ML20136B065
| ML20136B065 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 11/05/1985 |
| From: | SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136B057 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8511200123 | |
| Download: ML20136B065 (23) | |
Text
.
i
~
,0
^
l
- i5 le5
~
,,i**
.,. :s,
f-
-,,'. ~ i V'
m Q
e.?" : p N;-..
i %'
- i w F
li _ 7 __w i -
[ J
,;l
- m. _.c.
e%
I
}i p
ie II & ~,
UIIII&lN.Ill m,,...
I.
U-w& w.w-m m
pf{Nf.
ff,1,'h'$::a.E Y'.
l STATUS OF LRS RECOMMENDATIONS REY. 24
$h l
NOVEMBER 5, 1985 m
o
~
rn m
E' 20 l
3$
S.
N 5
2 m
3, g
a l
1 8511200123 851107 l
PDR ADOCK 05000312 p
$SMUD SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT YOUR ELECTRIC SERVICE i
Action Assigned-Item No.
Item Required Stirt-Comp 1;t3 Individual Comments
.-i SGM-I The General Manager should be given Complete 05-03-85 Mattimoe The SMUD tegal 3epartment has advised us that an employment contract for the General Manager is illegal. This item is an employment contract for a period considered closed, of two or three years to reduce con-tinuing tensions that result from the " pleasure of the Board" tenure BGM-2 Establish as soon as possible a Complete 05-21-85 Mattimoe Guidelines have been prepared and reviewed by GM and approved by the Board.
written set of performance appraisal guidelines or objectives for the General Manager for joint General Manager /8oard agreement I
BGM-3 Prepare annual General Manager Complete 05-21-85 Mattimoe Guidelines have been prepared and reviewed by GM and Board approved by the Board.
performance reviews in writing and
)
present them to him as the concensus of the Board. Performance reviews must be objective and measured against clear performance criteria BGM-4 Clarify the Board / General Manager Complete 05-03-85 Mattimoe Document delineating these relationships completed.
Board working relationship in writing BGM-5 Establish in writing what reporting Complete 05-03-85 Mattimoe Document preparcd is desired by the Board from the l
General Manager l
l BGM-6 Recruit at least one senior experi-Complete 07-15-85 Mattimoe Deputy General Manager hired.
enced outsider at the level reporting directly to the General Manager BGM-7 Reduce the number of people reporting Complete 05-13-85 Mattimoe New organization in place.
directly to the General Manager to 6 or 7 BGM-8 Increase the span of control of AGMs Complete 05-13-85 Mattimoe New organization in place.
from 3 or 4 to 6 or 7 BGM-9 Planning should be initiated between Complete 05-10-85 Mattimoe Deputy General Manager hired.
Board the General Manager and the Board for I
the training and development of an individual to replace the General Manager when he retires BGM-10 The title of Chief Engineer should Complete 02-07-85 Mattimoe Title of Chief Engineer deleted, be reassigned from the GM to an appropriate AGM BGM-11 The Executive Director. Nuclear Complete 03-28-85 Mattimoe Executive Director. Nuclear is now Assistant General Manager. Nuclear should be retitled an Assistant General Manager to clearly reflect the importance of the nuclear operation.
u_
r
Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required Stirt Complit3 Individual Comment 3 BGM-12 Establish a suite of at least two Complete 05-06085 Mattimoe Permanent office established on fourth floor.
offi.es on the fourth floor of the headquarters building with secretarial services, phones, desks, conference tables, etc. for Board members to use at their convenience BGM-13 Establish a budget for the Board to Complete 05-13-85 Wilcox Mr. Wilcox, President of the Board of Directors, will be administered and controlled by develop with Mr. Carr, Chairman of Budget Committee.
the Board President with no require-Budget approved 5/13/85 Board Meeting.
ment for GM approval of either the budget or expenditures BGM-14 Establish a department reporting Complete 02-07-85 Mattimoe Function established.
directly to the GM to handle Public Information, Board Liaison and Local.
State and Federal Government Affairs.
The Board Liaison would include pro-viding administrative (e.g., budget, schedule, clerical, meeting arrange-ments, etc.) support and assisting the GM in timely delivery of information BGM-15 The Board members should attend Complete 05-03-85 Mattimoe Board members attended American Public Power Association Board I
(APPA) Policy Maker Workshops similar to the one conducted March 1, and 2, 1984 which covered legal responsi-bilities, Board / Management interfaces.
Board nember authority and responsi-bility, Utility Financing Operations and Planning BGM-15 Constituent or other complaints to Complete 05-03-85 Wilcox The President of the Board of Directors has developed with Board members should be passed on the existing Board an unwritten procedure on how to handle.
to the staff in a neutral fashion these items with the Staff.
for staff investigation Annually the new President develops this relationship J
with the Board and the General Manager.
BGM-17 Complex items requiring staff Complete 05-03-85 Wilcox The President of the Board of Directors has developed evaluation brought to Board meetings with the existing Board an unwritten procedure on how to from the public should be submitted handle these items with the Staff, to the staff for comment and evalu-ation before Board concent Annually the new President develops this relationship with the Board and the General Manager.
BGM-18 The GM should solicit and the Board Complete 05-21-85 Mattimoe Performance guidelines for Annual Reviews have been adopted Board by the Board.
should provide written comments regarding AGM performance to the GM I
on an annual basis.
~
Item Action A23tened 16 0.
Item Required Sttrt Compl".t3 Individual Comunents OM-1 Departments reporting to each AGM Complete 04-01-85 Mattimoe See new organization chart, should be based on similar or complementary functions OH-2 Consideration to be given to Implement 07-01-85 09-30-85 Rodriguez Reconsmendation is being implemented, organization reorganizing nuclear organization charts available.
j Develop 08-07-85 01-30-86 Rodriguez Construction and startup phases under development.
OM-3 Program of goals and objectives to Develop 08-01-85 12-01-85 Rodriguez 1986 goals and objectives to be submitted for review by be amplifted and strengthened; 12-01-85.
accountability for supporting over-all goals to be required at all organization levels l
4 OH-4 Develop and implement District-wide Complete 04-04-85 Mattimoe Refer to JJM Letter 04/04/85.
succession planning program OM-5 Develop and implement improved Appraisal 10-01-85 01-15-86 Fassler Request Personnel Dept, to to do appraisal of present recruitment of key personnel program hiring program.
Appraisal needs to be redone. Present memo discusses what was done, not if effective.
OM-6 Adopt long range goal of eliminating Implement 05-13-85 Open Rodriguez Goal to eliminate all contractor personnel who are doing contractor forces from nuclear tasks which have duration of 5 years or greater. An annus1 operation with program to accomplish appraisal will be done to measure progress against depart-developed goal ment plans, i
1 j
OM-7 Reevaluate requirements for ECP Complete 06-05-85 Mattimoe Professional registration no longer required but i
approval of engineering promotions optional. ECP does not approve promotions.
]
and professional licenses for senior engineers j
OM-8 Audit C/A such as PAS /SALP reports Appraisal 07-29-85 12-15-85 Schwieger Comunents incorporated and procedure in final draft. I 4.r :
to be thorough, substantive anj for appraisal will be complete 12/01/85.
2 carried through to completion I.
i 1 l i
Item Action A32igned no.
Item pequired Start Complet?
Individual Commenta
~
DM-O Internally generated analysis or Implement 05-23-85 Open Schwieger LGS to develop appraisal plan to evaluate implementation.
evaluations of trends; incidents or of this item.
accidents to be thorough and objec-tive in definitive recomunendations as well as prompt and effective corrective action OM-10 Implement a sound accident preven-Implement 03-12-85 Open D. Martin Safety Dept. to develop appraisal plan to evaluate tion program with added incentive implementation. This appraisal should include interviews of getting line managers, super-with site personnel.
visors and foremen out into the work place frequently OH-11 Number of standing comunittees should Complete 05-14-85 Mattimoe Standing connittees reduced by approximately 2/3.
be reduced significantly; AGMs or Dept Mgrs should be Ilmited to no more than 2-3 consnittees o
e.
Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required St::rt Comp 1:;tt. Individual Comuments
~
E-1 NED engineering to expedite depart-Complete 06-25-85 Keilman The NEPs have been issued as a living document with tho' mental procedures and concurred with intent that revisions will be issued to individual by Nuclear Ops. Executive Director, procedures as required.
Nuclear to play strong role in dis-cussions to assure timely resolution of issues and clear understanding by complete nuclear organization of how Rancho Seco engineering process is to function E-2 Consider rotating Sr. nuclear per-Develop 08-01-85 01-01-86 Rodriguez Senior nuclear personnel will be rotated after refueling, sonnel between NOD and NED E-3 Pevelop plans to remove design ener.
Complete 05-06-85 Rodriguez The origin of this conenent was the feeling that engineering function from maintenance engineering was being done without proper review. A review of the organization as soon as NED can Administrative Procedures and Quality Program shows that in obtain or develop engineers with fact all design changes do receive proper engineering plant experience review. In addition, a program has been developed to hire and rotate new engineers through Maintenance operation and QA prior to reviewing a final engineering assignment.
E-4 Expedite training of engineers and Complete 05-03-85 Coward 1985 schedule initiated and training started.
technical managers; especially on Schwieger Rancho Seco plant systems E-5 Promptly fill key personnel Complete 06-14-85 Ke11 man All key engineering positions for 1984 have been filled, vacancies; especially maintenance In addition. B. Kumer. Senior Electrical Engineer, and I&C. NED electrical /I&C and cost R. Pate. Associate Electrical Engineer (ISC) have been control hired for 1985 positions.
E-6 Carefully monitor elimination of Complete 05-03-85 Keilman A monthly management report used for monitoring the existing backlog of " yellow" drawings Coward schedule is being prepared and reviewed by the Nuclear to assure a timely schedule is Schwieger Management Team.
maintained n
.s' Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required St:rt Comp 11t3 Individual Comments.
L-1 Aggressively fill vacancies in the Complete 04-22-85 Dieterich Dnly one licensing engineer vacancy. Pursuing filling
~
licensing group with experienced same.
licensing engineers L-2 SMUD should consider consolidating Complete 02-07-85 Rodriguez Compliance and licensing will not be put under one manager.
licensing function under one manager L-3 NORC group should be ia reased by at Develop 03-28-85 12-31-85 Coward Reg Compliance Supv to review workload; one engineer added least one or two nuclear engineers and additional clerical support provided. Staff required, with additional clerical help position description and budget (1986) by and of 1985.
L-4 Use of associate engineer to take Complete 04-29-85 Coward Manager of NO to review if additional help is required and PRC minutes to be reviewed with WP equipment purchased.
option of having dedicated clerical support and upgraded word processing Associate Engineer vital to technical continuity and assistance to chainman. Upgraded word processing completed.
L-5 Increased management emphasis on Appraisal 07-15-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Appraise effectiveness of NRC CCL for success in getting commitment tracking and timely NRC submittals on time.
submittals to NRC Appraise effectiveness of CCL closecut program for getting items off the list. i
Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required St:rt ComplLt3 Individual Comments OP-1 Develop and implement nandatory Impl ement 03-28-85 01-01-87 Coward Part of progran developed and isolemented. Program given management / supervisory training twice to new individuals. Scheduled again 2/86. Program program for all personnel promoted to cover all existing personnel projected to complete by or hired into operations supervisory end of 1986.
positions OP-2 Develop expedited procedure for Implement 04-01-85 03-01-86 Coward Personnel required for six-shift rotation now available.
However, implementation of six-shift rotation will be Six shifts delayed until first quarter 1986 in order to increase the level of newly licensed operators.
OP-3 Develop and implement extensive and PAR 05-06 85 11-30-85 Coward Program developed and implemented. Report will be detailed procedure review program to issued this week. Ref. EQC 85-588 determine what procedures need revision or require new procedures OP-4 Develop list of critical drawings Appraisal 10-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger List developed to eliminate use of uncontrolled drawings in CR.
Only controlled drawings are now maintained in required for operation, expedite revision and eliminate use of uncon-the control room (August 15, 1985).
trolled drawings when completing critical plant operations OP-5 Develop methodology of conducting Appraisal 05-01-86 05-31-86 Coward Root cause program implemented and lessons learned independent review of operational (INPO) program implemented. Appraisal during second quarter of 1986 to allow for development of appraisal data base.
errors; establish management system that assures delegation, authority, Coward will have INPO conduct appraisal.
responsibility and accountability at individual level OP-6 Consider expanding use of STA Complete 05-03-85 Coward STAS are trained in different discipline; no change in function into more plant activities abnormal tag procedure. The new tag procedure deemed including abnormc1 tag engineer appropriate for plant use.
signoff OP-7 Study benefits of developing a PAR 05-06-85 01-01-86 Coward Study is underway (see MA-2 and PS&DM-3). Study and the totally integrated planning and implementation plan for any changes identified by the scheduling organizational concept study 'o be complete by 12/1/85.
OP-8 Expedite use of large room adjacent Complete 06-01-85 Coward Rearrangement of former office area is underway.
to control room OP-9 SHUD should induce NRC licensed Complete 02-07-85 Rodriguez The 2 former Rancho Seco individuals will remain at the personnel who are working in other geothermal unit.
positions to return to operations or training at Rancho Seco 1
Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required St rt ComplSt3 Individu11 Comments MA-1 Steps to be taken to correct the Implement 04-29-85 Open Coward A report by M. Tompkins which addresses this concern has-management style currently utilized been generated. In addition, corrective actions for each in mechanical maintenance item identified in the report have been identified and are' being implemented. Status report 12/15/85.
MA-2 Consider development and implementa-PAR 05-06-85 01-01-86 Coward Same as OP-7.
tion of total work management program utt11ains a centralized planning and scheduling department for all plant conditions MA-3 Develop and implement maintenance Develop 02-07-85 12-31-86 Coward Incorporated as part of long-range program for INPO dept. apprentice training program accreditation.
MA-4 Insure all plant procedures are Appraisal 03-01-86 04-01-86 Schwieger Appraisal conducted on September 20, 1985 which indicates adhered to and appropriate procedural progress being made but action not complete. Will re-steps taken appraise during March 1986.
MA-5 Expedite preparation, review and Appraisal 10-01-85 01-01-86 Coward G. Coward to provide appraisal to committee by 11/15/85.
issue of new Clearance Procedure MA-6 Establish a responsive working Appraisal 10-01-85 12-01-85 Vinquist Appraisal of this item to be completed by J. Vinquist.
relationship between Rancho Seco Purchasing. Personnel, and Data Processing.
and SMUD supporting departments MA-7 Expedite development and implemen-Develop 01-28-85 01-01-86 Coward Manager to determine what part is not documented; will not -
tation of integrated program for be part of site document control until review completed maintenance and control of vendor for reorganization, manuals and tech information; to be controlled by site document control MA-8 Expedite filling of lead I&C tech-Closed 12-11-84 Coward I&C Engineer hired.
nician position MA-9 Develop C/A plan to eliminate backlog Implement 03-28-85 01-01-86 Coward Recognize and need to eliminate backlog of PM ttoms; in preventive maintenance program additional personnel in budget for 1985 - Personnel hired dedicated to PM.
Program currently being updated.
Action AsstDaed Item No.
Item Requir;d Sttrt Comp 11t3 Individual Connents QA-1 Revise QA organizational structure; Implement 07-01-85 12-30-85 Schwieger Reorganization in progress; additional personnel being recruited.
identify supervisory and lead post-tions QA-2 Revise QA Manual into 18 sections to Develop 04-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Joint Utility Audit comments being incorporated and I
manual written. Manual to be presented to HSRC prior to more closely track and identify with 12/01/85.
NRC requirements QA-3 update and supplement QCI Manual to Develop 04-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger QCI Hanual will be updated when QA is completed.
adequately and accurately provide implenenting procedures for the QA program; consider changing name to Quality Procedure Manual; include QAIPs; and move NDE procedures to separate manual QA-4 Revise QA Program to assure QA Develop 04-01-85 11-18-85 Schwieger A. Schwieger will develop position by 10/19/85. This l
position will be discussed between R. J. Rodriguez, G. A.
involvement in all QA Class I and Coward, and L. G. Schwieger for final resolution.
Commercial Grade to be used in Class Meeting being established by Schwieger.
I systems activities; includes prs.
I WRs and changes to both prior to their release QA-5 Estabitsh comprehensive QA training Develop 02-07-85 10-01-86 Schwieger General Physics has task for training program for QA personnel (QA training complete; QC training 1/1/86) and program for all nuclear personnel who engineers / warehouse personnel (late 1986). Other nuclear have responsibilities in QA program personnel covered by appropriate training programs.
QA-G Provide for QA/QC involvement in Appraisal 10-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Will be a priority item for HP engineer in QA.
packaging and shipping of radioactive materials QA-7 Estabitsh program of verifying Appraisal 05-01-85 11-15-85 Schwieger QA to appraise completion of this item.
l education and experience records of all audit and inspection personnel to use on safety-related activities QA-8 Re-evaluate audit and surveillance PAR 05-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Re-evaluation of audit program complete. In process of preparing documentation.
program to assure it covers all important safety-related procedures and work activities QA-9 Establish system to assure timely Appraisal 09-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Program initiated; additional personnel recruited tu implement program.
followup of open QA Surveillance Report items Item Action Assigned-no.
Item Required Stcrt Comp 1;t3 Individual Ceausents.
T3-1 Develop and implement program for Implement 08-01-85 03-30-88 Rodriguez Consultant report approved.
replacement of training contractors ASAP TR-2 As additional licensed operators Implement 08-01-85 03-30-88 Rodriguez Consultant report approved.
become available operators to be made available as trainers TR-3 Butid separate training butiding Develop 02-08-85 3/87 Kellman Board of Directors approved A/E firm of Nacht & Lewis on capable of housing all the dept.
3/21/85 for design and construction of facilities for the needs; simulator to De designed training department / simulator; building to be complete 1st and built expeditiously quarter 1987. simulator complete by 1989. When the Board authorizes the monies for this item. it will be considered closed.
T3-4 Expedite procurement of simulator Develop 02-08-85 6/89 Keilman 11/01/85 Simulator specification out to bid.
T3-5 Replace INPO accreditation program Complete 04-08-85 Rodriguez Lead position for INPO accreditation program is a SMUD lead position with SMUD employee; Employee. Contact to Toledo Edison completed.
key personnel to visit other B&W facilities T3-6 Conduct management review of INPO Implement 08-01-85 Rodriguez Consultant report approved.
training program accreditation plans /
processes to assure that technician resources available are consistent with comunitments TD-7 Assign SMUD employee to lead con-Complete 01-16-85 Rodriguez SMUD employee responsible for interface with contractor tractor effort of developing lesson personnel.
plans and system manuals T3-8 Expedite delivery of computerized Complete 04-08-85 Rodriguez Computerized program delivered; being implemented (TRIM).
system for training dept. records.
~
~,
Item Action Assigned me.
Item Required Stcrt Comp 1'ts Individual Comments PS40M-1 Goals and objectives by SMUD Implement 07-01-85 12-01-85 Rodriguez Implemented for 1985, 1986 goals and objectives will be management to be made clear and promulgated in the near future, concise and passed through all levels of the organization PS40M-2 Relocate construction functions into Develop 09-01-85 01-30-86 Rodriguez RJR to schedule Department Managers meeting to review
'the Planning. Scheduling and Outage comuntttee reconumendations and reach concensus in Management Organization resolution.
PS40M-3 Nove total planning and scheduling PAR 05-06-85 01-01-86 Coward Study to determine progransnatic action required.
organization to a centralized locatton I.
1
1
~
Item Action Assigned w.
No.
Item Required St;rt Comp 1 t3 Individual Comments CRP-1 Sp11t present combined chem / rad PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward General Dynamics study underway. See note below.
protection group into separate units to allow upgrading performance i
CRP-2 Supervisors to spend more time in Impl ement 02-18-85 04-22-85 Coward Nuclear Operations taking action to accomplish; however, during refueling outages contractor supervisors will be plant and not delegate their respon-used.
sibility to contractor supervisors CRP-3 Attempt to eliminate all contractors PAR 03-12-85 Open Coward /
PAR refers to elimination of contractors. Appraisal of except during outages when more HP RD 11-01-85 11-18-85 Schwieger screening and training of contract personnel recommends techs are necessary; carefully screen the program implemented is in need of additional work and recommends re-direction of development (RO). Ref.
and train contract personnel LGS85-273 CRP-4 Supervisors to assure techs are Appraisal 10-01-85 12-01-05 Schwieger All NOTEPAD. NOMIS, updates, IE Information Notices and Bulletins. INPO Significant Operating Experience Reports aware of significant radiological /
and Operational Assessment Reports are routed to Chem / Rad chemical events at other nuclear Protection Superintendent and passed on at daily Chem / Rad sites
" Plant Status" meetings.
CRP-5 Carefully document personnel Implement 12-15-85 11-04-85 Coward Procedures require documentation of all personnel contaminations including management feedback methods to contamination; include trending of assure appropriate and effective corrective action. In significant contamination addition, appropriate trending is being accomplished.
CRP-6 Rigorous scheduling of all techs to Implement 08-01-85 01-15-86 Coward Program underway. Schedule developed for 1986, ce done for training in chemistry to be implemented by 1/15/86, and HP CRP-7 Supervisors to participate in lesson Implement 01-16-85 01-16-86 Rodriguez Part of accreditation program will be appraised when accreditation is implemented.
plan development and approve all plans submitted by Training Dept.
CRP-8 Track radiation levels for specific Appraisal 10-01-85 02-01-86 Schwieger Program to record and trend specific plant location radiation in progress. QA Surveillance No. 321 issued.
plant locations on a systematic basts; trend data acautred CRP-9 Improve communications w/ Operations PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward Steps to be taken 'to improve communications to further enhance knowledge of changed conditions within plant.
so that both chemistry and radiation General Dynamics study for additional improvement.
protection supervisors are aware of See note below.
changed conditions in plant.
MQII: This item is being resolved by a four phase study by General Dynamics. Phase 1 of the 3eneral Dynamics study has been completed and reviewed by the operating organization. Phase 2 has been defined and commenced in 7/1/85, to be completed by 9/1/85. Phase II draft reviewed and SMUD comments being forwarded to GD 11/4. Outage activities and availability of personnel to interview caJsed a delay in completion of Phase II.
Phase II now scheduled to be complete 11/15/85. Phase III expected to connence 11/IS/85.
Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required Stcrt Comp 1;t2 Individual Comment 2 Cap-10 Give additional information to Complete 01-16-85 Rodriguez Program for training individuals on effects of ionizing workers on health effects of radiation certified by INPO.
ionizing radiation to be were aware of current knowledge in this field CRP-11 Thoroughly investigate unusual Appraisal 10-01-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Program will be expanded to include summary to incidents radiological or chemical occurrences, to be sent to Department Manager. QA to appraise reports if advisable. issue summary reports to determine if reports acceptable and program worthwhile.
on a timely basis CRP-12 Give all workers exposed to radiation Implement 05-10-85 03-01-86 Coward Information is available; will be distributed. Implemen-written notification of their annual tation of this item will be considered cDaplete when 1985 and cumulative plan exposure exposure data is distributed to workers in 1986.
CRP-13 Split C&RP organization into two PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward Study program underway on Rad / Chem area. See note below.
units; say need to add to tech staff, if so. recruit highly qualified indi-viduals on a timely basis CRP-14 Upgrade chemistry laboratory PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward Study from CRP-13 will include this. See note below.
factitties CRP-15 Head up dosisetry by qualified PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward Same as CpP-13.
See note below.
health physicist CRP-15 Consider replacing photographic film PAR 04-08-85 Open Ceward Will study to identify whether TLD or film badges are the badges with TLDs best for Rancho Seco; part of General Dynamics study.
See note below.
CRP-17 Review radiation records to make PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward Program will be developed under General Dynamics certain data are adequate and easily organization study. See note below.
retrievable.
CRP-18 Conduct SMUD audits prior to INPO Appraisal 11-01-85 01-01-86 Schwieger QA program developed. 1985 audit complete. Appraisal to audits to assure previous recommen-take place commencing 11/1/85.
dations have been carried out and new adverse findings are minimal CRP-13 ALARA should report to plant health PAR 04-03-85 Open Coward Same as CRP-13; contract personnel to study structure.
See note below.
physcist CRP-20 SMUD health physicists to be Complete 04-22-85 Coward HP personnel are encouraged to achieve American Board encouraged to achieve American Board certification.
of Health Physics certification EQIE: This item is being resolved by a four phase study by General Dynamics. Phase 1 of the General Dynamics study has been completed and reviewed by the operating organization. Phase 2 has been defined and connenced in 7/1/85, to be completed by 9/1/85. Phase II draft reviewed and SMUD connents being forwarded to GD 11/4. Outage activities and availability of personnel to interview caused a delay in completion of Phase II.
Phase II now scheduled to be complete 11/15/85. Phase III expected to connence 11/15/85.
f'
. ~
Item Action Assigned no.
Item seguired Start Comp 1;ta Individual Comments
~-
CRP-21 Plant MP should prepare quarterly Complete 10-01 11-15-85 Keilman Report completed and accept'd, e
tabulation of significant radiological events at other sites and circulate to training and RP staff n
e d
I I
6-.
-m.
7
_. _~ --
~_.
' f :- -
. s Ites Action 4:stened
~c.
