ML20136B122
| ML20136B122 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/15/1985 |
| From: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Ebneter S, Starostecki R, Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8511200139 | |
| Download: ML20136B122 (24) | |
Text
~
=
/
\\
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
r, a
wasumarow o.c. zones
~s
/
November 15, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Richard W. Starostecki, Director, DRP, RI Stewart D. Ebneter, Director, DRS, RI Roger Walker, Director, DRP, RII Albert G. Gibson, Acting Director, DRS, RII Charles E. Norelius, Director, DRP, RIII Carl J. Paperiello, Director, DRS, RIII Eric H. Johnson, Acting Director, DRSP, RIV Dennis F. Kirsch, Deputy Director, DRSP, RV FROM:
Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement
SUBJECT:
EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION INSPECTION PROGRAM I
This is a followup to R. DeYoung's memo to Regional Administrators dated January 11, 1985 which outlined the initial plan for development of a program for inspection of licensee compliance with 10 CFR 50.49. This plan is being updated in accordance with the staff's comitments resulting from the April 2, and September 17, 1985 Comission meetings.
As of November 1,1985 nine facilities including several multi-unit sites have been inspected and a followup inspection has been conducted at one facility. This is consistent with the original objective of the EQ pilot inspection program.
We have established a goal to complete the first round inspections at all operating plants by the end of FY87 and have reevaluated the program resource needs and methods of implementation to accomplish this goal. Based on this evaluation we have concluded that for the near tem the EQ inspection program should be continued in its present format (IE lead), however the inspection i
frequency should be increased to meet our schedular comitments. The program will be further reassessed by the end of FY86 with regard to continued inspections, budgetary requirements and the respective roles of IE, NRR and i
the regional offices.
i For EQ inspections during FY86, IE will be responsible for overall inspection scheduling (with regional input), providing inspection team leaders and technical consultants and preparation of the inspection reports.
IE will also recommend enforcement actions including severity levels for specific violations and will be responsible for the resolution of any outstanding technical issues, eewym a m
l Regional Directors November 15, 1985 The regional offices will be requested to provide two inspectors for each inspection at least one of which will be trained in EQ and essentially dedicated to this effort. The regional offices will be responsible for all enforcement actions including the preparation of enforcement packages, verification of corrective action commitments, and the conduct of all followup inspections.
IE will coordinate and provide consultant and/or i,
NRR technical assistance in this effort as required.
For the near term we plan to inspect approximately two plant sites each month. At multi-unit sites all operating units will be inspected. The inspection frequency may be increased during FY86 depending on overall resource availability.
1 Additional details concerning the EQ inspection program will be discussed in a program coordination meeting between IE and regional management which is planned for December 3,1985. Further details regarding this meeting will be provided.
We also invite your comments on the draft inspection module (enclosure).
We plan to schedule an EQ training seminar in the near future to provide additional inspection guidance and technical training to NRC and contractor personnel who will be involved in the EQ inspection activities.
If you have any questions regarding the inspection program please ontact Uldis Potapovs (FTS 492-8030) or Gary Zech (FTS 492-9663).
- Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor and Technical Training Center Programs i
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosure:
Draft Temporary Instruction t
e i
s
(
ene TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/XX EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-01 PURPOSE To provide guidance for the inspection of licensee environmental qualification (EQ) programs for electrical equipment important to safety located in harsh environments as required by 10 CFR 50.49.
This temporary instruction (TI) also provides guidance for determining that licensee commitments for resolution of outstanding issues from NRC equipment EQ safety evaluation reports (SERs) are being properly implemented.
2515/XX-02 OBJECTIVES Review of licensee's implementation of a program for meeting 10 CFR 50.49 requirements.
Review of the licensee's implementation of SER corrective action commitments.
Review of the licensee's implementation of a program for maintaining the qualified status of equipment during the life of the plant.
Performance of a physical inspection of equipment to determine that the installations agree with SER commitments and qualification requirements.
2515/XX-03 BACKGROUND In response to IE Bulletin 79-01B and NUREG-0588, licensees submitted EQ documentation Aich was reviewed by the NRR-EQB staff and their consultar;s.
- N were issued listing the deficiencies in the documentation.
r,eetius were held with the licensees during 1983 and 1984 to establish commitments for corrective action.
10 CFR 50.49 became effective on February 22,
- 1983, further establishing formal qualification requirements.
Performance of this TI determines that the Licensee has implemented an EQ program as required by 10 CFR 50.49 and has implemented corrective actions in response to the EQ SERs.
The inspection also determines that the qualification documentation is applicable to the installed equipment.
l Issue Date:
u.
a s
J
-.L-EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 2515/XX-04 LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-04 REFERENCES 04.01 10 CFR 50.49, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Eouipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants,"
effective February 22, 1983 04.02 Regulatory Guide 1.89, " Environmental Qualification of Certain Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1 04.03 NUREG-0588, Rev.1 (for Connents Version), " Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Equipment," July 1981 j
i 04.04
" Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equ pment in Operating Reactors,"
November 1979 (DOR Guidelines 04.05*+ Technical Evaluation Report (TER), " Review of Licensees' 2
Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environmental Qualification Safety Evaluation Report."
An individual TER for each operating power plant prepared by Franklin Research Center under NRC Contract 03-79-118 04.06+
NRC Safety Evaluation Reports (SER) concerning Environmental i
Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment, including the SER that forwarded the TER to licensees 04.07*+
Licensee's commitments for corrective action including May 1983 SER/TER response,1984 minutes of meeting with NRC, and subse-quent changes 04.08 Regulatory Guide 1.97, " Instrumentation for Light Water-Cooled Nuclear Reactor Power Plants to Assess Plant and Environmental Conditions During and Following an Accident,"
Rev. 2 1
04.09 Technical Evaluation Report, " Implementation Guidance for New and Corrective Equipment Environmental Qualification "
prepared by Franklin Research Center Under NRC Contract 03-79-118, April 22, 1983 04.10*+
a.
Licensee's List of Equipment Requiring Environmental Qualification (Master List, submitted in May 1983) b.
Master List, version in effect at time of inspection f
04.11*+
a.
G.
Eisenhut to Licensees and Applicants, dated December 27,
- 1984,
Subject:
Certification of Compliance to 10 CFR 50.49 b.
Licensee's Response to Generic letter 84-24 Issue Date:.
- =
EVALUATION OF LECENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR-QUAlfFICATION OF ELECTRfCAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN PARSH ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-04 d
04.12*
Licensee's current System Component Evaluation Worksheets (SCEW sheets) or equivalent (earlier SCEW sheets may have been included in previous licensee submittals) 1 04.13*+ Licensee's Procedures. Applicable to Equipment Qualification (EQ program, procurement of qualified equipment, maintenance of qualified equipment and modifications to plant that could affect qualified equipment) 04.14*
Licensee qualification documentation and/or files 4
l
- These documents shall be available for the inspectors' use throughout the inspection.
+These documents shall be obtained for review before the inspection.
1 i
j 2515/XX-05 GENERAL INFORMATION 05.01 Composition of Inspection Team It is recomended that a team be assigned to perform this inspection. The following is a suggested minimum team:
a.
Team Leader - Leads discussion with licensee at entrance and exit interview.
Should be a region-based inspector.
Ccordinates team activities and participates in the i
inspection effort.
(May also perform role b, c, or d below).
b.
Technical Specialist Knowledgeable of and familiar with - application and operation of electrical power and j
control equipment requiring EQ.
I i
c.
Quality Assurance Specialist Knowledgeable of quality assurance requirements for procurement. maintenance, and testing of electrical' equipment requiring EQ.
j d.
Ecuipment Qualification Specialist Knowledgeable of Et testing and analysis requirements and requirements for documenting qualification results.
