ML20135H817

Corrected Copy of Response to Generic Ltr 85-07 Re Intentions Concerning Implementation of Integrated Living Schedule concept.Long-range Planning Activity Implemented. Completed Form Encl

ML20135H817
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek, Three Mile Island, 05000000
Issue date:	08/27/1985
From:	Wilson R GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:	Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20135H816	List: ML20135H815 ML20135H817
References
5211-85-2155, GL-85-07, GL-85-7, RFW-85-0596, RFW-85-596, NUDOCS 8509240262
Download: ML20135H817 (4)

Text

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

t GPU Nucl< ear NQgIgf 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 201 263-6500 TELEX 1316-482 Writer's Direct Dial Number:

August 27, 1985 RFW 85-0596 5211-85-2155 Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-16 Docket No. 50-219 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (Unit 1)

License No. OPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Integrated Living Scheduling for Plant Modifications (Generic Letter 85-07)

Your letter of May 2, 1985 (Generic Letter 85-07) requests Licensees document intentions regarding the implementation of the Integrated Living Schedule concept.

During the past year, we have implemented a long range planning activity for Oyster Creek (0C) and have recently initiated this activity for Three Mile Island Unit 1 (THI-1). Discussions with other utilities already having Integrated Living Schedules, and with members of your staff, indicate that a cooperative effort between GPU Nuclear and the NRC could benefit both organizations including improving our long range planning activity already initiated.

We agree with your assessment that the underlying benefits of adopting a preplanned, structured management approach to implementing plant changes is the added assurance that utility sponsored " plant betterment" projects will have an opportunity to be scheduled and completed along with NRC directed activities in an appropriate order of priority and significance.

With respect to timing; concerning OC, we have already started discussions with your staff and for TMI-1, assuming an early restart, we would propose starting disucssions with your staff in early 1986.

8509240262 85091829 PDR ADOCK O P

GPU Nuclear is a part of the General Public Utilities System

4 -

e 2-Attached is the completed form provided in Generic Letter 85-07 which you requested. If there are any questions, please contact Mr. Michael

'Laggart at (201) 299-2341 regarding OC or Mr. Richard McGoey at (201) 299-2204 regarding TMI-1.

truly yours, 9d,%

F. Wilson Vice President Technical Functions RFW:gpa 2280f/001 Attachment cc: Administrator Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 NRC Resident Inspect'or

• Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating. Station Forked River, NJ 08731 J. Donohew U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 R. Conte NRS Resident Inspector Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1 Middletown, PA 17057 J. Thoma Project Manager TMI-l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 J. F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactor Branch f4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014

~

,-2

o i

l ENCLOSURE 2 '

RESPONSE FORMAT - GENERIC LETTER 85-PLANT NAME: Oyster Creek and Three ffile Island 1 UTILITY: GPU Nuclear I. INTENTIONS A. Intend to work with the staff to develop'an ILS x B. Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS C. Do not presently intend to negotiate an ILS with the staff D. Plan.to implement an informal ILS only.

II. STATUS A. If you answered I.A above:

1. Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant (s)?

Circle One: (Yes) No If yes, select best description:

Engineering judgement Analytic Hiearchy process Risk based analysis X Cost-benefit analysis x Other (please describe)

If no, provide estimated date for selecting a methodology:

Date or If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the-selection of a methodology:

2. What is your . estimated date for making a' oyster Creek submittal to the NRC- 12/31/85 l or l If not presently available, planned date for ThreehiileIsland1 scheduling a submittal to the NRC 6/30/86 1

~

r ,

t e- ,-

B.

If you answered I.B above:

1 or provide your schedule for supplying an expla See separate sheet (s)

Separate submittal scheduled for

~(Date!

2.

If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements Contact / Time Frame _

Phone Number C. If you answered I.C 1

development' of an ILS for your facilityf s)?Would you s th'e Circle One: Yes No a contact that can rake arrangements.If v e- yes, propose a tim Contact Time Frame Phone Number If no, any constructive comments you haveae. would be appreci t d III.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS Please make any suogestions'you may have as to how a cnhancement.

utility sponsored availability / reliability pro.iect mighte. be credited f ey i

'N A