SER Approving Amend 3 to License SNM-1067,requesting Extension of Interim Storage Period of Packaged low-level Radwaste from 5 to 10 YrsML20133A959 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
07001100 |
---|
Issue date: |
12/24/1996 |
---|
From: |
NRC |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20133A927 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9701020191 |
Download: ML20133A959 (2) |
|
|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20210U0091999-08-12012 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 7 to License SNM-1067 ML20198R0331997-10-29029 October 1997 SER Recommending That Bldg 21 & Immediate Environs Be Released for Unrestricted Use ML20211H7981997-09-30030 September 1997 SER Supporting Amend 4 to License SNM-1067 ML20133A9591996-12-24024 December 1996 SER Approving Amend 3 to License SNM-1067,requesting Extension of Interim Storage Period of Packaged low-level Radwaste from 5 to 10 Yrs ML20132D9821996-12-17017 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Approving Amend 2 to License SNM-1067 ML20056D6901993-08-10010 August 1993 SER Recommending Approval of Amend 26 to License SNM-1067 ML20126B0371992-12-17017 December 1992 SER Approving C-E 920903 Application & Suppl Re Revised Radiological Contingency Plan ML20055J2871990-07-26026 July 1990 SER Supporting 900601 Application for Amend to License SNM-1067,authorizing Organizational Changes ML20248H8751989-10-0404 October 1989 SER Supporting Amend 15 to License SNM-1067,per C-E 890623 Application Re Organizational Changes ML20153F7921988-08-29029 August 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 14 to License SNM-1067 ML20151T0521988-08-11011 August 1988 SER Authorizing Storage of U Enriched Up to 5.0 Weight % in U-235 Isotope ML20149F7731988-01-0404 January 1988 SER Recommending Approval of Licensee 871009 & 1215 Applications for Amend to License SNM-1067 Re Exemption to 10CFR20.203(F) & Changes to Criticality Alarm Sys ML20237H6811987-08-20020 August 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 10 to License SNM-1067. Amend Revises License Re Moderation Control Criteria for Safety ML20207R9281987-03-13013 March 1987 SER on 870120 Application for Amend to License SNM-1067, Excluding Storage of Fuel Bundles in Shipping Containers 927A & 927C.Issuance of Amend Recommended ML20212H5171986-08-0404 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend to License SNM-1067, Authorizing Increase in Max Depth of closely-packed Fuel Rods to Six Inches in six-plane Arrays ML20137P6431985-11-25025 November 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting 850923 Request for Amend to License SNM-1067 Authorizing Identified Licensee Personnel to Conduct Monthly Criticality Safety Audits of Nuclear Fuel Mfg Operations ML20127D4851985-06-12012 June 1985 Evaluation of 841130 License Amend Application Re Addition of 1,000 G of Contained U-235 in Residue Enriched to Greater than or Equal to 20 Weight Percent U-235.Issuance of Amend Recommended 1999-08-12
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20210U0091999-08-12012 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 7 to License SNM-1067 ML20198R0331997-10-29029 October 1997 SER Recommending That Bldg 21 & Immediate Environs Be Released for Unrestricted Use ML20211H7981997-09-30030 September 1997 SER Supporting Amend 4 to License SNM-1067 ML20133A9591996-12-24024 December 1996 SER Approving Amend 3 to License SNM-1067,requesting Extension of Interim Storage Period of Packaged low-level Radwaste from 5 to 10 Yrs ML20132D9821996-12-17017 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Approving Amend 2 to License SNM-1067 ML20056D6901993-08-10010 August 1993 SER Recommending Approval of Amend 26 to License SNM-1067 ML20126B0371992-12-17017 December 1992 SER Approving C-E 920903 Application & Suppl Re Revised Radiological Contingency Plan ML20055J2871990-07-26026 July 1990 SER Supporting 900601 Application for Amend to License SNM-1067,authorizing Organizational Changes ML20248H8751989-10-0404 October 1989 SER Supporting Amend 15 to License SNM-1067,per C-E 890623 Application Re Organizational Changes LD-88-144, Radiological Survey Rept - Wooded Area C-E,Inc Property, Windsor, Ct1988-11-30030 November 1988 Radiological Survey Rept - Wooded Area C-E,Inc Property, Windsor, Ct ML20206D2661988-09-30030 September 1988 Nuclear Fuel Mfg Facility Independent Task Force Review Status Rept ML20153F7921988-08-29029 August 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 14 to License SNM-1067 ML20151T0521988-08-11011 August 1988 SER Authorizing Storage of U Enriched Up to 5.0 Weight % in U-235 Isotope ML20149F7731988-01-0404 January 1988 SER Recommending Approval of Licensee 871009 & 1215 Applications for Amend to License SNM-1067 Re Exemption to 10CFR20.203(F) & Changes to Criticality Alarm Sys ML20237H6811987-08-20020 August 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 10 to License SNM-1067. Amend Revises License Re Moderation Control Criteria for Safety ML20207R9281987-03-13013 March 1987 SER on 870120 Application for Amend to License SNM-1067, Excluding Storage of Fuel Bundles in Shipping Containers 927A & 927C.Issuance of Amend Recommended ML20212H5171986-08-0404 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend to License SNM-1067, Authorizing Increase in Max Depth of closely-packed Fuel Rods to Six Inches in six-plane Arrays ML20137P6431985-11-25025 November 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting 850923 Request for Amend to License SNM-1067 Authorizing Identified Licensee Personnel to Conduct Monthly Criticality Safety Audits of Nuclear Fuel Mfg Operations ML20127D4851985-06-12012 June 1985 Evaluation of 841130 License Amend Application Re Addition of 1,000 G of Contained U-235 in Residue Enriched to Greater than or Equal to 20 Weight Percent U-235.Issuance of Amend Recommended 1999-08-12
[Table view] |
Text
- __ _ _ - -- . .-- .. . - .
i "G
' ' y- *,. UNITED STATES i S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION !
f WASHINGTON D.C. 20555 4001
% ,, # December 24, 1996 j DOCKET: 70-1100 i LICENSEE: Combustion Engineering (CE)
Windsor, Connecticut
SUBJECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT: AMENDMENT APPLICATION DATED OCTOBER 31, 1996, REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF INTERIM STORAGE PERIOD
, Backaround By License SNM-1067, CE is authorized to store packaged low-level radioactive waste onsite for up to five years. By application dated October 31, 1996, CE requested that the period of time allowed for norage be increased from 5 years to 10 years.
I Discussion CE is authorized to store packaged low-level radioactive waste onsite for up ;
to five years. CE uses this authorization to store the waste that was i
generated from the Atomic Energy Commission operations conducted at the Windsor site prior to licensed operations. CE currently possesses such waste ,
material awaiting action by the Department of Energy (DOE) to determine disposition with CE. By application dated October 31, 1996, CE requested that the period of time allowed for interim storage be increased from 5 years to 10 years in order to accommodate these circumstances. In CE's request, only the allowed storage period would be changed, all other conditions of storage that are specified in the license would remain, including the provisions for monitoring, separation, container integrity and protection from the elements.
The staff has reviewed the application and determined that CE's request is justifiable and that the present radiological protection program is adequate to ensure the continued integrity of the stored waste.
The conditions of the stored waste at Windsor site were recently examined by Region I and noted in an inspection report published on December 4, 1996, (070-1100/96-02). During that inspection, no violation was reported.
Cateaorical Exclusion This amendment is one which is administrative and procedural in nature, and does not constitute a change in process operations or equipment. Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22(c), neither an Environmental Impact Statement nor an Environmental Assessment is warranted for the proposed licensing action.
QOpD Oi C
f 4
j c.. .
r 1
1 Conclusion / Recommendation The NRC. staff has reviewed the licensee's proposed amendment and has l l
determined that the proposed change will have no adverse effect on public-health and safety or the environment. Therefore, approval of the amendment l application is recommended. ;
The Region I project inspector has.no objection to the proposed amendment.
Principal Contributors Sean Soong.
l Susan Chotoo l
l !
i
~
l i
1 i
i l
4 l
i 4
3 i
s
- -