ML20133A760
| ML20133A760 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/07/1996 |
| From: | Mace M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Patrick W CENTER FOR NUCLEAR WASTE REGULATORY ANALYSES |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-J-5147, CON-NRC-02-96-004, CON-NRC-2-96-4 NUDOCS 9701020103 | |
| Download: ML20133A760 (5) | |
Text
e
/
t
,(5k3"ICg t
UNITED STATES j
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'f WASHINGTON. D.C. 2055M001 o
49.....,o Wesley C. Patrick President Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses 6220 Culebra Road P0 Drawer 28510 San Antonio TX 78228-0510
Dear Ms. Rowe:
Subject:
Task Order No. 3 Entitled " Standard Review Plan for In-Situ Uranium Mining Source Material License Applications". Under Contract NRC-02-96 004 In accordance with the task order procedures of the subject contract, this letter definitizes Task Order No. 3.
This effort shall be performed in accordance with the enclosed Statement of Work and the Contractor's technical proposal dated August 2.1996 as revised on August 19 and 22,1996. The effective date of this task order shall be November 4,1996.
Task Order No. 3 shall be in effect from November 4.1996 through July 4.1997 with a cost ceiling of $127.961. The amount o epresents the total estimated reimbursable costs. the amount of epresents the cost of facility capital, and the amount of $9.223 r presents the fixed fee for this task order.
The amount currently obligated is $127.961.
The obligated amount shall, at no time, exceed the task order ceiling. When and if the amount (s) paid and payable to the Contractor hereunder shall equal the obligated amount, the Contractor shall not be obligated to continue performance of the work unless and until the Contracting Officer shall increase the amount obligated with respect to this task order. Any work undertaken by the Contractor in excess of the obligated amount specified above is done so at the Contractor's sole risk.
Accounting Data for Task Order No. 3 is as follows:
B&R No.:
75015233000 I[/
JC No.:
J5147 I
B0C:
252A Appn. No.: 31X0200 Obligated:
$127.961 The following individuals are considered to be essential to the successful f
performance of the work hereunder:
Patrick Mackin. Gordon Wittmeyer. David Turner. Dr. Mark Jarzemba, and Pat LaPlante.
d 010042 c
9701020103 961107
-0
-004 PDR
- s 3
i 3
Task Order No. 3 Page 2
?
The Contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the effort under the task order without compliance with Contract Clause H.1 Key Personnel.
Further, any consultants that the Contractor plans to utilize under this task order must be approved by the NRC Contracting Officer before that cnnsultant may begin work under this task order.
j g
8 Your contacts during the course of this task order are:
1 Technical Matters:
Deborah DeMarco l~
Project Officer (301) 415-7796 Contractual Matters:
Deborah Neff Contract Specialist i
(301) 415 8160 4
i The issuance of Task Order No. 3 does not change any terms and conditions of the subject contract.
Please indicate your acceptance of Task Order No. 3 by having an official 1
authorized to bind your organization, execute three (3) copies of this document in the space provided and return two (2) copies to the U.S. Nuclear 4
Regu"atory Commission Attn:
Ms. Deborah Neff, ADM/DC/ TAB 1, Mail Stop T 712, Wast igton, DC 20555.
You should retain the third copy for your records.
j I' you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ms. Neff on
( 3) 415 8160..
Sincerely, j
(
d) y H. Mace, Contracting Officer i
echnical Acquisition Branch No. 1 Division of Contracts j
Office of Administration
}
Enclosure:
j As stated j
Accepted:
{
' $WW ja/
i Name Robert E. Matten Robert E. Chatten Title Director, Contracts Date
u TASK ORDER NO. 03 TITLE:
STANDARD REVIEW PLAN FOR IN SITU URANIUM MINING SOURCE MATERIAL LICENSE APPLICATIONS JOB CODE J5147 NRC ISSUING OFFICE NMSS NRC PROJECT OFFICER DEBORAH DEMARCO, 415-7796 NRC 'ECHNICAL MONITOR WILLIAM FORD. 415-6630 DOCl r T NUMBER:
NONE TAC NUMBER:
(Not Yet Assigned)
FEE REC 0VERABLE:
NO 1.0 Backaround Uranium in situ processing sites licensed by the NRC must obtain a Source Material License in accordance with 10 CFR Part 40.
The NRC is in the process of granting performance based licenses, which at this time is a new style of license from previous licensing actions.
Therefore, the staff is in need of guidance to review license renewals, license amendments. and new applications, with the objective of awarding both performance based licenses.
2.0 Obiective Tre objective of this task shall be to prepare a standarc review plar. for an j
in situ uranium mining source material license applicatico for either a J
performance or nonperformance based license.
3.0 Technical Qualifications Reauired The contractor shall provide the services of geohydrologists, geochemists, and health physicists who have an understanding of ground-water movement. well drilling and operation, and with the health physics concerns of a uranium source material processing facility.
Familiarity with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulatory process is required.
4.0 Level of Effort The estimated effort for this task is 1040 staff hours (0.5 FTE).
5.0 Comoletion Date Approximately 6 months will be required to complete the task.
6.0 Scoce of Work Using the previously prepared annotated outline the contractor staff 1.
shall identify the regulatory and environmental requirements from
- 20. 21. 40 and 51 that are related to the applicable 10 CFR Parts section of the review plan and need to be met: by using appropriate information gathered from:
(a) NRC files.
(b) State oi Wyoming regulations (the state of Wyoming has published regulations on uranium in situ mining, even though the NRC also
a regulates uranium in situ mines in Wyoming).
(c) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Underground Injection Control Regulations and guidance.
(d) Texas state files.
(c) the public literature.
As the Standard Review Plan proceeds through "significant" revisions 2.
contractor staff shall provide copies of the current draft to the NRC.
It is not expected that these drafts shall be formal deliverables to the NRC. but shall be sent by FAX and e-mail, with the purpose of maintaining an active dialogue between contractor and NRC staff.
A draft of the Acceptance Review Section shall be prepared which 3.
includes qualitative and quantitative options for acceptance criteria.
NRC staff will review these drafts and provide the contractor guidance on which options shall be specified in the review plan.
However, while the NRC staff conducts it's review; work would not stop on preparation of the review plan. Only options selected shall be incorporated into the review plan.
4.
A draft of the Conclusions Section shall be prepared that includes a short. one to three paragraph conclusion that needs to be made concerning the rcgulatory requirements identified under item 1.
NRC staff will review these drafts, but while the NRC staff conducts it's review; work would not stop on preparation of the review plan.
The contractor shall prepare drafts of the review plan that contain 5.
quantitative and qualitative options for review criteria and procedures that could be acceptable in meeting the recuirements identified under item 1 above and support the conclusions icentified in item 4. Options that are identified shall be based on (1) previous NRC review precedents. (2) operational experience. (3) inspection results, and (4) information outlined in item 1 above.
All options identified must be The NRC staff will provide the directly within NRC's regulativos.
contractor guidance on which option shall be incorporated into the final review plan.
Therefore the final review plan shall have only those review criteria and procedures the staff wants to adopt in it's formal l
NRC staff will review these drafts, but while the NRC review process.
work would not stop on preparation of the staff conducts it's review:
is anticipated that the NRC staff will communicate it's review plan.
review observations in active dialogue with the contractor staff and not through formal review transmittals 6.
Near draft provided to NRC staff.
7.
NRC staff reviews final draft.
Contractor staff prepare a final annotated outline that is camera ready 8.
for publication by NRC as a NUREG.
7.0 Meetina and Travel Many NRC records, which cannot be readily provided may have to be researched.
Therefore. some trips to search the NRC records may be necessary.
It is estimated 3 one person trips of one week duration to Washington D.C. may be required.
One trip to Washington DC may be required to discuss NRC comments on the
" final draft" It is estimated that this trip might require 1 individual's i
time for 2 days in Washington D.C.
8.0 NRC-Furnished Materials The NRC will furnish materials as requested by contractor staff or the contractor staff shall have to travel to Washington DC or Austin Texas to access the public document rooms.
9.0 Schedule The following schedule of the staff time required is based on estimates of time intervals to accomplish this task. The time required to obtain responses from DOE or management approval of various phas~ is estimated under the response column.
Calendar Time To Accomplish Tasks Contractor Deliverable (s)
L' Staff
Response
(Weeks from (Weeks)
(Weeks)
Contract Award) l l
Literature research 15 and staff interactions 20 Draft of Acceptance Review Section Prepared.
Draft of Conclusions 23 Section prepared.
Final Draft 3
34 Prepared.
NRC Staff Review of 3
Final Draft l
I Final 3
40 l
10.0 Technical Direction Technical instructions may be issued from time to time during the duration of this task.
Technical instructions shall not constitute new assignments of work or changes of such nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period Directions for changes in the scope of work, cost, or period of performance.
of performance shall be issued by the NRC Contracting Officer.
i
.