ML20133H244
| ML20133H244 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 10/09/1985 |
| From: | Siegel B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8510160323 | |
| Download: ML20133H244 (20) | |
Text
,.
[#
UNITED STATES
{,,.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
WASHINGTON. D. C 20555
- ~.
e OCT S 1985 Docket No. 50-461 APPLICANT:
Illinois Power Company FACILITY:
Clinton Power Company SU6 JECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING WITH ILLIN0IS POWER COMPANY RELATED TO THE PV0RT RECOVERY PROGRAll A meeting with Illinois Power Company (IP) was held with the NRC staff and its consultant BNL on September 26, 1985, in Bethesda, Maryland. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss IP's recovery program following the unsatisfactcry PVORT audit at Clinton the week of August 26, 1985. A list of meeting attendee's is contained in Enclosure 1.
4 S. Perry of IP and R. Heider of Sargent and Lundy (S&L) described IP's PVORT recovery program that has been developed to meet the regulatory requirements. contains copies of the vu-graphs used dt. ring their presentation.
Following the presentation the NRC staff caucused and presented IP with the following requests and conclusions:
1)
Provide two procurement specifications complete with all revisions by 4
l October 2, 1985. One of the specifications should be for RCIC suction isolation valve E51-F063.
2)
To provide the staff assurance of the acceptability of the recovery program IP should return to Bethesda during the latter part of October 1985 prepared to describe the overall program plan by going through, in detail, the qualification of the RCIC suction isolation valve E51-F063.
3)
Provide precedure PI-CP-079 developed by S&L for IP to assure compliance of the equipment packages with the regulatory requirements by Octcber 2, 1985.
4)
Assuming that the staff finds the above items acceptable the staff will be prepared to perform a reaudit of the PVORT program for Clinton during the month of November on dates proposed by IP provided the staff has no conflict that would take priority. This also assumes that IP will provide an equipment master list to the staff on a schedule that will support the proposed reaudit dates.
i 1
851016032t3 851CX19 PDR ADOCK 05000461 A
r.,
, a-
.:.=u :
- c. : -
+
Copies of items 1 and 3 were received by the staff and BNL on September 30, 1985.
l
/
4 ron Sie el, Project Manager licensing Branch No. 2 Division of 1.icensing i
Enclosures:
j As stated f
cc: See next page P
4 i
i 4
7 j
a y
-.,,,,,yg.--.
--m...n my -., -,-..
n w.,.
.-,,,-,n
,r,,
,n,,.,me
.,oww-o
,-wm-y--
-ew--
>~-vm--s e m w m,www-
4 Copies of items 1 and 3 were received by the staff and BNL on September 30, 1985.
Original Signed by Byron Siegel, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See next page j
2 OISTRIBUTION:
l ONU NRC PDR local PDR PRC System NSIC i
LB#2 Reading j
Goddard, OELD BSiegel EPylton i
l t
l I
s 1
4 LB#,
LB#2/DL/BC i
.lb-WButler-5 10A)/85 L
... - = - -. -.
a..... :... ~ _
p,~ ~.-. -
l_ j -
l i-Mr. Frank A. Spangenberg Clinton Power Station 4
Illinois Power Company Unit 1 cc:
Mr. Allen Samelson, Esquire Jean Foy, Esquire 4
Assistant Attorney General 511 W. Nevada
~
Environmental Control Division Urbana, Illinois 61801 Southern Region 500 South Second Street Richard B. Hubbard Springfield, Illinois 62706 Vice President Technical Associates i
Mr. D. P. Hall 1723 Hamilton Ave. - Suite K l
Vice President San Jose, CA 95125 Clinten Pcwer Station P. O. Box 678 Clinton, Illinois, 61727 Mr. H. R. Victor Manager-fluclear Station Engineering Opt.
Clinton Power Station P. O. Box 678 Clinton, Illinois 61727 I
Sheldon Zabel, Esquire Schiff, Hardin & Waite 7200 Sears Tower 233 Wacker Drive Chicago. Illinois 60606 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cct.nission RR 3, Box 229 A Clinton, Illinois 61727 Mr. R. C. Heider Projectf!anager Sargent & Lundy Engineers 55 East licnrce Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Mr. L. Larson Project Manager General Electric Company i
175 Curtner Aver.ue, N/C 395 San Jose, California 95125 t
.iagicnal Administrator, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 I
_= -_ -
September 25, 1985 Meeting on PVORT ReAudit Recovery Program i
Name Affiliation Byron Siegel PM/DL
.i.
