ML20132B891
| ML20132B891 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1996 |
| From: | GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132B884 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9612170453 | |
| Download: ML20132B891 (7) | |
Text
.
Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Revised Quality Assurance Program Change Submittal With Corresponding Marked-Up FSAR Pages The following marked-up Unit 2 Final Safety Analysis Report pages are included in this enclosure:
17.2-6 and insert page 17.2-17 and insert page 17.2-18 and insert page 9612170453 961211 PDR ADOCK 05000321 P
PDR HL-5275 E2-1
Eucwsucr_ 2
{
s Ij-HNP-2-FSAR-17 t
systems.
These activities are governed by appropriate QA program I
procedures.
The SNC SAERM performs, or causes to be performed, l
l audits of these activities and procedures.
l t
17.2.1.2 Plant Oreanization and Resnonsibilities for OA/OC l
W 17.2.1.2.1 Nuclear Plant General Manaaer l
i
~
l
~2 The NPGM has the site responsibility for implementation of the QA l
{
program at the plant site.
He is responsible for compliance with
~
the requirements of the operating License and the Technical i
O Specifications, and for the safe, reliable, and efficient O
operation of the HNP.
The plant operations assistant general j
4 manager (POAGM) and the plant support assistant general manager
'i i
(PSAGM) report to the NPGM'.
The organizational structure, the interface with the general office, and the qualifications of j
plant personnel are discussed in chapter 13.
1
-C>
17.2.1.2.2 Plant Review Board (PRB)
The PRB is comprised of the designated plant supervisory i
persennel or alternates and has advisory duties to the NPGM.
Th l
l C ;; Ji;.;; prep;;;.
- 2et.,-
.l.;.J yl...
y.
.J...;
th:::t: pri r t:
- c;l by pi;at ;;n;;;;;nt and r;ci;;; 211 j
pr ;:: d th r; : t: : f:ty ::1;t:d y;t;;;, ::;p :: te, trd
--' pr ; ::d t :t
- nd ;;;p;ri;;nt _
The PRB reviews j
all reportable violations of the Technical Specifications and l
also screens subjects of potential concern to the SRB.
(See g
paragraph 13.4.2.1.)
17.2.1.2.3 operations Manager l
W i
)
The operations manager reports to the POAGM and has the l
responsibility to ensure the plant operates in accordance with j) written, approved procedures and license requirements.
He must j
'f ensure operations personnel are trained and qualified and l
h operations activities are governed by effective administrative j
g He is also responsible for the operation of the controls.
radwaste facility.
I d
)
d REV 1 7/83 REV 2 7/84 t
REV 3 7/85 l
g, REV 4 7/86 3
W REV 5 7/87 g
REV 7 7/89 4
i REV 8 7/90 i
REV 9c 7/91 Q-. {
REV 10c 7/92 REV 115 1/93 17.2-6 REV 14D 7/96 l
_. _. _. _. _.. _ ~... __
INSERT 1 17.2.1.2.2 Qualified Reviewer / Plant Review Board 17.2.1.2.2.1 Qualified Reviewer i
Qualified Reviewers are supervisory level (or equivalent) plant personnel designated by the General Manager-Nuclear Plant to act in this capacity. The Qualified Reviewer reviews items which require screening for 10 CFR 50.59 applicability and for which the answers to the screening questions indicate that the completion of a 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation is not required. All such items will be reviewed as described in Supplement 13.4A.
INSERT 2 The PRB reviews items which require screening for 10 CFR 50.59 applicability and for which an answer to at least one of the screening questions indicates that the completion of a 10 CFR 50.59 safety evaluation is required. All such items will be reviewed as described in Supplement 13.4A.
HL-5275 E2-3
4 i
ENC.L o5u.RE Z HNP-2-FSAR-17 17.2.5.1 Plant Procedures. Instructions, and Drawines The HNP procedures are used for periodic test and calibrations, special processes, modifications, maintenance, and other plant activities on safety-related systems, equipment, or structures.
New procedures and revisions to existing procedures are reviewed by plant personnel.
This review is for compliance with provisions of the QA program, applicable codes, standards and regulations, inclusion of appropriate acceptance criteria, and process controls.
__.2_._2 u..
.u_
__2__
m_
u 2 _ _. _
___2 u__
__u__
_,_,__m Written administrative procedures ensure proper control of instructions such as temporary procedure changes, standing orders, and night orders.
These instructions are of limited scope and issued for limited time periods to ensure proper N
requirements included in the procedures are not bypassed or b
neglected.
j M
i Plant drawings reflect the properly reviewed and approved configuration of the plant.
Changes as a result of design 3
changes (subsection 17. 2.3) or as-builts are controlled by written procedures the same as drawings until properly revised I
drawings are received.
The design organization implements design L
control through written procedures.
3 17.2.5.2 Other Procedures N
Each organization performing quality-related activities has I
properly reviewed and approved QA programs or procedures.
O.
These programs or procedures are reviewed for quality ul requirements and concurred with by the SAERM or his l
d representative.
Examples of procedures include corporate nuclear support procedures.
REV 1 7/83 REV 2 7/84 REV 3 7/85 REV 5 7/87 REV 6 7/88 REV 7 7/89 REV 9C 7/91 E 4.- H REV 12A 10/93 17.2-17 REV'14D 7/96
INSERT 3 Following this review, the procedures are reviewed by either a Qualified Reviewer or the PRB (see 17.2.1.2.2) prior to being signed by a member of plant management.
i l
i HL-5275 E2-5
W l-E Nc.t.as s e 2.
4 i
1 I
RNP-2-FSAR-17 l
17.2.6 DOCUMENT CONTROL i
i 17.2.6.1 Procedure Chances and Control i
Changes to HNP procedures fall into two categories:
permanent
^- - - - - ' - - -
" " ' - - ' - - - ^ ' - -
changes and temporary changes.
l
~~
=
=
=
=
52 2 E E=
=
E
=
=
==Cm= _ _
_1_'....
r......' u
-u z-2_:
__--2.._--
,,, e
,s l
'ft:r rc::: :nd:d ;;;;;c;l ij t.'.; 220, the appropriate member of l
plant management gives written approval prior to the change being i
implemented and incorporated in the appropriate section of the procedure.
The proposed temporary changes that require immediate gp action to protect the safety of personnel or provide for protection of plant equipment require that the change be written,-
provided the intent of the original procedure is not altered and i
that the change is approved by two members of the plant i
%i management staff, at least one of whom holds a senior reactor i
VL operator's license.
The required action is taken as set forth in, l
}{
administrative procedures.
1 i
All other instructions, procedures, and drawings are revised and l
2C controlled in a manner consistent with'the original issue of that
);
procedure unless otherwise specified in this paragraph.
3 The plant administration manager establishes a system ensuring l
that the responsible supervisors receive current revisions of (d
drawings, procedures, and other required documents and that j
superseded revisions or copies are removed and destroyed.
The responsible supervisor is responsible for ensuring that the latest revision of appropriate documents is being used to perform q,
(d safety-related activities.
Documents controlled by offsite gf organizations receive comparable issue and control as site documents.
17.2.6.2 Final Safety Analysis Reoort. Emercency Plan. Security i
Plan. Technical Soecifications Chances and control The NELM of the HNP nuclear support organization has I
j administrative control of the Final Safety Analysis Report
)
REV 2 7/84 REV 3 7/85 REV 4 7/86 REV 5 7/E7 REV 6 7/88 REV 7 7/S?
REV 9C 7/91 REV.12A 10/93 REV 13B 1/96 g,t-4 REV 14B 1/96 17.2-18 REV 14D 7/96
i I
INSERT 4
- ~
On procedures that do not require inunediate action, the change is prepared and subsequently reviewed by either a Qualified Reviewer or the PRB (see 17.2.1.2.2).
Following recommended approval by the Qualified Reviewer /PRB (as appropriate),,,
I' l
i e
4 i
s i
4 1
4 l
s 1
t HL-5275 E2-7