No.
Item Required St;rt Comp 1;ts Individual Comuments e-AL-1 ALARA should report as separate PAR 94-08-85 Open-Coward Will'be covered in study from CAP-13. Same as CAP-ig.~
function to plant health physicist AL-2 Insure ALARA function is staffed by PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward On completion of CRP-13 study; ALARA will be staffed by SMUD; not a contractor SMUD individual. See note below.
AL-3 Develop a detailed ALARA training RD 11-05-85 Open' Keilman Training module'is being reviewed and will.be changed program Develop to reflect the results of the appraisal. This is primarily directed at the effectiveness of the training.
AL-4 Provide support required to insure RD 11-05-85 Open Kellman Training module is being reviewed and will be changed to ALARA has high plant visibility and Develop Coward reflect the results of the appraisal. This is primarily management backing to terminate directed at the effectiveness of the training.
activities that could result in will be closed, unnecessary exposure to personnel AL-5 Maintain detailed dose data on outage Complete 10-14-85 Keilman Refer to letter from L. R. Kellman to R. J. Rodriguez, work to permit thorough post-outage dated 10-4-85, subject LRS Update: Buclear Engineering ALARA analysis of high pressure Department exposure activities 04-15-85 Keilman 2nd draf of eport sent to ALARA Committee; complete by AL-6 Prepare annual ALARA report sununar-Complete izing outage and annual exposure data 4/15/85.
with reconumendations for achieving future ALARA goals HQII: This item is being resolved by a four phase study by General Dynamics. Phase 1 of the General Dynamics study has been completed and reviewed by the operating organization. Phase 2 has been defined and comunenced in 7/1/85, to be completed by 9/1/85. Phase II draft reviewed and SMUD conuments being forwarded to GD 11/4. Outage activities and availability of personnel to interview caused a delay in completion of Phase II.
Phase II now scheduled to be complete 11/15/85. Phase III expected to comunence 11/15/85.
~
- Action Assioned Item No.
Item' Required Stirt Comp 1sts Individual Comments s.
EP-1 Develop qualification card system to Appraisal 09-15-85 12-01-85 Schwieger Qualification cards (task analysis check-off sheets) developed by Impe11 (Task 109). Jack Hau of NO has check off training requirements for designed format which will include applicable emergency persons engagrj in emergency planning training.
drills and exercises QA to audit / appraise effectiveness of program. Appraisal'.
to occur after emergency drill in September.
.A-
.w.
e e
M 9
i, l
yg Item Action As:1gned No.
Item Required Sttrt Complst3 Individual' Comments D',
EV-1 Reorganize environmental section for PAR 04-08-85 Open Coward Study by General Dynamics. Project on schedule 3/11/85, better evaluation of the NRC RETS Phase I complete by 7/1/85. See note below.
program EV-2 Release LLNL report on radiocestun Complete 04-01-85 Keilman LLNL report sent to NRC on 04/01/85.
releases to the public as soon as feasible with cover statement summarizing results in a manner easily understood EV-3 Hake available to the media and Complete 04-08-85 Kellman Annual report has been completed.
public an annual sunnary of environ-mental findings in a form permitting easy public comprehension NOTE: This item is being resolved by a four phase study by General Dynamics. Phase 1 of the General Dynamics study has been completed and reviewed by the operating organization. Phase 2 has been defined and consenced in 7/1/85 to be completed by 9/1/85.
. (
~'
Item Action Assigned No.
Item Required St:rt Comp 1;t?
Individual Comments s
PS-1 Re-evaluate system for procurement of Develop 08-01-85 01-01-86 Schwieger Program will be developed.
conenercial grade items to be used in Class I systems to assure items have received adequate attention from initiation of PR through item storage and installation at the site PS-2 Consider separate nuclear purchasing Complete 09-15-85 10-15-85 Vinquist Appraisal completed (reference J Vinguist to R Rodriguez dated 10/21/85). Appraisal complete, group whose sole duties are to per-form nuclear grade purchasing and should have prior experience in nuclear purchasing PS-3 Revise present practice of co-PAR 04-08-85 12-31-85 Schwieger QA has responsibility to clarify with the consultant the Coward issues related to these items. The clarification should mingling Class I, II and Connercial include the scope of industry and regulatory requirements Grade items with non-class items; against which the entire warehouse and seterials control institute visual system for identi-concept should be judged. From this evaluation the fication of safety-related items; Nuclear Operations and QA Hanagers shall establish a train personnel in new system program and schedule for implementation. Definition of the program and schedule should be established by 8/1/85.
i PS-4 Estabitsh more positive system of PAR 04-08-85 12-31-85 Coward QA has responsibility to clarify with the consultant the issues related to these items. The clarification should control for entrance / egress fran include the scope of industry and regulatory requirements safety-related storage facilities against which the entire warehouse and materials control concept should be judged. From this evaluation the Nuclear Operations and QA Hanagers shall establish a program and schedule for implementation. Definition of the program and schedule should be established by 8/1/85.
PS-5 Expedite placement of item classi-PAR 04-08-85 12-31-85 Schwieger Stock issue cards are being reviewed and updated as the necessary material is ordered.
fications on the stock record cards. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Action Asilgned y.
Iten
.No.
Item Required St rt ComplSt3 Individual Comments RMDC-1 Establish single records management Develop 10-30-85 01-15-86 Keilman/
Phase I, Cindy Buchanan to develop detailed program for
. integrating SDC control of drawings with NED. Program system using site records management development by 12/01/85.
organization and system as a basis Phase II, develop remaining requirements (Bill Braun) 01/15/86.
RMDC-2 -Assign control of records vault to Impl ement 09-15-85 02-01-86 Schwieger Move delayed because of space.
i records storage equipment; provide qualified staff to operate facility RMDC-3 Provide additional qualified per-Complete 02-07-85 Coward Additional personnel have been assigned to MIMS Coordinator.
sonnel to maintenance to accelerate handitrg of WR infonmation into MIMS RMDC-4 Perform study / action plan to deter-Complete 05-06-85 Keilman Order GR 69282 placed with Sentinel Fire Co. to install halon system in NEDC trailer; complete by 5/1/85.
mine impact of a major fire in Design City and precautions to prevent RMDC-5 Return control of Tech Manual Complete 04-08-85 09-15-85 Rodriguez Part of overall organization adjustments.
Library to Records Management.
f,,,,,
DEFINITIONS FOR
" METHODOLOGY FOR RECOMMENiiATION RESOLUTION" FLOW CHART The following definitions are to be used in interpreting the requirements delineated in the attached flow chart as well as the " status" column in the Status of LRS Recomendations report.
1.
Valid An evaluation of the recommendation to determine whether the recommendation accurately reflects an adverse condition, management methodology, or requires action which would be in violation of applicable law, rule, or policy governing the operation of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District.
2.
Justification A written explanation which includes the reasons why a recomendation is cetermined to be invalid for SMUD.
3.
Complete Complete, no followup required.
4.
Resolution The response to valid recommendations for which programmatic action is determined not to be required.
5.
Progransnatic Actior. Required (PAR)
The recommendation is evaluated for its impact and depth of corrective action required.
This includes a determination if the required action can be completed on a "one-time" basis or if existing District programs must be modified or new programs developed in response to the recommendation.
6.
Develop An evaluation of alternatives and/or development of a corrective action program is underway.
7.
Implement The corrective action program has been developed and implementation is underway.
la DEFINITIONS FOR
" METHODOLOGY FOR RECOMENliATION RESOLUTION" FLOW CHART 8.
Appraisal (App) for Effectiveness (Eff) and Implementation (Imp)
The corrective action program is underway or implemented and an effectiveness appraisal is being performed to determine if the program was implemented as intended and if it was effective. When warranted, several recommendations may be grouped for a single appraisal if the combination of these recommendations is indicative of broader programmatic concern.
I 9.
Redirect Implementation (RI)
The results of the Appraisal indicate that the corrective action program was not implemented as intended or implementation is incomplete.
Direction to complete or implement the original approved corrective action program and accountability for proper response is re-emphasized.
- 10. Redirect Development (RD)
The results of the Appraisal indicate that the corrective action program was not effective and alternatives must be reexamined and the existing program modified or a new corrective action program developed.
- 11. Closed The results of the Appraisal indicate the proper implementation of the corrective action program has been completed and the effectiveness of the program is satisfactory.
l l ;
~
^
METHOL: OLOGY FOR RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION Recommendation i f Valid justification 1 r Complete h
l PAR Resolution Yes 1 r Develop 1 r Implement 1 r l
No Appraisal No g
g IMP EFF 1
Close
.