ML20134A425

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Errata to Rev 1, Procedures Generation Package
ML20134A425
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/1985
From: Stratman R
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20134A419 List:
References
PROC-850906-01, NUDOCS 8511040406
Download: ML20134A425 (17)


Text

PGP o

Pag:::

222 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 97 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-1 PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-1 Deviation:

Sentence " Suppression pool makeup may be augmented by SPMU" was included.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Perry design incorporates a suppression pool makeup system. Hence, the inclusion is warranted.

Reviewer:

r v

Date: 9['

f f

/

'/

Approved:

YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

NO (circle one) h,1 ddh tf M /0~

GSO:

Date:

</dfff7 Date:

f/

I Incorporated:

2 z-8511040406 851029 PDR ADOCK 05000440 E

PDR

.a

PGP Page:

224

-e' Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 99

~

EPG Step Number (s): SP/L PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-2

' Deviation:

Perry specific curve for Heat Capacity Level Limit used in place of EPG curve.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Reference Perry specific-calculation 11016-15, Rev. O.

hb mnh Reviewer:

9((!T8 Date:

. Approved:.

J ff i '

YES NO N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

A Date:

9-f -#U' Approved:

NO (circle one) 0.I, Md GSO:

Date:

4MN Incorporated:

</[/,

1

//<t/N%

Date:

/

7y

i PGP Page:

223 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines

' Deviation Sheet: Number 98

4 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-1; SP/L-3 PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-1; SP/L-3 Deviation:

Perry specific value for suppression pool level following SPMU initiation has been used' in place of. EPG value.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85

+

' Justification:

4 Reference Perry specific calculation 11016-28, Rev. 1.

t 4

Tf7!TI Reviewer:

4 Date:

/

NO(f

~/

Approved:

S N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

((.

4 Date:

f*N6 Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO:

h.; Md Date:

9 M MI

- Incorporated:

f

[ d !5 ftS-,.

Date:

[ v' i

PGP P2gn: 225 R v.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines

r Deviation Sheet: Number 100 EPG Step Number (s): SP/L-3.2 PSTG Step Number (s): SP/L-3.2 Deviation:

Perry specific value for Maximum Primary Containment Water Level Limit used in place of EPG value.

b Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Reference Design Specification 660, Revision 7, 5/2/d3.

Reviewer:

b snc Date:

797[

j r>

Approved:

YES NO N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

/L Date:

f-9-/J' Approved:

NO (circle one)

GSO:

8,a.dd/1 Date:

1 ADI M f!9/' f_7~~

Incorporated:

f

((

Date:

/

//

PGP Pega:

226 R v.:

1 - (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 101 EPG Step Number (s): Secondary Containment Control Guideline PSTG Step Number (s): N/A Deviation:

EPG " Secondary Containment Control Guidelines" was removed.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

The Perry secondary containment design does not require a separate guide-line.

t..

[ffrfm ;

,/((-O

~

Reviewer:

Date:

Approved:

YES NO (circle one)-

NDAS Imad Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO:

0_ l e $1, L Date: 6 J2/' eft Incorporated:

4,

$ge[fu Date:

[

PGP Pagina 227 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 102 EPG Step Number (s): Radioactivity Release Control Guideline - Entry Con-

~

dition; RR-2 PSTG Step Number (s): Radioactivity Release Control Guideline - Entry Con-dition; RR-2 Deviation:

PSTG does not provide a specific value (in Ci/sec.) for the release rate which requires a specific Emergency Plan classification.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

The Emergency Plan at Perry specifies several different release rates which would result in Alert or General Emergency classifications. Hence, listing only one of these could be possible misleading.

v Reviewer:

/[g

[w fps Date: r/ /

F Approved:

YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

NO (circle one)

CSO:

0.1Msb Date: f Jg M Incorporated:

bm Date:

/

f

/

' /

/ /

PGP Pagn 228 s

a Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 103 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-1 Deviation:

" Condensate" was changed to " Condensate /feedwater".

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Provide consistency with other steps where condensate and feedwater systems are molded into one system.

Reviewer:

p e

Date: 9

/

' /

//

Approved:

YES NO M

(circle one) v NDAS Lead Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

NO (circle one)

GSO:

0.0 A $uh Date:

{ Eh c)F

/

' Id X/rfd Date: # !W Incorporated:

o

//

l L

PGP Pagn:

229 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 103a EPG Step Number (s): Box preceding step Cl-1 PSTG Step Number (s): Box preceding step Cl-1 Deviation:

The phrase " Boron Injection is required or boron has been injected into the RPV" has been deleted, and the phrase "Any control rod is not in-serted to or beyond position 02 (Maximum Suberitical Banked Withdrawal Position)" has been added.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

The guidelines are now organized to provide the correct direction for control of RPV water level for any ATWS whether or not boron has been in-jected. This guidance is provided in Contingency 7.

[7X/rA

</[//

Reviewer:

Date:

/'

/'/

' I Approved:

.YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

NO (circle one)

[.1, 8d/U Date: 4h8 GSO:

Incorporated:

M4,

,/,/ 7 s

flaf% / Date:

~

PGP Page:

230

-Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 104 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-1 Deviation:

Reference to LPCS A and LPCS B was changed to LPCS.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Perry design utilizes only one LPCS train.

Reviewer:

f f/retA_ -

Date:

/

[

r

/.

r ir Approved:

YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Imad Engineer:

Date:

Approved:-

h NO (circle one)

G30:

h.l Si{

Date: f M n/C

- -If, h

[fflff7 d Date:

Incorporated:

y,

s 1

y.

PGP Paga:

231 Rev.:

1

' Attachment 7 (Cont.).

1 Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number' 105 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-2; C6-2.2; C6-3.1; C6-4; C7-2.2 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-1; C6-1.3; C6-3.1; C6-4.1; C7-2.2 Deviation:

List of alternate injection subsystems revised to reflect Perry design.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85

. Justification:

Evaluation of system capabilities indicates these systems can be used to-provide alternate means of injecting water into the RPV.

L Reviewer:

de Date:

4. T8 f l N/R Approved:

ES NO (circle one)

NDAS Imad Engineer: Y

((

d Date:

f-f/J-Approved:

NO (circle one)

GSO:

k,M ddk Date:

4dd dr Incorporated:

!w Date:

/f I

r.

//

PGP Page:

232 Rev.:

1

.. (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 106 P

EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-4 PSTG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-2 Deviation:

Location of " box" changed.

~

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Relocation of the " box" improved the guidelines from a human factor stand point.

In its previous position it could easily be missed if the operator had to loop back to step Cl-2 (which is likely to occur).

'f!$'!sg Reviewe r:

uk Date:

~

}'

f)

/ I Approved:

YE N0 N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

A Date:

f- /s-/S-Approved:

NO (circle one)

GSO:

0.y dgjfsp$,,

Date: 4 drM-JT

[4,

9/'

,,f' F[

Incorporated:

/

Y of U Date:

PGP Page:

233 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 107 EPG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-4 PSTG Step Number (s): " Box" preceding Cl-2 Deviation:

Perry specific value for ADS initiation setpoint used in place of EPG value.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 d

Justification:

Reference draf t Technical Specification Table 3.3.3-2.

+ -

i h

9 (!qg wmd Date:

Reviewe r.

.) NO ff f I Approved:

YES N/R (circle one)

NDAS 14ad Engineer

[M.,

M Date:

f-4W Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO:

f.1L Mf jl.

Date: J 2AM e s-u/

r Incorporated:

/

ddfua'V r

Date: _ f'

[

//

- - ~,, -,

,~.-.w,m_,

y,.._,%

__,,~.__,,,-y,.._,.__._,._.,.._,,_..,,.,,..,_,_,,y%_~7,,

.-,,, -. _..,__y,_

l PGP Pega:

234

~

  • Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 108 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-3 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-2 Deviation:

Perry specific value for division between the " Intermediate" and "High" pressitre regions used in place of EPG value.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Reference GE design specification data sheets 22A3125AM, Rev. 2. Section 4.1.2.b for LPCS 22A3139AM, Rev. 7, for LPCI.

These are preliminary

, values and may be revised based on results of vie-operational testing.

Note also Deviation Sheets 40 and 41.

be a r,,

Date:

1

[

Reviewer:

Approved:

YES NO N/R (circle one)

NDAS Lead Engineer:

[I A

Date:

f-98 Approved:

h NO (circle one)

[1.kh Date: i gId df GSO:

Incorporated:

Mt.

[W

'/,/,

[

se Date:

e

PGP Pags:

235 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 109 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-3 PSTG Step Number (s): C1-2 Deviation:

None Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Previous deviation 109 has been deleted. The setpoint between the High and Intermediate pressure systems should be the LPCS shutoff head as stated in the EPG.

Reviewers

/

fv Date: 9/f f

/

/

Approved:

YES NO N/R (circle one)

NDAS IAad Engineer:

Date Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO:

k.d M Date: _ ( fdoPo' 7/h 7

Incorporated:

s Date:

/

/

/ '

I l

1 L

1

PGP Page:

236 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 110

?

EPG Step Number (s): Cl-5; Cl-7 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-4; C1-6 Deviation:

None Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Previous deviation 110 has been deleted. With respect to the actions specified in Contingency 1, HPCS should not be treated as a HPCI system.

HPCS is not steam driven which is the important consideration in Contin-gency 1.

Reviewer:

4

[_ ~

Date:

7 f

f

<v-r /

Q/

(circle one)

Approved:

YES NO NDAS Lead Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

h NO (circle one) k d, M///v Date:

t,1//r GSO:

Incorporated:

/I, Date:

'7' f

/ f O

PGP Page:

237 Rev.:

1 (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet: Number 110a EPG Step Number (s): Cl-7 PSTG Step Number (s): Cl-6 Deviation:

CRD has been added to this step.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

CRD is a high pressure system which may not be operating.

It is appro-priate to restart this system at this point.

Reviewer:

/

Date:

  • / // [

/

'l

/ 'l Approved:

YES NO (circle one)

NDAS Imad Engineer:

Date:

Approved:

h NO (circle one)

GSO:

[.i Md Date:

(, E_ M Incorporated:

/

,9,/ES-'

Date:

y_,,

PGP Page:

238 Rev.:

1

, (Cont.)

Deviations from the Generic Guidelines Deviation Sheet:

Number 111 EPG Step Number (s): Cl-8 PS~tG Step Number (s): Cl-7 Deviation:

"If no HPCS or LPCS subsystem is operating" was included in the ins +. rue-tion.

Evaluator: R. A. Stratman Date:

4/22/85 Justification:

Incorporation of the phrase provides consistency with Contingency 4.

t,

, ---[ fr[m

,7//, I Reviewer:

Date:

Approved:

YES NO (circle one)

NDAS 1Aad Enginet.r:

Date:

Approved:

h NO (circle one)

Gso:

2.L dL$aL Date:

C, 4d als-Datesf,-[C Incorporated:

/

9/t w

...