Text

Summary of 850613 & 14 Meetings W/Util in Arlington,Tx Re Development of Program Plan.Viewgraphs Encl
	ML20129E728
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	07/03/1985
From:	Vietti A; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20129E732	List: ML20129E728; ML20129E758;
References
	NUDOCS 8507170048
	Download: ML20129E728 (176)
	v • d • e

r g UNITED STATES

{[

5 7,

E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 JUL 0 31985 k ..... #

Docket Nos.: 50-445 and 50-446 FACILITY: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 APPLICANT: Texas Utilities Electric Company

SUBJECT:

MEETING HELD ON JUNE 13 AND 14, 1985 IN ARLINGTON, TEXAS TO DISCUSS THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE APPLICANT'S PROGRAM PLAN On June 13 and 14, 1985, a meeting was held with Texas Utilities Electric Company and the NRC staff to discuss the development of the Applicant's Program Plan. The meeting was he~.d at the Arlington-Sheraton hotel and was transcribed. Participants are identified in the transcript. A copy of Applicant's viewgraphs are enclosed, as is a copy of the transcript.

The meeting was requested by the NRC staff to get a status on the develop-ment of the Applicant's Program Plan which is to address all issues needed

~

in order for NRC to reach a licensing decision on Comanche Peak. The Pro-gram Plan will address all concerns expressed to date from all sources and do sampling in other areas as well in order to provide reasonable assurance that the plant has been both designed and constructed in accordance with regulatory requirements.

As part of the program, Texas Utilities identified some of the following activities:

1. Changes are being made in Texas Utilities management within the nuclear organization.

2. Stone and Webster will be reevaluating all ASME Class 2 and 3 pipe supports larger than 2" (and all Class 1 supports not designed by West-inghouse). This involves about 9000 supports, with a scheduled completion date of December 20, 1985.

3. Ebasco will be reevaluating electrical cable tray and conduit supports.

l l

l 8507170048 850703 i PDR ADOCK 05000445 A PDR L

p.

JUL 0 31985

5. The Comanche' Peak Response Team (CPRT) will be responding to the NRC Technical' Review Team findings identified in SSER's 7 through 11 in the areas of QA/QC, protective coatings, test programs, electrical /instru-mentation, mechanical / piping, civil / structural and miscellaneous. '

The fonnal program plan will be submitted to NRC for approval in early July 1985.

GIM SIGRED BY Annette L. Vietti, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated t--

f l

ll LBI L T CP/TR L

Nb,ab BJi gblood bnn/DL ell VSNoonan D7/ /85 07/ /85 07/\/85 07/p85

r JUL 03 M55 MEETING

SUMMARY

DISTRIBUTION NRC Participants I NRC'PD

% "RFtief L POR V. Noonan NSIC R. Martin PRC System D. Eisenhut LB#1 Reading File D. Landers Project Manager A. Vietti R. Bosnak M. Rushbrook L. Shao Attorney, OELD J. Calvo R. Hartfield* A. Marinos OPA* R. Keimig i

J. Ililhoan J. Youngblood

3. Black J. Axelrad J. Treby OTHERS C. Trammell H. Livermore J. Gagliardo P. Check R. Denise E. Jordan R. Vollmer L. Chandler A. Patterson bec: Applicant & Service List t

Caseload Forecast Panel Visits

O O

4 TUGC0 PRESENTATION TO NRC JUNE 13,'1985 MORNING SESSION

9 e

e e

MNAGEMENT OVERVIEW OF SAFETY

l t

10 CFR s

UNDERSTANDING OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES / CRITERIA

PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT TO IMPLEMENT 1 AND 2 p

I l

I

T"~ * =M--- y ---- m ..m p<, - ,y,_, , ___ _ _ _

r-4 4

TRAINING IN PROCEDURES l

I

CONSTRUCTION / OPERATION TO THESE STRICT PROCEDURES 1

<

INSPECTION TO ENSURE PROPER IMPLEMENTATION P

4

)

G e

4 4

f SAyyyy ETHIC

1- -

P j

)

MANAGEMENT STATE OF MIND i

4 GOES BEYOND CODES / CRITERIA I

INSTILLS SAFETY ETHIC IN ALL EMPLOYEES CONSERVATIVE - ALWAYS ASKS THE QUESTION "WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF?"

8 i

e I

_ ____ _ ,. . . _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .

=

ENCOMPASSES "DOING IT RIGHT THE FIRST TIME" MUST HAVE A STRICT ADHERENCE TO PROCEDURES ENCOURAGE ALL EMPLOYEES TO ADOPT

" SAFETY-FIRST" ATTITUDE

=

REQUIRES MANAGEMENT TO BE TOTALLY INVOLVED

TO LEAD TO TRAIN TO DEVELOP ORGANIZATIONAL SAFETY ETHIC

_ , . . . - , , - - . , - - r '" ^~~' * ~ ' ~

WHEN SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES ARE FOUND, CORRECTLY ENGINEER THE FIX FOLLOW UP TO ENSURE THAT PROPER IMPLEMENTATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REMOVE THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM i

1 1

0

-- - , , -__ .- _ . - ., --s _ .. , -,.,, ..., . _-,- - , , - . - ._ - - . -,- - - - - - -

MANAGEMENT MEETING WITH NRC JUNE 13 - 14, 1985 PROGRAM PLANS 4

- = COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW OF PROGRAM

DEALS WITH IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

= DEALS WITH ALL CONCERNS, REGARDLESS OF ORIGIN

=

PROGRAM GOES BEYOND CONCERNS EXPRESSED TO DATE PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE TUGCO MANAGEMENT WITH ASSURANCE THAT PLANT IS PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED AND'CAN BE OPERATED SAFELY TUGCO MANAGEMENT WILL NOT ASK NRC FOR OPERATING LICENSE UNTIL WE ARE SATISFIED THAT THESE OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN MET TUGCO WANTS NRC CLOSELY INVOLVED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL STEPS

PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC WILL BE PROTECTED

S e

ORGANIZATION t

l 1

i

4 4

e 9

H' P*

ame y .

~

Amme 'M suA pm e Wuut lur e 84 eam w

L.

,. 3 ~

~

8"8 #

fu 6

E1 L .* .m

,y

~

.m.

SamWW O-

%mp pa 48 4

)

M b

m g

2 am

. a

(

g 9O $4 w *eS 8' 8 1 M w W

wa w ,,, es yo.

P '8Bmse e*

euma- *M>

"uD y

' w tud. .ings m '88 A he W umme ,,

star w

, ,d* p g og

f g we ame d"b duus to w mus w- w a -

,; .- ,, .a . - . . , , y --

- w .,. e= .. == a*

w

=a. w

.. .a e y * ..w - w

.,. es v "

him# 8P4 , g DA

't

- .a e..

P-w am a

-. =m. .te..s g fu

,e

$ w em p.

M Pt af d %sp g

g tud a me m aew 8see e=-

W I -

bt e~-

-e M- e -

du8 ES we 4

Z L, . C.

C

.- , ,,,; a

":p- w w ,,,, ,,, w

=== ** .

.m= w

mm=

.- O .. w *.

~. ~

5 mw

% ey w .,.

( m ao

-U opus g

V

-= ..

ee w

m O O W SmEIA d%#

,( ^

w e

e pm te

%m# *e m W *w

@% #9 g w w

me m

> .c. d N

due

W. G.

C O U N S i . I, Vice President Nuclear Operations l

11 . E. KAlli. Ell J. C. K U Y K E N D A I,I.

Supervisor, J. D. EDWAltDS Engineering & Manager, Supervisor, administrative Services Nuclear Operations IIcal th Pliynics

O 4 l

J 5

e

[ l

, v m4 l

Sie

.f

. i

%) /

l

- l a -

he *

~ c e ' noe 8 i h,eree

,,W me #4 9A 954 W W %8

Pg yw w s's

- . = een c- =

m8 W" w %g

N m O e,e sum "

e 4

m,4 Me ene sus

'w

== = .

O M eu8 og en w

e . dh# - W 8"

p, w

amag w

- OF

% O MIF #

g. W g

ther

* *dh* ** "

"W'"

De **

%sp me

.e.e . w -m a

.e.m.

ea we

.a. =r=-. e

- emme

%sP OA

.( w'

. 8

, '88 o e ahm 8'" **we

-. a .as O qu, p man o em #

m M* 4F 4 4WP

.,,o w w

%r am

4 ERIM ame Gum

.b m, guy U@ 18 W ,,

g

eum -

O,'

> w a -

emm 4:

-.. .cm em 99 s

9N si

%p 09%

mur

+

Wsus aus M -4 e .e,n 7 as **

.,,,, 4 m.

M

Su,IF dllWP mum "e s dhap W a,

g ene*

. W 96 F.

a aan eme

'ne

, -- ~. ..

Gut 4"E dup

9 m

W O am

e WE U.. ar" ee

<we r-. - - . . . a ~ - - - , . .v. - ,, ,g7 ,. - , . - - . - - ~c.-.- -- - - - - - - - , - p- - - - - --w--

4 e

1 i

p.'*%.

1

~

92 d

O-b f

., ~ L w* 3 b

h aus

M te V we

s

.m.. ; C 3*** ,O< ,,,

. b b em M -

- ^ .,

emie WW4

-C d

6 he ame I

pauswe- p_m h,#,

,, == ,

mas

.. - ..w e.

- , 6 >.

m e, e ,. "

= g m M P. WEB mun tair s, ash '"e f

es.

W

, me E'"

m be p, "a'me Pe mur ia#

aan "a e a g M esas e

':P= W

='" .

~

w y

, w als eine 0 ,, -

er h

9

> M

%ur e Wd De*w MM -

O"*W SI.

4 he e get

$4 nowe U.. . .

~ 7 w

H $

neem o+

E'um..

w G g SID "

me =w*-

- g g

w enn* DEI'm s.

4lulP d

N ese

g ma2.. A m -m ,e A 4 24 ---+ -

42-..-d-p.p< m-%E=. .*

k I

i

(

s

.Y G

O f

r 4

Sun 6

==

=

m e e, e a--

~

emi s ent, 4 g s

= m k N

% X Y a >*

> :: >. - r -

"* = = = ," 6 t 6 w a

i

.=

.- L' .

w

. .= C C * * *

+

. w ..

ame c== _

6e. .

as y

,9 m

< u

~.

Em e

tuf 6 m em o n

' ~

2 2 ~

w b - .

y eAm em O

,, = -

v

=~

, 6 L

t **

amma m , , ,

m Eis 8%# "

F.,.

- .me. U a

=

. -ma m : -

m.m L =

. 69 ew **

9e M

-W m .M ilmP

- 9

.:. w 4r ..

m m

g - _ w 4 * .* .

a quF Sum

.I

.. 7

L We y mum A

giam 9

e=e ame

' d'e*s m

1' O

.a O

kam 6

O 7

om.e M

4 i

1 4

1 1

-- -s. .-~, 1. - . . . . _ . , _. _ _ _ . _ .. _, , , . _ , , ,_. __, , _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _

9 4

0 A

(

D A

A b a O v a "

c C L c C a

0 .a O

O t L c L C

El i C

- X e

<f J c ,g -

C ,

-e.. . 3 0 L.

c .-

e w ..=

d C > c

- 6 a C

O 7

- 3 a e

? m me 9 e.

w w

Z c . >

U

.ERW tune F pe Q %.#

.ame

~ .Q .

pa P4 we W m

.mo a

C .

@M r'

6

.e L

.-. .Q

PRINCIPAL AREAS TUGCO ORGANIZATION NON-CPRT LICENSING ISSUES CPRT ORGANIZATION CPRT ISSUES OVERALL SCHEDULE AND RESOURCE LOADING JUNE 13, 1905 l-

l ,'. .

Ii i i j .

l .

l '

s J. Deck Vice l'residenL

.J. Itudiliny 1: :. c. A s s i s t. .

I, i i . , lit t lienda

h. i:l; 1

R. Janne J. Wells M i: .iq. t I.i< nuinq Manager Director Puols & Sa fely Anal QA/QC JUNE-13, 1985

,,,, - J b ,_- _ w +_s-.L.,--

- a 4

e m

omee S

9 e

. LG

. ,. .. CO cn -

r-4 s

N 2 r-i

~ . <

a c LJ.J Q ~ < Z O 2 O o O' C 7 3 WH .

~

-. cll M

c:

g C,

D C. C

< t/2 Z

n m

2 n

M +

9

< b, s _

- - e

,, O a, 34 a- M,

, ,e i

g hm.# W4 w

, <-. . Z.

. .Me b M n

yJ e

~w & "o O

w V W

=

e m.e em-

-u_

M 1 *O mmWe W 4

- , v. .m.

=

< -. ..+*

eiEn s

.a %

t T.

i - . .

a w

.a-= ~

i

-== . -.

m #4 *.*

{

m m M t.se mis Mut l

5 l

l t

i I

I e,o m- --m , - .-m- -- , -- ,r---w.,,-w-y---, m--t-.- r-e- --+P---,--- - - - -

-e&--- ,-w - * - - - *- - e

PRINCIPAL AREAS TUGCO ORGANIZATION l

l NON-CPRT LICENSING ISSUES I

CPRT ORGANIZATION !

