ML20134B117
| ML20134B117 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1985 |
| From: | Brockman K, Wilson B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134B108 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-321-OL-85-03, 50-321-OL-85-3, NUDOCS 8511110278 | |
| Download: ML20134B117 (2) | |
Text
I V
ENCLOSURE 1 EXAMINATION REPORT 321/0L-85-03 Facility Licensee: Georgia Power Company P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Facility Name: Edwin I. Hatch Facility Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366 Written examinations _ were reviewed at Plant Hatch near Baxley, Georgia.
Simulator examination were administrated at Plant Hatch near Baxley, Georgia.
Chief Examiner:
w&f m/nr ~ -.
b /2 9 /gs-K.~
. Brock f
Date Signed tobofr5 Approved by:
Wct d.
/^ %
Bru A. Wilson, Section Chief Date 5'gned Summary:
Examinations on October 15-17, 1985 Simulator examinations were administered to three operators; one of whom passed.
Six operators were: administered written requalification examinations by.the utility; NRC review of examination results verified all operators passed.
8511110278 851106 PDR ADOCM 05000321 G
z; REPORT DETAILS 1.
Facility Employees Contacted:
- H. C. Nix, General Manager -. Hatch
- T. V. Greene, Deputy General Manager - Hatch
- L. Summer, Operations Supervisor - Hatch
- C. T. Moore, Training Manager - Hatch
- R. S. Grantham, Operations Training Supervisor
- Attended Exit Meeting 2.
NRC Senior Resident Inspector:
P. Holmes-Ray 3.
Examiners:
- K. E. Brockman J. F. Munro
- Chief Examiner 4.
Examination Review Meeting At the conclusion of the written examinations, the examiners met with C. T. Moore and R. S. Grantham to review the written examination and answer key.
Review of utility grading was found to be within the guidelines as esta-blished in NUREG-1021, ES-601.
5.
. Exit Meeting At the conclusion of the site visit, the examiners met with representatives of the plant staff to discuss the results of the examination.
Those-
-individuals who clearly passed the simulator examination were identified.
There were no. generic weaknesses (greater than 75-percent of candidates-giving, incorrect ' answers to or:s-- examination topic) noted during the simulator examination.
l The' cooperation given to the examiners 'was noted and appreciated.
The -licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided.to or reviewed by the examiners.
~.--.L
.._a-_--__-_ _. _ _ - - _ _ _ __,_
.L- --
u.-a - ---
. ~ -
N--.
~