ML20135F958

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That No Environ Assessment or EIS Warranted for 850822 Request for Amend to License SNM-1950,allowing Use of SNM for Testing &/Or Calibr
ML20135F958
Person / Time
Site: 07003014
Issue date: 09/10/1985
From: Crow W
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20135F922 List:
References
SER-850910, NUDOCS 8509180033
Download: ML20135F958 (2)


Text

-. ,

SEP 10 1985 DOCKET NO: 70-3014 APPLICANT: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Connecticut Light & Power Company <

Western Massachusetts Electric Company New England Power Company United Illuminating Company Public Service Company of New Hampshire Central Vermont Public Service Corporation Montaup Electric Company City of Burlington, Vermont, Electric Light Department Chicopee Municipal Lighting Plant Massachusetts Municipal. Wholesale Electric Company Vermont. Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc.

Central Maine Power Company Village of Lyndonville Electric Department

-Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative Fitchburg Gas and Electric . Light Company FACILITY: Millstone Nuclear Power Station (MNPS), Unit No. 3

SUBJECT:

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION FOR AMENDMENT REQUEST DATED AUGUST 22, 1985 By letter dated August 22, 1985, the Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, on behalf of itself and its partners, requested a license amendment to allow the storage and use of special nuclear materials in the form of sources and detectors at MNPS, Unit 3. The present license permits only the storage of such materials at Unit 3. The requested amendment would allow the use of special nuclear materials for.the purpose of testing and/or calibration at MNPS, Unit 3, at this time. Approved radiation. protection measures will be employed for the .

storage and handling of all radioactive materials licensed for MNPS, Unit 3.

Accordingly, the staff has concluded that the following conditions have been met:

1. There is no significant increase in the type or significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite,
2. There is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure,
3. .There is no significant construction impact, and
4. There is no significant increase .in the potential for or consequences from radiological accidents.

8509180033 850910 PDR ADOCK 07003014 C PDR

r:

a 2

SEP 101985 i

Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22(c)(11), neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is warranted for this proposed action.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Original Sisned37,5 g.!. Crow W. T.' Crow, Acting Chief Uranium Fuel Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety, NMSS OFC: FCUP :FCUP :FCU :FCUF </:  :  :

NAME:KKod li as:NK lach:VL arpe :WTCrow  :  :  :

DATE:9/9/85- :9/ /85 :9/f/85 :9/ // /85 :  :  :

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

..