I i

CPRT ISSUES CVERALL SCHEDCLE AND RESOURCE LOADING l

t 1

I l

1 JU 'E 13,1935 i

. . . . . . . _ . = - - -- - -

T

~

1 i '

SER OUTSTANDING ISSUES (NRC ACTION)

INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR PUMPS SUBMITTED 10/12/83 AND VALVES REMOTE SAFE SHUTDOWN SUBMITTED 7/27/84 .

HEAVY LOADS SUBMITTED 1/22/85 INTECRATED LEAK RATE TEST SUBMITTED 12/21/84 1

4 i

SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SUBMITTED 5/1/85

?

JUNE 13, 1985 I'

- . . -, _._-.__#_.,_ . , , . _ , - , , - . . ,.--__---,r,_4 w ,v.--. ,-.. -- - v-. .- ---__, .-, y , -.

LICENSING ISSUES -

~'

OTHER THAN CPRT ,

SER OUTSTANDING ISSUES

SER CONFIRMATORY ISSUES

SER LICENSING CONDITIONS

SER OPEN CORRESPONDENCE

SIGNIFICANT ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ITEMS SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS REPORTS

NRC INSPECTION REPORTS c

PREOPERATIONAL TESTS

(

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS i

MISCELLANEOLS JUNE 13, 1903

, .= 4

%g. ,

. 1 ,

-N 1 .

(+

~

b.

t. -

r SER OUTSTANDING ISSUES j

' ' ~'

(TUGCO ACTION) i 5 T

CONTAINMENT ISOLATION z-9/30/85 DEPENDABILITY F . ~

f-CONTAINMENT SUMP PERFORMANCE 8/1/85 CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW DEFERRED UP TO 5% POWER PRESERVICE AND INSERVICE PRESERVICE COMPLETE INSPECTION PROGRAM INSERVICE FL + 6 MONTHS

.s JUNE 13, 1985

l SER CONFIRMATORY ISSUES l (NRC ACTION) l:

g.

TURBINE DRIVEN AUXILIARY COMPLETED 7/29/84

~

. FEEDWATER PUMP TEST & 8/31/84-RELIEF AND SAFETY VALVE TESTING SUBMITTED 5/10/83 l

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUBMITTED 2/~15/85 NATURAL CIRCULATION TESTING SUBMITTED 1!21/85

.: JUNE 13, 1985

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - -

6 SER LICENSE CONDITIONS ISSUES

- (TUGCO ACTION)

ULTRASONIC TESTING OF L.P. TURBINE 7//1/85 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 11/30/85 PREOPERATIONAL TESTINC PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD SECURITY PLAN PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD i'

I--

I e

s JUNE 13, 1985 m

# ,, - , . + . 4 %,u, ,.#... - , - -.---~% -...,._.,.a. -

,, - * , . ---...4

SER LICENSE CONDITIONS ISSUES (NRC ACTION)

DIESEL CENERATORS OWNERS CROUP SCHEDULE RECULATORY GUIDE 1.97 REV. 2 SUBMITTED 1/28/85 JUNE 13, 1985

SER UCENSE CONDITIONS ISSUES (TUGCO ACTION)

LICENSED OPERATOR O.L. TO O.L. + ONE YEAR MINERAL EXPLORATION CONTROL ACTION WHEN REQUIRED INSTRUMENTATION FOR INADEQUATE REMAIN AS LICENSE CONDITION CORE COOLING JUNE 13, 1983 n

SER OPEN CORRESPONDENCE ISSUES (TUGCO ACTION)

PURCE AND VENT VALVE OPERABILITY 9/30/85 BREAKER FUSE COORDINATION STUDY 7/1/85 JUi!E 13, 1985

p-l~

i

l. .

p l

l L SER OPEN CORRESPONDENCE ISSUES

l. (NRC ACTION) i L

SPDS OPTICAL ISOLATION SUBMITTED 1/7/85 c.

SAFE AND ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN SUBMITTED 5/21/85 REQUIRED ACTIONS BASED ON SUBMITTED 6/7/85 CENERIC IMPLICATIONS OF SALEM I

ATWS EVENT (CENERIC LETTER 83-28) l-JUfiE 13, 1985

9 ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ITEMS APPENDIX R - FIRE PROTECTION 9/28/85 -

(9 ITEMS)

EQUIPMENT QUAllFICATION (7 ITEMS) 11/15/85 VENTILATION. SYSTEM COMPLETION 10/1/85 (3 ITEMS)

DIESEL CENERATOR EXCITATION 6/30/85 MSIV BYPASS VALVES 6/15/85 HOT SHUT DOWN PANEL BOLTS 7//31/85 CONTAINMENT SPRAY VALVES TIM!NC 10/14/65 SPDS ISOLATOR $ ANALYSIS 1ST REFUELING FIRE PROTECTION PANELS 3/31/86 JUNE 13, 1985 c.

5 I

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS REPORTS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 8/31/85

- FOR HiCH ENERGY LINE BREAKS (84-12)

VENTILATION EXHAUST DAMPERS 10/1/85 (84-27)

CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEADER VALVES 7/31/85 (85-04)

CONTROL BOARD MODEllNC (85-10) 7/12/85 ACTIVE VALVES (85-22) 7/11/85 5 1 JUNE 13, 1985 y e y, ws, t t- e- ~ = = --^~ewu-w**vv-- ~~

l l

INSPECTION REPORTS COMPLETE CHANCES TO VARIOUS 8/1/85

< PROCEDURES L

COMPLETE HARDWARE AND 10/1/85 PROCEDURAL CHANCES ASSOCIATED ,

WITH FIRE PROTECTION SECURITY COMMUNICATIONS 7/30/85 l

[

PERMANENT SECURITY LOCKS ONE WEEK PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD l

SOUD RADIOACTIVE WASTE SYSTEM AFTER FUEL LOAD l

l FIRE ALAM1 PANELS 1ST REFLEL 4

JUNE 13, 1935

PREOPERATIONAL TESTS VENTILATION SYSTEMS RETESTS 10/1/85 DIESEL GENERATOR LOAD TEST TO BE SCHEDULED SOLID STATE ISOLATION 6/14/85 CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM RETEST 7/31/83 MAIN ~ STEAM ISOLATION BYPASS 6/15/85 VALVES ACTUATORS JUlE 13,1985

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CPSES PROPOSED CHANCES TO FINAL 11/15/84 DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS ,

NRC REACTOR SYSTEMS BRANCH 4/9/85 QUESTIONS JUNE 13, 1985

MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN NRC TO ISSUE EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AUGUST 1985 JUtiE 13, 1983

PRINCIPAL AREAS TUGCO ORGANIZATION NON-CPRT LICENSING ISSUES CPRT OhGANIZATION CPRT ISSUES OVERALL SCHEDULE AND RESOURCE LCADING JU.1E 13, 1933

4 9

e

.1 mee 1 D o M

~~ O, ano N

A -

e

>4 C O O U L9 O CO 3: O M

s b3 r-1 t.j E--m 22 7 (A

Z U

< O

= x Z_ O W

O E

n -

W N

~

a-o e

< ~ C N > b a

- 2: *) <

z : J ; O

~ +

= w 0

=

3 O b 2

= '.". <

O < N. =,

w ,w 7

= = >~ E

.", s W W m

OOdO $4

=

W M

.,9- .

.=.

=

-e m

O d m N

&O eee M ,

M

> e M M

- e ee H M

,tl *

. .i.

t.

5 n 8 o 9 i 1

!. . t ,

.. c uy 3

~

rc 1 t a E su N nq oe U

i .

Cd J A

i,. .

f l oC i.

e Q s y/

ntA

l l

aiO l

I l ad

. us i JQa 1 ,

T R

S Y

i.

i p

i e

s' N i

l e m.

s i i i l i.I lL

PRINCIPAL AREAS TUGCO ORGANIZATION NON-CPRT LICENSING ISSUES CDRT ORGANIZATION CPRT ISSUES 1

CVERALL SCHEDULE AND RESOURCE LOADING JUilE 13, 1985

CPRT CHARTER

THE CHARTER-0F THE CPRT IS TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A' COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW PROGRAM WHICH WILL ADDRESS POTENTIAL SAFETY CONCERNS RELATED TO THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CPSES UNITS 1 AND 2.

b O

JUf1E 13, 1985

l-SOURCES _0E ISSUES NRC-TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM (TRT)

CYGNA INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (IAP)

ASLB PROCEEDINGS OTHER NRC ACTIVITIES (E.G. SIT, CAT, REGI0rt IV)

SELF-INITIATED TOD JutlE 13, 1985

9 CPRT OBJECTIVES IDENTIFY-ROOT CAUSE AND EVALUATE GENERIC IMPLICATIONS OF CONFIRMED DEFICIENCIES.

DEFINE ACTIONS TO PRECLUDE SIMILAR OCCURENCES IN THE FUTURE.

EVALUATE COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF CONFIRMED DEFICENCIES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO ASSURE THE CONCERNS HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED.

PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT CPSES CAN BE OPERATED WITHOUT UNDUE RISK TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.

- CPRT PROGRAM PLAN JUNE 13, 1985

x_

s CPRT OBJECTIVITY KNOWLEGE AND EXPERIENCE

- PERc' 'AL AND ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY NO PREVIOUS INVOLVEMENT IN CPSES ACTIVITIES IN QUESTION .

- CPRI PROGRAra PLAft Jur:E 13, 1985

CPRT PRINCIPLES CPRT HAS FULL AND COMPLETE ACCESS REVIEW TEAM LEADERS, SUBJECT TO SRT GUIDANCE, HAVE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR TECHNICAL AREAS ANALYSES AND CALCULATIONS EITHER TO BE PERFORMED BY THOSE PREVIOUSLY UNINVOLVED OR REVIEWED BY THIRD PARTY INSPECTIONS EITHER BY THOSE PREVIOUSLY UNINVOLVED OR BY THIRD PARTY VALIDATION ON A SAMPLING BASIS RECORD REVIEWS BY THIRD PARTY OR VALIDATED ON A SAMPLING BASIS BY THIRD PARTY TESTING AND NDE ACTIVITIES (OTHER THAN PRE-0PS) .

TO BE CONDUCTED AND CERTIFIED BY THIRD PARTY CPRT WILL NOT PERFORM INSPECTIONS, CALCULATIONS OR DESIGNS OR RECORD. WHERE APPROPRIATE THIRD PARTY WILL OVERVIEW.

- CPRT PROGRAM PLAN JVME 13, 1985 !

SAFETY-SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ALL CONFIRMED DEVIATIONS WILL BE EVALUATED FOR REPORTABILITY AND SAFETY-SIGNIFICANCE SAFETY-SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CPRT GUIDELINES ALL EVALdATIONS WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND RETAINED IN THE CPRT PROJECT FILES REPORTABILITY EVALUATIONS tlILL dE PERFORMED IN ACCOR0ANCE WITH 10CFR55(E)

'N JUilE 13, 1983

SAMPLING SAMPLING TECHNIQUES ARE USED.IN MANY OF THE CPRT ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS SAMPLING PROGRAMS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CPRT GUIDELINES [ APPENDIX 0 TO CPRT PROGRAM PLAN]

CPRT SAMPLING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT ISAP-SPECIFIC SAMPLING PROGRAMS -

UTILIZE RANDOM SELECTION METn005 FOR SAMPLES OF DEFINED POPULATIONS

-UTILIZE SAMPLE SIZES fnaT MEET A 95% CONFIDENCE /

'95% PR06A81LITY'sfATISTICAL STANDARD UTILIZE PRE-UEFINEO ACCEPT / REJECT CRITERIA IDENTIFY DECISION CRITERIA FOR SAMPLE RESULTS ACCEPTANCE AN0 5 AMPLE EXPANSION i

i JUNE 13, 1933

CPRT I$5UE-RESPONSIVE EFFORTS WILL LEAD TO CONCLUSION THAT THERE'IS REASONABLE ASSURANCE'THAT NO SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES, DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION, RELATED TO ISSUES RAISED BY OTHERS. EXIST AT CPSES.

n JUNE 13, 1985

t

~- ,

CPRT SELF-INITIATE 0 EFFORTS PERMITS CONCLUSIONS RE: ISSUE-RESPONSIVE EFFORTS TO BE EXTENDED TO BALANCE OF SAFETY SIGNIFICANT PLANT.

ENHANCES CONFIDENCE IN CONCLUSIONS.

i i

l t

l i

$wid 13, 1935 h

.- ..--,-4 . . , . . - . . ~, _....,_-....__..,_...,,_.,__,._,,_,._,-,....,_,_.,...,---_-,__....,,.._,,...,_..__.,_,,__.._..,-.._.,_,;._.

. e'

. r.'

PRINCIPAL AREAS TUGCO ORGANIZATION NON-CPRT LICENSING ISSUES CPRT ORGANIZATION CPRT ISSUES OVERALL SCHEDULE AND RESOURCE LOADING L._. . . - .. . - - - - _ - - - . - - - - - - . -- -

TUGC0 PRESENTATION TO NRC JUNE ~13, 1985 AFTERN0ON SESSION i

e

QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION AND QA/QC ADEQUACY PROGRAM INTRODUCTION - OBJECTIVES ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN QA/QC ISAPS CATEGORY I - EXTERNAL SOURCES CATEGORY II - SELF-INITIATED PROGRAM INTER-RELATIONSHIPS OF ELEMENTS RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHER ACTIVITIES COLLECTIVE EVALUATIONS QA/QC-REVIEW TEAM

' SCHEDULE

,Eno PRODUCTS i

JUNE 13, 1985 e

. -t, 4

l- .

~0BJECTIVE: PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT THERE ARE NO

' UNDETECTED AND UNCORRECTED SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES AT CPSES.

SPECIFIC EXTERNAL ISSUES

., ROOT CAUSE/ GENERIC IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTERNAL ISSUES SELF-INITIATED PROGRAM T

1 i JUNE 13, 1985 i

I

'I

- OBJECTIVE: PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT THERE ARE NO UNDETECTED ~AND UNCORRECTED SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES AT CPSES.

SPECIFIC EXTERNAL ISSUES ROOT CAUSE/ GENERIC IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTERNAL ISSUES 4

SELF-INITIATED PROGRAM t

JUNE 13, 1965 I

+- ~ .. - ,, . , ,, - - ,,,,--.,,,- ,,- -,,, , , , , , , , - , . . , , , - , , . , - - , - ~r-,- ,- - , - - - , .

-rr-. ,,

b\ \A Elements of the Plan UV d s IAllDWAflE f1tlNSPECTION il AllDWAllE ISSUES OPitOGilAMMAllC ISSUE EXilltf4AL SOUllCES EXIEllNAL SOUllCES ISAPs PilOGilAMS DOCUMEN TAllON 11EVIEW COLLECTIVE EVALUATION COLLECTIVE EVALUAllON HEPORT ON IlEPOR T ON "OUALITY OF "ADEGUACY OF GA/OC CONSTRUCTION AT CPSES" PROGHAM AT CPSES"

SUMMARY

HEPORT

- JUtlE 13, 1985

. - . . - - - = - . . . -. -

., =9 T

l- ~ . CATEGORY I ISAP.'S. ADDRESS ISSUES IDENTIFIED BY EXTERNAL SOURCES 4

4 REVIEW DOCUMENTS TO-IDENTIFY EXTERNAL ISSUES 4

i L

GROUP ISSUES BY CATEGORY AND SIMILARITIES HARDWARE SPECIFIC PROGRAMMATIC ~

1-t PREPARE-ACTION PLANS I

i I

JUNE 13, 1965 d

a 4

,. - . <, , , ---ow,.,, ,-y...--y,_,,%,%w-,-,--y, -+rwww.-, % --

I

, .i ;

l l

l CATEGORY I ISAP METHODOLOGY IS:

i ASSURE ISSUE FULLY DEFINED SELECT EVALUATION APPROACH AND IMPLEMENT EVALUATE RESULTS PROVI6E DATA TO COLLECTIVE EVALUATION PROCESS Juni 13, 1965

/

ISSUE IDENTIFICATION FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES SSER's 7, 8, 9, 10, AND 11 NRC SIT REPORT, FEBRUARY 1983 NRC CAf REPORT, APRIL 1983 NRC SPECIAL REVIEW ~ TEAM REPORT, APRIL 1984

'CYGNA INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM CONCERNS IN CONTENTION BEFORE ASL8 OTHER APPLICABLE REPORTS JUNE 13, 1985

CATEGORY I PROGRAMMATIC ISAP'S 1.D.1 QA INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION I.0.2 GUIDELINES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF GA INSPECTOR TESTS VII.A.1 MATERIAL TRACEABILITY VII.A.2 NONCONFORMANCE AND CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEMS VII.A.3 00CUMENT CONTROL VII.A.4 AUDIT PROGRAM AND AUDITOR OdALIFICATION VII.A.5 MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT VII.A.6 EXIT INTERVIEWS VII.A.7 HOUSEKEEPING AND SYSTEM CLEANLINESS VII.A.8 FUEL POOL LINER DOCUMENTATION Juad 13, 1965

CATEGORY I HARDWARE ISAP'S

f. VII.8.1 ONSITE FABRICATION c .

VII.B.2 VALVE DISASSEMBLY VII.B.3 PIPE SUPPORT INSPECTIONS 4

l VI,I.8.4 HILTI ANCHOR BOLT INSTALLATION '

4

VII.8.5 ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SUPPORT INSPECTIONS 4

1 i

f i

l I,

t JUNE 13, 19c5 4

i 0

1 p -.

1 EVALUATION ALTERNATIVES' REINSPECTION OF HARDWARE DOCUMENTATION REVIEW

~

DATA FROM OTHER CPRT ISAPS REVIEW / VERIFY OTHER TUGC0 ACTIONS i'

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAMS SPECIAL INSPECTIONS /WALKDOWNS IESTING PROGRAMS i

' ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION TO DETERMINE SIMILARITY PROCESSES -

INSPECTORS CRAFT -

CONTROLS l

JUNd 13, 1965 i

E O

w v~w - w - e-riw-e:-w.---m*--, -y.- p - - , , , - ,--,qs.-,y.nme --e,-= _--w-mv.-w.

- -= --,----%r-*.w r e - m-es-r 9v ---i-n-c re-et w

EVALUATE RESULTS SPECIFIC DEVIATIONS DETERMINE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OR PROGRAMMATIC DEFICIENCY DETERMINE ROOT CAUSES DETERMINE GENERIC IMPLICATIONS PROVIDE INPUT TO COLLECTIVE EVALUATION PROCESS JUNE 13, 1985 1

ROOT CAUSE EVALUATION

1. CONDITION INITIATING ROOT CAUSE EVALUATION SAFETY SIGNIFICANT HARDWARE DEFICIENCIES PROGRAMMATIC DEFICIENCIES ADVERSE TRENDS (REINSPECTION)

2. POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE REVIEW DESIGN INSPECTION -

DOCUMENTATION CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKMANSHIP RECUR 05

3. IDENTIFY ROOT CAUSES

4. INITIATE GENERIC IMPLICATION EVALUATION JUNE 13, 1965

CATEGORY I ISAP'S WILL HAVE:'

IDENTIFIED SAFETY SIGNIFICANT HARDWARE DEFICIENCIES AND PROGRAMMATIC DEFICIENCIES m ANALYZED ROOT CAUSE AND GENERIC IMPLICATION FOR SAFETY SIGNIFICANT HARDWARE DEFICIENCIES AND -

PROVIDED REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT THERE ARE NO UNDETECTED AND UNCORRECTED SAFETY SIGNIFICANT HARDWARE DEFICIENCIES RELATED TO ISSUES FROM EXTERNAL SOURCES.

JUNE 13, 1965

Elements of the Plan I

"^ ^ " ' '

rnocHauuAs tc issue ltAHOWARE ISSUE S At l)

Ollillt CPHT OTHE R ff4VESilGATIVE l [XIEHf1At SOUHCES EklEHNAL SOUNCES DOCUMENTAllON HEVILW

'^* " " ^ $

l

\

COLLECTIVE EVALUATION COLLECTIVE EVALUATION flEPORT ON I1EPORf ON l

- OUALITY OF "ADEGUACY OF GA/OC CONSTRUCTION AT CPSES" PflOGilAM AT CPSES"

SUMMARY

flEPOflT JUNE 13, 1985

/

CATEGORY II ISAP IS SELF-INITIATED:

a PROVIDES ADDITIONAL CONFIDENCE IN RESULTS 0F CATEGORY I ISAP'S.

\

EXTENDS CONCLUSIONS TO THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF SAFETY )

RELATED HARDWARE.

.j

)

Jund 13, 19c5

r' CATEGORY II ISAP METHODOLOGY INCLUDES:

ESTABLISHING HARDWARE POPULATIONS ,,

SELECTING SAMPLES INSPECIING/ EVALUATING HARDWARE / DOCUMENTATION

~

EVALUATING RESULTS JUNE 13, 1965 O

REINSPECTION PROGRAM ESTABLISli INSPECTOR POPULATIONS; CERTIFICATI0il v ,r DEVELOP SELECT

+ CHECKLISTS &

SAMPLES INSPECTION PROCEDLTRES i i w

PREPARE !

VERIFICATION-l PACKAGES l

PERFORM RElllSPECT10ll/

DOCUMEllTATI0il REVIEW I

EVALUATE FOR 4 PROCESS

_ _ _ ,) SITE ilCR SAFETY SIGilIFICAtlCE DEVIATIOil REPORTS PROCESS I

l 5' 1

L__ __ ___ EVALUATE RESULTS

+

FIllAL REPORT

PRELIMINARY MASTER POPULATION LIST DISCIPLINE POPULATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE PLACEMENT STRUCTURAL STEEL MASONRY WALLS LINERS CADwELDS (DOCUMENTATION ONLY)

FILL AND BACKFILL PLACEMENT (DOCUMENTATION ONLY)

LARGE 80RE PIPE SUPPORTS (RIGID)

LARGE BORE PIPE SUPPORTS (NON-RIGID)

SMALL 80RE PIPE SUPPORTS LARGE BORE PIPE WHIP RESTRAINTS INSTRUMENT PIPE /TU6E SUPPORTS CAT. I CONDUIT HANGERS .

CAT. I CABLE TRAY HANGERS HVAC DUCT HANGERS AND AUXILIARY STddL ELECTRICAL CONDUIT l CABLES CABLE TRAY ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION MECHANICAL HVAC OUCTS/PLENUNS AND HOUSINGS hVAC EQUIPMENT INSIALLATION MdCHANICAL dOUIPMdNT FIELD FAeRICATION (TANAS)

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION (INCLU0d5 ass $

dQUIPMini)

LARGE c0dd PIPd - CONFIGURATIuN SMALL e0Rd PIPd - CONFIUURATIUN LANGd eund - adLOS/MATdx1AL

$NALL aund PIPd a lusinUMdai Pi?d/fued l adLOS/MAfddIAL

! PIPING SYSidM e0Lidd JUINIS/AgidnIALs l INSTRUMdNT PIPE /IUdd JOINib PIPING SYSidM 6 ENDS -

1 JUNE 13, 19d5

f l

l SELECT SAMPLES OEVELOP LIST OF ALL SAFETY RELATED CONSTRUCTION WORK THAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INSPECTED FOR BOTH UNITS FOR EACH POPULATION.

SELECT RANDOM $ AMPLE.

VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY OF RANDOM SAMPLE. -

RANDOMLY SELECT ENGINEERING SAMPLE FROM SYSTEMS REQUIRd0 FUR SAFE SHUT 00WN.

VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY OF ENGINEERING SAMPLE.

JUNd 13, 1965 l

DEVELOP CHECKLISTS AND INSPECTION PROCEDURES DEFINE SAFETY SIGNIFICANT ATTRIBUTES AND ACCEPT / REJECT CRITERIA BASED ON REVIEW OF DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, ORAWINGS, REFERENCED CODES AND STANDARDS, PROCEDURES, ETC.

CHECKLISTS AND INSPECTION PROCEDURES DEVELOPED TO PROVIDE DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS TO THE INSPECTOR 5 FOR PERFORMING THE INSPECTIONS.

(

June 13, 1985 i

i a he.es f

PROCESS DEVIATION REPORTS VALIDATE DEVIATIONS DEVIATIONS MAY BE INVALID IF:

A. THE CONDITION DESCRIBE 0 IS, IN FACT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVE 0 DESIGN B. THE CONDITION DESCRIBE 0 IS DOCUMENTED UN A CONTRuLLED DEFICIENCY 00CUMENT (I.E., NCR)

C. THE CONDITION DESCRIBE 0 IN ACCORDANCE WITH OESIGN APPLICABLE AT IHE TIME UF CONSTRUCTION, 00CUMENTATION MUST EXIST EXEMPIING THE SPECIFIC ITEM FROM SUBSEQUENT DESIGN CHANGE RdQUIREMENTS

0. IF THE CONDITION DESCRIBE 0 15 HIGHLY Sud]ECTIVE IN '

NATUdd, A LEVEL III INSPECTOR MAY BE REQUESid0 TO DETERMINE THE ACCdPTAb1LITY OF THE ITEM ENTER VALIO DEVIATIONS INTO SITE NCR SYSTEM EVALUAid FOR SAFdTY SIGNIFICANCi Uund 13, 1905 s

EVALUATE FOR SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE REVIEn DEVIATION REPORTS TO DETERMINE IF SUFFICIEisT INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.

PERFORM ENGINEERING EVALUATION OR ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE IF ITEM AS CONSTRUCTED CAN PERFORM INTENDE0 SAFETY FUNCTION UUCUMENT EVALUATION RE5uLIS Juud 13, 1965 l

l l

EVALUATE RESULTS SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES IF SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY EXISTS EXPAND SAMPLE DETERMINE ROOT CAUSE/ GENERIC IMPLICATIONS OF SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES - EXPAND APPROPRIATELY a

TREND ALL DEVIATIONS PERFORM ADDITIONAL EVALUATIONS AS NEEDED D

f e

1 JuaE 13, 1965

POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE DETAIL DESIGN UNCLEAR / CONFLICTING DESIGN DIRECTION TO FIELD OBSERVE 0 CONSTRUCTION OEVIATION CAUSED 8Y A DESIGN ERROR CONSTRUCIABILITY PROBLEMS Jui4E 13, 1965

r --- -.

POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE DETAIL DOCUMENTATION INCOMPLETE DRAWING INCOMPLETE PROCEDURE (FABRICATION, INSPECTION, ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL) l CONFLICT BETWEEN ORAwlNGS OR PROCEDURES (FA6 VS, INSPECTION)

INCORRECT ORAWING OR PROCEDURES USED (AOMINISTR.ilVE CONTROL)

" INACCESSIBLE" UxW.ilsGS OR PROCEDubES June 13, 1935 O

e POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE DETAIL WORKMANSHIP INADEQUATE WORKMANSHIP STANDARDS UNQUALIFIED CRAFT PERSONNEL UNTRAINED CHAFT PERSONNEL (SPECIFIC PROCEuuRES)

SUPERVISION / MANAGEMENT DIRECTION PLANNED MANAGEMENT RISK INSUFFICIENT TIME KNOWING VIOLATION OF PHOCEDURES LuCudnECI MAiddlAL Juad 13, 1965

POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE DETAIL INSPECTION

~

INA0E0uATE INSPECTION STANDARDS UNQUALIFIE0 INSPECIORS UNTRAINED INSPECTORS (SPECIFIC PROCEDURES)

INADEQUsTE INSPECTION CHECKLIST INADEQUATE SURVEILLANCE SUPERVISION /MANAGENEnT ERROR I.4 JuuGE da f Juni 13, 19c5

POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE DETAIL CORRECTIVE ACTION RECURRING DEFICIENCY iNA0 EQUATE ATTENTION TO TRENOS JUNE 13, DSS

POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSE DETAIL RECORDS i

INCOMPLETE RECORDS INCORRECT RECORDS

(

i ILLEGI6LE RECORDS Vi9 AUTHORIZED SIGi1ATURE JUNE 13, 1965

0A/0C TREND PROGRAM OBJECTIVE ,_

TO IDENTIFY DEVIATIONS WHICH IN THEMSELVES ARE NOT SAFETY SIGNIFICANT BUT WHEN TAKEN COLLECTIVELY MAY HAVE SAFETY IMPLICATIONS JusE 13, 1985

E V

I T

A G S l

i M

S A H E

VG NO I

H 5 H P 8 l

il 9

l 1

O 3

N 1 O C" I

T OS

/ E E

1 A A S r U u L N GP J A OF C i VT OT l

f P s ERY A C P 1

A EOCM VPA 1 I A O_

1 S T E U R C H 1 I G

E G 1

1 0 E L Dl O n L O Ai P l

a C P

e "

W t

h i

'V E t H Y

N RT f " O l AR o

g MO l

A I

N MEP UH s E M

U

. S t "

n "

^

C O) e " (

m l

e N S

E S ES O S E E l

t C

l I

T P C

Sl SU A I

O U F T AON O A E S L l

l A LA VT T NY WN !

4 ERI OL D I' EO AT I

l I l

AI VP U C i X I E l E T C HO" U

I F

E T L S L

O N C O C

E US SE SC I l l

CU l

l O AS ML MA N A H t

i L GI OX HE P

O

. e

INTERACTION WITH OTHER GROUPS INTERFACES SENIOR REVIEW TEAM CPRI REVIEW TEAM LEADERS AND ISSUE C00RDIyATORS DESIGN ADEOUACY GROUP AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPECTOR TUGC0/B&R MANAGEMENT SRT STATISTICIAN ACTIVITIES EXCHANGE INFORMATION ON OA/QC ISSUES ASSIST IN PLANNING INSPECTION / DOCUMENT REVIEW ACTIVITIES CONDUCT /0V RVIEW REINSPECTIONS/ DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS POPULATION DEFINITI0ci, INSPECTION ATTRIBUTES, SAMPLE SELECTION UETERMINE SAFETY SIGNI.ICANCE OF DEVIATIONS JUNE 13, 1965

COLLECTIVE EVALUATIONS PERMIT THE ASSESSMENT OF THE AGGREGATE OF THE DATA SO AS TO PERCEIVE TRENDS AND RELATIONSHIPS NOT APPARENT WHEN DATA IS VIEWED FROM AN ISAP PERSPECTIVE.

ADEQUACY OF QA/0C PROGRAM ADEQUACY OF INSTALLED HARDWARE JUNE 13, 1985

COLLECTIVE ~ EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION ADEQUACY CONDUCT COLLECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE FOLLOWING ITEM 5 USING SOURCE INPUTS:

ROOT CAUSES AND GENERIC IMPLICATION.. EVALUATIONS TO IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL HARDWARE ISSUES NOT APPARENT IN INDIVIOUAL EVALUATIONS 4

RESULTS AS THEY RELATE TO EACH HARDWARE POPULATION 8ASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE COLLECTIVE EVALUATION DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING:

NECESSITY FOR THE CONDUCT OF ADDITIONAL PROGRAMMATIC OR HAR0 WARE EVALUATIUNS TO RESOLVE NEWLY IDENTIFIEU ISSUES i

ADEQUACY OF INSTALLED HARDWARE INCLUDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO RESOLVE ANY SAFETY SIGNIFICANT HAR0 WARE DEFICIENCIES f

4 I

JUNE 13, 1985 i

-,, s - -,

COLLECTIVE EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION GA/0C PROGRAM ADEQUACY CONDUCT COLLECTIVE EVALUTION OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS USING SOURCE INPUTS:

a ROOT CAUSES AND GENERIC IMPLICATION EVALUATIONS TO IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL QA/QC PROGRAM ISSUES NOT APPARENT IN INDIVIDUAL EVALUATIONS a

RESULTS AS THEY RELATE TO EACH 10CFR50 APPENDIX B CRITERION

, BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE COLLECTIVE EVALUATION DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING:

NECESSITY FOR THE CONDUCT OF ADDITIONAL PROGRAMMATIC OR HARDWARE EVALUATIONS TO RESOLVE NEWLY IDENTIFIED ISSUES ADEQUACY OF OA/0C PROGRAM INCLUDING THE IDENTIFICATION UF LESSONS LEARNE0 APPLICABLE TO UNIT 2 CONSfRUCTION AND OPERATIONS.

1 JUNE 13, 1985 e

y V ,ag-m

+ - . , , y- v w e- y..y,- y- m---,-,

OAIOC J. lIANSI E Di l'UI Y J. CitillS1 E NSE N

PitOCIDUll[S Es ENGINEERING CONSUL I AN T ^b""^""

V.1901 i mat 1

l11ColtDS MANAGEMifJT

1 RAINING ft CElllillCAllOf1 SAF E1Y SIGNiflCANCE Stt F INiilAlED PROGRAMMATIC llAllDWAFIE

.EVALUA110N ISSUES itEINSPECllON AND '" '"

ISSUES TDD DOCUMENT flEVIEW P. OIIIST ADT D' ALEXANDER C. SPINKS A. PAT l[IlSON EL ECTillCAL/lfsC CIVIL /STiluCTURAL llVAC/MECilANICAL s l\1

. O 9

1985 1986 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN CATEGORY I ISIP'S i.n ..n nn ie n.......... l.........n..i ........nu,...n u n..... en. ne n., . l.. nu CATEGORY 11 ISAP

" PROGRAM ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

DEVELOPMENT .

INSPECTION i.une....in is.....s. esse. suus...n .i ..nseess....,

EVALUATION OF RESULTS COLLECTIVE EVALUATION

UA/LC PROGRAM .....ni .. n n u.........inen. teen..i

CONSTRUCTION is...., ,,,,,........ ,............. .....,,

FINAL REPORT ,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

JJE 13,1985 5

e

=

REPORT STRUCTURE PROGH AMM AIIC ISSUE llAHDWAHE ISSUES

"^" ^"

EXTEntJAL SOUllCES AJ 01til11 CPili O IHE R IrJVE SilG A TiVE EXTERNAL SOURCES DOCUMENTAllON REVIEW IS^I* PIIU6R^MS

HISULTS REPOiliS

HESULTS flEPOilf

RESULTS REPORT

ITESullS DEPORT FOR EACl4 ISAP FOR EACllISAP

HISULIS HE POltIS FOR EACll POPUl ATION FOR EACl4 ISAP

SUMMARY

llEPolliS

SUMMARY

llEPORT COLLECTIVE EVALUATION COLLECTIVE EVALUAllON REPORT ON REPORT ON "OUALITY OF "ADEOUACY OF OA/OC CONSTRUCTION AT CPSES" PROGRAM AT CPSES" i

SUMMARY

REPORT i9

~

4 CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO NRC JUNE 14, 1985

4 e

MEETING OUTLINE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM l 1

PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 14,1985 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION METHODOLOGY GENERAL METHODOLOGY EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUE EVALUATIONS SELF-INITIATED EVALUATIONS ROOT CAUSE AND GENERIC IMPLICATIONS DISCIPLINE REVIEW DESCRIPTIONS MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ELECTRICAL /l&C SYSTEMS PIPING & SUPPORTS CIVIL / STRUCTURAL 0

l I

l l

_ _ - - . _ - . _ _ - _ _ . . - _ - _ _ . --- - ~.. ._ __.. . .-- - --..-. - -- - ------ - . - - - - - -

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM INTRODUCTION l -

BACKGROUND t

- ISSUES I

- CPRT RESPONSIBILITIES

- PROGRAM GOAL

- PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

- PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION

- FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS

- ORGANIZATION

- PERSONNEL

- ROLES 2

J J

JUNE 14,1985 ;

4 i l

d

\

9 CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM BACKGROUND

-lSSUES RELATED TO DESIGN AND DESIGN CONTROL HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY EXTERNAL SOURCES SUCH AS:

-lNDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

-NRC ASLB PROCEEDINGS

-NRC LICENSING REVIEW - TRT, SIT, SSERs !

-NRC INSPECTION PROGRAM - R IV, CAT

-TUGCO HAS CHARGED THE CPRT WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM THAT WILL ADDRESS AND RESOLVE ALL IDENTIFIED ISSUES RESPONS BI ITY T E SURE O UNDET TED FETYI SUES r

4 JUNE 14,1985 i

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM GOAL PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DESIGN DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN DETECTED AND RESOLVED. '

i 4

JUNE 14,1905

l COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM u OBJECTIVES

-DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM THAT:

-ADDRESSES ALL EXTERNAL SOURCE IDENTIFIED ISSUES

-PROVIDES REASONABLE ASSURANCE OF DETECTING SIGNIFICANT ISSUES THAT ARE PRESENTLY UNIDENTIFIED INVESTIGATE ROOT CAUSE OF SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES CONSIDER GENERIC IMPLICATIONS OF KNOWN ISSUES

- ASSESS DEGREE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LICENSING COMMITMENTS l

ASSESS SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE (l.E. ABILITY TO MEET FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS) OF ALL DEVIATIONS FROM COMMITMENTS AND DEVIATIONS THAT MAY BE IDENTIFIED

! DURING EXECUTION OF DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM CORRECT ANY SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES TREND NON-SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS FROM LICENSING COMMITMENTS ADDRESS ISSUES IN AN INTEGRATED MANNER l

l JUNE 14,1985 l

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT THREE FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS ARE REQUIRED:

-EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUES EVALUATION AND RESOLUTION

-SELF-INITIATED EVALUATION

-ROOT CAUSE AND GENERIC IMPLICATIONS EVALUATIONS JU NE 14,1985 v

CPRT DESIGN ADEGUACY PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CPRT SENIOR REVIEW TEAM l

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM REVIEW TEAM ---- QA/QC REVIEW LEADER TEAM LEADERS H. Levin I

CONSTRUCTION QUALITY DESIGN ADEQUACY THIRD PARTY REPORTING INTERFACE MANAGER --- INTEarACES WITH ADOJECT Ar:0 MANAGER F. Dougherty OTHER REVIEW TE AM LE ADERS

, J. Honekamp I

i I l PROGRAMMATIC /

CIVIL / STRUCTURAL PIPING / SUPPORTS GENERIC COORDINATOR COORDINATOR IMPLICATIONS C. Mortgat T.Snyder COORDINATOR E. Blackwooc I

TUCCO SUPPORT STONE & WEBSTER TUGCO SUPPORT COORDINATOR COORDINATOR l PIP NG/ SUPPORTS R. Hooton PROGRAM MANAGER J. Redding t

MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL, I&C l

SYSTEMS SYSTEMS COORDINATOR COORDINATOR F. Schofer M. Jones TUGCO SUPPORT TUCCO SUPPORT COORDINATOR COORDINATOR F. Madden I. Vogelsano JUNE 14, 1985 i

ORGANIZATIONAL ROLES WITHIN CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM THIRD PARTY

- DEFINE OVERALL PROGRAM PLAN

- IN-PROCESS OVERVIEW AND GUIDANCE TO PROJECT DURING EXECUTION OF PROJECT TASKS DEFINED WITHIN THE DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM PLAN

- CONCURRENCE WITH PROJECT QUALITY PROGRAMS, DESIGN

' PROCEDURES AND SPECIFICATIONS GOVERNING CURRENT CPRT WORK t

- SELECTIVE VERIFICATION OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION OF DESIGN BASIS ACTIVITIES

-DESIGN CRITERIA

-DESIGN ANALYSES

-DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

- EVALUATION OF ROOT CAUSE, GENERIC IMPLICATIONS AND SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT

- EXECUTION OF DESIGN BASIS ANALYSES AND DESIGNS

- COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL INFORMATION FOR USE BY THE THIRD PARTY !

- IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION l l

! JUNE 14,1985 4

e CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW -

ACTION PLAN INITIATIVES ISSUE CLASSIFICATION DOCUMENTATION EXTERNAL SOURCE IS' SUES EVALUATION DESCRIPTION OF APPROACH IDENTIFICATION OF ACTION PLANS SELF-INITIATED EVALUATIONS DETERMINATION OF SCOPE DESCRIPTION OF APPROACH IDENTIFICATION OF ACTION PLANS

- ROOT CAUSE AND GENERIC IMPLICATIONS EVALUATION PURPOSE

- SCOPE / INPUTS

- DESCRIPTION OF APPROACH CONCLUSIONS CLOSURE JU NE 14,1935

l ISSUE CLASSIFICATION TYPES / DEFINITIONS DISCREPANCY INCONSISTENCIES IN CRITERIA OR DOCUMENTATION (E.G., TYPO, MATH ERROR)

DEVIATION FAILURE TO MEET CRITERIA (E.G., FSAR COMMITMENT NOT MET)

DEFICIENCY Y SIGNIFICANCE A DEVIATION (E.G., WITH SAFDT,TERION SINGLE FAIL'.L9E CF. NOT MET) s i

e i

l l

JU NE 14,1905 l

l i

1

_n -.

DOCUMENTATION OF REVIEn PROCESS AND CONCLUSIONS

- CHECKLISTS ENSURE COMPLETENESS OF REVIEW PROCESS AND TRACEABILITY OF ITEMS REVIEWED.

- ENGINEERING EVALUATIONS DOCUMENTATION OF REVIEW OF ACTION PLAN SEGMENT

- RE5ULTS REPORTS DOCUMENTATION OF RESULTS OF ACTION PLAN

- DESIGN Aud0uACY nE?bsi 00CUME.4TATION OF C V i A A t t. 204CL.5I;;;5 tEGAn0I:4G DESIGN ADEQUACY CF C?S52

.;sJ5 .4, .?s; 9

~

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM SELF-INITIATED EVALUATION PURPOSE a

VERIFICATION THAT DESIGN-RELATED ISSUES AS IDENTIFIED BY VARIOUS EXTERNAL SOURCES 00 NOT EXIST IN THE SAME OR DIM 1LAR FORM COMPLEMENT SCOPE OF EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUES EVALUATION suCH THAT THE COMBINEU SCOPE A00RESSES -

- uESIGN DISCIPLINES

- DESIGN AREAS

- UESIGN ACTIVII1E5/PRUCESSES ev.c 1,. .9s5

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM DETERMINATION OF SCOPE INITIAL DETERMINATION: PHASE 1 EVALUATION OF INDUSTRY /NRC DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAMS (i.e. IDVPs, IDI, etc.)

- IDENTIFICATION OF DESIGN AREAS ADDRESSED:

- PROFILE PAST CPSES EFFORTS (e.g. LAP, NRC-TRT) AGAINST THESE DESIGN AREAS AREAS, ADDRESSING:

BREADTH DEPTH FINDINGS

- COMPARISON WITH INITIAL DAP SCOPE PRODUCT: GENERAL SPECIFICATION OF DESIGN AREAS WITHIN SCOPE AND DEPTH OF REVIEW d

JUNE 14,1985 i l

CPRT DESIG,N ADEQUACY PROGRAM DETERMINATION OF SCOPE INITIAL DETERMINATION: PHASE 2 EVALUATION OF SELECTED DAP SYSTEMS ,

- IDENTIFICATION OF GENERAL ATTRIBUTES FOR SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS (e.g. DESIGN CRITERIA, HARDWARE TYPES, ORGANIZATIONS, INTERFACES, etc.)

- IDENTIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PRODUCT: CONFIRMATION THAT DAP SYSTEMS ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS I I l

I l

JUNE 14,1985 4

i

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM DETERMINATION OF SCOPE ,

FINAL DETERMINITION: PHASE 3 EVALUATION OF A-E DESIGN SCOPE AND DESIGN PROCESS

- IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PRINCIPAL DESIGN ACTIVITIES

- ASSOCIATION OF DESIGN CRITERIA METHODS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND DESIGN PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES WITH EACH IDENTIFIED DESIGN ACTIVITY

- CORRELATION OF INITIAL DAP SCOPE WITH A-E DESIGN ACTIVITIES DEVELOPMENT OF CHECKLISTS SUPPLEMENTATION OF DAP SCOPE, AS REQUIRED PRODUCT: CONFIRMATION OF COVERAGE (BREAD AND MINIMUM DEPTH OF FINAL DAP SCOP E __TH_).

AND ABILITY TO EXTRAPOLATE RESULTS TO '

OTHER SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS l

t JUNE 14,1935 l

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM ,

DETERMINATION OF SCOPE FINAL DETERMINATION: PHASE 4 EVALUATION OF DAP FINDINGS (i.e. DEVIATIONS AND DEFICIENCIES)

- CONFIRMATION OF BASES FOR SAMPLE SELECTION / EXPANSION

- EXECUTION OF ROOT CAUSE/ GENERIC IMPLICATIONS EVALUATIONS

- DETERMINATION OF COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE SUPPLEMENTATION OF DAP SCOPE AS REQUIRED PRODUCT: CONFIRMATION OF DEPTH OF FINAL DAP SCOPE AND REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES COULD NOT REMAIN UNDETECTED ,

JUNE 14,1985 l

i t' ORT DESfCN ADEQUACY EVALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR EXTERNAL SOURN ISSW5 onwrairarr cw m...

. .merent

. ca.w sa ason.

. sse .own

. eas. vs. ese.

e OENTIFICATiON l****''""'"l l CartGo.irare= o8 $559E S I

l So tSE.Do.l I 'C("C !

CF y * ,'

ISSUES i looco it= rare. .., nve a=o nuno.=w smaeaa.o.a.

on il 1.sv . o,n nair =s.ve l e<= vie s w a. to s ro! =owFp i

e e s w a. ire.s ee=v.to 9, eso I S3 j O'SSut'ee t=Tw t lr.

lvts l sote,sf ei,Cate= of por.E=f'a.tt* I

] an ic eo seeni. o.a : l

,a, * "

E' aoe uan i tosta.tio =v.ae= ' ' * "u'c8 ' 5' 5-mia t occu

. aaor av*rr tare =

- - - - r'c.

to.e c.. 'a.t .a.n..a..s s s.te oes=r1a .ca.wissi CEFNTCN I acomo=a6 amea=s s m=e L =ettt*.=att I, s=tuwaa., oa tt.ia=sto.L gp levatuarem on uco.o r i or tave=r . c oc.a.s. , , .,,,

, . ,go ..,,,,,,,

ISSUES iocu..=ca me ='* e o ACYitlee pt aas WEQUupfD '

L ogs.a.fio= op is t g ffC=susCat o. p.ota ut.5 a. anCD o, .-, e~ n i i ACTIO>e l w

l TECue=iC at #55Ut(St ' j p.osaa esafiC 'Stutt1ll

.l ilotarto , #

) cartso. erg av + l ef =' *ic l Sco#ti-a.o.a g 3 l.off ser'at .arcas osco' I l et{ cauSE

=f e.c.ation of Sves l fi fo.S

, v..a cc a w ...

OEVELCAYENT +c - au ,eno

w. w, CF ],q,6,;s ' .

ACTION ALANS * ~' "

f.e sotva o..eci tv l [=rts.ec' osow ,c=1 r , ,

i ca .t6oew = r o ac ro :ct.< ae.e =' y ac to.i

' sta= si an.ucas6E to ataansi.a**sicante 'o .

ot atoe.t=r ce ssa u *te.=< au spe.

o o. css..mo,c,r,i

., 1o st.s, cr.u o o. .<c..ne,ce

., ,e.s sses 4 specs.c acnon eta =si,- ,

I t.

i 9

l l..o..a...au ce=s, l=a.ows sa.esa j ,

I satse no= 4

,,,,,,,e.,,o o,.. .,,

,o ,, ,r sr to so. aes cr **cs '.n e 9 . tvau,ar T

e..L c=terfat'o=

i igaev e=rar.oun , co=e...are.v u t se=e i _

j c %uatico a a=atests t i e.oo.a.s i ,

n6 a ... m o=.

MALEMENTATICN v''.U'"**

er = =~.c a, o. o i.- , r =.ce 5, g

. , , o ,'t.

,..e,..a..... ,u.,= . ..,a .-e. ==N -+ o_'

2

.. N A.e.NS

. . . ~

s esc,re.w.e,ve=<.r= e= scoer ai **M***

_ ., ,, o, i ,a.o.a,.e

,,u s.aao.u.g . . .,3.g =. ,,ac , .g.:o .., a,wa. , .o= i~ cc . .a.. .

a i sooaf'o=~ Samet'=4 % I nn ar<. ,,e.c .a. G..ca..' . .

,.-a a... ' ao,, s . , r = q, 1, i,;*, pg=,",3,,,,,, ,

,o

. . ,uno .

c,...c,= c. u;

, * .. . ,..t.

o . .: a. s. . .. .c.a, s c ..wa e o c. ...: .a.,

ers>c= acto a:* 1

-_ t .. - ~ . _ -

_ s

,mw.,........

a.

n ... ..av . s ,

9

[CS EE C T 'e E . + . l it t AO*.ON/L *ENSM t

.e ,va, ... . t,+ t ,". m . l l .

. *4 e, , . . +e q ' *

,,,,,...,...,-.w n-.. . -a m, .s.a l

<> b e 4

g------ - -

mco- .9 I ss .

,. pE . . .- L f% ace s.awi e a n* . e..s a=n ,.c.- .s

,e 4.T Ea re.;E S

.a.o.e .r a.wc = ..... i ..g. =ss ss m JCME 14, 1985

EXTERNAL ISSUES METHODOLOGY IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES LOCIC DESCRIPTION Ffift E ATEPueg gnLJs(t Staf 9

. =-~.:

st..:=-

ce w=i=.=.1 i =.-i

~'

i_== =:=r i m!.redws a

106. ** vm#ss. ,eu+e s

is:p:s

'+"gghW;iijg. "* <=v==.,: -

': t=4 ,8 ,

---. .. .s: _ aW.s :c

<- =

c.-:.cc:= ;w;..

mt

- - -a: . e. . .

mc :.~.

"........a.- c : _ g,

. :s:f--*:se -

w:

VE

.f"---. .......

. ;,x,;,t gni

%.t>:.:scgg s :

. :; . :.:s

O$d% ****'* +%::r 7

.7' '

@l::i! 'Q-hii

-4. .m.!!w<yr !!t . . Ms "1.x CAPTURE POTENTIAL ISSUES iiw==. s. .

.ac.: t.-.Ap-=.

. .u~.

uf g.sXg.w.5p--

w e s

=-:,2 . ..

E..

. 4;,. s.. . -

h - ,

(E.G., NCR/TRT, IAP, ASLB, gwa w:k~^te.c g

-g; s . ....asm=_.3.

_t.=h.

CASp.

t)

S.h. JkfM;T :*-.**yC .v..yg -

w w s t;.

. . . . . ., . c.,-

mf,._

PROCESS H%,E. . ...- '

7. .

.s- -a . - ig. ~Y.~s?

s. w

,. . .. .'. Dwm.,ms'J@y-~d!ll as,a e w_.

isiggijg;3=,

w - - wsn REVIEW DOCUMENTATION T0 t::l g me..u;

!a .s=merreW=+9-mem m ;. .:.;,z;,,a. e n ..:F ;

IDtNTIFY P0 EW.TIAL 1 ISSUES

..t :: -

py :::.nM.

e%. .. cr t ;.3= :.e.-rrs==.+w:c;m.e

. r : m. i _.cf.;;

em:.

_ __ c: J s- s

- 'E= DETERMINE ISSUES FOR m . mth:%.ryd$

'~

.r31 FURTHER REVIEW

.p -g 1.q.g:;

., . - ~ .

q,".;,~',y +3 '2';dh?2::h M T.; -"* = ;

.m. Vp s, y._- , v .- - . -

6/14,'t15

EXTERNAL ISSUES METHODOLOG DEFINITION OF ISSUES LOGIC . DESCRIPTION

--N,wb y we*F N ",;;r.. .......[

.,~ ....... # 2 = le;= T.!! 2! M = s

E'

[E N1.1*Gli jMNNI$Ni h

. 23mT i s

M f.me* ::g.;i:..' :. .:f:*jj$+-

4.-. r-

rn =1 OBJECTIVES s _ _.c. m t .-

2 rrs=2 ci-2;.55q

~ ~f- r==l==a 7 , -ggp := j _;--

IDENTIFY POTENTIALLY d.=--i ~~; "[ ~ ~ - ' AFFECTED SCOPE AND cs_a - .

4 . - . -

HARDWARE

^~:gde.n. p i-i.D cggi;-

_. _ . .. -===L

-,J- k. A=:q.a [t.a.glh== h GROUP OF ISSUES r;r, - ,.: - =::= -l - - ----

_ r_=g: yM-m- . PROCESS

~r u -:- ,

=. :-:.

n t

-. y- r .fy- s_in ,- 3 DETAILED REVIEW OF

" ' " ~

. '-(D;;ijgg-"f'MT

. % . -- F ~~ DOCUMENATION

.= m ,.- m g _= E e_.

~- ;- r-r-er-q .

.e _ . E.__...- . .:.==-" ...}

, , EVALUATIONS OR WALKDOWNS

. . . . . ~ . = . j F- -- --u =di9 CONSIDER DIRECT CORRECTIVE

~3E l WsC'_ IN=! .. , , , ACTION

' IDENTIFY PROGRAMMATIC AND TECHNICAL ISSUES I

t>l 14. li5

EXTERNAL ISSUES METHODOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF ACTION PLANS LO CIC .

DESCRIPTION

~,-

~. ,- _,m.. ., _ .m m

. g.. ..pg m g7 .

w.A=.1 > m_ r I :l:::::5c.=.- '

. ? I":l:: .a -.

. r....: d _ _. , .

em'I e.-e -l

=':1-

~=

t.:=. - w..

t.

=_:=s=....] ==.-

i - ~~ OBJECTIVES '

4 i

.=-s ~ ,_ .p 4

.i -

9.EE i cem. r .=! . .iNrc=N= DEFINE INITIATIVES, i

u-. L.=f- 554==:

=*

g ar ,

LOGIC, AND RESPONSIBILITIES :

"-P W +5 .

l::e.is.,:.:JLf.: l : .s- =

2

$ m. .

.. 7

.;Fo*77.'.'.y4W: .23?m.:mm.***=

~ ..'.

?.L j "'-'*. . r.-

PROCESS

.m.. >

.- O.h *

~~..$'.I! <.

. .,... a ?6421,_ -

M _:- W.!! WC CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES,

]pdrs__._..f:?:*e=.Mi__, :

,,s , : m:1-

m. POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSES, t r=w,. %u..e... w_ y.:2:.yL.=. '

.%g:=- ..

CUMULATIVt EFrtC 1S oe=& fM5f:g=,,..x..t

,2 ..gf fgft- ~=.=sst:

. k .a

a =.=.x ;

m.o . ..

[c ,, .y~~ -

DEVELOP ISSUE SPECIFIC Ws =#. . . .1f.

-'O.'r r OR PROGRAMMATIC ACTION

-__._.__h u.2._ >Ziftrs-i.l tr.

i

. _ _ piAng

. n_,.u..w n . . . . e- _ ;

.. S

. .: p . * ,. r.e+j. ;

l .'

,,...s.

hh

4 EXTERNAL ISSUES METHODOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTION PLANS s

LOGIC DESCRIPTION r=.r cus.ru arm.acy rmo r== .vt.emrcy f rut E NTE% lfi.st(7 MisG %

5

> x s

p . .,y ---~. r. ~m

+

i .. -

. . . . , n_Wrr ! m ._-r SUS 1 I m=E.r. v ! . ' ["!!M"*

- A.W- .

r=.-.t <. -~t

- OBJECTIVE s - r.= - 1 p. ... .=- .=_:. :: .

.] t m ..

L ww_c ..r-': _

-- _ - - - ~ ;

-t --

i- -

.1-4- DETERMINE NEED FOR -

3 ;~=" 1 _ ___'l .l .

CORRECTIVE ACTION m _. _ . . . .

c- - _ ,

-~

rz-h- r.s: .j:.-r@na 3

SCf W ^M

- = ~i M,re" e._.~~-,.-

PROCESS

,t

. rg, g rim.Is '

l ..,g1 nr a en !.YWE g m_ .,.m.. ,or .._.. m . __:.

. . -.: i . _.:~.::.::: _

o g t . em o _ _ _ _

i i i gggv.}. .__. . . _ .

gl { q ,.

i i r _-#.m> i TASKS :

c- r : p_=. c- _ ,., .

B=,5:%f, rM, , _ ..

c.=.*m2 r-_

- f ~. :

~ ~ ~

L_ i = ..r= r ,= -... i ~ ./ =: = _ EXPAND SCOPE AS

__.d.

E::. 1 -. w ; " , E i.: > = . . !

NECESSARY

-- pg-2.gew..

y e . = ..... ..~- ..

wag: t ,e g g,6FJ INVESTIGATE ROOT c

. , y. :. --. .g, ._u . . g .,,, . . . -

' CAUSE AND GtW.ERIC M ;.__, ;w.r==a ::

" .~ .'2' W~ 5 4Ig[n.. MAT $(.h a1 4_ -1 IMPLICATIONS 6/14/M

EXTERNAL ISSUES METHODOLOGY -

CORRECTIVE ACTION LOGIC DESCRIPTION

- .. _ ..,IFrue% E a M stCFsait#1

= ; . --- pp . ;; ecq~

s,. .u .. .. + . - .

. , ~ .

6 G ; grA =i E_t

. c ==: a .= = ,

t&c.bi-e a m--- i. .

g m t_.- r .. .

P 2..:- :g r m=.-m --

- =

l - -w:_. ___ . _"):= F.E* .

'3~ f~ - OBJECTIVE

~!

1.

m - =~ j - g i.. .)e.

.m.- .- - ,.. ,

. DETERMINE CORRECTIVE 2~rG-c_F=E.3_4HL ACTIONS REQUIRED

. . . . ~ , ,

w.a - -

-===.-:-3 .

s. e 1-u.'- ._ L -

-- ,r as

- .__3,,

P.. , s: .c- - f9~E3[,.mt...-7i?EE L. PROCESS l ; gem irb'l} .

p Az.i

~ r '. .:

.__,_._m.m,_

ww -.- --.--

i= E- ! .

%g . w. 9 FOR DEVIATIONS, DETERMI-Nu C m..,...- - -

.- ._ _ .. _ e. - im___. c._a .=,

e*~ , ..

. ,. SAFtTY SIGNIt-ICANCE, MODIFY 6...C d M_ M-Qs

~~

, ;, ... HARDWARE OR DOCUMENTATION,

~ ~ ? _2: .cE=t -hi ..

m nan =: - AS NECESSARY

_-.r.,:_-- -. . .

3

, .:.. . =

_,r.i.;t .! -

' ~ ^ . . e.E.

FOR DEFICIENCIES, MODIFY j t q= r ~-:-

t 2'. *:i -

.';;u*r;P/.'. ,'.*M 21#.3Jb

.: HARDWARE AND DOCUMENTATION

....[', l ~..*-*h,.. m.".'.y+:

o!14.115

1 EXTERNAL ISSUES METHODOLOGY REPORTING LOCIC DESCRIPTION

-..m........,~,mm.,

..,m g s .:. ..,g x ..

3 .

...~ .. .. c_.%- _7 . n.

..___i.

L -- d::.= _.-\ M .h w -

l=-M m-a - w: -g %. .. .=:.::

- a.

"j" f.?h=x = ~ TWEWi:' ~~".';- -~~

"*' a

,! -- , ~ , _ _.e- _

--~,

0BJECTIVE a.r .=~i i ).

w .- . -- g c . - - ,

o r_.. m. m

._ . , m _.._ .._, i L._.m DOCUMENT RESULTS a 4 6 .s. .= =, ".MM b JE.

m~~ r. .- w.:. ,, -

j*.=. . _.=. .- j . ... .*_.. PROCESS

... _,....e _

i r .a ...,

<-..~.

._. . ._2_. . .. _, .. ISSUE ACTION PLAN RESULTS p _ L ,. .- - _=.t,. .=

REPORTS m.

....u..=

-.-~ ~ --

=

=.. ..a..-_-

~ - ~

i . -=, = z_ ._.

_.m. - ; . ie.f.,._.

-f_g r

..e

'=E:3.=.-+- J-- .ra. . _ :. .:.:.-

..m ISSUE DESIGN ADEQUACY L

,-.:.::.aw=e = ,-

.......m.

_ r:,.,j, _,- . 3 REPORT

, e ...::. c.,- ;

.. T' .l, ; ~

rH 'v'=E.J l, p_.t.-- , =.. U-. i ..

. = = . . -

~-**

.. l p .T.

.".,. n !.~'_.,.~."v....;.se,.*...

.t..o ,

N. kb

GENERAL APPROACH SELF-INITIATED ACTIONS SELF-INITIATED ACTION ANSI N45.2.11 TERMIN0 LOGY CRITERIA DESIGN INPUTS IDENTIFICATION (E.G., REGULATIONS, FSAR COMMITMENTS, AND REVIEW CODES / STANDARDS, OTHER DESIGN BASES) w IMPLEMENTING DESIGN ANALYSES DOCUMENT (E.G. , CALCULATIONS, EVALUATIONS, ETC.)

REVIEW w

DESIGN OUTPUT DESIGN OUTPUTS

-i> REVIEW (E.G., DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS)

._..E a,:935

I CRITERIA IDENTIFICATION AND REVIEW OBJECTIVES DETERMINE CRITERIA THAT DESIGN SHOULD MEET FOR USE IN SUBSEQUENT REVIEWS ASSESS COMPLETENESS AND CONSISTENCY OF CRITERIA PROCESS IDENTIFY DESIGN INPUTS FROM FSAR, REGULATIONS.

l CODES / STANDARDS, WESTINGHOUSE INTERFACE CRITERIA, ETC.

REVIEW IDENTIFIED SET OF DESIGN INPUTS FOR CONSISTENCY e

l I

JUNE 14,1985 l _ ._

l l

t IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENT REVIEW 1

_ OBJECTIVES !

- DETERMINE WHETHER IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS CORRECTLY USE CRITERIA (DESIGN INPUTS)

IDENTIFY AND EVALUATE ADDITIONAL DESIGN INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS INTRODUCED INTO THE DESIGN THROUGH IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS

- EVALUATE THE ADEQUACY OF ANALYSES AND EVALUATIONS PROCESS IDENTIFY RELEVANT DOCUMENTS (E.G. CALCULATIONS, EVALUATIONS OTHER DOCUMENTS)

CROSS REFERENCE DESIGN INPUTS TO DOCUMENTS IDENTIFY DESIGN INPUTS AND ASSUMPTIONS EVALUATE DESIGN DOCUMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF DESIGN INPUTS INCLUDING CRITERIA AND ASSUMPTIONS

. REVIEW OF CALCULATIONS, ALTERNATE CALCULATIONS, p

JUNE 14,1985 4

. .,.y_ _ , . . _ _ . _ _ _ . , _ , , _ _ . __ , _ _ . , . _ , _ , . _ _ , _ _ _ , , _ _ _ , . , . , _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ , , _

,m_._ _, . __. , , _ _ _ . _ , ______,, . _ _ _ ._._ __ . _ _

e - e I

4 9

DESIGN OUTPUT REVIEW OBJECTIVE DETERMINE CONSISTENCY OF DESIGN OUTPUTS WITH DESIGN INPUTS AND IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS

! PROCESS IDENTIFY DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO SYSTEM / STRUCTURE

/ COMPONENT UNDER REVIEW CROSS REFERENCE DESIGN OUTPUTS WITH CRITERIA AND i

IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENT RESULTS i EVALUATE WHETHER DESIGN OUTPUTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH CRITERIA AND IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS J

4 I

4

! JUNE 14,1985 1

USE OF PROGRAMMATIC REVIEnS IN DESIGii ADEQUACY PROGRAM EMPLOY UNDERSTANDING OF GI685 5 HILL PROCESSES TO EVALUATE ADEQUACY OF DAP SCOPE EVALUATE PROGRAMMATIC DEFICIENCIES AS POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSES

.J ui4 E 1 4 , 1965

o GENERIC IMPLICATIONS PROGRAM PURPOSE SCOPE / INPUTS l DESCRIPTION OF APPROACH .

C0aCLubI0N t

l l

1

..a .~. . *::

GENERIC IMPLICATIDsS PROGRAM PURP0dE TO ESTABLISH A FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF GENERIC IMPLICATIONS RELATED TO CPSES DESIGN PROGRAMS, PROCESSES, OR CONTROLS TO DEVELOP ACTIONS PLANS OR EXPAND SELF-INITIATED ACTION PLANS IO EVALUATE POTENTIAL GENERIC IMPLICATIONS OF DESIGN-RELATED DEVIATIONS, DEFICIENCIES AND THEIR POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSES

TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF APPLICA8ILITY OF DESIGN-RELATED DEFICIENCIES AND POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSES.

TO ENSURE THAT ANY RESULTING ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HARDWARE ARE EVALUATED AND RESOLVED IO IDENTIFY NECESSARY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO PRECLUDE RECURRENCE.

IU oR0 VIDE REASONASLE ASSURANCE THAT GENERIC EF#EC TS OF it00T CAUSES A4D OESI5N DEFICIErlCIES NAVE 3EEN IDENTI3Ii2 maJ iE50LVED

. w .i .~. .?:5

CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM GENERIC IMPLICATIONS PROGRAM SOURCES OF INPUT EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUES t ACTION PLANS OfSIGN RELAILD DEVIATIONS. DEFICIENCIES,

, ROOT CAU5F5

CENERIC TRT-RlLATED ,

ACTION PLANS '

CENERIC EffECT5

' ^ ,

P C t e ON HARDWARE DE51CN n

SELF INITIATED DESICN y EVALUATIONS j,.o DESIGN RILAIII) ROOT CALAES DEflCIENCIE5; -

CONSTRUCTION DESIGN OA bSLE4 QUAllIY & OA OC j ACTi()N l>l ANs LLNtKIL IvlL3IN

CON 5IRLCIlON OR QA QC b 14 US

O GENERIC IMPLICATIONS PROGRAM DEFINITION OF ISSUES UBJECTIVE: IDENTIFY COMMON ATTRIBUTES AMONG IDENTIFIED DEVIATIONS, DEFICIENCIES, AND POTENTIAL ROOT CAUSES ATTRI6ufES:

SOURCES SYMPTOMS BOUNDS AFFECTE0 ORGANIZAT, IONS, DISCIPLINES, PROCESSES UR PROGRAMS INTERRELATIONSHIP aITH OTHiR ISSUES POTENTIAL SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE ROOT CAUSE aHAT COMMan ATTRI6uTES EXIST AMONG THE INPUTS?

nHEdi iL52 navd Udv1ATIONS Ud DiFIClinClis SURFACiv?

<4nini i.li Jeutu vi'tiAilUc.5 an siF:Jiic,Clia falai?

l JUNi 14, 1965 i

.s

4 GENERIC IMPUCATIONS COMMON ATTRIBUTES MATRICES (CONCEPTUAL DESIGN)

ROOT CAUSE, DEVIATION, ? ATTRIBUTES DEFICIENCY DESIGN ACTIVITY LEVELI DESIGN DISCIPLINE DESIGN ORGANIZATION DESIGN PROCEDURE 1r DESIGN PROGRAM TUCCO DESIGN INPUTS DESIGN PROCESS A-E DESIGN VERIFICATION CONTRACTORS DESIGN CHANGE LEVELll CONTROL 1r CIVIL / STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL i

LEVEL 111 CABLE TRAY /

l DESIGN REVIEWS CONDL'lT SUPPORTd ALTERNATE STRUCTURAL l CALCULATIONS STEEL l QUALIFICATION

, TESTING CONCRETE l

.,w in

(

l L

GENERIC IMPLICATIONS PROGRAM EVALUATION OF ISSUES OBJECTIVE: DETERMINATION UF AFFECTED DESIGNS ALTERNATIVES FOR MANAGING TECHNICAL EVALUATIONS:

ISSUE SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS SELF-INITIATED DESIGN EVALUATIONS EVALUATION TECHNIQUES MAY INCLUDE:

SAMPLING' EAPANSION OF OEPTn UR 6 DEA 0TH 0F REVIEa GUTPUTS:

c0UNUARIES UF 15sai (EXTENT)

IMPACT UW HAdUnAnd UEs1 Gad AECc:.MEuUaTIUas P.d i:sPdJvdAdc4I cP .i:.Ja HkUudA:13, .- ~2i:22:

0A CUaTROL JUNE 14, 1985 l

l

r GENERIC IMPLICATIONS PROGRAM RESOLUTION AND CLOSURE OF ISSUES GENERIC ISSUES ARE RESOLVED AND CLOSED WHEN:

BOUNDARIES OF ISSUES (EXTENT) ARE DETERMINED, CORRECTIVE ACTION IS DEVELOPED, CLEARLY DEFINE 0 AND EVALUATED ACCEPTABLE 6Y THIRD PARTY CORRECTIVE ACTION COULD APPLY TO DESIGN PROCESS, PROGRAM, OR UESIGN CONTROL HARunARE DEFICIENCIES ARE REFERRED TO AFFECTED DISCIPLINES Id EITHER CASE, RESULTS OF GENERIC IMPLICAf10NS PROGRAM ARE FE0 6ACK TO SELF-INITIATED DESIGa EVALUATIONS REduLTS REP 0xi IS IS5ud0 Jaad 14, .965 l

l l

i

r 4

CPRI DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM SCOPE EXPANSION REASONS IO INVESTIGATE TRENDS OF DEVIATIONS IO INVESTIGATE ROOT CAUSE IO IDENTIFY THE RANDOM OR PROGRAMMATIC NATURE OF DEFICIENCIES IO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT ALL DEFICIENCIES ARE IDENTIFIED AND CORRECTED (I.E., AREAS REVIE'.vED BOUND THE PROBLEM)

CONDITIONS REQUIRING EXPANSION OEFICIENCIES DEVIATION (S) THAT .10ULD BE A DEFICIENCY (IES) IF GCCURRING ELSEhHERE IDENTIFIED ROOT CAUSES THAT CAN AFFECT DESIGN ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE OR INSIDE THE iCCPE OF dEVIEa 4::::TD ?Q?uLATi3.,

2 C:P E ..Out o 3 E E A 7i.'.CE - - ; :I:.iIL As a d 5 :5Ns;d PiccEdsE:

5 Asis an THE ,ar.ms Ir :,e gaIsarI4 ,00T cause JUNE 14, 1965

l CPRT DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM BASIS FOR CLOSURE CLOSURE UCCURS WHEN THIR0-PARTY ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC ISSUE OR GROUP OF ISSUES PROVIDES REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT NO SIGNIFICANT DESIGN DEFICIENCIES REMAIN UNDETECTED t

..: .<, .l~5

CPRI DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM CONDITIONS FOR CLOSURE ISSUE CLOSURE:

WHEN SAFETY SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCIES (AND TRENDS OF NON-SAFETY SYSTEM DEVIATIONS) IDENTIFIED CONCLUSIONS REGARDING ROOT CAUSE(S) AND GENERIC IMPLICATION (S) REACHED.

DETERMINATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS MADE.

PROGRAM CLOSURE:

WHEN ALL ISSUED CLOSED li4TEGRATED hSSESSMENT COMPLETED 6Y THE THIR0-PARTY ENASLING RECOMMEN0aTIONS OR IMPROVEitENT JF CONSidVCTION AND C? ER A TION AL i sit- AH GEllERATOR PIPIT 4G ISOLATION COMPONENT ISSuts lot .41IFliin HESTRnIt1TS (lTEM V.C) FUNCTIONAL l 10 Unit (lit'M V.8) REQUIREMENTS i

(ITEMS l.A.3, DESIGil UF SEISt1IC l.B.1, l.B.2) !

CAI. Il ITEMS '

l (lith ll.D)

SElf-lu l i l #$ l t .s liVsiC bilPt>UuTS Nat1E, AUXILIARY FEEDWATER I&C DESIGN AND SCOPE ALREADY SYSTEM COMPONENT COMPONENT Lunctet It. UESIGN ADONESSED AS FUNCTIONAL FUNCTIONAL.

i

' PART OF EXTERNAL REQUIREMENTS AND (AUX. FEEDWATER ,

b i t t 1. I AE S IGri SOURCE ISSUES DESIGN SYSTEM AND EvnLt1ATION POWER SUPPLIES)

ONSITE .

EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM.4 DC POWER SYSTEM L DESIGN AND ,

FUNCTIONAL HEQUIREMENTS &

t JUNE I4, 198S HDDRESSED WITillit SELF-[f1ITI ATED HEVIEW .i

I MECHANICAL SYSTEMS DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM ORGANIZATION i

MECHANICAL l SYSTEMS l COORDINATOR t F. Schofer

- um mm - - amm me - sum mm .

l ? i TUCCO ! CRITERIA l DESIGN SUPPORT VERIFICATION ! ! VERIFICATION COORDINATOR ENCINEERS I l ENGINEERS F. Madden E l P

l TUCCO TECHNICAL SUPPORT JUNE 14, 1985

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ACTION PLANS FOR CYGNA-IDENTIFIE0 ISSUES SYSTEM TEMPERATURES THIR0-PARTY ACTIONS: REVIEW OF AFW SYSTEM REVIEW OF D/G AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CCW SURGE TANK ISOLATION PROJECT ACTIONS:

