ML20133N302
| ML20133N302 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/01/1996 |
| From: | Bangart R NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | Cameron F NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133N206 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-448 NUDOCS 9701230233 | |
| Download: ML20133N302 (1) | |
Text
- _
l i l I
i s
From: Richard Bangart / # ##3 C
! To: FXC 7e d fe b
!' Date: 3/1/9611:14am
Subject:
Update on Contamination at former Isotopes Specialties buildings-Forwarded
, Chip, See attached. I'll need some feedback from you on my earlier message asking for clarification on whether NRC or the Agreement State has jurisdiction for currently unlicensed contaminated
- sites resulting from previous AEC/NRC licensed activities. If California won't assume jurisdiction, do we have to suspend part of their Agreement? My understanding is that other i Agreement States may have indicated they won't assume jurisdiction for SDMP sites in their l State.
l CC: H LT,CJ P 1, DAC, PH L,J RS 1, PFG, RAS 1,JWH3 1
1-i
?
i i
1 i
I, i 1
- 1 i ,
- ' l i .
! l 1
i 1
i j i
I g 12 g 3 970116 j SIEFERT96-448 PDR
. ._ .- - ,. --- , - . . .. , . . ,