Jim Lombardo EQB Goutam Bagchi NRR/DE/EQB Bruce Miller BNL Arnold Lee NRR/DE/EQB Bruce Weinhold S&L R. C. Peider S&L 4
i A. E. Meligi S&L C. T. Gentile IP Parltio Rayfircar IP J. S. Perry IP Walt Emerson SWEC Paul Telthorst IP Doyle Wilson IP i
4 l
l l
f 4
f l
i t
I NRC PVORT AUDIT CONCERNS
- 1. INADEQUAC OF PVORT PACKAGES
- The Accuracy Active Pump & Valve List
- Procedure for Revision and. Approvals of I
packages l
Component Qualification Status Component Installation Status i
e
- Qualific.ation Documentation Review p
2 TEST VS ANA. LYSIS l
(
x
,r I
PVORT PROGRAM l
In-Shop Tests Shell & Disk Hydrostatic Test EQ Program Main & Back Seat Leakage SQRT Program Test Clyclic tests Evaluation of mounting Operating Cycle Test (pumps)
Thermal and radiation tests followed by a Pump Perfonnance Tests Stress evaluation under functional test different seismic Overspeed Test condition at critical Operated during and locations after LOCA test Qualification Tests and Analysis functional capability Functional test after prior to testing the LOCA test EQ results Operational verification (SQresults during and after testing Post-Installation Tests Functional capability after test Cold Hydrostatic Tests Deflection at critical i
Hot Functional Tests location Startup Tests 4
In-Service Tests 1
(
3 I
i C _ITON PIPP & VALVE 0) ERA 3I _.:TY Ah A _YSIS & "ES" A))R0ACi L
t A.
VALVES
- 0PERATOR
- 0PERABILITY DEMONSTRATED BY TEST
- VALVE ASSEMBLY (OPERATOR & VALVE BODY) l
'0PERABILITY DEMONSTRATED BY ANALYSIS
- ANALYSIS,'M.ETHQD CONFIRMED BY TEST B.
PUMPS
.i
- PUMP
'0PERABILITY DEMONSTRATED BY ANALYSIS
- DRIVER
' MOTOR OPER, ABILITY DEMONSTRATED BY ANALYSIS
- TU.RBIME OPERABILITY DEMONSTRATED BY TEST 4
1
1
~
f y
[/
1
/
i:
TEST AND ANALYSIS STANDARD REVIEW PLAN GUIDELINES k
?
' ANALYSIS:ALONE ACCEPTABLE IF STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ALONE ASSURES OPERABILITY i:
'I
- COMBINATION OF TNST AND ANALYSIS IS ACCEPTABLE WHEN COMPL.TE TESTING IS, IMPRACTICAL E
I i
)
]
t
~'~
s I
VA_VE ASSEM3LY 03ERAB:'L::TY VER: F:: CATION BY TESTING e
- STATIC PULL TEST OF REPRESENTATIVE VALVE ASSEMBLIES TO VERIFY STROKING UNDER 5G TO 12G SIMULATED SEISMIC LOAD (CLINTON WORST CASE 4.5G)
- SEISMIC TESTING REPRESENTATIVE VALVE ASSEMBLIES
- lN-SITU TESTING OF REPRESENTATIVE VALVE ASSEMBLIES L
I
.~
I REPRESENTATIVE VALVE ASSEMBLY IN-SITU TESTING i
l l
2" Motor-0perated Gate Valve l
4" Motor-0perated Gate Valve 6" Motor-0perated Gate Valve i
12" Motor-0perated Globe Valve 14" Mot'or-0perated Gate Valve (HPCS) 16" Motor-0perated Butterfly Valve 4
l MS Isolation Valve t
1
l
\\
PUMP OPERABILITY VERIFICATION BY ANALYSIS
- PUMP SHAFT (IMPELLER)
DEFLECTION DEMONSTRATES NO INTERFERENCES WITH CASING
- PUMP MOTOR SHAFT (ROTOR)
DEFLECTION DEMONSTRATES NO INTERFERENCE WITH STATOR l
' ALIGNMENT OF MOTOR-PUMP SHAFTS AT COUPLING DEMONSTRATED TO SATISFY VENDOR REQUIREMENTS I
i
- BEARINGS CHECKED FOR QUALIFIED LIFE j
i 1
,1 l
i l
Y
~
(
)
I PUMP OPERABILITY VERIFICATION BY TESTING i
l Adequacy of analytical models used by S & L verified by IN-SITU impedence~ testing conducted for other S & L projects RBCCW Pump and Motor LPCS Pump and Motor RCIC Pump SLC Pump and Motor
\\
~
t t
i i
l VALVE ASSEMBLY 0)ERABILITY VERIFICATION BY ANALYSIS I
1 4
i
' VALVE STRESSES DEMONSTRATED TO BE IN ELASTIC RANGE i
' VALVE STEM (YOKE)
DEFLECTION DEMONSTRATED NOT TO CAUSE 1
i BINDING I
i 4
I i
\\
l l
Comparison Between Clinton Active Valves and Clinton Valve Assemblies Tested Valve Size (inches)
Valve Type
.5C
.75 1
1.5 2
2.5 3
4 6
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 30 36 Gate A
A A A
A A
A A
A A A A
A A
A Globe A
A A A
d 1
1 1
1 A
A A
A l
Butterfly A
A A
A A A A
A A
A A
Plug / ball.
