ML20132A870
| ML20132A870 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 12/11/1996 |
| From: | Miraglia F NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Decamp W AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132A874 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#197-18127 2.206, DD-96-22, NUDOCS 9612160367 | |
| Download: ML20132A870 (3) | |
Text
.-
December 11, W 6 Mr. Willia] decamp, Jr.
Oyster Cre:k Nuclear Watch P.O. Box 243 Island Heights, NJ 08732
Dear Mr. decamp:
I am responding to the Petitions filed pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Reaulations, Section 2.206 (10 CFR 2.206), on May 11 and June 14, 1996, on behalf of Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch.
In your Petitions you asked that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) investigate and require the correction by GPU Nuclear of a highly inaccurate public statement in the
" Neighborhood Update," and purportedly false public testimony given by the management of GPU Nuclear, and take appropriate disciplinary action.
2 Your Petitions were referred to me pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Comission's regulations.
The NRC staff investigated the statements and testimony as requested by the Petitions and concluded that the assertions of in the Petition are without merit.
For the reasons given in the enclosed Director's Decision (D9-96 22), the Petitions are denied. A copy of the decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Comission for the Comission to review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206(c). As provided by that regulation, the decision will constitute the final action of the Comission 25 days after the date it is issued unless the Comission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the decision within that 1
time.
I have also enclosed a copy of the notice of this Director's Decision that is being filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
Sincerely, original signed by l
Frank J. Miraglia Frank J. Miraglia, Acting Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-219
Enclosures:
1.
Director's Decision (DD-96 22) 2.
Federal Reaister Notice cc: w/encls:
See next page DISTRIBUTION:
see attached list 3
DOCKET NAME: A:\\2206.LTR
- See revious concurrence e Ta enceive o copy of thee document,indcate in the ben:
"C" = Copy without ottachment/ losure "E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" = No copy 0FFICE PDl-2:PM l e PD3-1:LA le PDM 2TD\\ m,l
- TECH ED l
- 0GC l
NAME REaton CJamerson ny J9tD)lf \\f)V MMejac HJMcGurren
'7 12p{ '/96i 10/18/96 11/07/96 DATE 12/ /96 12//o/96
/
0FFICE DRPE:D
- ADP NRR:DT U )
(A) ADT NAME SVarga*
VarcaforZinnermar FMiffagsis BSheron*
DATE 11/12/96 12/02/96 4,12/M96 11/22/96 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 160063 3+
9612160367 961211 k
PDR ADOCK 05000219
\\
P PDR
_ - ~.. - - -
i putro i
g UNITED STATES g
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
2 WASHINGTON, D.C. 30806 0001
+o December 11, 1996 i
Mr. William decamp, Jr.
Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch P.O. Box 243 I
Island Heights, NJ 08732
Dear Mr. decamp:
I am responding to the Petitions filed pursuant to Title 10 of the.Cade_p.f Federal Reaulations, Section 2.206 (10 CFR 2.206), on May 11 and June 14, 1996, on behalf of Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch.
In your Petitions you asked that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) investigate and require the i
correction by GPU Nuclear of a highly inaccurate public statement in the
" Neighborhood Update," and purportedly false public testimony given by the management of GPU Nuclear, and take appropriate disciplinary action.
l Your Petitions were referred to me pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Comission's regulations. The NRC staff investigated the statements and j
testimony as requested by the Petitions and concluded that the assertions of j
in the Petition are without merit.
For the reasons given in the enclosed Director's Decision (DD-96-22), the Petitions are denied. A copy of the decision will be filed with the Secretary of the Commission for the Comission to review in accordance with 10 CFR 4
4 2.206(c). As provided by that regulation, the decision will constitute the final action of the Comission 25 days after the date it is issued unless the i
Commission, on its own motion, institutes a review of the decision within that j
time.
i 1
I have also enclosed a copy of the notice of this Director's Decision that is being filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
4 Sincerely,
- t2L
)
Frank Miragl
, Acting Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regu'lation Docket No. 50-219 i
Enclosures:
1.
Director's Decision (DD-96 22) 2.
Federal Reaister Notice cc w/ enc 1:
See next page
~
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station cc:
Ernest L. Blake, Jr., Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, NW.
Washington, DC 20037 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 BWR Licensing Manager GPU Nuclear Corporation 1 Upper Pond Road Parsippany, NJ 07054 y
Mayor Lacey Township 818 West Lacey Road Forked River, NJ 08731 Licensing Manager Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Mail Stop: Site Emergency Bldg.
P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731 Resident Inspector c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 445 Forked River, NJ 08731 Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 Mr. Michael B. Roche Vice President and Director GPU Nuclear Corporation Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731
-t l DISTRIBUTION FOR DIRECTOR'S DECISION DD-96-22 DATED: December 11, 1996
,j Docket File (50-219) (w/ original incoming letters)
PUBLIC (w/ incoming letter) i EDO.GT96345 and GT96452 PDI-3 Reading (w/ incoming).
l JTaylor JMilhoan-
~
l HThompson JBlaha WRussell/FMiraglia LAThadani TTMartin RZimmerman l
L SVarga JZwolinski JStolz CJamerson JKennedy PMilano REaton
'CThomas OPA OCA NRR Mail Room (ED0 GT96345 and GT96452)
SECY 3 CRC-96-0633 and CRC-96-0523 (0-12 G18) l CNorsworthy i
JLieberman JGoldberg l
ASLBP l
TDunning (TGD) (DD only) 1 l
HJMiller, RI PEselgroth, RI i
l VYanez-(2) 1 CCater l
cc:
Licensee w/ incoming letters-l i
I i
i l
.