ML20133Q333
| ML20133Q333 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 09/09/1985 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8511010502 | |
| Download: ML20133Q333 (2) | |
Text
!
DUKE POWER Goxnm P.O. Hox (111150 CHAHLOTTE, N.O. 2f1242
,l c
' d,((/ /gro. n.rpnome HALII. TUCKER 9
re 4
n)g,//
a73 mu m.... -
September 9, 1985 i
i Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II J
101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Re: RII:ABR I
50-413/85-28 1
J
-i
Dear Dr. Grace:
Please find attached a response to Violation No. 413/85-28-02, as identified i
in the above referenced Inspection Report.
i Very truly yours, l
KA MM/
~
I Hal B. Tucker i
LTP/hrp Attachment i
cc: NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station
{
Robert Guild, Esq.
P. O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29205 Palmetto Alliance 21351s Devine Street i
Columbia, South Carolina 29205 i
Mr. Jesse.. Riley Carolina Eu ironmental Study Group 854 Henley Place Charlotte, North Carolina 28207 8511010502 850909
~
PDR ADOCK 05000413 lt G
PDR I
I ZB ol
d Violation 414/85-28-02 10 CFR 50.54 (a)(1) requires the licensee to implement the quality assurance program described or referenced in its Safety Analysis Report. The Quality Assurance Program Topical Report Duke 1 A requires that activities affecting quality be performed in accordance with documented instructions, procedures or drawing.
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to carry out the quality assurance program in accordance with their Construction Procedure - 438, Instrument Protection. Records required by this procedure to determine protection and maintenance requirements for instruments after installation were not available.
Response
a) Duke Power Company admits the violation.
b) This violation was caused by failure to follow procedure CP-438, Instrument Protection.
c) The purpose of CP-438 was to assure that each instrument installed would be reviewed f o r p ro t e c t ion requiremen t s. As written, CP-438 did not require approved signatures or sign offs when filling out the forms.
For this reason, the records required by this Construction Procedure cannot be located. As a result of this deficiency, another procedure, CP-368 Instrument Control, has been revised (Rev. 10) to include the CP-438 requirements and to include assurance that these records are properly completed and maintained.
Since it is no longer useful, CP-438 has been deleted.
d) To avoid further violations, action is being taken to assure that there are no other Construction Procedures which are not being completely followed at Catawba.
This action involves a renewed emphasis on the annual CP review process to better assure that CP's reflect current practices and needs.
In addition, all instruments which presently have no protection will be reviewed to see if protective measures are warrented, e) Full compliance will be aci.faved by November 20, 1985.
4-
!