ML20133K189
| ML20133K189 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 10/09/1985 |
| From: | Martin T Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8510210108 | |
| Download: ML20133K189 (3) | |
Text
.
r.
Pubhc Service Electric and Gas Company a
Thomas J. Martin 80 Park Plaza, Newark, NJ 07101 201430-8316 Mading Address P.O. Box 570, Newark, NJ 07101 Vice President Eginatig aM Consusthm i
October 9, 1985 4
2 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Administrator U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
Dear Dr. Murley:
NRC INSPECTION REPORT #85-35 NOTICE OF VIOLATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Your letter-dated September 5, 1985,. transmitted the above referenced Inspection Report which-contained a Notice of Violation citing one (1) item of nonccmpliance concerning l'
our Preoperational Test Program.
The following response is i
provided in accordance with the Notice of Violation.
j 1.
FSAR Section 14.2.12.1.48, Fuel Handling and Vessel Servicing Equipment, and GE Preoperational Test Speci-fication for Hope Creek (No-A4102300-32(1)-3: 22A2271AZ, J
Revision 2) state that all interlocks associated with the refueling and service platforms will be verified and
~
included as acceptance criteria in the preoperation test (PTP).
Contrary to the above, approved PTP KE-1, Fuel Handling and 4
Vessel-Servicing Equipment, Revision 0, did not include steps to properly verify a refueling interlock that prevents moving the refueling platform over the core in the Startup 4'
mode with all rods in and.all hoists unloaded..
2'.
FSAR-Section 14.2.12.1.54, Remote Shutdown Panel,. states that proper function of control room alarms associated with transfer of control of individual components to the remote
. shutdown panel will be included as acceptance limite for'the i
PTP.
t 8510210100 851009 7
i PDR ADOCK 05000354
-o PDR
,a
\\l O
L.
J.
y.
-.,.._-,m..
,.y J
m
-42 a--n-,
e 4
,2,~
2n--
.r6.4
%al-J.
z'
W"-
w--
-~,a,-~A+A-~
m h.
M
- = *
-m--.
m.
1 i
Dr.
T. E.
Murley 2
10/9/85 i
i Contrary to the above, proper function of alarms was not included as an acceptance limit for PTP SV-1, Revision 0, Remote Shutdown Panel.
4 3.
FSAR Section 14.2.12.1.54, Amendment 11, Remote Shutdown Panel, states that all valves and controls associated with i
the remote shutdown panel will be tested and included as f
l test acceptance criteria.
Contrary to the above, valve LEG-HV-2520B, SACS cooling I
inlet to RHR pump B seals and motor bearings, was not j
included for testing in the PTP SV-1, Revision 0, Remote l
Shutdown Panel.
Corrective Steps Taken and Results Achieved As indicated in Inspection Report No. 85-35, Change Notices (CN) or On-The-Spot changes (OTS) were initiated to correct the items identified in the respective Preoperational Test Procedures (PTP's).
i j
Corrective Steps Taken to Preclude Recurrence i
1.
The Hope Creek Test Review Board (TRB) was established to provide a highly detailed review of preoperational test procedures.
In this case, a mistake was made by all reviewers.
As a result of this violation, the Startup Manager has provided personalized training for the TRB l
and reemphasized the requirements that each PTP is a quality product and that all test commitments shall be fully tested and properly documented.
~
i i
j 2.
Same as Section 1 abo.ve.
i
~
3.
FSAR Change Notice No. 760 changed valve designator 1BC--
HV-2520B to LEG-HV-2520B.
PTP BC-1 did not address the subject valve due to the new designation.
FSAR Change Notice No. 760 had not been routed through the Public Service Startup k
i i
-ano^
y
'u,--rg w-mi w--
7
-y
-*getiro
>-og g,y
.aq4%,scw--et
-yw-,9,a pyw.e.-9weow-e-
-,-yp--py----w--,g, e-
.*q,-9 99-pe%a myyw.,
,-9 go, e pg.-yc p-y
-e j
i e
l Dr.
T.
E. Murley 3
10/9/85 i -
f Group (PSSUG) during the review cycle.
The Licensing Manager -
Hope Creek has counseled his personnel and reemphasized
[
i.
the importance of routing all design / operations related FSAR Change Notices through PSSUG.
Additionally, all Change Notices routed subsequent.to FSAR Amendment 11 are being reviewed to identify any additional Change Notices for PSSUG review.
s~
J Date of Full Compliance f
The date of full compliance.will be October 18, 1985.
4 Very truly yours, i
).
i i
1 i
C Office of-Inspection and Enforcement l
-Division of Reactor Construction Inspection j
Washington, D. C.
20555 NRC Resident Inspector P.. O.
Box 241 i
Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 I
s 1
1 1
4 i
I i
I
_. u._,_
,2
- 2.... -- ;...., _ _ _, - _. -.
,. -