2515/XX-06 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS f
06.01 Pre-Inspection Tasks Prior to the site inspection, the following tasks should - be l
accomplished:
Issue Date:,
EVALUATf0N OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR l
QUALIFICATION OF ELECTR8 CAL EQUIPMENT 2515/XX-06 LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS a.
Document Review In preparation for the inspection, the inspectors should obtain copies of the plant-soecific documents marked by a "+" in Section 04, "ReferenceM" b.
Sample Selection The inspection will include evaluation of qualification documentation and visual inspection of 10 to 15 equipment items.
Selection of the devices to be evaluated is important since multiple concerns must be addressed,_by the inspection.
The sample list should be ranked ' in importance with the most critical first.
The list of devices to be evaluated should be developed with the following concerns in mind and should contain as' many different equipment types as possible.
1.
Table 4-1 and the Equipment Item decksheet Index in Section 4 of Reference 04.05 should.sbe the
[
starting point-for development of the sample lis't.
Devices listed - in categories I.B. II:A, II.B. II.C' and IV may be chosen as samples.
Tables' 4-2, 4-3 and 4-4 provide further information concerning deficiencies in the documentation.
Reference 04.10 provides the base list of items that the licensee has determined to require qualification in j
accordance with 10 CFR 50.49, i
2.
Outstanding IE Bulletins and Ynformation Notices related to qualified.. equipment should be considered.
Generic Letter 84-24 (Reference 04.11.a) lists
)
several such Bulletins and Notices. "
I g
3.
plant-specific EQ-related problems reported
$nde'r i
10 CFR Part 21 or paragraphs 50.72 and 50.73 should be considered.
4.
Access to the equipment during the walk-th ough inspection should be considered.
4' 5.
Equipment which the licensee added to or dele.ted from the list of devices requiring qualification i
since issuance of Reference 04.05 should be -
considered.
4 i
Issue Date:
~
1
,m-e,.r-~---
,m- - -
,--,-~--~,--a-
,--.n,
.,n,-
e-,-
r,------,,----
gr
,.,_.,--g-,--e.
...--~,---s
..m=,v-4n.
- -.~
c 9
< VALUATION OF LfCENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR 6
QUALIFTCATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-06 y.
6, s Equipment that has changed from one category to another (e.g.,
from qualification not established to qualified) since issuance of Reference 04.05 4
should be considered.
7.
x.Special attention should be given to devices listed in Reference 04.05 for which no documentation was i
submitted for review.
i; 8.
Equipment that has been installed as replacement for non-qualified equipment should be included.
5 9.
At least one piece of equipment qualified to the 00R Guidelines (Ref. 04.04) should be included.
- 10. The list of samples should cover a variety of equipment types including transmitters, valve
. operators, solenoid operated
- valves, cables, limit
- switches, motors, terminal
- blocks, and
- ontainment penetrations when possible.
- 11. Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) of the,
sensitivity of hypothetical severe accident
' damage to component failure should be considered.
Tables I
and II list the most significant EQ-i related components identified in one study ' in order of decreasing significance.
- 12. Partial review of certain files should be considered, checking only the treatment of specific concerns such as those cited in 2 and 3
- above, in order to address concerns more rapidly.
i
. Sore modification of the sample list during the inspection may be desirable or necessary.
i f
I c.
Team Member Assignments b
Prior to the inspection, the responsibility for the main segments (see Section 06.02) of the inspection should be divided among the members of the team.
The segments may 'be performed in parallel with each other; however, comparison and correlation of information discovered during the inspection is necessary.
For
- example, maintenance requirements described in qualification 0
documentation should be compared with maintenance N
procedurbs, and master list equipment descriptions t
7 shoul' be compared with the installed equipment.
- 4..
n Issue Date:
.o#-
.. -. -.,=-
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 2515/XX-06 LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS d.
Licensee Contact Approximately three weeks before the inspection, the following items should be reviewed with the 1.icensee:
1.
Detailed inspection scope.
2.
Documents to be made available for the inspection -
see section 04, References.
3.
Request advance copies of procedures reference 04.13.
4 Request for licensee presentation in the entrance meeting covering:
(a organization chart with EQ applicability (b
overview of EQ program (c
overview of EQ documentation file organization 5.
Advance arrangements for plant walkdown to avoid unnecessary delays.
6.
Other logistics matters as appropriate.
06.02 Inspection Tasks a.
Entrance Meeting At the start of the inspection, an Entrance Meeting should be hel d.
During the meeting, the inspection team leader will describe the scope of the inspection and identify the list of the samples selected including identification of walkdown samples.
The logistics of the inspection should be discussed.
.During the meeting the licensee should describe his organization, aspects of his EQ program, and the status of. program implementation, b.
Procedural and Programmatic Inspection 1.
Review the licensee's procedures to determine that a program has been implemented to generate,
- maintain, and distribute the list of equipment requiring qualification in accordance with 10 CFR 50.49.
Issue Date:
i >
\\
l
EVALUATION OF LECENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL ECUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSP ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-06 4
I 2.
Review EQ program " documentation to determine that the licensee has implemented procedures for review 4
l and approval of EQ documentation and for establishing equipment qualification.
3.
Review selected maintenance and/or surveillance procedures to determine that EQ requirements have been incorp rated.
4.
Determine that the procedures for procurement of replacement and spare equipment address EQ requirements and that they require qualification
.of the equipment to be established prior to use in the plant.
Review selected procurement documents to detemine that EQ requirements, have been incorporated.
In most instances, Paragraph t
1 of 10 CFR 50.49 requires that replacement equipment must be. qualified to a
higher level than the 00R Guidelines.
Revision 1,
provides guidance for alternatives to this requirement.
5.
Determine that the procedures for control of
'4 plant modifications include evaluations of the effect of the*
modification on qualified i
equipment (e.g.,
the modification requires equipment that is qualified or the modification affects the' environment of qualified equipment).
t Review selected modification packages and related documents such as work requests to determine that EQ requirements have been incorporated.
]
6.
Detemine by interviewing licensee personnel perfor-ming work involving qualified equipment that they are 3
' i aware of EQ requirements and procedures.
Determine that personnel performing review and approval i
of qualification documentation have appropriate training or experience.
7.
Determine that the licensee has established and implemented a
mechanism for addressing IE Bulletins and Information Notices relating to equipment requiring qualification.
}-
8..
Review licensee QA/QC audit records for evidence of conformance to procedure requirements.
)
i
/
j
/
i
.}
l I
Issue Date: '
1
- - - - ~ f.
EVALUATION OF LfCENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALZFICATION OF ELECTR8 CAL EQUIPMENT 2515/XX-06 LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS c.
Documentation File Inspection 1.
Review the completeness of the licensee's list of equipment requiring qualification by i
determining that the list includes the equipment listed in the licensee's list of emergency procedures equipment and that equipment required by Reg.
Guide 1.97 is included.
Compare Reference 4.10.a to Reference 4.10.b.
Review the changes made to the EQ list and detennine that they have been made in accordance with established procedures.
2.
Review the qualification files for the samples selected in 06.01.b to determine if they cbntain the qualification specification for the equipment, adequate documentation of the qualification of the equipment, and a
positive statement that the documentation has been reviewed and approved and the equipment determined to be qualified for its application.
The review should be general in nature to determine that the '
important qualification requirements have been addressed.
A checklist that can be used as a guide for these reviews is contained in Appendix A.
Not every checklist item need be reviewed for each file; the Comments Column can be marked N/A for items not reviewed.
In-depth review of one qualification package is addressed in Subsection 06.02.C.5 below.
3.
Review the documentation files to determine that the licensee has demonstrated that the qualified devices are the same as, or have been proven to be adequately similar to, the devices requiring qualification (i.e., the installed equipment).
4.
For the selected samples, determine if that the comitments for corrective action stated in Reference 04.07 have been fulfilled or appropriate action is being taken.
5.
Determine if the licensee's procedures for review and approval of qualification documentation have been implemented through review of the documentation file for a
new device cualified to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49 or for a piece of replacement equipment.
Issue Date:.
I
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUAlfFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSF ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-06 This evaluation should entail an in-depth review of the adequacy of the qualification documentation in addition to the evaluation of the licensee's review and approval process.
The check sheet provided in Appendix A should be compl4ted for the in-depth review of one component file.
6.
Obtain the equipment descriptions, model and serial
- number, and plant ID for use in the physical inspection.
Determine any special requirements for device orientation, connections, housing
- seals, etc.
dictated by the EQ documentation.
(Appendix B
contains checklists for standard pieces of equipment.)
7.
For Westinghouse
- plants, verify that -
the licensee has satisfactorily addressed IE Information Notice 84-90 concerning Main Steam Line Breaks.
e.
Physical Inspection 1.
At the beginning of the inspection, discuss the accessibility of the devices to be inspected with the licensee. Modify the list as appropriate.
2.
Through use of the equipment checklists contained in the Appendix B,
determine if the installed equipment is that which is. described in the li::ensee's documentation and that the eouipment appears to be properly installed and maintained.
The team member reviewing the documentation for a
component should also perform the physical inspection, if possible.
Physical inspection of the equipment by the entire team is desirable.
3.
Determine if the equipment surrounding the device being inspected may fail in a manner that could prevent the device from performing its safety function.
Any condition that could adversely affect the safety function of equipment being inspected should be noted for discussion with the licensee.
Issue Date:
EVALUATf0N OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 2515/XX-07 LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-07 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS The team leader is responsible for the timely assembly and generation of the inspection report.
The resul ts. of the inspection will be documented in a
standard inspection report.
A copy of the report shall be forwarded to the Office of Inspection and Enforcement, Vendor Program Branch, and to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Environmental Qualification Branch.
2515/XX-08 EXPIRATION DATE This temporary instruction shall remain in effect for one year from the date of issue.
2515/XX-09 IE CONTACT R. C. Wilson (492-4841) 2515/XX-10 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTING (LATER) i i
Issue Date:.
' EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUZPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS 2515/XX-07 Table I.
PWR Component Sensitivities, PRA Study Solenoid Valves for Control Valves Auxiliary Feedwater Motor Operators for Valves Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Motors Auxiliary Feedwater Motor Operators for Valves High Pressure ECC Motor Operators for Valves Service Water Pump Motors Service Water Motor Operators for Valves Low Pressure ECC Pump Motors High Pressure ECC.
Pump Motors low Pressure ECC Table II. BWR Component Sensitivities, PRA Study Motor Operators for Valves low Pressure ECC Motor Operators for Valves Service Water Purp Motors Service Water Motor Operators for Valves High Pressure ECC Pump Motors low Pressure ECC Pump Motors High Pressure ECC Issue Date:.
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Appendix A LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CHECKLIST This checklist is provided for use in performing evaluations of the adequacy of a qualification package for a piece of equipment.
Such reviews will determine the adequacy of the qualification program for the device and will determine the adequacy of the licensee's review and approval process for the equipment.
Perfonn a complete review for one file.
For other files, items not reviewed should be marked "N/A" in Comments Column.
Issue Date:.
m m
.. _.. _.. ~. _
. EVALUATION OF LfCENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUAlfFICATf0N OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED TN PARSH ENVIRONMENTS Appendix A CHECKLIST FOR REVIEW 0F LICENSEE EQ DOCUMENTATION FILES Plant / Docket No.:
Reviewer:
Component (s):
Equipment Documentation File:
Criteria:
10 CFR 50.49 or DOR Guidelines or Other Covered in i
EQ Occumentation EQ Issue Yes No Comments 1.
