requalification train-ing program.

s Mr. Robert D. Martin December 23, 1985

'Page Three I appreciate the efforts of your staff in helping OPPD quickly understand the nature of the problem our personnel experienced with the recent NRC requalification examinations.

As I understand it, your staff has concluded that the OPPD re-qualification examinations administered this fall were of adequate quality, satisfactorily graded, and properly prepared and admini-stered.

Although this is a very significant, and not unexpected, positive result for OPPD, I want to assure you that I expect improvements in our requalification trainiag process as detailed previously.

Sincerely,

/$WhO R.

L.

Andrews Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/jmm cc:

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036 E. G. Tourigny, Project Manager P. H.

Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector