ML20129H044

Informs That ACRS & ACNW Agreed to Improved Working Relationship W/Nrc Nuclear Safety Research Review Committee

ML20129H044
Person / Time
Issue date:	12/09/1991
From:	Fraley R Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To:	NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE (ACNW), Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Shared Package
ML20129G748	List: ML20129G744 ML20129H044
References
ACRS-3024, NUDOCS 9610070411
Download: ML20129H044 (14)

Text

_ ~ _ . . . . ~ - . . . . - . . . - . - , . . , . _ . . . . . . . - - - . ~ - - - - . - - - - - - . ..-..- --- .

j.

, sp EtG4

3. *

1. " o, , UNITED STATES 1  !" o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{o I ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20666

( December 9, 1991 i,

4 l'

! MEMORANDUM FOR: ACRS Staff I ACNN Staff i

l /

I l FROM- R V.

! Executive Dir or i

I StT3 JECT:

INTERACTION WITH THE NUCLEAR SAFETY RESEARCH l REVIEW COMMITTEE i

] Both the ACRS and the ACNW have agreed to an improved working l relationship with the NRC Nuclear Safety Research Review Committee

] (NSRRC). Specifically, the NSRRC and the ACRS and ACNN have agreed that:

1) The Chairman of the NSRRC or his designee will be invited to meet with the ACRS and the ACNW at mutually agreed times.

) 2) NSRRC will be informed of ACRS and ACNW meetings, including i

Subcommittee and Working Group meetings, at which research j program activities or results will be discussed, and will be i

welcome to attend, and participate as appropriate.

! 3) The ACRS and ACNW will be provided copies of all NSRRC j reports.

l l

4) The NSRRC will be provided copies of all reports issued by the ACRS and ACNN related to NRC research activities.

5) Inform ACRS and ACNW members of anticipated NSRRC meetings as i far in advance as possible.

}

} 6) ACRS. ACNW temberp and/or cognizant staff members should

at NSRRC meetings as appropriate. Cognizant consultants j shou 3 also be invited to attend as appropriate.

t In order to help make sure that all of.the above get implemented

! properly, a few specific assignments and bits of guidance are noted j below. If you have any questions or problems, let's discuss them.

i i Item 1: NSRRC Renresentatives attend /narticinate in ACRS/ACNW 1

j meetinas -

Neither Committee has provided specific guidance regarding what " mutually agreed times" might be. The following are j possibilities:

l~

e After the NSRRC has issued a specific report on a topic the l (

i 9610070411 960907 i PDR ACRS

! 3024 PDR 4

i

)

i 2

l ACRS or ACNW might be interested in hearing more about.

e When the Committee schedules a briefing or discussion on a i

I specific part of the research program or an overview of the NRC research program, NSRRC input might be helpful.

!

• In connection with Chet Siess' recent suggestion (at the ACRS 4

" retreat") that the ACRS review the purpose of/need for an NRC l research program.

i j e Annually, just to keep in touch if there has been no other

! interaction.

?

1 Project engineers should remind cognizant Subcommittee Chairmen of i

this arrangement and the availability of Mr. Morrison or his designee whenever substantive discussion of a research topic is planned. This will provide an opportunity to determine on a case-i 2

by-case basis whether or not we should invite him. The degree of participation should be settled on a case-by-case basis.

J Item 2: Inform NSRRC of ANR/ACNN Meetinas -

Barbara Jo White will send the coadinated " monthly" Federal Register Notice of both l ACRS and ACNW meetings to the NSRRC Designated Federal Employee (DFE) (Ralph Meyer, RES). Federal Register notices of individual i

meetings engineers.

should be sent to Mr. Meyer by the cognizant project

}

1 Item 3: Send ANA and ACNW renorts to NSRRC - ACRS and ACNW i reports that involve safety research issues will be sent by Carol l

Ann Rowe and Ruby Stapler, respectively, to the NSRRC DFE as part j of the internal NRC distribution of these reports. Any questions 1 about which particular reports are relevant should be discussed I with me or Dick Savi~. o 4

I Item 4: Forward NSRRC reports to ACRS and ACNN maahars - Members i of the ACRS and ACNW have asked that they be provided copies of All NSRRC reports.

1 l

The NSRRC has agreed to provide this office copies of its reports and is already doing so. Copies of NSRRC reports received in this office should be forwarded to all ACRS and ACNW nenbers routinely by Paul Boehnert (ACRS matters) and Rich Major (ACNW matters) . (If specific members request that copies not be provided to them, adjustments can be made later.)

4 Item 5: Inform ACRS/ACNW === harm of NSRRC rrtinas - Copies of NSRRC meeting notices will be sent by the Mail Room to Paul Boehnert and Rich Major for distribution to Committee members, consultants, and staf f . engineers who may have an interest in

! attending, depending on the subject of meeting. Copies should be j sent by the cognizant staff engineer to all Committee members as

)

4

'3

!' I l

. 1 I

3 soon as possible so they can make appropriate plans to attend. i I have asked the NSRRC to provide any long-range list they may have ;

of planned meetings to give the ACRS/ACNW members as much notice as 4

possible to plan related activities.

1 l l

cc:

D. W. Moeller, ACNW D. A. Ward, A N I. Catton, ACRS e 4 M

f

4 i

From: Richard Savio

! To: TWD2.TWPO.JXC5 i

Date: 7/11/961:27pm i

Subject:

fos coordination -Forwarded JOSE-Please take a look at this attachment to see if the referenced documents will j give you the information you need to stay informed as to what the ACRS and ACNW j are doing. There are other bulkier documents that we could send you, such as meeting i minutes, transcripts,etc. I found a few old documents in my working files which i

describe what our Offices had agreed to in the past and asked that a further search be l made of our old hard copy files to see if there is anything else that would be useful, as j to not reinvent any wheels. I will stop by and lesve copies of what I have with you j today. On my end, my Office would need the following:  ;

1)The announcements of and agenda for NSRRC meetings. E-mail would be helpful j as my Office can then route the material around the Office and to the responsible i members via the LAN rather than by copying and carrying. ACRS/ACNW staff would,

as they have been, attend (as listeners) some of these meetings. .

j 2) Any lists / letters relating to planned NSRRC reviews would also help us in planning l j our own ACRS and ACNW reviews and staff attendence at NSRRC meetings.

3) Copies, for information, of NSRRC reports as they are issued.

l 4) While not related to NSRRC coordination, we used to get, on request, printouts of j RES's FIN by FIN listing of ongoing RES contracts. I would like to have a current one

sent to me sometime in the next month to support some discussions that John Larkins i and I will have with Tom Kress.

j i would be the addressee for all of this material and would be responsible for having i appropiate actions taken on the ACRS/ACNW end. -Lets discuss all this. Dick Savio

. 4 1

a

/0

From: Jose Cortez To: TWD1.TWP2(RPS1)

Date: 7/11/96 4:19pm

Subject:

res coordination -Forwarded -Reply I will send FINS via M. RIGG office, I am asking Sandy Young to go over the list of items on your E-mail to see what we already do and what else needs to be done. The NSRRC only meets two or three times a year and only do one report after each meeting. This report alredy goes to you. I do not know of any particular study or report they have produced since I took over from Sage. As I told you before, I do this job on a part time basis in addition to my coordination of international cooperative research projects of this office which currently number over 60 agreements with 24 countries and growing, that is already a job and halfill, AND I CAN ONLY DO "lT" WITH SANDY YOUNG'S HELPl!!

The committee does not have a staff , and I only set up meetings and handle the administrative details of their visit, and appointments, etc. I do not do any staff work for the committee, as such and only answer their request for specific information on RES programs. If NSRRC committee wants to be kept informaed on what your committees are doing, the only thing I can do is ask you fellows to put the NSRRC committee members on your distribution lists and maybe come to your meetings. Attending your meetings has not been a requirement , and we would have to consider this as an additional expense if we were to ask them to cover the ACRS of ACNW.... We talked about this with Morrison, but made no recommendations.

Lets keep on taiking about this , because if you feel we need more ACRS/ACNW/NSRRC interaction we may have to get Morrison involved for him to consider the staffing question. To do a respectable job of maintaining the NSRRC committee wired into the rest of the NRC, we need some full time staff to do the job right, or at least better then we are doing it now.

/

I 1 PROPOSED AGENDA FOR CENG-NRC MEETING l ON THERMAL-HYDRAULICS RESEARCH )

September 30.1996 l

9:00 - 10:00 Introduction by CENG (Dr. Grand) & NRC (Dr. Eltawila) l

= Objectives of Meeting

. Overview of Research Program ,

. Long Range Goals / Plans l 10:00 - 11:00 CATHARE Development & Assessment (Dr. Brun/Bestion ?)

11:00 - 12:00 NRC Long Term Code Development Program (Mr. Kelly) 12:00 - 13:30 Lunch 13:30-14:30 CENG Separate Effects Test Program (?)

14:30 -16:30 NRC Integral & Separate Effects Test Program (Dr. Eltawila & Prof. Ishii)

. OSU/ APEX Facility

. UMCP Facility

. PUMA Facility 16:30 - 17:00 Discussion - Potential Cooperation on Code Development & Assessment, and Separate Effects Testing October 1.1996 . .

9:00 - 10:30 BETHSY Integral Test Facility (Dr. Deruaz)

. Facility Description & Future Test Program 10:30-11:30 Tour of BETIJSY Facility 4.; .

I1:30 - 13:00E Lunch 13:00 - 15:00 Two-Phase Flow: Fundamental Research

. CENG Program (Prof. Delhaye ?)

. NRC Program (Prof. Ishii) 15:00 - 16:00 Tour of CENG Two-Phase Fundamentals Laboratory 16:00 - 17:00 Discussion & Summary - Areas for Potential Cooperation

/A

/

4 4

.'ane. Or.: . : s(

3.e :--

3 9,9A ACRS SPECIAL TRAVEL ENDORSEMENT FORM

.,-EN :S NRC ~ORM 15 TO SUPPORT BEPARTIAL FOR USEDOR TO REQUEST FULL REIMBURSEMENTACRSOF ENDORSEMENT EXPENSES AND/0R O TIM

. :5 :ROCEDURE IN NO WAY' LIMITS THE FREEDOM OF A MEMBER TO PARTICIPATE IN

NDiv: DUAL AT PERSONAL EXPENSE.

5.SC: PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE PLANNING AND P

=A MMINEE AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IF POSSIBLE. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMA ::',

SE A00E0 AS OE* AILS DEVELOP.

"emce" Name fVA A) n7TCA Date Submitted: l{ $vly /7ff 2 +Its$ 'ft,

a:es :' Dianned Trip:

es: ca: on O E Eat (O A to 24Q 7d ee:seg er Facility to ee visited: /xb#Abset uk 44 4.ht ft %

f nutwer-@a^* N Lo su) $!bt $n7

.I hed% r

, :cse Relevance to ACRS Business:

P,dsywu ce %A wa uh Ls. is >asie)/v

\oelow;,.. a. oad o& 16 NR C we I ( '

C C4e l u 0 IY NUS HG$$

d--  : :a:'cn (Invited Speaker. paper presented, etc.):

btw , ,

.. - ' :at'en (Foreign Travel Oniy): e Tlftenf %0 te!lll hf "4 et nub < A$w  % eMOwk S., nu', a:.< M.. :. kl 26;., L h v&A w dema low) % sdL wv/rk'm. L ',oua 14 i ,bo h h ee co~^' W

.n.Y 4 C. e t f,N f r f u e

NRC SUPPORT REQUESTED ,

i

. -re es s: :e- : em. es so :3. _3__ l

- +; !*. 2:':- s :m:ersa:':n: fes [ No  !! 5 d f i

/A M

4 1

• 1 , . . _

i 3

! International Conference on i

Perfonnance-Based Codes and j Fire Safety Design Methods 24-26 September 1996 Sheraton Ottawa Hotel & Towers Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Organized by l International Council for Building Research j Studies and Documentation (CIB), The Netherlands l + E National Research Council, Canada Society of Fire Protection Engineers ;

Boston, MA, USA s

O-

.'W .

About tho Cenfaranca C

Performance oriented resulations have existed in various countries around the world for g To date, tlurteen countries and two international organizations have been or are actively involved in the devel-opment of performance-based fire safety regulations and design approaches.

This thus Aay condannce willbring together professionals hem around the world to discuss the state-of-the-art O in these unpassant amas. Festund wil be invited papers that discuss various performance-based codes and de-W sign methodsunder development or in use and a workshop in which representatives hem various countries and I

g organizations wS IDustrate the application of their fin safety design approaches to a common test building, complemented by selected papers based upon the response to the call for papers.

An innovation for this conference will be special receptions and discussion sessions on 'Ibenday and Thursday Q evenings at 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> where delegates may gather to discuss the events of the day or make plans for the evening.

Reheshments willbe available.

1 @

Due to the burgeoning interest in wrformance-based codes andfire safety design methods and the limited stu.e meeting l

g space, attendance may have to buimsted t1 thefirst 175 registrants. Those pinnning to attend are urged to make thent plans early.

g Location, Travel and Accommodation The Sheraton Ottawa Hotel and Towers is conveniently located at 150 Albert Stmet in the very heart of Canada's U capital city. Ottawa is a city of world dass museums and internationally-known festivals, the centre of the na tion's business and a booming hub of high technology. ne Sheraton Ottawa is only two blocks from historic g landmarks such as Parliament Hill and the Rideau Canal (the longest ice skating rink in the world) and close to excellent shopping and major attractions such as the lively Byward Market.

O Ottawa International Airport is situated about 26 kilometres (16 miles) fmm the city centre. It is mainly served by W connecting flights hem Vancouver, Montaal and To onto. However, there are diact flights ham Boston, Massa.

' g chusetts, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Baltimore, Maryland and New York City, U.S.A. As well, there is direct ser-vice hem London, UK and Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

1 Y 4

, Hotel Accommodations g The standard rate is $125.00 (Canadian) per night. Tower rooms are: single $169.00 (Canadian); double / twin

$189.00 (Canadian). Rates do not include 5% PST; 7% CST. To reserve accommodations, complete the form W on page 5. Enclose a check or money order (Canadian funds) for the first night's deposit payable to the g Sheraton Ottawa Hotel and Towers or guarantee on a major credit card (American Express, Diners Club, MasterCard, VISA).

0 4

Mall or FAX directly to the hotel. De toll-free number for North America: 1-800-489-8333; outside North E -ca: 613 23 is00. ldentify you,seif as being pa,t o, the ,oom biock heid ,o,ihe Society of ri,e Protecnon

! Engineers. The CUT-OFF DATE for reservations is 23 AUGUST 1996. Reservations received after the con-6 tracted block of rooms is full or aher the cut-off date are subject to space and rate availabiltiy. Check-in time is 0 1500 hours0.0174 days <br />0.417 hours <br />0.00248 weeks <br />5.7075e-4 months <br />. Check out time is 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br />.

6 Registration Monday,23 September, at the Sheraton Ottawa from 1500 hours0.0174 days <br />0.417 hours <br />0.00248 weeks <br />5.7075e-4 months <br /> until1800 hours and Tuesday 24 September to g Thursday,26 September, fmm 0730 hours0.00845 days <br />0.203 hours <br />0.00121 weeks <br />2.77765e-4 months <br /> until 1630 hours0.0189 days <br />0.453 hours <br />0.0027 weeks <br />6.20215e-4 months <br />.

L .s Social Program

@ Unless otherwise stated the full delegate registration fee includes the two social events.

g Monday,23 September-1800 hours - 1930 hours0.0223 days <br />0.536 hours <br />0.00319 weeks <br />7.34365e-4 months <br />. Welcome to Ottawa Reception in the Sheraton Ottawa Hotel.

, All delegates and accompanying persons are invited.

Wednesday,25 September-1900 hours. Gala Conference Reception and Dinner. Tickets for accompanytng per-

, sons and daily fee registrants are available at US $45.00 each.

Special Requirements 0 if you have speciai r quirements due co disabiiity or speciai dietary needs, piease contact Sers Headquar:ers by 23 August.

J

$ ../

1 O

Conference Committees ORGANIZING COMMITTEE W D. Peter Lund, Chair SFPE Brian Meacham Robert Bowen SFPE W CIB TG11 Matti Kokkala CIB W14 J. Kenneth Richardson NRCC PROGRAM COMMfTTEES Performance toned Codes session N  !

l Robert Bowen, Chair NRC, Canada " I '

i Jane Blackmore CSIRO, Australia MattiKokkala, Chair VIT, Finland &

Russell Thomas NRC, Canada Peter Johnson Arup Fire, UK John Hunt BIA,New Zealand J. Kenneth Richardson NRC Canada -

' Yoshinobo Hirano BRI, Japan M BRI, Japan David Stone Scoe Office, UK Sven Erik Magnusson Lund University, Sweden Jon Traw ICBO, USA S E, WA l David Lucht WPI, USA Mare Janseens ARA, WA 08 AND150 MEETINGS Concurrent with and inunediately after the International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire g'

Safety Design Methods, there will be meetings of CIB Ell, CIB W14 and ISO TC92 SC4. The CIB TUll meetmg will be held Wednesday,25 September, the CIB W14 meeting will be held Friday,27 r, and the ISO TC92 SC4 meeting will begin 28 September and continue through the following week. ofthe '

CIB and ISO groups are efigible for the conference room rates at the Sheraton Hotel Ottawa when reserved by

! 23 August 1996. Look for meeting details from CIB TG11, CIB W14 and ISO TC92 SC4. Please note that partici-pation in the CIB and ISO meetings may be limited to members of those organizations. Any non-members g'

who are interested in attending these meetings are urged to contact the respective organizations well in ad.

vance of the meetmgs to avoid difficulties.

Tuesday, 24 September 1996 "'

! 07:30 Registration i 08:15 Welcome (SFPE,NRCC,CIB TG11) Vl 08:45 Invited Paper: 06 factive-Based Codes: The Canadian Direction, R. Thomas, Canada 09:15 Invited Paper: Performance-Basal Codes- The United Kingdom Experience, T. Rackliffe UK l 09:45 Invited Paper: Performance 4csed Codes: The New Zailand Expenence, J. Hunt, New Zealand 10:15 Break

10:35 Invited Paper: Performance-Based Codes: The Srvedish Experience, R. Jonsson and T. Rantatalo, Sweden 11:05 Invited Paper: 7he Performance Building Code Australia, Lyall Dix, Australia O

11:35 In% Paper: Future Perspective of the U.S. Model Building Codes, Jon Traw, USA

! 12:05 Lund E i

l 13:00 Invited Paper: Public Policy and Performance-Based Engineering, D. Lucht, USA 13:30 Invited Paper: legal Concerns Related to Performance Based Codes, K. Lovegrove, Australia E 14:00 Education for Performance-Based Codes, C. Fleischmann, New Zealand 14:20 Ten Yarrs Experience as an Architect and Fire Engineer on the Deoelopment and Application of &

Performance-Based Codes, A. Parnell, UK i

14:40 Break

15:00 Performance Based Fire Safety, H. Nelson, USA 15:20 The " Culture" of Performance-Based Fire Codes, A. Buchanan, New Zealand 2 /b7 i

i Tuesday, 24 September 1996 continued 2

D 15:40 W en Building Cada, Daign Standards, and Performance Evaluationsfor Firaafety, R.W.

j Pip M Z 16:00 Perferiaans-Based Codas: Reengineering the Reguistory System, V.M. Brannigan, USA 16:20 Break

, 16:40 Our Approach Tonard the Building Codes and Standards of a New Generation, l. Nskaya and E Y. Hirano, Japan i

17:00 Performance-Based life Safety Code, J.M. Watts, USA i 17:20 A HypotheticalModelpr a Performance-Based Cada Systen for the United Stata, R. Bukowski, USA i

Y 17:40 NFPA's Objectrees in Purse.i.y PMormance-Based Cada and Standards, M. Puchovsky, USA 18:00 End g 1940 Informal Remption and Discussion Session Wednesday, 25 September 1996 07:30 Registration 08:15 Weimme (SFPE, NRCC, CIB W14) 08:45 Invited Paper: Technology Raguiremenis for Performana Based Fire 5 ifety Daign, J.K. Richardson, Canada j Q 09:15 Invited Paper CIB WId Activitia to Promote Performance Based Fire Safety Daign, M. Kokkala, Finland 09:45 Invited Paper:ISOfTC92/SC4 Fire Safety Engineering-Praent Activiies and Future Sirategy W. Becker, l

Z C'""'aY 10:15 Break

, 10:35 Invited Paper: Performance-Basai Code in Fire Resistance A First Attempt by Eurocodes, J. Kruppa, France

! E 11:05 Invited Paper: Integrated Analysis of Fire Exposed Structura, H. Landro, Norway

~

l 11:35 Invited Paper: How fo Derive Safety Factors, S.E. Magnussor;, Sweden g 12:05 Invited Paper: The Use of Computer Models to Support Per;ormance Based Fire Safety Designs: A Code Official's Perspective, J. Fleming, USA

12

35 Lunch W

13:35 Cas#-Egamer Fire Safety Upgrade Options for a Canadian Office Building, D. Yung, G. Hadjisophocleus and i G houts, Canada

{

% 13:55 A Cias Study: A Perfor"tence Based Methaifor Fire Safety Analysis of Existing Hotels R.LP. Custer USA 14:15 Smokt Detribution and Egnss at Vancouver's New International Terminal Building: A Value Engineersng Study Using CFD, N. Rhodes, R.D. Lamb and H. Locke, Canada

( Z 14:35 The Use of a Risk Based Engineering Method in the Analysis of Alternative levels of Building Firesafety.

j J. LaSalle, USA O 55 "''

15:15 Development of a Waiver / Deviation Process for Determining Equitelent Fire Protection at United States Research Stations in Antarctica. D. Carpenter, USA i

V j 3 i

i Wednesday, 25 September 1996 l continued

{ 15:35 Na@and Inesntion in Fire Engineering Design: A New Zasland View, D. Gillespie, New Zealand 15:55 P., ' '- ' Approach to Prota ting Our Heritage, J.M. Watts and M.E. Kaplan, USA 16:15 Break .

d i 16:35 Reflections on Tan Yssrs of Fire Safety Engineerug in Australis, H. Allan, S. Grubits and C Quaglia, Australia l 16:55 Performance-Based Design Infonnation Rasource Naafs and Proposaf Generalizef Data Formats, C. Wood, USA 17:15 Coupling the Fire Bakeomer of Contents and Interior Finishes for Performance-Basaf Coda and Fire Safety b Design Methods, R.B. Williamson, USA 17:35 Some lasuas in the Computational Domain Modsis for Fire Risk Analysis, P.E. lahner and V.M. Brennigan, USA 4

17:55 End (

19:00 Reception i

19:45 Conference Dinner

e4

}

! T h u r s d a y, 26 _ ..

September 1996 PERFORMANCE BASED FIRESAFETY DEllON METHODS The organizations listed below have been invited to perform a case study. They have been given a " performance Il specification" for a multi-purpose commercial office building (e.g., general offices, insurance offices, law offices, storage spaces, assembly spaces and mechanical spaces) that is to be 4 levels above ground and 11evel below with an area of approximately 3000 m8 per floor. The floor plan is to be determined by the invitees. The invitees have t

been asked to design the building to meet prescriptive requirements (or deemed-to-satisfy rJternatives) that are

, being used in their country and provide two performance-based designs for an "acceptabey" safe building: one having automatic sprinklers and one without. The invitees have been asked to provide a relative comparison of ',

fire safety performance and costs for the three designs.

! The primary fire safety goal for the building is to safeguard occupants from the unwanted effects of fire in the building until they can safety escape or be safely evacuated. Additional fire safety goals and objectives can be applied at the discretion of the invitee. All assumptions are to be provided. The minimum performance criteria is j to be determined as that which meets the minimum (performance) requirements of the current prescriptive code or prescriptive deemed-to-satisfy solutions for their country.1For example,in the USA, the BOCA National Build-ing Code may be used to define the minimum levels of " performance" whereas partidpants from UK or New l Zealand may use the approved documents allowable in their countries as their bases.) Allinformation used as part of the analyses and designs must be provided (assumptions, methods, models, statistics, probabilities, etc.).