A A
A l
Safety A
g g
g g
g g
relief
- Vacuum g
g relief j
Check A
A A A
A 1
1 A A A A
A A
A Clinton active valve size f
r Range of Clinton valve assemblies tested l
a Range of. valve assemblies tested.
(Sargent & Lundy Nuclear Projects) l t
i
l
-]
-)
Comparison Between Clinton Active Valves and Clinton Valve Assemblies Tested i
Valve Size (inches)
Valve Type 5C.75 1
1.5 2
2.5 3
4 6
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 30 36 Gate A
Ad l
Clobe A
A A
i Butterfly A
A A
I Plug / ball.
A A
A i
O' Ih;}'}
Safety l
gl relief vacuum g
relief Check A
AA AAA A
AAA A
A A
A Clinton active valve size 5 Range of Clinton valve assemblies tested Range of; valve assemblies tested.
l l
(Sargent & Lundy Nuclear Projects)
l t
\\
3
-3 t
, i Comparison Between Clinton Active Valves and ClintonValveAssembliesfTested s
a
+
l I
e
(
l valve size (inches).
valve Type l
.50.75 1
1.5 2
2.5 3
4 6
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 30 36 Gate A
AA l
i
,t Globe
(%'4 k-Butterfly AA I
i Plug / ball.
d A
A
)
Safety I
relief I
Vacuum
- g j
relief j
j t
Check A
A AAAA A
AAA l
l A Clinton active valve sizd-g Range of Clinto[1 valve Assemblies testgd; j
W Range of: valve assembliesf tested. -
(Sargent & Lundy Nuclear Projects)
=_._m._
\\
TESTlilG PERFORMED 0?) REPRESENTATIVE VALVEhSEM3 LIES DAGE VALVE DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS SIZE - RATlHG -
SHAKE TABLE STATIC MAXIf1tM 0 PETTING CLOSING /
B0DY TYPE AND QUALIFICATIOlf PULL TEST VALVE VALVE TINE ACTUATOR TYPE TEST TEST INPUT PRESSURIZATION CYCLED MONITORED 1" - 600# GLOBE WITH X
9.4c YES YES YES AIR OPERATOR 1k" - 600# GLOBE WITH X
9.70 YES YES YES AIR OPERATOR 5" - 600# GLOBE WITH X
10.5s YES YES YES
\\lR OPERATOR 1" - 600# GLOBE WITH X
9.2G YES '
YES YES tlR OPERATOR
'" - 1500# GLOBE WITH X
- 9. 4r, YES YES YES
'LIR OPERATOP.
.h" - 2500# GLOBE WITH X
6.00 YES YES YES OTOR OPERATOR
- 600# GLOBE WITH X
4.50 YES YES YES OLEN0iD OPERATOR
" - 2500# GLOBE WITH
~
X 4.5G-YES YES YES
=
s
~
, SLEN01D OPERATOR
~
i
l PAGE 2 VALVE l
DESCRIPT10:1 DARAf1ETERS SIZE - RATING -
SHAKE TABLE STATIC ' MAXIMU'1 OPENING CLOSING /
BODY TYPE AND QUALIFICATION PULL TEST VALVE VALVE TIME ACTUATOR TYPE TEST TEST INPUT
, PRESSURIZATION CYCLED M0lllTORED
- 5/8" - 150# GLOBE
- ilTH S0LEN0ID X
11. 5 0 YES YES YES
- )PERATOR i L2" - 150# WAFER jiTOP VALVE WITH X
11','Oc YES YES YES ILIROPERATOR
[L2"-150r
- IUTTERFLYWITH X
3.0a YES YES
-N0 1
- ilR OPERATOR i" - 150#
iUTTERFLY WITH X
3.0s YES YES N/A lANUAL GEAR 1" - 300# GATE
~
flTH MOTOR X
6.75a YES YES YES IPERATOR
.6" - 1500# 6 ATE
~
!IITHMOTOR
~
X 6'.75s YES YES YES
~
4 jIPERATOR i
PAGE ?
1 I
VALVE i
DESCRIPTION PARAf1ETERS SIZE - RATING -
SHAKE TABLE " STATIC HAXIMUM OPENING CLOSING /
B0DY TYPE AND QUALIFICATION PULL TEST VALVE VALVE TIME ACTUATOR TYPE TEST TEST INPUT PRESSURIZATION CYCLED MONITORED
=
1" - 1500# PRESSURE X
6.00 YES YES YES t
RELIEF VALVE 2" - 1500# PRESSURE X
6.00 YES YES YES l
REllEF VALVE 4" - 1500# PRESSURE X
6.0c YES YES YES REllEF VALVE
~
8" x 10" SAFETY i
RELIEF VALVE WITH X
9.00
.YES YES YES I
AIR OPERATOR
- 1" EXPLOSIVE VALVE X
6'750 YES N/A N/A 4
i I
l
~
O j
~
..