ML20132A325

Attachment Resolution of Comments Final Safety Evaluation for Westinghouse Electric Company Topical Report Quality Management System (Qms)

ML20132A325
Person / Time
Site:	Westinghouse
Issue date:	05/12/2020
From:	Ekaterina Lenning Licensing Processes Branch
To:
Lenning E
Shared Package
ML20132A017	List: ML20132A303 ML20132A321 ML20132A325
References
EPID L-2020-TOP-0022
Download: ML20132A325 (2)

Text

RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS ON DRAFT SAFETY EVALUATION FOR TOPICAL REPORT QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS), REVISION 8.0 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY By letter dated May 7, 2020 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML20129K029), Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) provided comments on the draft safety evaluation (SE) for Topical Report Quality Management System (QMS), Revision 8.0. Westinghouse stated that there is no proprietary information in the draft SE. The NRC staff has reviewed two clarification comments provided by Westinghouse and agrees that the proposed changes provide additional clarification. The NRC staff reviewed nine editorial comments provided by Westinghouse and finds them acceptable because the changes are editorial in nature.

Comment Comment Location Comment Type Comment NRC Number 1 Page 1/Line 15 Editorial ML20118C993 is the non-proprietary Change accepted package. ML20118C994 is the actual transmittal letter. Suggest referencing ML20118C994 to be consistent with the SE cover letter.

2 Page 1/Line 36 Editorial Revision 7.0 should be changed to Change accepted Revision 7.1. Westinghouse QMS Revision 7.1 was accepted by the U.S.

NRC on September 19, 2019 (ML19246A008) 3 Page 1/Line 36 Editorial The quoted QMS text is in Section 4.3.1, Change accepted General, under Procurement.

Therefore, Section 4.3, Procurement, should be changed to Section 4.3.1, General, under Procurement.

4 Page 1/Line 46 Editorial The quoted QMS text is missing the Change accepted following paragraphs:

For safety-related items and services, Quality determines the need to conduct supplier audits based on an evaluation that is conducted and documented in accordance with established procedures. Based on this evaluation Supplier audits need not be conducted for suppliers of safety-related items which are:

Audit programs for suppliers of items and services for nuclear power plants that are not subject to NRC regulations comply with requirements imposed by the governing regulatory agency or customer contract.

Attachment

Comment Comment LocationComment Type Comment NRC Response Number 5 Page 2/Line 27 Editorial type should be changed to types Change accepted 6 Page 2/Line 42 Editorial the should be deleted Change accepted 7 Page 2/Line 43 Editorial supplier audits should be changed to Change accepted supplier audits and surveys to be consistent with the last sentence in the paragraph.

8 Page 3/Line 41-42 Clarification It is unclear to Westinghouse the Change made. Final applicability of the SE reference to SE references Westinghouse, when the QMS cites RG 1.28, Rev. 4, RG 1.28, Revision 4, Section C.2.b.5 Section C.2.b.5 and which allows the 90-day grace period. not the SE.

9 Page 4/Line 10 Editorial length should be changed to duration Change accepted 10 Page 5/Line 7 Clarification It is unclear to Westinghouse the Change made. Final applicability of the SE reference to SE references Westinghouse, when the QMS cites RG 1.28, Rev. 4, RG 1.28, Revision 4, Section C.2.b.5 Section C.2.b.5 and which allows the 90-day grace period. not the SE.

11 Page 5/ Line 7 Editorial ML101830108 should be changed to Change made. Final ML101820108 SE references RG 1.28, Rev. 4 when discussing the 90-day grace period. SE reference deleted.