ML20133J224
| ML20133J224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1985 |
| From: | Styles L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | Guild R GUILD, R. |
| References | |
| CON-#485-814 OL, NUDOCS 8510180338 | |
| Download: ML20133J224 (24) | |
Text
e Malt.D LUlitttJPON[)l?Nf?F qs ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE COUNSELORS AT LAW l* *
.Mc t'20 CONNECT' CUT AVENUE N W
- SoiTE $40 WASwNGTON D C 26
'85 nor n a- - u. IA EDWARD S ISMAM ta=,
ut#EE g%TN Ai A
ROBERTT UNCOLN t472188 C CAGO NC W'WAM G SEALE
'885 1923 October 15, 1985 taux nm "Cd 5Ui;'d Robert Guild, Esq.
BPI 109 North Dearborn St.
Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Re:
In the Matter of:
Commonwealth Edison Company (Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2) Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 D/_
Dear Mr. Guild:
On August 28, 1985, Commonwealth Edison Company filed its Sixth Partial Response to Intervenors Rorem, et al.
("Intervenors") First Set of Quality Assurance Interrogatories and Request to Produce.
The Sixth Partial Response provided responses to Specific Interrogatories 58 and 59, which pose specific questions with respect to the 68 separate items of Intervenors' QA Contention.
Enclosed herewith are the affidavits of Messrs. Gieseker and Cuaka supporting the revised response to that part of the response to Interrogatories 58 and 59 which corresponds to Contention Item 3.C.
The revised response which is attached to those affidavits replaces in its entirety the response to Contention Item 3.C. that was originally submitted in Conconwealth Edison's Sixth Partial Response.
The revised response provides an updated and more accurate respense than the criginally submitted response to Contention Item 3.C.
In addition, a document referenced for the first time in the revised response to Contention Item 3.C. and not previously provided is enclosed for your information.
Very truly yours,
,' f..,-
,./
6 V.4 <1_L
/}4:
Lisa C. Styles One of the Attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company LCS:kis Enclosures cc:
Service List 8510180338 851015
,h 3 i
g.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of:
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
)
Docket Nos. 50-456 (Braidwood Station
)
50-457 Units 1 and 2)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF THOMAS E. QUAKA I,
Thomas E.
Quaka, being first duly sworn, hereby depose and state as follows:
1.
I am employed by Commonwealth Edison Company as Site Quality Assurance Supervisor at Braidwood Station.
2.
My business address is Braidwood Nuclear Power Station, Braceville, Illinois 60407.
3.
I have participated in the preparation of the response to specific Interrogatories Nos.
58 and 59 filed by Intervenors Rorem, et.
al.
These interrogatories pose specific questions with respect to the 68 separate items of Intervenor's QA Contention.
In particular, I have responsibility for the third paragraph of the revised Response to Item 3.C. attached hereto.
4.
The third paragraph of the revised Response to Item 3.C.
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Further affiant sayeth not.
[
A Thomas E. Quaka Subscribed and sworn to before me this I day of October, 1985 V
NotaryPublQ U
My Commission expires on 0293H
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of:
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
)
Docket Nos. 50'-456 (Braidwood Station
)
50-457 Units 1 and 2)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES W. GIESEKER I, James W.
Gieseker, being first duly sworn, hereby depose and state as follows:
1.
I am employed by Commonwealth Edison Company as a Project Construction Field Engineer at Braidwood Station.
2.
My business address is Braidwood Nuclear Power Station, Braceville, Illinois 60407.
3.
I have participated in the preparation of the response to Specific Interrogatories Nos.
58 and 59 filed by Intervenors Rorem, et.
al.
These interrogatories pose specific questions with respect to the 68 separate items of Intervenor's QA Contention.
In particular, I have responsibility for the first and second paragraphs of the revised Response to Item 3.C. attached hereto.
4.
The first and second paragraphs of the revised Response to Item 3.C.
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Further affiant sayeth not, b lu. b k
amjsW.Gieheker Subscribed and sworn to before me this I day of October, 1985 Q
Notary Public%
E #
My Commission expires on l
0292H
--m..
CONTENTION ITEM 3.C 3.
Contrary to Criterion II, " Quality Assurance Program " of 10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix B, Commonwealth Edison Company has failed to establish a quality assurance program which complies with the requirements of Appendix B and which is documented by written policies, procedures, and instructions.
Commonwealth Edison Company has failed to assure that its Q.A. Program provides controls over activities affecting quality and that such activities are accomplished under suitably controlled conditions and are not appropriately verified for quality by inspection.
C.
The applicants electrical contractor (Comstock) utilized Level I Quality Control Inspectors for inspection and acceptance of electrical welds.
This involved fourteen different Level I Inspectors over four years (Inspection Report 85-06, Exhibit 11).
RESPONSE
An NRC inspection of the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) activities conducted by Mr. R. N. Gardner on February 4 through March 4, 1985 identified the concern referred to in this subcontention with regard to Comstock weld inspections.
The results of the NRC inspection were reported in Report Numbers 50-456/85-006 and 50-457/85-006.
Although the focus of the inspection activity was on the BCAP Program, the thrust of *he above concern was directed against the overall acceptability of Comstock Level I weld inspections performed from 1979 through 1983.
Specifically, the N!!C inspector concluded that Comstock had utilized Level I Q.C.
Inspectors for both inspection and final acceptance of electrical 3413A/ October 1, 1985 l
l l
CONTENTION ITEM 3.C welds in contravention of the requirements of ANSI N45.2.6-1978 which required, as a minimum, a Level II certification for Quality Control (Q.C.) inspection personnel who determine weld acceptance based on inspections conducted by Level I inspectors.
It would appear that the NRC inspector believed that under Comstock Weld Procedure 4.8.3, Comstock Level II inspectors' method of accepting g
welds was unclear and that Level 1 inspectors were doing both the inspection and final acceptance of the welds in question.
The NRC l
Inspection Report indicated that this practice involved fourteen different Comstock Level I Q.C.
inspectors over a four year time period.
NRC Region III issued a notice of violation with respect to this matter on March 8, 1985.
Commonwealth Edison Company does not agree with the proposed violation because the actual use of the Comstock Level I and Level II inspectors for visual weld inspections l
between 1979 and 1983 was consistent with ANSI N45.2.6-1978.
During this time, the activity of Comstock Level I inspectors was limited 1
to the gathering and recording of inspection data and Level II inspectors were making the final decision on weld acceptance based on the evaluation of the inspection checklist generated by the Level I inspectors.
Although the Comstock Procedure did not describe clearly the objective criteria used by the Level II inspector to 3413A/ October 1, 1985
e CONTENTION ITEM 3.C accept the welds in question, this circumstance did not detract from the fact that both Levels of inspectors were functioning in a manner consistent with ANSI N45.2.6-1978.
ANSI N45.2.6-1978 specifically provides that Level I Q.C.
inspectors are qualified to perform weld inspections, examinations and tests to predetermined or specific requirements, provided that they document their findings on inspection checklists which include sufficient information to serve as a basis for the final review and acceptance of the weld by Level II inspectors.
The review by a Level II inspector of a Level I's weld inspection checklist to determine final acceptability of the weld is a longstanding r9quirement of the Comstock program as documented in Comstock Weld Proceduro 4.8.3.
At the time of NRC's inspection, the Braidwood Site Quality Assurance Department was conducting a follow-up sur,veillance (No.
4178) with respect to Weld Inspection Procedure 4.8.3.
Surveillance No. 4178 was a follow-up to General Office Audit 84-122 which was conducted in September 1984.
The audit had determined that' Procedure 4.8.3, Rev. F, was inadequate in that the inspection checklist as formulated could not be completed by a Level I inspector without the implication that the Level I inspector was passing judgment on the acceptability of observed conditions. 3413A/ October 1, 1985
CONTENTION ITEM 3.C That is, the lack of documented objective evidence on the Procedure checklist made it unclear as to the method used by the Level II inspector for establishing weld acceptability.
It was recommended 1
that either the procedure be revised to define precisely the limited nature of the Level I's involvement or that only Level II Inspectors be used to conduct visual weld inspections.
In December 1984, it was decided to use Level II inspectors only to conduct future visual weld inspections.
The Surveillance also required that a program be established to re-evaluate past weld inspections performed in the first instance by Comstock Level I inspectors and accepted subsequently by Level II inspectors.
Edison is presently initiating a program to verify the acceptability of the welds at issue.
i l
l 1 3413A/ October 1, 1985
~.
CONTENTION ITEM 3.C
^
REFERENCES 1.
