ML20134L253
| ML20134L253 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek, 05000000, Crane |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1985 |
| From: | Wilson R GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | Thompson H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-85-07, GL-85-7, RFW-85-0596, RFW-85-596, NUDOCS 8509030161 | |
| Download: ML20134L253 (4) | |
Text
i GPU Nuclear NMCIMr 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 201 263-6500 TELEX 136-482 Writer's Direct Dial Number.
j August 27, 1985 RFN 85-0396 Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station License No. DPR-16 Docket No. 50-219 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (Unit 1)
License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Integrated Living Scheduling for Plant Modifications (Generic Letter 85-07)
Your letter of May 2, 1985 (Generic Letter 85-07) requests Licensees document intentions regarding the implementation of the Integrated Living Schedule concept.
During the past year, we have implemented a long range planning activity for Oyster Creek (OC) and have recently initiated this activity for Three Mile Island Unit 1 (TMI-1).
Discussions with other utilities already having Integrated Living Schedules, and with members of your staff, indicate that a cooperative effort between GPU Nuclear and the NRC could benefit both organizations including improving our long range planning activity already initiated.
We agree with your assessment that the underlying benefits of adopting a preplanned, structured management approach to implementing plant changes is the added assurance that utility sponsored " plant betterment" projects will have an opportunity to be scheduled and completed along with NRC directed activities in an appropriate order of priority and significance.
With respect to timing; concerning OC, we have already started discussions with your staff and for TMI-1, assuming an early restart, we would propose starting disucssions with your staff in early 1986.
kR k9 P
p GPU Nuclear is a part of the General Public Utilities System N:
Attached is the completed form provided in Generic Letter 85-07 which you requested.
If there are any questions, please contact Mr. Michael Laggart at (201) 299-2341 regarding OC or Mr. Richard McGoey at (201) 299-2204 regarding TMI-1.
truly yours, sb.n F. Wilson Vice President Technical Functions RFW:gpa 2280f/001 Attachment cc: Administrator Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 J.'Donohew U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 R. Conte NRS Resident Inspector Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1 Middletown, PA 17057
-J. Thoma Project Manager TMI-l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 J. F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactor Branch #4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014
)
1 ENCLOSURE 2 RESPONSE FORMAT - GENERIC LETTER 85-PLANT NAME:
Oyster Creek and Three !!ile Island 1 GPU Nuclear UTILITY:
I.
INTENTIONS A.
Intend to work with the staff to develop an ILS X
B.
Have reservations that must be resolved before developing ILS C.
Do not presently intend to negotiate an ILS with the staff D.
Plan to implement an informal ILS only II.
STATUS A.
If you answered I.A above:
1.
Have you settled on a method for prioritizing the work at your plant (s)?
Circle One:
(Yes)
No i
If yes, select best description:
Engineering judgement Analytic Hiearchy process Risk based analysis x
Cost-benefit analysis x
Other (please describe)
If no, prov.ide estimated date for selecting a methodology:
Date or If not presently available, provide estimated date for scheduling the selection of a methodology:
2.
What is your, estimated date for making a oyster creek submittal to the NRC-12/31/85 or If not presently available, planned date for Three Mile Island I 6/30/86 scheduling a submittal to the NRC
v
]
B.
If you answered I.B above:
i 1.
Please explain your reservations on separate sheet (s) or provide your schedule for supplying an explanation See separate sheet (s) or Separate submittal scheduled for (DateT 2.
If available to meet with the staff to discuss your concerns, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements Contact / Time Frame Phone Number C.
If you answered I.C 1.
development of an ILS for your facility (s)?Would you be wil Circle One:
Yes No If yes, propose a time frame for such a meeting and provide a contact that can make arrangements.
Contact Time Frame __
Phone Number If no, any constructive comments you have would be appreciated.
III.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS availability / reliability proiect might be credited for plan enhancement.
Provide additional constructive comments as appropriate.
.