ML20133G174

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notation Vote Response Sheet,Approving W/O Comment, SECY-96-261, MOU Between DOE & NRC for Cooperation in Support of Significant Projects & Activities
ML20133G174
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/10/1997
From: Dicus G
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Hoyle J
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
Shared Package
ML20133G137 List:
References
SECY-96-261-C, NUDOCS 9701150206
Download: ML20133G174 (1)


Text

.__ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _

l NOTATION VOTE i l

RESPONSE SHEET TO: John C. Hoyle, Secretary FROM: COMMISSIONER DICUS

SUBJECT:

SECY-96-261 - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FOR COOPERATION IN SUPPORT OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES Approved d Disapproved Abstain Not Participating Request Discussion COMMENTS: l l

i l

4 N ou tw V j Gg TURE Release Vote / / imm /d 19f/7 J DATE /

Withhold vote / /

Entered on "AS*' Yes N No 9701150206 970114 PDR -COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR

MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE immediate Corrective Actions I i Internal HPES i e Multi-discipline Evaluation Team i

e MOV Program Key Event History v Industry Documents i

v RG&E Implementing Documents v MOV Program Personnel RG&E g

MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE Immediate Corrective Actions Internal HPES Results e Barrier Analysis v Inadequate Establishment of Team Based Program v Inadequate Feedback of Test Data o Change Analysis i

v Program Personnel Changes v Didn't Use Research & Industry Experience 6

h

MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE Immediate Corrective Actions i , .

XRC Commitment Review (In Progress) i e Review v 73 NRC & RG&E Documents v 154 Commitments e Categorize Commitments v Administrative l v Technical  !

e Validate Commitment Closure v Altran v Kalsi v JOSH Associates II' RG&E 20

MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE Immediate Corrective Actions i i Quality Assurance Review e Review QA oversight of MOV Program e Assess line management response to QA surveillances e Assess QA use of Technical Specialists e Determine whether QA should audit programs RG&E '

i

MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE immediate Corrective Actions Internal CATS Review Results  ;

(In Progress) e IR 95-06 Inspector Follow-up Items Extracted as 1 Commitment vs 28 e Commitment Closure Review - No Significant Deficiencies Yet identified 4

A 1  !

l

MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE Immediate Corrective Actions t I Quality Assurance Review Results

~

e No MOV Program Audit Performed e Surveillances Lacked Scope & Depth e Didn't Use Technical Specialists 11 RG&E

_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _