ML20134M433

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 850729-0802
ML20134M433
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/27/1985
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134M427 List:
References
50-348-85-33, NUDOCS 8509040119
Download: ML20134M433 (2)


See also: IR 05000729/2008002

Text

. - - -. , ._ . _

_ _ - . - _- . __ - - -

i

. .

! l

'

.

I

i

1

ENCLOSURE 1

,

! NOTICE OF VIOLATION

!

Alabama Power Company Docket No. 50-348

Farley License No. NPF-2

,

i The following violations were identified during an inspection conducted on

! July 29 - August 2, 1985. The Severity Levels were assigned in accordance with

the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).

1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X, as implemented by paragraph 17.2.10 of

the Farley FSAR, requires, in part, that a program for . inspection of

4

activities affecting quality be established and implemented to verify '

l conformance with procedures and that inspections be performed by individuals

other than those who performed the activity being inspected.

- 10 CFR

j 50.55a(g) requires, in part, that components classified as ASME Code classes

1, 2, and 3 meet the requirements set forth in ASME Section XI. Paragraph

'

j IWA-4000 of the 1974 Edition of ASME Section XI requires that a QA program

l (NA-4000) be documented and maintained for repairs and modifications. Para-

!' graph NA-4133.10 of subsection NA of the 1984 Edition of ASME Section III

requires that in-process inspections be performed to assure conformance with

! procedures and that the inspections be performed by persons other than those

i- who performed the activity being examined. In addition, such persons are

! not to report directly to the immediate supervisors who are responsible for

the work to be performed. Paragraph 17.2.10 of the FSAR requires, in part,

l that maintenance activity inspections include the original inspection

i requirements, including visual examinations to determine material and

i assembly integrity, cleanliness, critical dimensions, and compliance with

work procedures.

Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not independently

, in-process inspected to assure compliance with procedures in.that class 1

4

and 2 pipe welds covered by Maintenance Work Request Nos. 94322, 88067, and

,

84604 did not receive the independent in-process inspections (fit-up, final

visual, etc.) performed on the original welds.

'

. This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

2. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by Section 17.2.5 cf the '

Farley FSAR, requires, in part, that activities affecting quality shall be

-prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, and drawings and shall be

'

. accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures and drawings.

Paragraph 3.6.1 of procedure ISI-8, Revision 07, the applicable procedure

for visual inservice inspection (ISI) of class 1.and 2 pipe supports,

3

requires that hangers having calibrated iload indicators have the scale

i reading recorded. Paragraph 4.10 of procedure FNP-1-STP-157.0, Revision 1,

the applicable-procedure for control of ISI, requires that support settings

,

of constant and variable spring type hangers be verified.

"

8509040119 850827

PDR ADOCK 05000348

.

G PDR

1

,

_ . . - _ _ . _. _ _ _ _ . _ ~ . - -_ __ ,_. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ , _ -._ _ _

l

- ,

e

)

1

.

Alabama Power Company 2 Docket No. 50-348

Farley License No. NPF-2

Contrary to the above, during the last outages, activities affecting quality

were not accomplished in accordance with prescribed procedures in that, for

Class 2 pipe support spring hangers "A" on ISO ALA-221 and "F" on ISO

ALA-218, the support settings were not recorded and verified.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).

l Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within 30

days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply,

including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violations; (2) the reasons

'

for the violations if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken

and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid

further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Security or safeguards information should be submitted as an enclosure to

facilitate withholding it from public disclosure as required by 10 CFR 2.790(d)

or 10 CFR 73.21.

AL)3 2 71985

Date:

i

!

!

. . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ,