|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARLIC-99-0094, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code1999-10-0101 October 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Eliminating Requirement for Licensees to Revise Their Inservice Insp & Testing Programs Beyond Baseline Edition & Addenda of ASME Code ML20216F6761999-09-17017 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & NUREG-1022,Rev 1 LIC-99-0082, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans1999-09-10010 September 1999 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to NRC Emergency Preparedness Regulations on Use of Potassium Iodide in Emergency Plans LIC-98-0168, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments1998-12-0909 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Npps. Concerns Raised by NEI Well Founded & Endorses NEI Comments ML20248C0491998-05-21021 May 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R for Plant, Unit 1.Exemption Re Unpressurized Leakage Sites in RCP Lube Oil Collection Sys Granted LIC-98-0052, Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal LIC-97-0034, Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit1998-03-0202 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rev to RG 5.62, Reporting of Safeguards Events. Generally Draft Suggests More Stringent Reporting Requirements than Industry Now Following in Generic Ltr 91-03.No Analysis Performed to Determine Cost/Benefit LIC-98-0025, Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP1998-02-24024 February 1998 Comment on Proposed Communications Re Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at NPP ML20203B2031998-02-0606 February 1998 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24, Criticality Accident Requirements. Exemption Granted ML20199E2941997-11-19019 November 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effectively Immediately).Fs Bandy Prohibited from Involvement in Activities Licensed by NRC for Period of 5 Yrs LIC-97-0136, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors1997-08-28028 August 1997 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 73, Frequency of Reviews & Audits for Emergency Preparedness Programs, Safeguards Contingency Plans & Security Programs for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20151L9901997-07-24024 July 1997 Comments on NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML20217J6521997-07-22022 July 1997 Demand for Info Re NRC Question Re Arrest Info Supplied to OPPD in Mar 1993 for Unescorted Access to Plant ML20141B8821997-05-0606 May 1997 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements.Rule Should Not Be Limited to Designated Licensee or licensee-owned Vehicles,For Listed Reasons LIC-97-0052, Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies1997-04-17017 April 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed safety-conscious Work Environ Strategies ML20128F6571996-09-26026 September 1996 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations LIC-96-0110, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements1996-08-0505 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mod to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements ML20117P0961996-06-18018 June 1996 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Reactors. Any Addl Costs Imposed on Licensee Due to Change in Decommissioning Funding Will Aggravate Potential Investment LIC-96-0069, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment1996-06-11011 June 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.76, Reporting Reliability & Availability Info for Risk-Significant Sys & Equipment LIC-95-0193, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs1995-10-11011 October 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning of NPPs LIC-95-0165, Comments Supporting Revised Salp1995-08-29029 August 1995 Comments Supporting Revised Salp ML20086T3911995-07-20020 July 1995 Comments on Proposed Generic Communications Re Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits LIC-95-0116, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control1995-05-25025 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control LIC-95-0106, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial1995-05-22022 May 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial LIC-94-0236, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings1994-11-11011 November 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Frequency of Medical Exams for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment. Util Feels Proposed Change Would Be Beneficial in Terms of Cost Savings LIC-94-0137, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program1994-07-18018 July 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50 & 73 Concerning Frequency for Conducting Independent Reviews & Audits of Safeguards Contingency Plan & Security Program LIC-94-0072, Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area1994-03-31031 March 1994 Informs That Implementation of Proposed Rulemaking at Plant Would Require Numerous Procedure Changes,Addl Dosimetry for Members of Public, & Changes to Chemical Effluent Release Software Due to Deletion of Term Controlled Area LIC-94-0047, Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code1994-02-18018 February 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-1482, Guidelines for IST Programs at Npps. Licensee Should Not Have to State in IST Program Methods of Ensuring Code Compliance,If Licensee Complying W/ Code LIC-94-0035, Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications1994-02-0404 February 1994 Comments on Proposed GL Guidance for Mod of Tech Specs to Reflect Revs to 10CFR20 & 10CR50.36,related Current Industry Initiatives & Miscellaneous Related Editorial Clarifications LIC-93-0300, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs1993-12-20020 December 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Protection Against Malevolent Use of Vehicles at NPPs ML20045H3231993-07-0606 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20096A0351992-05-0101 May 1992 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking, Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety ML20094K7831992-03-17017 March 1992 Comments Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-57 Re Insurance Requirements for Shutdown Reactors ML20092D2791992-01-31031 January 1992 Comment Supporting & Endorsing Positions Submitted by NUMARC & BWR Owners Group Re Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys ML20086F8931991-11-11011 November 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-30-59 Re Rev of Decommissioning Regulations to Provide for Means of self-guarantee of Decommissioning Funding Costs by Licensees Meeting Stringent Financial Assurance Requirements ML20085K1581991-10-23023 October 1991 Supports Proposed Rule 10CFR50,requiring That NRC Evaluate Decommissioning Funding Plans for Power Reactors That Shut Down Prematurely on case-by-case Basis LIC-91-0063, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a1991-04-15015 April 1991 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Incorporating 1986- 1988 Addenda & 1989 Editions of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Iii,Div 1 & Section Xi,Div 1,by Ref Into 10CFR50.55a LIC-91-0046, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept1991-01-25025 January 1991 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule (Misc 90-10), Regulatory Impact Survey Rept LIC-90-0820, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments1990-10-12012 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses NUMARC Comments ML20012C6471990-03-12012 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Thermal Shock Events. Recommends That Use of Credible Surveillance Data Be Allowed to Establish Consistent Calculational Method W/Reg Guide ML19353B2091989-11-30030 November 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Supports NUMARC Position ML20246K2441989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Enactment of Generic Ltr 89-02 Requirements & Info Sharing Would Achieve Desired Results LIC-88-1031, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees1988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty. Endorses NUMARC Comments.Believes That 100% Annual Testing Frequency Appropriate as Adequate Deterrent & More than 100% Would Install Burden of Excess for Certain Employees ML20206C1081988-11-0404 November 1988 Requests for Renewal or Extension of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Regulations ML20204C1721988-10-14014 October 1988 Corrected Page 1 of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i), Increasing Amount of Onsite Property Damage Insurance Required by NRC Licensees ML20155F7021988-09-30030 September 1988 Temporary Exemption from 10CFR 50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements Until Completion of Pending Rulemaking Extending Implementation Date Specified But Not Later than 890401 ML20236X6881987-11-25025 November 1987 Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(1) Requirements Re Util Maint of Min Insurance Coverage for Operating Plants.Exemption Extends Date for Acquiring Full Amount of Property Insurance Required to No Later than 881205,per Util 851005 Request ML20206C1341987-11-0202 November 1987 Requests for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Requirements Due to Licensees Inability to Provide Equivalent Protection in Lieu of Purchasing Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd Coverage ML20236F7601987-10-0202 October 1987 Request for Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.54.Util Will Not Be Able to Comply W/Requirements by Effective Date or within 60 Days Thereafter ML20238E0891987-09-10010 September 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Identified During Insps on 850916-20, 1001-08,1106-08,18-22 & 1209-17 1999-09-17
[Table view] Category:ORDERS
MONTHYEARML20199E2941997-11-19019 November 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effectively Immediately).Fs Bandy Prohibited from Involvement in Activities Licensed by NRC for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238E0891987-09-10010 September 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Identified During Insps on 850916-20, 1001-08,1106-08,18-22 & 1209-17 ML20132G6021985-07-30030 July 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $21,425 for Violations Noted During Special Insp on 840820-24 Re Failure to Adhere to NRC Regulations & Physical Security Plans 1997-11-19
[Table view] |
Text
,
h UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Docket: 50-285 (Ft.CalhounStation) License DPR-40 EA 84-122 ORDER IMPOSING CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES I
0maha Public Power District,1623 Harney, Omaha, Nebraska (the " licensee") is the holder of License DPR-40 (the " license") issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (the "NRC"). License DPR-40 authorizes the licensee to operate the Ft. Calhoun Station at the designated location in Washington County, Nebraska, in accordance with the procedures and limitations set forth in the license and the rules and regulations of NRC.
II An inspection of the licensee's activities under its license was conducted during the period August 20-24, 1984. As a result of the inspection, it appears that the licensee had not conducted its activities in full compliance with the conditions of its license. The results of the inspection were discussed with licensee representatives during an enforcement conference on October 11, 1984. A written Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties was served upon the licensee by letter dated February 14, 1985. This Notice stated the nature of the violations, the provisions of its license conditions which the licensee had violated, and the amount of civil penalties proposed. An answer dated March 15, 1985 to the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties was received from the 1icensee. 7,;.; g = 73133 j m ma momI13.
(DRB50sok h g g o 'n:s E b.h:Ia ,THIS
,,gs m a m.mc.
4 III Upon consideration of the answers received and the statements of fact, explanation, and arguments for remission or mitigation of the proposed civil penalties contained therein, as set forth in the Appendix to this Order, the Director of the Office of Inspection and Enforcement has determined that, with one exception, the penalties proposed for the violations designated in the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties should be imposed.
IV In view of the foregoing and pursuant to Section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2282, PL 95-295) and 10 CFR 2.205, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The licensee pay civil penalties in the total amount of Twenty One Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-five Dollars within 30 days of the date of this Order, by check, draft, or money order, payable to the Treasurer of the United States, and mailed to the Director of the Office of Inspection and Enforcement, USNRC, Washington, D.C. 20555.
V The licensee may, within 30 days of the date of this Order, request a hearing. A request for hearing shall be addressed to the Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, E:'cLosta: cont.ux3 S.t.FEJ" .13 I:J ^ itMAT I S.
"FC1' Si?.EA?!0?l, TRIS PAGE 15 OECCNTRCLLED.
6 D.C. 20555. A copy of any request for hearing shall also be sent to the Executive Legal Director at the same address. If a hearing is requested, the Comission will issue an Order designating the time and place of hearing.
Upon failure of the licensee to request a hearing within 30 days of the date of this Order, the provisions of this Order shall be effective without further proceedings and, if payment has not been made by that time, the matter m5y be referred to the Attorney General for collection.
In the event the licensee requests a hearing as provided above, the issues to be considered at such hearing shall be:
(a) whether the licensee violated NRC requirements as set forth in the Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalties, as modified by the Appendix to this Order; and (b) whether on the basis of such violations this Order shall be sustained.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y
/ /
n mes M. Tay1 is ff
, Director (jfficeofIn ection and Enforcement Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, -//
this}oti ay d of July 1985.
n;ct,g n =:r' 03 aay gy;a,;u 3 iNF~.d 3 I1 O
- hoysLF.48.ATi'U.IIIl3 uau s w==== =c -
.- . . . _ . -_