|
---|
Category:ANNUAL OPERATING REPORT
MONTHYEARML20211J6651998-12-31031 December 1998 10CFR50.59 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for 980101-981231 for Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3 ML20195F4541997-12-31031 December 1997 10CFR50.59 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Jan-Dec 1997 HBL-97-013, Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Plant for Jan-Dec 1996,per 10CFR50.591997-12-19019 December 1997 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Plant for Jan-Dec 1996,per 10CFR50.59 HBL-87-086, Annual Rept of Design Changes,19861987-12-29029 December 1987 Annual Rept of Design Changes,1986 ML20138C5521985-12-31031 December 1985 1985 Annual Rept ML20135D1341984-12-31031 December 1984 Annual Rept of Facility Changes for 1984 1998-12-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20211J6651998-12-31031 December 1998 10CFR50.59 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for 980101-981231 for Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3 DCL-99-045, 1998 Annual Financial Rept for PG&E Corp. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Financial Rept for PG&E Corp. with ML20151U1691998-08-28028 August 1998 Rev 2 to DSAR for Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3 ML20216C8821998-04-0808 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 32 to License DPR-7 ML20203J6601998-02-28028 February 1998 Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept for Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3 ML20195F4541997-12-31031 December 1997 10CFR50.59 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Jan-Dec 1997 ML20217G5151997-12-31031 December 1997 1997 PG&E Corp Annual Rept HBL-97-013, Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Plant for Jan-Dec 1996,per 10CFR50.591997-12-19019 December 1997 Annual Rept of Changes,Tests & Experiments for Plant for Jan-Dec 1996,per 10CFR50.59 ML20205F5881997-07-24024 July 1997 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Diablo Canyon Power Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20205F5991997-04-12012 April 1997 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Humboldt Bay Power Plant, Unit 3 DCL-97-045, Pacific Gas & Electric Co 1996 Annual Rept1996-12-31031 December 1996 Pacific Gas & Electric Co 1996 Annual Rept ML20129J4311996-10-18018 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Approving Corporate Restructuring & Establishment of Holding Company Under Temporary Name PG&E Parent Co.,Inc of Which PG&E Would Become Wholly Owned Subsidiary ML20058P6281993-08-31031 August 1993 Rev 6 to Pacific Gas & Electric Co Humboldt Bay Power Plant Unit 3 - Safstor QA Plan ML20141M0471991-12-31031 December 1991 Pge Annual Rept - 1991 ML20236E0581988-12-31031 December 1988 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Annual Rept 1988 ML20151G2361988-07-19019 July 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 23 to License DPR-7 ML20151P6951988-04-30030 April 1988 Pacific Gas & Electric Co,Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3 Safstor QA Plan ML20196F3641988-01-31031 January 1988 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1988 ML20148Q3281987-12-31031 December 1987 PG&E 1987 Annual Rept HBL-87-086, Annual Rept of Design Changes,19861987-12-29029 December 1987 Annual Rept of Design Changes,1986 ML20237H7861987-07-31031 July 1987 Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1987 ML20236G8241987-07-31031 July 1987 QA Plan for Humboldt Bay Power Plant Unit 3 - Safstor ML20237K8471987-06-30030 June 1987 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1987 ML20235C9311987-06-23023 June 1987 Rept to ACRS Re Humboldt Bay Unit 3 - Core II ML20237K4221987-05-31031 May 1987 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1987 ML20210C5311987-04-30030 April 1987 SER Re Decommissioning of Facility ML20237K5311987-03-31031 March 1987 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1987 ML20211C5721987-02-11011 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 22 to License DPR-7 ML20205C0891987-01-31031 January 1987 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1987 ML20204H4331986-12-31031 December 1986 PG&E Annual Rept for 1986 ML20212P8841986-12-31031 December 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1986 ML20211Q0541986-11-30030 November 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1986 ML20211H3401986-10-31031 October 1986 PG&E Responses to Public Comments on Des for Decommissioning Humboldt Bay Unit 3 ML20212L8991986-10-31031 October 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1986 