ML20134G997

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to RAI Re Core Reload Methodology
ML20134G997
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 11/06/1996
From: James Knubel
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
6710-96-2352, NUDOCS 9611130478
Download: ML20134G997 (2)


Text

-

~ _ -

l l

l l

LPU Nuclear,Inc.

I

(

Route 441 South 1

NUCLEAR Post Office Box 480 1

Middletown. PA 17057-0480 Tel 717-944 7621 (717) 948-8005 6710-96-2352 November 06, 1996 1

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Ger,tlemen:

[

Subject:

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TM1-1)

Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Response to Request for Additional Information -

Core Reload Methodology In response to NRC questions raised during discussions on September 25,1996, GPU Nuclear is providing the following information.

The safety analysis for the postulated main steam line break (MSLB) accident in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) assumes that water from the cold legs homogeneously mixes in the lower

~

plenum before entering the core region. Plant test data documented in EPRI NP-3545, " Thermal Mixing in the Lower Plenum and Core of a PWR," dated May 1984, indicated that mixing of the cold leg water in the lower plenum was less than that assumed in the FSAR analysis. Babcock &

Wilcox's (B&W) evaluation of this issue was addressed in B&W letter GPUN-89-133, dated May 30,1989. This evaluation considered possible impacts on reactivity feedback coeflicients, peaking factors, location of the hot channel, stuck rod peaking, boron worth and shutdown margin.

GPU Nuclear intends to perform reload analysis using the RETRAN-02 code, and based on the above-referenced plant test data which is applicable to TMI-1, a reduced vessel mixing assumption will be conservatively utilized. The amount of the thermal mixing in the reactor vessel can be quantified by the ratio of the difference of the loop temperature of the hot legs to the difference in the loop temperature in the cold legs.

9611130478 961106 I

h

()

j hDR ADOCK 0500 9

i 6710-96-2352 i

^

Page 2 This is represented by:

n n

P A hot leg temperature - Loop B hot leg temperature

)

htio _ I. - I. _ L T,-T, Loop A cold leg temperature - Loop B cold leg temperature c

c When T, is equal to T, the above ratio will be equal to zero. This would mean total mixing u

g has occurred in the reactor vessel. Conversely, when the difference T, - T, is equal to u

u Tc, - T,, the above ratio would be 1.0. This implies no mixing in the reactor vessel. The tests I

e show this ratio to be between 0.4 and 0.5 (a ratio of 0.4 implies 60% mixing, while 0.5 implies 50% mixing). The TMI-1 RETRAN model will conservatively incorporate a reactor vessel mixing ratio of 0.5 based on the above test data.

If any additional information is required, please contact Mr. David J. Distel, GPU Nuclear f

Regulatory Affairs at (201) 316-7955.

Sincerely l

l 1

J.

nubel Vice President & Director, TMI i

E DJD/jr l

cc:

Administrator, Region I i

NRC TMI Senior Resident < Inspector j

NRC Senior Project Manager, TMI F. Orr - NRC, NRR l

l l

1 i

4 j

,