. 07:30 Registration 13:25 Case Study 6: Caldwell Consulting, New i 08:15 Welcosse s Zealand 14:10 Case Study 7: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 08.20 CaseStudy1: Arup Fire,UK USA 09:05 Case hdy 2: Building Research Institute, Japan 14 F5 Case Study 8: National Research Council, 09:50 Break National Fire Laboratory, Canada 10:10 Case Study 3: Fire Code Reform Centre Ltd., 15:0 Break Australia 16 0i., Case Study 9: Custer Powell Inc., US A j 10:55 Case Study 4: Bengt Dahlgren AB, Sweden 16:45 Case Study Panel and Open Discussion i 11:40 Case hdy 5:NationalInstitute of Standards and 17:45 ConferenceSummary Technology and the General Services Adm., USA 18:15 End 12:25 Lunch 19:00 Informal Reception and Discussion ston

< /

.' . Janet / Pat y Disk: Ta 1.Fr2 9/9/94 yg y j l ACRS SPECIAL TRAVEL ENDORSEMENT FOR A THIS FORM IS TO BE USED TO RE0 VEST ACRS ENDORSEMENT OF SPECIAL TRAVEL RE0 VESTS BY MEMBERS '

i WHEN NRC SUPPORT FOR PARTIAL OR FULL REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND/0R TIME IS DESIRED. s THIS PROCEDURE IN NO WAY LIMITS THE FREEDOM 0F A MEMBER TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING AS AN INDIVIDUAL AT PERSONAL EXPENSE. PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE PLANNING AND PROCEDURES V SUBCOMMITTEE AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IF POSSIBLE. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION MAY BE ADDED AS DETAILS DEVELOP.

Memoer Name: b N OITOAAK)( Date Submitted: ~hk y 3 {396 Dates of Planned Trip: Eeyd . M, 76 to O C.k 3 , '9 C Destination: Y avR C ihy

//

Uhk7 Meeting or Facility to be Visited: 75A 96 Purpose / Relevance to ACRS Business: Ne d(-m e n\ 7SA hf i( McS s 4 kodcud 1GM-Sm.Ad cat wI d io m."

v Participation (Invited Speaker, paper presented, etc.): [o C(M/

% Y1 med oH 7 or or w m h d bdb". a 9 G bd w &y ' ~

ks3wu v

M . .

Justification (Foreign Travel Only):

s t

NRC SUPPORT REQUESTED Air Fare: Yes Noj[ Per Diem: Ves No M Days Compensation: Yes No (/ Days Registration: $

M

/

'are*/0a**.,. p. ~ i.e --

i99.:

ACRS SPECIAL TRAVEL ENDORSEMENT FORM

" !S TORM IS TO BE USED TO REQUEST ACRS ENDORSEMENT OF SPECIAL TRAVE

1. EN NR' SUPPORT FOR PARTIAL OR FULL REIMBURSEMENT OF EXP

!S :RCCEDURE

• NDIVIDUAL AT PERSONAL IN NO WAY LIMITS THE FREEDOM OF A MEMBER TO P EXPENSE.

PLEASE SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE PLANNING AND P

< 5.BCCMMITTEE AT LEAST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. IF POSSIBLE. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMA'::'.

"Av BE A00E0 AS DETAILS DEVELOP.

"emcer Name h e bNTAA/A Date Submitted: 7 // f/ 9 6

ates of Planned Trip: / 29 /M to /*/3/9 4

est' nation- Ph m<. Cihy ,U TAH

) *ee:'ng er Facility to te visited: (15' A 94 d

eccse/Re'evance to ACRS Business: Pr?u 7 o J i u 5 A c TNr waty of l 11 C &TW L 70 G\/ d L V N 6 5 f 0 cr oc /285 4 e m m n m e72 /

t'tT1M wq + e e -

EAs en 2.L'h uw7i J

d t :' 3 tion (Invited Speaker, paper presented, etc.): A 7 7 A r-o i

..it ' cation (Foreign Travel On.)y)-

l 4

4 d

NRC SUPPORT REQUESTED

. - 3 e es / sc :e- : ee. es V sc  :: "

e; s: a: Or 5 TTM)  :: :ersa: :n. fes V No  :!,- -

- er r