ML20207F8221986-09-30030 September 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1986 ML20207D6041986-08-31031 August 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1986 ML20212N4921986-08-26026 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 21 to License DPR-7 ML20215D4281986-07-31031 July 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1986 ML20214L7861986-06-30030 June 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1986 ML20206H1771986-06-16016 June 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 20 to License DPR-7 ML20206C3131986-06-15015 June 1986 Comments on Des for Decommissioning Humboldt Bay Power Plant,Unit 3. Monetary Cost Estimates & Data on Contamination from Early Pool Leak Should Be Provided ML20205Q0061986-05-31031 May 1986 Rev 2 to Safstor QA Plan ML20205D6071986-05-31031 May 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1986 ML20154Q0541986-03-31031 March 1986 Rev 1 to Safstor QA Program ML20197D1711986-02-28028 February 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1986 ML20203E0151986-01-31031 January 1986 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1986 ML20210F2361985-12-31031 December 1985 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1985 ML20138C5521985-12-31031 December 1985 1985 Annual Rept ML20138L8501985-12-31031 December 1985 Rev 1 to Humboldt Bay Power Plant Unit 3 - Safstor QA Plan ML20137U3771985-11-30030 November 1985 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1985 1998-08-28
[Table view] |
Text
.
PGandE Letter No.: HBL-85-041 ENCLOSURE HUMBOLDT BAY POWER PLANT UNIT NO. 3 DOCKET NO. 50-133 ANNUAL REPORT OF FACILITY CHANGES FOR 1984 Pacific Gas and Electric Capany
~
8509130358 850904 PDR R ADOCK 05000133 PDR 0457S/0036K~
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY CHANGES WHICH AFFECT THE PLANT AS DESCRIBED IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 1. DCR HB3-0-SE-097, Circuit Breaker Control Transformer Secondary Fuse Inspections of circuit breakers at HBPP determined that approximately 95 percent of the circuit breaker control transformers had secondary side fuses that were sized too large for the transformer rating. These fuses were replaced with properly sized fuses.
Safety Evaluation Summary Reduction of the transformer secondary fuse rating will protect the transformer from overloading which could result in a fire and damage the breaker. System designs provide redundant equipment to protect against breaker failure. Reducing the size of the fuses will not result in an unreviewed safety question.
- 2. DCR HB3-0-SI-106, Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharge Process Ibnitor The liquid radioactive waste discharge process monitor was originally installed during plant construction in 1962. Due to its design and age, the monitor had become very difficult to calibrate and maintain. A new nonitor was installed that does not have these problems. The nei monitor has a shielded monitor cavity, which enhances the accuracy of the instrument.
Safety Evaluation Summary Since the new monitor performs the same function as the original monitor, an unreviewed safety question does not exist. Replacement of the original monitor does not increase the potential for an unintentional release of radioactive material.
, 3. DCR HB3-0-SM-lll, Resin Storage Tank Conversion To Laundry Waste Hold Tank This modification converted the resin storage tank from the condensate demineralizer system to a laundry waste hold tank and permits draining of the existing laundry waste tank into the new laundry waste hold tank. As a result, the contents of the waste hold tank can be analyzed prior to release. This allows operation of the laundry to continue while waiting for analyses results.
Safety Evaluation Summary This modification does not increase the potential for an unmonitored release of radioactive waste since the tanks and piping are all contained within plant structures and are adequately drained to the plant radioactive waste collection system.
0457S/0036K !
1 1 4. DCP. HB3-0-SI-116, Gas Treatment System The gas treatment system sample valve was replaced with a carbon steel valve. The fonner valve i.as constructed of brass. Caking of sodium hydroxide on the valve seat had caused the valve to leak. The carbon steel valve is more resistant to corrosion from the caustic solution in the system.
Safety Evaluation Summary An unreviewed safety question does not exist since the carbon steel valve is less susceptible to corrosion from sodium hydroxide and, therefore, is an improvement over the former valve.
l i
J
)
)
t' 0457S/0036K ,
- - , - -"