Positive statement by the licensee that the equipment is qualified for its application.
l 2.
Full description of the equipment.
3.
If qualification sample is not identical to the installed device, a similarity analysis has been provided.
4.
Allowed mounting methods and orientations.
5.
Interfaces - conduit, housing seal, etc.
6.
A qualified life has been establish-* based upon accelerat J aging-thermal, radiation, cyclic as appropriate.
7.
All type tests performed Jon the same specimen (N/A 00R Guidelines).
8.
Performance / acceptance criteria (operating time, transmitter accuracy, etc.
as applicable to component).
9.
Test sequence conforms to IEEE 323-74 or justification has.been provided.
(N/A DOR Guidelines) l Issue Date:.
r n
w
w-
,,,n---w v-
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Appendix A LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS CHECKLIST FOR REVIEW 0F LICENSEE EQ DOCUMENTATION FILES (continued)
Component (s):
Cover in EQ Documentation EQ Issue Yes No
- 10. Radiation dose covers accident and normal service (DOR Guidelines permits analysis)
- 11. DBE exposure simulation meets plant requirements:
Steam Exposure Temperature Pressure Humidity (DOR Guidelines requires test for steam environment)
- 12. Chemical or water spray simulation performed when required
- 13. Accident environment margins (N/A D0R Guidelines)
- 14. Submergence test (if required for application)
- 15. Test anomalies resolved
- 16. Applicable ins, etc.
resolved
- 17. Maintenance / Surveillance Criteria and Life Defined
- 18. References clearly identified and attached or retrievable (including I.D. of plant equipment)
Issue Date:.
=w w o
~--
EVALUATION OF LlCENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS Appendix B Appendix B PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLISTS This appendix contains checklists for use in physical inspection of environmentally qualified equipment.
Prior to the physical inspection, checklists should be prepared for each device that is to be inspected.
The blank spaces in the
" Documented Information" section of the checklist should be completed from the information in the licensee's documentation files relating to the device.
Alternately, SCEW sheets, other licensee's current equivalent, may be used in lieu of completing some of the checksheet spaces.
During the physical inspection, the installed condition should be compared with the documented condition.
Agreement between the "As-installed" and "As-documented" information should be marked in the "Yes" column.
A disagreement shoul.d be marked with a "No" and a description of the nature of the disagreement placed in the "Coments" column.
A space is provided for general coments at the bottom of the checklist.
Checklists are provided for the following equipment:
Pressure Transmitters (also to be used for level and flow transmitters).
Motorized Valve Actuators Limit Switches Solenoid Operated Valves Electric Motors Cables A general form is provided for other devices.
I i
t Issue Date:
15 -
.g-
-.~~-m
.,,.r.-.
-.a n-,.
.-,----n-.,,.--,,--..m.--
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Appendix B LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS TRANSMITTER PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Component ID No.:
Reviewer:
Installed Condition Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
Manufacturer 3.
a.
Model No.
b.
Range / Type Code c.
Serial No.
4 Mounting Description 5.
Orientation 6.
Process Connection Type 7.
Electrical Connection Type 8.
Housing Seals in Good Condition, Covers in Place 9.
Does Installed Device Experience (If
- yes, review a Significant Temperature Rise documentation to from Process?
determine whether considered)
- 10. Ambient Normal Expected Temperature (If ambient temp-Range erature exceeds normal
- expected, verify that quali-fied life evalu-ation considered)
General Comments on Physical Inspection:
Issue Date:
l !
I i
~ ~
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFTCATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS Appendix B MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Component ID Reviewer:
Installed Condition
- Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
Manufacturer 3.
a.
Model No.
b.
Serial No.
4.
Mounting Description 5.
Orientation 6.
Housing Seals in Good Condition, Covers in Place 7.
