ML20134A425

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Errata to Rev 1, Procedures Generation Package
ML20134A425
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/1985
From: Stratman R
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20134A419 List:
References
PROC-850906-01, NUDOCS 8511040406
Download: ML20134A425 (17)
v • d • e


Text

PGP

, o Pag::: 222 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 97 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-1 PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-1 Deviation:

Sentence " Suppression pool makeup may be augmented by SPMU" was included.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Perry design incorporates a suppression pool makeup system. Hence, the inclusion is warranted.

Reviewer: r v Date:'/9[' f f '

/

Approved: YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:

Approved: NO (circle one)

GSO: h,1 ddh Date: tf M /0~

Incorporated: 2 </dfff7 Date: f/ I z-8511040406 851029 PDR ADOCK 05000440 E PDR

.a

PGP

-e' Page: 224 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 99

~

EPG Step Number (s): SP/L PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-2

' Deviation:

Perry specific curve for Heat Capacity Level Limit used in place of EPG curve.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Reference Perry specific-calculation 11016-15, Rev. O.

Reviewer: hb J

mnh Date: 9((!T8

. Approved:. YES NO ffN/R (circle one) i '

NDAS Lead Engineer: A Date: 9-f -#U' Approved:

@ NO (circle one)

GSO: 0.I, Md Date: 4MN Incorporated: </[/,

/ 1

//<t/N% Date:

7y

i PGP

. . Page: 223 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines

' Deviation Sheet: Number 98

4 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-1; SP/L-3 PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-1; SP/L-3 Deviation:
Perry specific value for suppression pool level following SPMU initiation has been used' in place of . EPG value.

+

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 4

' Justification:

Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-28, Rev. 1.

t 4

Reviewer:

/

4 Date: Tf7!TI

~/

Approved: S NO(f N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: ((. 4 Date: f*N6 Approved: h NO (circle one) ,

GSO: h.; Md Date: 9 M MI

- Incorporated:

f ,

[ d !5 ftS-,.  ; Date: [ v' i

PGP

,_ ,- P2gn: 225 R v.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines

r Deviation Sheet: Number 100 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-3.2

, PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-3.2

-, Deviation:

Perry specific value for Maximum Primary Containment Water Level Limit

!' used in place of EPG value.

b Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Reference Design Specification 660, Revision 7, 5/2/d3.

Reviewer: b j snc Date: 797[

Approved:

r>N/R <

YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: /L Date: f- 9-/J' Approved: NO (circle one)

GSO: 8,a .dd/1 Date: 1 ADI M Incorporated:

/

f'

((  % Date: f!9/' f_7~~

//

l

PGP Pega: 226 R v.: 1 Attachment 7 - (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 101 EPG Step Number (s): Secondary Containment Control Guideline PSTG Step Number (s): N/A Deviation:

EPG " Secondary Containment Control Guidelines" was removed.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

The Perry secondary containment design does not require a separate guide-line.

~

Reviewer:  ; [ffrfm ; Date: ,/((-O t.. , ..

Approved: YES NO (circle one)-

NDAS Imad Engineer: Date:

Approved: h NO (circle one)

GSO: 0_ l e $1, L Date: 6 J2/' eft Incorporated: 4, $ge[fu Date: [

PGP Pagina 227 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 102

~ EPG Step Number (s): Radioactivity Release Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition; RR-2 PSTG Step Number (s): Radioactivity Release Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition; RR-2

. Deviation:

PSTG does not provide a specific value (in Ci/sec.) for the release rate

.. which requires a specific Emergency Plan classification.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

The Emergency Plan at Perry specifies several different release rates which would result in Alert or General Emergency classifications. Hence, listing only one of these could be possible misleading.

v Reviewer: /[g [w fps Date: r/ / F Approved: YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:

Approved: NO (circle one)

CSO: 0.1Msb Date: f Jg M Incorporated:

/ ' /

bm - Date: /

/ /

f

PGP Pagn 228 s a Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 103 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-1 Deviation:

" Condensate" was changed to " Condensate /feedwater".

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Provide consistency with other steps where condensate and feedwater systems are molded into one system.

Reviewer: p e Date: 9

/ ' /

//

Approved: YES NO Mv (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:

Approved: NO (circle one)

GSO: 0.0 A $uh Date: { Eh c)F Incorporated:

/

o ' Id X/rfd Date: #

//

!W l

L

PGP Pagn: 229 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 103a EPG Step Number (s): Box preceding step Cl-1 PSTG Step Number (s): Box preceding step Cl-1 Deviation:

The phrase " Boron Injection is required or boron has been injected into the RPV" has been deleted, and the phrase "Any control rod is not in-serted to or beyond position 02 (Maximum Suberitical Banked Withdrawal Position)" has been added.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

The guidelines are now organized to provide the correct direction for control of RPV water level for any ATWS whether or not boron has been in-jected. This guidance is provided in Contingency 7.

Reviewer:

' I

[7X/rA , Date: </[//

/' /'/

Approved: .YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:

Approved: NO (circle one)

GSO: [.1, 8d/U Date: 4h8 Incorporated:

~

M4 , s flaf% / Date:

,/ ,/ 7

PGP Page: 230

-Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 104 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-1 Deviation:

Reference to LPCS A and LPCS B was changed to LPCS.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Perry design utilizes only one LPCS train.

r Reviewer:

/.

f<

r f/retA_ - Date: /ir [

Approved: YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Imad Engineer: Date:

Approved:-

h NO (circle one)

G30: h.l Si{ Date: f M n/C Incorporated:

- -If , h

[fflff7 d Date: #

y,

s 1

y.

PGP Paga: 231 Rev.: 1

' Attachment 7 (Cont.) . 1 Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number' 105 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2; C6-2.2; C6-3.1; C6-4; C7-2.2 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-1; C6-1.3; C6-3.1; C6-4.1; C7-2.2 Deviation:  ;

List of alternate injection subsystems revised to reflect Perry design.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85

. Justification:

Evaluation of system capabilities indicates these systems can be used to-provide alternate means of injecting water into the RPV.

L Reviewer: '

de Date: 4. T8 Approved: ES NO f l N/R (circle one)

NDAS Imad Engineer: Y (( d Date: f-f/J-Approved: @ NO (circle one)

GSO: k,M ddk Date: 4dd dr Incorporated:

r.

!w Date: /f

//

I

PGP Page: 232 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 106 P

EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-4 PSTG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-2 Deviation:

Location of " box" changed.

~

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Relocation of the " box" improved the guidelines from a human factor stand point. In its previous position it could easily be missed if the operator had to loop back to step Cl-2 (which is likely to occur) .

Reviewe r: ~

, uk Date: 'f!$'!sg Approved:

}' f) / I YE N0 N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: A Date: f- /s-/S-Approved: NO (circle one)

GSO: 0.y dgjfsp$,, Date: 4 drM- JT Incorporated:

/ [4 , Y of U Date:

,9/',f' F[

PGP Page: 233 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 107 EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-4 PSTG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-2 Deviation:

Perry specific value for ADS initiation setpoint used in place of EPG value.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 d

Justification:

Reference draf t Technical Specification Table 3.3.3-2.

+-

i.

Reviewe r. h; wmd Date: 9 (!qg Approved: .) NO ffN/R f I YES (circle one)

NDAS 14ad Engineer [M ., M Date: f-4W Approved: h NO (circle one)

GSO: f.1L Mf jl u/ . Date: J 2AM e rs-Incorporated: / r ddfua'V Date: _ f'

//

[

--- - - - ~ , , - , ,~.-.w,m_, y,.._,% . , . , _ _ , , , , , . , . _ , , , , _ . . , . __,,~.__,,,-y,.._,.__._,._.,.._,,_..,,.,,..,_,_,,y%_~7,, .- , , , - . _..,__y,_

l PGP Pega: 234

~*

Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 108 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-3 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-2 ,

Deviation:

Perry specific value for division between the " Intermediate" and "High" pressitre regions used in place of EPG value.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Reference GE design specification data sheets 22A3125AM, Rev. 2. Section 4.1.2.b for LPCS 22A3139AM, Rev. 7, for LPCI. These are preliminary

, values and may be revised based on results of vie-operational testing.

Note also Deviation Sheets 40 and 41.

Reviewer: be a r, , Date: 1 [

Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: [I A Date: f- 98 Approved: h NO (circle one)

GSO: [1.kh Date: i gId df Incorporated:

Mt. ..

[W se Date: '/,/, [

e

PGP Pags: 235 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 109 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-3 PSTG Step Number (s): C1-2 Deviation:

None Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Previous deviation 109 has been deleted. The setpoint between the High and Intermediate pressure systems should be the LPCS shutoff head as stated in the EPG.

Reviewers

/

/ /

fv Date: 9/f f Approved: YES NO N/R (circle one)

NDAS IAad Engineer: Date Approved: h NO (circle one)

GSO: k.d M Date: _ ( fdoPo' Incorporated: , s Date: 7/h 7

/ / / '

I l

1 L 1

PGP

.. . Page: 236 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 110

?

EPG Step Number (s): Cl-5; Cl-7 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-4; C1-6 Deviation:

None Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Previous deviation 110 has been deleted. With respect to the actions specified in Contingency 1, HPCS should not be treated as a HPCI system.

HPCS is not steam driven which is the important consideration in Contin-gency 1.

Reviewer: 4

<v- -

[_ ~ Date: 7 r /

f f

Approved: YES NO Q/ (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer: Date:

Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO: k d , M///v Date: t,1//r Incorporated: /I, Date: '7' f

/ f O

PGP

,- . Page: 237 Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 110a EPG Step Number (s): Cl-7 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-6 Deviation:

CRD has been added to this step.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

CRD is a high pressure system which may not be operating. It is appro-priate to restart this system at this point.

Reviewer: '

/ _ Date: */ // [

/ 'l / 'l Approved: YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Imad Engineer: Date:

Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO: [.i Md Date: (, E_ M Incorporated: / Date:

,9 ,/ES-'

- , - _ --, - .- y_,, .-.. - _ _ . _ _ , , . . , , - - - , - , , -- . .- -

PGP Page: 238

, Rev.: 1 Attachment 7 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 111 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-8 PS~tG Step Number (s): Cl-7 Deviation:

"If no HPCS or LPCS subsystem is operating" was included in the ins +. rue-tion.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date: 4/22/85 Justification:

Incorporation of the phrase provides consistency with Contingency 4.

Reviewer: , t, , ---[ fr[m  ; Date: ,7//, I Approved: YES NO (circle one)

NDAS 1Aad Enginet.r: Date:

Approved: h NO (circle one)

Gso: 2.L dL$aL Date: C, 4d als-Incorporated:

/ . ..

9/t w Datesf,-[C

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20134A425&oldid=2916469"