ML20133G174
| ML20133G174 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/10/1997 |
| From: | Dicus G NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Hoyle J NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133G137 | List: |
| References | |
| SECY-96-261-C, NUDOCS 9701150206 | |
| Download: ML20133G174 (1) | |
Text
.__
NOTATION VOTE RESPONSE SHEET TO:
John C.
Hoyle, Secretary FROM:
COMMISSIONER DICUS
SUBJECT:
SECY-96-261 - MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FOR COOPERATION IN SUPPORT OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES Approved d
Disapproved Abstain Not Participating Request Discussion COMMENTS:
l 4
N ou tw V
j Gg TURE Release Vote
/
/
imm
/d 19f/7 J DATE /
Withhold vote
/
/
Entered on "AS*'
Yes N No 9701150206 970114 PDR -COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR
l i
MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE immediate Corrective Actions i
I i
Internal HPES i
e Multi-discipline Evaluation Team i
e MOV Program Key Event History v Industry Documents i
v RG&E Implementing Documents v MOV Program Personnel f
RG&E g
MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE Immediate Corrective Actions i
Internal HPES Results e Barrier Analysis v Inadequate Establishment of Team Based Program j
v Inadequate Feedback of Test Data o Change Analysis i
v Program Personnel Changes v Didn't Use Research & Industry Experience l
6 h
MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE Immediate Corrective Actions i
XRC Commitment Review (In Progress) i e
Review v 73 NRC & RG&E Documents v 154 Commitments e Categorize Commitments v Administrative l
v Technical e Validate Commitment Closure v Altran v Kalsi v JOSH Associates l
II' RG&E l
20
MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE i
Immediate Corrective Actions i
i Quality Assurance Review i
e Review QA oversight of MOV Program e
Assess line management response to QA surveillances e
Assess QA use of Technical Specialists l
e Determine whether QA should audit programs RG&E i
MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE immediate Corrective Actions Internal CATS Review Results (In Progress) e IR 95-06 Inspector Follow-up Items Extracted as 1 Commitment vs 28 e
Commitment Closure Review - No Significant Deficiencies Yet identified 4
A 1
l
MOVENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE l
Immediate Corrective Actions
\\
t I
Quality Assurance Review Results e
No MOV Program Audit Performed
~
e Surveillances Lacked Scope & Depth e
Didn't Use Technical Specialists i
11 RG&E
-