NRC Inspection Report Numcers 50-456/85-06, 50-457/85-06; March 8, 1985 (pages A0003250-3275).
2.
Letter (R.F. Warnick to C. Reed) and Notice of Violation, March 8, 1985 transmitting Reference 1 (pages A0003250-3275).
3.
Letter (D.L. Farrar to J.G. Keppler), response to Notice of Violation, May 6, 1985 (pages A0003276-3289).
4.
Letter (D.L. Shamblin to F.
Rolan - BR/PCD 85-309) Level I Inspections, April 2, 1985 (pages A0014004-14005).
4 5.
ANSI N45.2.6-1978 (pages A0013781-A0013788).
6.
L.K. Comstock Work Procedures 4.8.3 and 4.13.1 4
j (pages 00002582-2630).
7.
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-456/34-07; 50-457/84-07; July 20, 1984 (pages A0002059-2073).
8.
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-456/80-12; 50-457/80-11; October 23, 1980 (pages A0000692-698).
9.
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-456/83-18; 50-457/83-17 (pages A0001732-1749).
10.
NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-456/84-19; 50-457/84-18 (pages A0002341-2363).
11.
CECO QA Audit Report No. QA 84-122 (pages B0005400-B0005416).
12.
L.K. Comstock Work Procedures 4.13.1 (pages 00002653-00002667).
13.
Licensing file on Item 85-006-02, Cont. 3.C (pages A0006572-6615).
14.
CECO QA Surveillance No. 4178 l
' b.-
m P
s' CONTENTION ITEM 3.C 4
NAMES AND ADDRESSES i
R.N. Ga7.dner NRC' Region III W. Forney NRC Region III R.F. Warnick NRC Region III M.J. Wallace Commonwealth Edison Company D.L. Shamblin Commonwealth Edison Company i
G. Marcus Commonwealth Edison Company J. Gieseker Commonwealth Edison Company 4
E. Fitzpatrick Commonwealth Edison Company T. Quaka Commonwealth Edison Company R. Seltmann L.K. Comstock and Company, Inc.
F. Rolan L.K. Comstock and Company, Inc.
4 i
1 i
I 1
4
?
6-
.--.._<y.=y_.___,_-_.
_,_..-~...,,...,,,,,,_,,,,,_.m_.~.
_-._,m.~~
_y,,
,~-,..--.,,.
-._m,-._,,.,,
I t
SURVEILLANCE DATE:
February 12, 1984 FILE NO.
SQ BRAIDWOOD Q.A. SURVEILLANCE REPORT NO. 4178 FOLLOW UP AUDIT REPORT NO. QAA G-84-122 Contractor /
Organization:
L. K. Comstock Cat. #:
5 Open Item #1:
(Questions #22, 28)
Five (5) concerns arose as a result of the review of the Welding Procedure for Structural Attachments (7018) 4.3.3 revision D and the Weld Inspection Procedure 4.8.3 revision F.
These concerns are addressed below.
bE Da t e J-/-R5" Reported by:
Lead Auditor:
Date f 5 Approved by-Date D
FU Action Verified By:
Da t e 7-/o - /[$
FU Action Reviewed By:
a t e 7-/d 'If FU Action Approved By Date 7
CAH/tlw (1598S) cc:
Manager of Q.A.
Assistant Manager of Q.A.
Director of Q.A. - (Engr./Constr.)
Manager of Projects Project Manager Licensing and Compliance Superintendent Project Engineering Manager Site Construction Superintendent B. H. Kulik Q. A. File 53.0 O b OOObb4(o m
9 Page 2 Surv. #4178 Discussion 1.
(Question #22)
S & L drawings 20E-0-3393P revision P, Section EE and 20E-0-3243N revision B detail DV-263 specified the use of single bevel partial penetration joint, but Comstock welding procedure 4.3.3, revision D failed to address the AWS D.l.1 prequalified joint.
Detail DV-263 was unique for one particular installation, and had not yet been employed.
When asked to assign a W.P.S.
to the joint specified in Section EE, a Comstock Engineer, who utilized the cross reference table attached to procedure 4.3.3, specified attachment K.
Attachment K was a single bevel full penetration weld and was incorrect.
The Engineer said that given a choice he would have assigned the alternate fillet weld configuration for that connection.
Resolutiqn Comstock will incorporate a partial penetration single bevel joint attachment into procedure 4.3.3 to preclude the inadvertant assignment of attachment K in the event the joint configuration must be utilized.