Housing and Motor Drains 8.
Does Installed Device Have a (If
- yes, verify Brake?
qualification status) 9.
Conduit Seals
- 10. Ambient Normal Expected (If ambient temp-Temperature Range erature exceeds normal expected conditions, verify that licensee has considered the elevated. tempera-ture in the qualified life evaluation)
General Comments on Physical Inspection:
i l'
1 Issue Date:.
9
a EVALUAT10N OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT A;pendix B LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS LIMIT SWITCH PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Component 10 Reviewer:
Installed Condition Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
Manufacturer 3.
Model No.
4.
Mounting Description 5.
Orientation 6.
Electrical Connection Type 7.
Housing Seals in Good Condition 8.
Ambient Normal Expected Temperature Range (If ambient temp-erature exceeds normal expected conditions, verify that licensee has considered the elevated tempera-ture in the qualified life evaluation)
General Comments on Physical Inspection:
L Issue Date:.
EVALUAT80N OF LlCENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS Appendix B SOLEN 0ID OPERATED VALVE PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Component ID Reviewer:
Installed Condition Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
Manufacturer 3.
a.
Model No.
b.
Voltage c.
Configuration 4
ounting Description 5.
Orientation 6.
Process Connection Type 7.
Electrical Connection Type ___
8.
Housing Seals in Good Condition 9.
Does Installed Device Experience' (If yes, document-a Significant Temperature Rise from Process?
ation must be reviewed to deter-mine if the tempera-ture rise was considered)
- 10. Ambient Normal Expected (If ambient temp-Temperature Range erature exceeds normal expected General Comments on Physical Inspection:
conditions, verify that licensee has considered the elevated tempera-ture in the qualified life evaluation)
Issue Date: -
EVALUAT!0N OF LlCENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIFMENT Appendix B LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS ELECTRIC MOTOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Component ID Installed Condition Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
Manufacturer 3.
a.
Model No.
b.
Serial No.
c.
Voltage Hp 4.
Mounting and Orientation 5.
Accessories Coolers f
Lubricant Reservoirs Heaters 6.
Housing Seals and Covers in Place and Tight 7.
Area Surrounding Motor is Clean and Dry 8.
Ambient Normal Expected Temperature Range
- 9.
a.
Junction Box Type b.
Drainage Method General Comments on Physical Inspection:
Issue Date:.
EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS Appendix B CABLE PHYSICAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST Installed Condition Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
a.
Manufacturer b.
Model No.
c.
Batch No.
3.
a.
Insulation Type b.
Jacket Type c.
Number of Conductors d.
Conductor Size e.
Shield Configuration 4.
Voltage Rating (General Information may not be discernible as installed) 5.
Ambient Normal Expected Temperature Range 6.
General Condition of Installed None Some Cable a.
Obvious signs of mistreatment b.
Obvious surface flaws c.
Obvious flaws on conductor insulation at terminations General Comments on Physical Inspection:
issue Date:
o EVALUATION OF LICENSEE'S PROGRAM FOR QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Appendix B LOCATED IN HARSH ENVIRONMENTS Equipment Description Component ID Reviewer:
Installed Condition Agrees with Documented Documented Information Yes No Comments 1.
Location Bldg.
Room Elev 2.
Manufacturer 3.
a.
Model No.
I b.
Serial No.
4.
Mounting Description 5.
Orientation 4
6.
Process Connection Type 7.
Electrical Connection Type 8.
Housing Seals in Good Condition, Covers In Place 9.
Does Installed Device Experience (If yes, document-a Significant Temperature Rise from Process?
ation must be reviewed to deter-mine if the temper-ature rise was considered)
- 10. Ambient Normal Expected (If ambient temp-Temperature Range i
erature exceeds General Comments on Physical Inspection:
normal expected conditions, verify that licensee has considered the elevated tempera-ture in the qualified life evaluation)
Issue Date:.
e
-