2.
(Question #22)
Multipass fillet welds were observed in the field and Weld Procedure 4.3.3, employed the prequalified status of fillet welds afforded by AWS Dl.l.
AWS Dl.1-75 specified the minimum size single pass fillet welds for various thickness ranges of base metal.
Comstocks' current multipass fillet weld practice created a condition in which the minimum weld size of the initial pass was no longer verifiable.
I Resolution Comstock committed to qualify by test the minimum size multiple pass and maximum size single pass fillet weld utilized in construction for incorporation into Welding Procedure 4.3.3.
3.
(Question #28)
AWS Dl.1 established essentially identical acceptance criteria for porosity in both groove and fillet welds.
Comstock's Weld Inspection Procedure 4.8.3 revision F, while specifically addressing porosity in fillet welds, failed to address that same criteria for groove welds.
Comstock's Q.C.
Inspection Supervisor was unaware of this procedural oversight.
He asserted that the porosity criteria addressed in procedure 4.8.3 had been applied to every weld inspected, since porosity is specifically addressed on the Weld Inspection Checklist.
i f
l t
(1598S) hMb
~
Page 3 Surv. #4178 Resolution Comstock will address the porosity criteria for groove welds in procedure 4.8.3.
4.
(Question #28) Comstock's Weld Inspection Procedure 4.8.3 revision F specified that a lap weld equal in size to the thickness of the base material was acceptable, but the criterion in AWS Dl.1-75 diverged from the above for material thicknesses exceeding 1/4".
A maximum weld size of 1/16" below the material thickness was permitted along edges for those materials.
Resolution Comstock will expand the scope of their criterion in procedure 4.8.3 to address those material thicknesses of 1/4" and greater.
5.
(Question #28)
Although Comstock did not currently employ Level I Inspectors, the Welding Inspection Procedure 4.8.3 revision i
E addressed their utilization in the completion of weld and other related inspections.
Level I Inspectors would be required to pass judgement on the acceptability of observed conditions to utilize the checklists supplied by this procedure.
Commonwealth Edison Co's. Q.A. Department will only allow a Level I Inspector to operate in the capacity of a data gatherer.
That data in turn, must be analyzed for acceptance by an inspector of a higher level.
Recommendations Either the references to the employment of Level I inspectors should be deleted from the Comstock's procedures outlining their inspection program or those inspection procedures should be revised to precisely define the limited nature of the Level I capabilities.
f i
O.A. Follow-UD 12-12-84 Concern #1 -
L. K. Comstock has revised procedure 4.3.3 to include in revision F the single-bevel partial penetration l
groove joint configuration designated as B-P4 in AWS i
l Dl.1-1975.
Procedure 4.3.3 has received interim i
approval from QA on 12-7-84.
This concern will be resolved when final approval is received.
Concern #2 -
L. K. Comstock has requisitioned material for procedure qualification.
This item will be closed i
when required inspection of procedure tests is t
complete and acceptable.
(1598S)
(
Beoosi8
Page 4 Surv. #4178 Concern #3 -
L. K. Comstock has revised procedure 4.8.3 for welding inspection in revision G to encompass all types of weld configurations for inspection criteria covering porosity.
Form 19 the Weld Inspection Checklist has always contained a check for porosity and was not changed in the revision.
Concern #4 -
L.
K. Comstock's specification has been ammended by ECN 23120 para. 401.19.2.d.4 which allows fillet welds equal to the thickness of the base metal.
Procedure 4.8.3 has been revised (rev. G) to reflect the exact words of the above ECN.
Concern #5 -
L. K. Comstock has revised procedure 4.8.3 in revision G to eliminate all references to a Level I Q.C.
inspector.
O.A.
Follow-Up 2-1-85 Concern #1 -
Procedure 4.3.3 revision F received final approval on 1-7-85.
This concern is considered closed.
Concern #2 -
Procedure qualification samples have been welded and are presently at PTL for testing.
Concern #3 -
Procedure 4.8.3 revision G received final approval on 1-11-85.
This concern is considered closed.
Concern #4 -
Procedure 4.8.3 revision G received final approval on 1-11-85.
This concern is considered closed.
Concern #5 -
Procedure 4.8.3 revision G received final approval on 1-11-85.
l l
QA to follow-up on Concern #2 and #5 only.
l (1598S) 3@N p.
4 y
yw n-ap--
y#
r-
..,..y
-w-
,w,
Page 5 Sury. #4178 1
OA Follow-Up 2-12-85 l
Concern #2 -
Samples have been inspected by PTL and found acceptable.
Tests have been numbered LKCE-PQR-076 through 079 (attached).
This concern is considered closed.
Concern #5 -
This concern remains open pending the establishment of a program for evaluating the acceptability of previous work performed by Level I inspectors.
I This open iten is considered open pending resolution of Concern #5.
OA Follow-Up 7-09-85 On July 8, 1985, NCR #688, Supplement 1 (Revision 1) " Quality Control Inspector Reinspection Program" (QCIRP) received final concurrence.
This NCR Supplement governs the QCIRP which initiated the development of Procedure PM-ll, " Quality Control Inspector Reinspection", to control this activity.
In addition, PM-11 is referenced in NCR #688 Supplement 1 (Revision 1).
The QCIRP, which is to be implemented in accordance with PM-11, encompasses "all inspectors" (Level I, II, & III) certified by contractors included in the QCIRP, (See PM-ll, Rev.
O.
Paragraph 3.11).
l These documents establish a methodology which will include the proof of contractor programs in regards to the utilization of Level l
I inspectors.
Based on the results of the QCIRP, a determination can be made as to the acceptability of previous work performed by Level I inspectors, i.e. if the programs for the utilization of Level I inspectors are evaluated to be satisfactory, then the work performed can be concluded to be satisfactory.
Thus, the QCIRP program will result in an evaluation of the acceptability of previous work performed by Level I inspectors.
As such, itea #5 1
may now be considered resolved.
Site Q.A. believes this item is
]
ready for closure.
i 4
i
{
(1598S) bCCOhD0
3 5t~-
}'
LL.f-PQR-076 WELDING PRCOEbuRE CUALIFICATION TEST RECORD PROCEDURE SPE !FICATION GROOVE WELD TE37 RESULT 3 Matenal sorcification A588 Reduesd section tension test
.;.ensk m% d Wetoing process SMA" Manual or maenme Manual g
N/A Possuon of weiems IF-Flat N/A Piher metal noe=ificanon A5.1 Guised.hend test l
Piher metal classification E7018 Aoot Wets metas grace N/A 7:::
I N/A N/A Shielding gas N/A pg,,,
N/A N/A Single or muinole mass _
sing 1e / Multiple 9
N/A Sinpa er mutuote art -
single Radiogreonic Urtrasonic imammatier, N/A
""""I Fillet test results Min Sias Multiole Pass Max Siza Single Pass Poemoetiresonant N/A Maosten j
Ns neme M. Dinelli #62 1 M 3 e "
/ M-t 3
! c-9Not 9MO i
(
Laboratory Test No.
~
6.m-969
- WELDING PROCEDURE Peo Esaus.
3,,e,e an, une a,,,,,
I y,,,
,,,,e 888't Duo 8 SINCLE PA lS 1
1/8" 130 24 N/A 1"
l L
a aum rrtE aASS
.y 1
3/32" 95 - 100 26 - 30 N/A 2
3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A 3"
3 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A i
f 1
' Single - 1/8" Fillet j
Multiple - 3/16" Fillet g
We the urusersigned, eartify that tne statemena in this record ere sorrect and that the test welds wome oren wetoso and tested in acooreanes wnn tne resuirements of SS of AW5 D1.1, Structural Walding Coos.
0 e* Base Metal Temp.
56 F Manscrurer or Contractor L.K. Comstock t Co.,
A1999 Due Date:
6-17-85 My,,jg g
g Date L N-SY l
84s*44to Ame40V ED RE vl&Eo TITLA 0487 0471 REVISI.ON i
i PROCEDURE s
N y9 Ol
.MN
L.SS O 7..a q f 6,'.,.
1.
F $$5bUYSh
>'o r m No. :
W Q. l l
TCSi$189 O n - c **. c ' *
- kev. 2 r
.. s a s.....-
aboratory 6-6-84 Report No:
M k/O ' 7//
3 Y -9499 kEPOMT Lab No.
of Miscellaneous Welding Qualification Report Date:
,) 76~
Client Commonwealth Edison Company J b No CH-3175 Project Braidwood Nuclear Power Station
~~
Contractor:
L..K. Comstock Centr 6ctor Supplied,Information:
Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position Qualified
/[~ - FL AT k' elder's Name M. D/MFtL f Walder I.D.
N [2 Welding Process b87A N Manual or Machine NAEldM L Material Specification M-688 standard A Ws Di.i-875 s
Date of Qualification:
O ~ 4/ _ gf APP-visual Inspection:
DiCC Daza EA 7 s. t s.-
Bend / Fracture ACC R.EJ
/A
,fg
'Hacroetch Test C
REJ N/A DAM lost Results:
feming Non-Con foming Not Applicable toma r k,s.. Visual inspection of weld area only.-
Inspartor/ Level:
- nfa4, /7/'
C. W. WOMAS iupervisor/Datc_M 17[/>t/ M-
/T J-M-M b B-L MEREDim '
- - REWEWED BY d'dl'
~,
DATE 2 //'
. n e..-.........=. =.:.u n..... ~.....:..:.._.
~.
Booocnok
L. K. COMSTOCK St COMP....Y. INC.
c.s---
LKCE-PQR-077
- 1 WELDING PRC"EDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD PROCEDURE SPECIPICATION GROOVE WELD TEST RESULT 3 Reduend-section tensson test Material ssecification - A588 Tensk w A Wetoeng proemas SMAW t
N/A Manual or macmne Manual 9
N/A Position of welding 2F-MarimnM Filter metas soecification M1 GuisetMeend test l
Filier metat stassification E7018 Aoot Face l
Weto messe praes N/A 1
N/A g
N/A Shielding pas N/A 7 6g,,
N/A 9
N/A Single or multiose pass Sinele/Mult191e 9
N/A Siripe or mutuote art -
Sincle p"_, _2.Uttrasones Exammatior.
N/A W surrent N
FDiet test reestis Min Size Multiste Pass Mas Size Single Pass Macroetess N/
i/t 4 A,6 7 jI ' ' -
Weteer's name M. Dinelli e62 14'4 4
1
~
9 $.!:*.
9 4 * *.
Laboratory Test No. /4 r
'j S 7~-., ;i ~ s rg j< k
- WELDING PROCEDURE
..? t Pam Eman.
sense.
w casa an.
aus 4,,,,,,,s I
v osuus 1"
SING: E PAS i f
1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A MULT] PLE P LSS 1
3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A
- V 2
3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A j
3 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A 3,.
1
's I
Multiple -
l
{
- Single - 1/8" Fillet 3/16" Fillet We the unserssened, certify that tne statemems in this record are sorrect and that the test welds woan presered, wetoed ano tested in accoreanes witn ine reousromems of 58 of AWS D1.1, Structural Weiding Code.
i 0
actum or Contractor. L.K. Comstock & Co.
l
- Base Metal Temp.
56 F A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 Auviertred w wh d ~ hY$
Date
~
sessanto a =enovan aavisso titLa omis. cats navisi0N l
I PROCEDURE
'amom3
,.' y t W.;
j
^; g r. - i s'
fillShurgl8 rorin Nci. :
%'Q.
h TeSlitig Ph - ca'c a aa Mcv. 2 I..? '.. ' '
N,a b O Ya i O Yy * ~'
Report No: Mh/D-7/M
_8_ C I' h@d REPOMT Lab No.
of M i s c e l l a n e ou.s Welding Qualification Report Date:
J-4-85' Job No CH-3175 Client Cocznonwealth Edison Company Project Braidwood Nuclear Pever Station Contractor:
L. K. Comstock Contractor Supplied Information:
Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position Qualified O h - MdPI70A/ /A L Velder's Name M. I)tLlELLI Welder I.D.
M b2 Welding Process b /Y7 A \\A/
Manual or Machine MMA//ld Material Specification A,T8 $
Standard M\\A/Cs h l l - l 9 '75~
,r - \\
Date of Q.:alification:
M - /-f - 8 5~
,/ I '.l'j','. m. - ~.
.... ~ -
wV'[-'
W Visual Inspection:
ACC REJ A
j Bend / Fracture ACC REJ IN,/A
.\\
[
Macroetch Test REJ N/A R
v f.
rost Results:
forming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Remarks:
Visual inspection of veld area only.
Inspertor/ Level:
d>r/h / 77--
C.W. THOMAS Supervir.or / oat et&M /4;M/N M J - #- #7 Re.iti4E0 BT jg/,4 /6
( B.L!.U.d G:1 2./>id5 g;
gy
L. K. CO?.tSTCCK & COMPfJ... !NC.
3m LKCE-PQR-078 WELDING PRC:EDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD PROCECURE SPECIFICATION GROOVE WELD TEST RESULT 5 A588
""**d'""*""""*""
Material soecification Tensile strenr.h, psi:
SMAW Wetorng process N/A Manual or macnme Manual
=
9 N/A Position of wetemg 3F-Vertical Fiber metat saecification AS.1 Guised bend ust Fi!6er metal classification E7019 Root Face Weis metal graos M/A t
N/A 1
N/A Shiefdmg gas M /1 Flow N/A 9
N/A 9
Single er multions oass Single / Multiple
~
N/A 51ngee or multiois arc Sincia Radiograonic Uttrasonic Exammassor*
N/A WMng armnt N
Fillet test resutu Min Sias Multiole Pass Max Size Single Pers 1Natment N/h Macroettft Macroetch y
Weiser's name B. Rawlinm #97 1,j,4, g, M g,~,
1 s
M s AT L 9 AJ$ ?
Laboratory Test No. #'OI# N N/
\\a
- WELDING PROCEDURE
- C""""
Pam seen.
3,,,,,,
MM g
9,,,
,,,,e nn.
ame 3,,,,,,
1"l e i
SINGLE PASH t
Ii 1
1/8" 130 - 140 20 - 22 N/A k
N MULTIPLE PJSS N
\\
.,6" x 12" N
1 3/32" 90 22 N/A 2
3/32" 90 22 N/A g
3 3/32" 90 22 N/A a
a
-g
- Single - 1/8" Fillet j
Multiple - 3/16" Fillet We tne sanoei signed, certify that tne statements in this record are oorrect and that the test welds weca orecared.
wetoed ano tested in accoreance with tne reovernments of 55 of AWS D1.1 Structural Wetoing Code.
Manufacturer or Contractor L._K. Comstock & Co.
- Base Metal Temp.
57 F A1999 Due Date:
6-17-81 Authorized W
<bh J-9-PS~
Date
==ceanco a =cvan navisto vm.a omis. oats navisiore PROCEDURE e464
.f9gg7%~...
~
- -~
r
'w
--'"="=-*w
'9'"
ww-
'""+9
_S w i. '
' l ll. <.
Pitisburgh
,.o r, N,,,,
n.n.,
E Testing on - c-c-a u: v.
2 3..^.'. : " ' '
La bora tory ***
Report No: M u /68 - #//3 897-949/
hEPOHT Leh No.
of Miscellaneous Welding Qualification Report Date:
M-4/ - Qf Client Cc:=envealth Edison Company J b No CH-3175 Project Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Contractor:
L. K. Co= stock Contractor Supplied Information:
Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position QJalified 3 F - VERTicA L Velder's Name 8, RAlA/l_ f AJS Velder I.D.
M97 i
Welding Process bM A k[
Manual or Machine M4 AJ/JA l_
[
Material Specification M,5 8 6 N h / S D l. l - / 9 7 6
,/' m. N Standard f, m. :
r, -
Dcte of Qaalification:
O-4-2Y
- ^
.d
k Visual Inspection:
ACC REJ A
i Eend/ Fracture ACC REJ 1 A
\\g -.... " -
//
/
Macroetch Test ACC REJ N/A Tost Results:
'e l
nforming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Rsmarks:
Visual inspection of veld area only.
i t
Inspartor/ Level:
]Pf[ma.c., /7 C. W. THOMAS Supcrviv.or / vat e0L /}0JA j W}/-
/W J f -- /s)~~
N 'Y f
/ E. L. Mratnim REVIEVED BY O^
DATE -
g
~_
4 L. K. COM3TC0K & CCf...
NY. lNC.
n n-r LKCE-PQR-079 WELDING PRC EDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION GROOVE WILD TEST Rt3 ULT 3 Redenen tension test Maunat sessifession A588 Tensile strength, esi:
Wetsing areams SMAN N/A g
Manual er meansne Mannm1 N/A Pos.m of weisang U-OV* * ** d Piher metalsaecifiestion A5.1 Guioed hend test ii Filter snetai sessifiestion E7018 Root Face
!i 1
N/A 1
N/A I
Weis messe grase N/A Shesighng gas M/1 Flour M/1 9
N/A 9
N/A I
% w mutuote essa Sincle /Multiele Singes w mulooie art Sinole Radiograonst Ultrasonic Examinatior N/A j
Weidag memnt N
p;llet east results W'08*8 8'*8"'"**
Min Eise Multiole Pass Mas size Single Pass i
Postnmet weeanent N/A Macreetan Macrootsh 1
c~,
j Weiser'a name B. Rawlins e97 1
I 9 M /'.
9 MO f
i Laowstory Test No./jfs'UO 'i'Y l
bb
..b i
\\a e WILDING PROCEDURE
[
l e
Pam hans.
Seems et
.imme osana
=
ene a,,,,,,
v,,
seues i
s l
l SINGIE PAS 3 i
1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A 4
MULTIPLE Ph55 1
3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A l
2 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A
- N l
3 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A f
n i
o t
i l
1a I
- single - 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet We the undsrugned, earthy that ins statsmenn in this record are serrect end that tne test welds wees presored.
I weisse ans usand in acooreanas wnn ine reeuwements of 58 of AW5 D1.1. Structural Weichng Coos.
t 0
8"
" O*"'88
- Base Metal Temp.
56 F Autnertand tsy
- b/ ~
f A1999 Due Date:
6-17-85
>- 9-##
os,e i
i sessaato a**=ov to navista TiTL.s omis. oats navistore PROCEDURE iapavga?..;
o
. '. _.. _. _ i ' i I_
?$$lSbHYQh y,,,,,. s,., :
w q.,
P Testisug
'"'-'-c-=
u.,.
2
, O. 7 '..'. " ' '
I,a boraioyy 6-6-e4 Fi i.tir t Nt. : M R/O 7/M k L P O k 'I Lal. No.
- 3$~7~-94 M of Hi sc e ll aneous W 1 ding Qualifiration Neport Dat c :
.2 4 - $ f Client Cc:::::envealth Edison Company J b No Cu-3175 Project Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Contractor:
L. K. Comstock Contractor Supplied Information: -
Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position Qaalified
/4 F - Ot/ ERNE'AD t! alder's Name
- 8. kMk((/M9 Welder I.D.
M 97 l
Welding Process 3 M 4 k/
Manual or Machine M A A //_] A L Material Specification 4 - 6 f3 A Standard N h/S Dl l- /9 #7I N.,
Data of Q:alification:
2-4-86 AFPRO'MO N Visual Inspection:
ACC REJ
/A q
c,,;.
Be r.d / Frac ture ACC J
E N/A Hacroetch Test CC REJ N/A pa.rE /
Tost Results:
forming Non-Conforming
- ot Applicable Rsmarks
Visual inspection of veld area only.
inspactor/ Level:
<[
mp ///
C. W. THOMAS h
Supervisor /Dat cd2////,1////#I I J-.54pr REV!EWED BY
'6'-
(B.t.t. men-/
i.n.,, 2. 4,fh c ggBOcO(o708 g9
N t
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-456
)
50-457 (Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the attached letter was served by deposit in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, on the persons identified below, this 15th day of October, 1985.
Herbert Grossman, Esquire Lawrence Brenner, Esquire Chairman Administrative Law Judge Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Administrative Law Judge Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Board Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Commission 4
Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Atomic Safety and Licensing Administrative Law Judge Appeal Board Panel 102 Oak Lane U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Ms. Bridget Little Rorem 117 North Linden Street P.O. Box 208 Essex, IL.
60935 n
e,.
--,7 r
< =,
% t
- w; t
4 Stuart Treby, Esquire Mr. William L. Clements Elaine I. Chan, Esquire Chief, Docketing and Services Office of the Executive U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Legal Director Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Office of the Secretary Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Robert Guild, Esquire Ms. Lorraine Creek Douglass W. Cassel, Jr., Esquire Route 1 Timothy W. Wright, III, Esquire Box 182 BPI Manteno, Illinois 60950 109 North Dearborn Street Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Charles Jones, Director C. Allen Lock, Esquire Illinois Emergency Services P.O. Box 342 and Disaster Agency Urbana, Illincis 61801 110 East Adams Springfield, IL 62705 William Little Jan Stevens Director Braidwood Project U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Region III Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 7920 Norfolk Avenue Commission Phillips Building 799 Roosevelt Road Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 1
Elta C.
Stylef/
-