REVIE.'s 0F HA0 MONITOR FUNCTION CHANGES THIRD PARTY ACTIONS: VERIFICATION uF Pdu]ECT ACTIONS AFw REVIEW INCLUDES ,*.ESIINGHuuSE CdITERIA AS INPUT CLASS 5 PIPIaG THIRO PARTY nCTIans: EVALUATE FUNCTI0nal di0u1Rd.winTS FOR CLASS 5 PIP!nd ih AF. :YdIE:i 51NGLE FAIL.Ri I11no 4.0 < -::....:: * ::<,ati 3 ...ni .., 3 i, . . . : <, a
.:.. i . . ,f , -:,> ,;.u. . i i . i :. a JutlE 14, 1985
T CPRT SELF-IrlITIATED EVALUATION MECHANICAL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES:
o EVALUATION OF WHETHER CYGNA-fDENTIFIED ISSUES OCCUR IN ANOTHER SYSTEM o DETE:Mit!E WHETHER OTHE: ISSUES MANIFEST THEMSELVES IN AFW SCO:E: RE'/IEW OF AFW SYSTEv JUrlE 14, 1935
AFW SYSTEM BASES FOR SELECTION i
//
e IMoORTANCE TO SAFE TY
, . / .,
o tr4TEoFACE5i^
44
'. WESTINGHOTSE
~
./300
/
'- l O O f.'E R 5 !I V.
MOTOR /STE AM OP:VE5 ,
- AU/DC POWER REQUlc.E.vp T5 o ~. v2.,.,,.. _ . 3
.i , . _ ~_
,'S:.e~,2.:..~^. 4,-1 ..s:_ ,,
i June 1/4, 1955
/
i ./
TYPICAL SOURCES OF AFw CRITERIA /REQUIREMENIS FSAR OTHER REGULATORY COMMITMENTS (REG. GUIDES, BTPS, ETC.)
WESTINGHOUSE-SUPPLIED INTERFACE CRITERIA REGULATIONS SSERS CODES /S T ANDAitOS JUNE is, 1965
(
l. .
1 l TYPICAL I
AFW IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS ;
l CALCULATIONS o FLOW REQUIREMENTS
'. o CONDENSATE STORACE REQUIREMENTS k
PRESSURE DROPS /NPSM o SYSTEM PRESSURES /TEvoERATURES FLOW DIAGRAM INSTRUMENT AND CONTROL DIAGRAM SINGLE . AILURE/ FAILURE MODES AND E ECTS EVALUATIONS PIDE 5 .EAM/:LCOD!tJG STUDIE5 FIRE P:.OTECTION EVALUAT!O' JUNE 14, 1985
~
TYPICAL AFW DESIGN OUTPUTS 1
SPECIFICATIONS i
o AFW PUMPS AND DRIVERS o ISOLATION VALVES o POWER-OPERATED VALVES DRAWINGS o PIPING o VENDOR DRAWINGS o VENDOR MANUALS AND INSTRUCTIONS t
a f
F i
JutlE 14, 1985
.'y-erw e*--eer ,-w,y-yy,-.v-yygy wr.'- .-g -m.,-e=mm--~TW&yp *eM-9.-y vp- w yevrP--m--"-y sw :p --W1e e nsp--T rv gr"mW-'rW6--pWe--sp--or>
PRELIMINARY AFW SYSTEM REVIEW MATRIX Criterio implementing Design identification Document Output Review Tooic cnd Review Review Review SYSTEM OPERATING MODES e Srcrtuo/ Shutdown X X a Accicent Conditions X X c System Alignment /Switchover X X OPE: EATING LIMITS c NPSH X X X o Mcximum Conditions X X X e Minimum Conditions X X X e Ove cressure Protection ': X X o Ste=m Flow Reauirements X X X HEAT REMOVAL CAPABILITY o Hect Removan Bases X X o tow Fairements X X WATER SUP3L!E5 o . Sources :
o Storec 7esum e - -
COMPONENT FUNCTIONA'_
REQUIREMENTS o Pumps cna Crivers :
o Volves cno Coera ors X < x o l&C Comoonents X X X JUtlE~14, 1985
PRELIMINARY AFW SYSTEM REVIEW MATRIX (Continued)
Criterio implementing Design fdentification Document Output R'eview Topic end Review Review Review SINGLE FAILURE /FMEA X X ELECTRICAL ASPECTS (See Self-Initiated Electrical /l&C Matrix)
INSTRUMENTATION AfD CONTROL' (See Self-Initiated Electrical /l&C Matrix)
SUPPORT SYSTEMS o HVAC X X o Cooling Water X X MULTI-DlSCIPLINE CONSIDERATIONS o High Energy Line Breaks X X o Internal Flooding X X o Fire Protection X X o Missile Protection X X o Environmental Qualification X X i
l l
l l Jur1E 14, 1985 l
l
ELECTRICAUl&C SYSTEhtS DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM ORGANIZATION ELECTRICAL I&C COORDINATOR M.B. Jones p amm um num aus - um - uma em I
TUCCO SUPPORT ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS l&C SYSTEMS COORDINATOR . LEADER , LEADER W.I. Vogelsang C.R. Setka L.D. Bates TUCCO CRITERIA CRITERIA TECHNICAL = VERiflCATION , VERIFICATION SUPPORT ENCINEERS ENGINEERS (2) (2)
DESIGN DESIGN VERIFICATION VERFICATION
" =
ENGINEERS ENCINEERS (3) (3) 6/14l85
l l
ELECTRICAL / INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL (l&C)
EXTERNAL SOURCES l
- TRT-IDENTIFIED ISSUES
- CYGNA-IDENTIFIED ISSUES SELF-INITIATED PLANS l
JUNE 14,1985 l
TRT-IDENTIFIED ISSUE j ELECTRICAL COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL l
. REQUIREMENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW / BACKGROUND TWO NRC ACTION ITEMS QUESTIONED COMPONENT QUALIFICATION:
-QUALIFICATION OF AMP BUTT SPLICES .
- USE OF SERVICAIR FLEXIBLE METALLIC C NDUlT FOR SEPARATION
~
USE OF THESE TWO COMPONENTS WAS APPROVED PRIOR TO CONFIRMATION OF THEIR FUNCTIONAL QUALIFICATION l
QUALIFICATION OF BUTT SPLICE NOT REVIEWED i
l -
QUALIFICATION OF CONDUlT FOR PANEL SEPARATION NOT l
ADEQUATELY ADDRESScD JUNE 14,1985
4 1
i ELECTRICAL COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS PROGRAM
. (CONTINUED)
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF KEY ISSUE 1
THE ISSUE IS THAT THE SITE ENGINEERING ORGANIZATION INITIATED THE USE OF OTHER SAFETY-RELATED COMPONENTS WHICH DO NOT HAVE A DOCUMENTED ENGINEERING REVIEW PROGRAM OBJECTIVE PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT COMPONENTS WHICH WERE SELECTED BY SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION MEET THE APPROPRIATE FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS i
JUNE 14,1985 l
1 ELECTRICA'L COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS PROGRAM (CONTINUED)
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION PLAN
- lDENTIFY COMPONENTS SELECTED BY SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION
- IDENTIFY SET OF ABOVE THAT DID NOT HAVE FORMAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW AT TIME OF SELECTION
- IDENTIFY FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA FOR COMPONENTS THAT DID NOT HAVE QUALIFICATION REVIEW
- EVALUATE COMPONENT AGAINST CRITERIA
- DEVELOP CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES
- INPUT RESULTS TO GENERIC IMPLICATIONS ANb ROOT CAUSE PROCESS.
JUNE 14,1985
ELECTRICAL CYGNA-IDENTIFIED DESIGN ISSUE TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE RATINGS OF INSTRUMENTS THIRD PARTY ACTIONS: DEVELOP ACTION PLANS TO ADDRESS CYGNA CONCERNS THAT SIMILIAR SITUATIONS MAY ALSO HAVE OCCURRED IN OTHER SYSTEMS e
1 l
i l
l l
1 JUNE 14,1985 l
1
-4 < .-M S
e ELECTRICAL /l&C REVIEW SELF-INITIATED EVALUATION BASES FOR SYSTEM SELECTION ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES IMPORTANCE TO SAFETY DESIGN INTERFACES DIVERSITY OF SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT AFW SYSTEM IMPORTANCE TO SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE MULTI-DISCIPLINE SYST5M INTERFACES CONSISTENCY WITH MECHANICAL SYSTEM REVIEW JUNE 14,1985
CPRT SELF-INITIATED EVALUATION ELECTRICAL / INSTRUMENTATION
~
AND CONTROL SYSTEMS OBJECTIVES:
- DETERMINE WHETHER DESIGN DEVIATIONS EXIST IN THE ELECTRICAL / INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL AREAS INITIAL SCOPE:
- REVIEW OF INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS FOR
- AFW SYSTEM
~
- ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES
- REVIEW OF ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES
- OFFSITE POWER FROM STARTUP TRANSFORMER TO 6.9 KV BUS TO 480 VOLT MOTOR CONTROL CENTERS
- BOP 118 VAC UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLIES FROM INVERTERS TO DISTRIBUTION PANELS
- 125 VDC POWER SUPPLIES FROM BATTERIES TO DISTRIBUTION PANELS 1
- ALL INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN AFW, OFFSITE, STANDBY,118 VAC AND 125 VDC POWER SYSTEMS l
l
TYPICAL SOURCES OF ELECTRICAL /l&C DESIGN CRITERIA
- NRC REQUIREMENTS (10CFR50)
- FSAR
- OTHER REGULATORY COMMITMENTS REG GUIDES, BTP'S, I&E BULLETINS, SSERs, etc.
- VENDOR INTERFACES
- WESTINGHOUSE NSSS
- SIEMENS (TURBINE-GENERATOR)
- OTHERS
- INDUSTRY CODES AND STANDARDS
- PLANT UNIQUE
- SYSTEM ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS
- SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS JUNE 14,1985
-. A A ,w a N
V i
ELECTRICAL /l&C TYPICAL IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS EVALUATIONS '
- SINGLE FAILURE / FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS
- HELBA
- FLOODING
- MISSLES FIRE HAZARDS ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS
- LOAD CAPACITY
- VOLTAGE PROFILE
- SHORT CIRCUlT
- INSTRUMENT SETPOINTS
- CABLE SIZING
- DRAWINGS
- ONE LINE DIAGRAMS
- INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL DRAWINGS (LOGIC)
- FLOW DIAGRAMS JUNE 14,1985 f
d ELECTRICAL /l&C TYPICAL DESIGN OUTPUTS SPECIFICATIONS
- DGs (ELECTRICAL /l&C PORTION)
- SWITCHGEAR, MCCs, RELAYS, ETC.
- ELECTRICAL ELECTION SPECIFICATION
.i VENDOR DOCUMENTATION
- DRAWINGS
- MANUALS
- CERTIFICATIONS
- DESIGN DATA CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS LINE DIAGRAMS
- SCHEMATICS
- WIRING DIAGRAMS
- INTERCONNECTION DIAGRAMS
- INSTRUMENT DATA SHEETS
- PHYSICAL LAYOUT DRAWINGS
- CABLE ROUTING SHEETS JUNE 14,1985
O ELECTRICAL /l&C REVIEW MAJOR ELEMENTS OF CALCULATION REVIEWS APPROPRIATENESS OF CALCULATION REFERENCES
- CALCULATION ASSUMPTIONS CALCULATION INPUTS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY - MATH CONFORMANCE WITH CRITERIA - FSAR, STANDARDS & CODES, ETC.
REASONABLENESS OF RESULTS APPLICATION OF RESULTS
- ADHERENCE TO DESIGN CONTROL REQUIREMENTS JUNE 14,1985
AFW AND -
l
~
POWER SUPPLIES PRELIMINARY REVEW MATRIX Criteria implementing Design Identification Document Output Review Topic and Review Review Review SYSTEM OPERATING LIMITS
Voltage X , X
Tme X X Current X X
Frequency X X SYSTEM OPERATING MODES
Normal /Startup-Shutdown X X
LOCA/ Loss of Offsite Power X X
Station Blackout X X ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Voltage Profiles X . X
Short Circuit Cdrrents X X
Terminal Voltages X X X
Cable Sizing X X X ELECTRICAL LOAD CAPACITY
Offsite Power X X
Standby Power Supplies (DCs) X X X
Inverters X X X
Batteries / Chargers X X X
Transformers X X LOAD SQUENCING, SHEDDING AND TRANSFERS X X X PROTECTIVE RELAYING X X X CONTROL
System Interlocks X X X
Automatic initiation / Operation X X X
Manual Operation X X, X
Process Control X X s;1.;;as
. o AFW AND POWER SUPPLIES PREllMINARY REVIEW MATRIX (Continued)
Criteria implementing Design Identification Document Output Review Topic and Review Review Review INSTRUMENTATION
Status Indication -
Operational Surveillance X X X
Alarm X X X Protective Devices / Settings X X X COMPONENT FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS X X X SINCLE FAILURE /FMEA
Redundancy X X
Independence X X
FMEA X X X Separation / Cable Routing X X X SUPPORT SYSTEMS - I&C DC Fuel Oil Transfer X X
DC Cooling Water Requirements X X
HVAC X X X MULTI-DISCIPLINE CONSIDERATIONS High & Moderate Energy Line Break X Environmental Qualification X X X
Intemal Flooding X l
Fire Protection X X
Missile Protection X Seismic Qualification X X X 6/14/85
PROJECT PIPING AND SUPPORTS PROGRAM PRESENTATION
- E. SISKEfl Jur1E 14, 1985 -
[ -
aggD- -
01UECTIVE -
i.ik
. nkh 4
e~ e. -l, g)g STottid & WittisTEtt ENGYNEERING CORPORATION [SWEC) l T/11.Y. ut).!I.WY AI.T. ASME CI ASS 2 AND 3 PIPING -
SYSTEu:1AN1) SUPPORTS IN ACCORDANCE WITII .
ACcisPTa U1 W PitoCEDURES, PRACTICES, TECIINICAI.,
i
'nsch1Hiqilha; !.NH CONTR0f.S.
Tile couvi s!;TW YHTEGRATED QUAIJFICATION OF I P!! iNd iiir> H11PPORTS WIIJ. RESUI.T IN PROVEN l .
CONS.in a'.s ya v M 1)ESIGNS.
eee J U t1 E l li , 1985 ,
I l 3
, . , . , ' yi rf':7..;.._ _ * . .-
SCOPE THE SCOPE OF Twx. PIPING AND SUPPORT PROGRAM WILL. INCLUDE : :
.e 100% OF ALL AWM CLASS 2 & 3 FIPING i LARG33 T.EAN 2" o 100% OF ALL Id3G3 3OR3 FI?3 SU?? ORTS INCLUDING SUPPORT DESIGNS 703 CIASS 1 SYbTr.IS h 33 ANAL" ISIS OF SM3TT,30?3 (2" .2 UMD33)
?I?ING RID SU?_ ORTS ON .1 S_U.I?L2TG 2 ASIS TO 73? M .1D3GUAC7 u,- . q -,
.- . m. -. _- ~ v _ . m - _. m, . _. , .,_7 3 --. u. , _ _ v _ _ . . . . - ,
-. 7 .,.
-- n --m-------, . - -
7.. :J q s __ . m s _ . a v v __;_ - ,-- , r s 7 :--- ,2
=m ~ _
., - - . : . r. ., ; . ., - - --
- .--__ __ T. 7 r-
- - . . . . ..~v_w
.) .-_-_3.,.,---
u. _ ..
. ---- r
. .. . - _ .s
- . - ., n s
r- r--- , ,w,
.- w- , 7. ---
.. _ .g V -, . _m - p. l k
JUtlE 14, 1985
. v.
1MSIGY PROCESS CONTROL .
i - -
h l ;Y-l .c :
i i Yint EH4:tHU:i::itilId MECIIANICS RELATED TASKS WILL i l . .
lii>J lison .1n:o d NI) ENCAPSVILATED FOR DESIGN CONTROL P i n o o :ie:::. A F11td COMP 1tETIENSIVE. DESIGN CONTROL
! etain-:n.; uu 1, lim INSTfTOTED TO COVER ALL ASPECTS -
i l uv Tut; t a-n u! Aul) SiTPPORTS ANAIXSIS PROGRAM, l
nnd t,n.i n lct.VillE VERIFICATION OF THE DESIGN uh::nt w'.irion, STRVICTVIRAf, IIODEL, ALL LOADS j 1Hci.u n n a : un;TEU MODES OF OPERA. TION, AND ALL
\
o niEu n n-dTS AFFECTING TflE DESIGN.
i l :.
JUNE 14, 1985. i l
. -jbw.... .
APPROACH
. gve/m.wr. -
., .:n.w: g w r..=. .
.p r.~- ,
PIPING AND SUPPGETS WIEL BE ANALYZED ~
USING EXISTING swds.C PROVEN STANDARDS.
THESE STANDARM YIEL BE REYIEYED TO
. ENSURE THEY ENCUMPASS FEATURES AND ISSUES 3 RELATED TO PmING AND SUPPORTS AT
.C0MANCHE PEAK. .,
~ .s~
PROCEDURES ARE BEING DEVELOPED TO :
O o
o DEFINE TECHNICAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS CRITERIA CONSD:rrmNT arra NRC AND FSAR REQUIREMENTS AND SHEC STANDARDS o VERITI AS-3UILT PIPING & SUPPORTS CONFIGURATION e CONT 3OL DOCUMENTATION REQUI3mMTS o V3EITI SYo'rmM DESIGN C3IT3PJi e 33yLsJ/DE73 LOP F_I.!'.u'.s '__tA?iSI3NT 23QI;e.32.IENTS i l
S T YEIT _;:idC SUAI.a7. ? A53uT12iC3 _DID ,
w -,r ,-31.l_.Ja. a . ~: .,J : w-- .: 1 1 L : .- -- ., -
.; ..a - v. 2 1, r:} ,J. '
3 yq=m) y ~ ~a u _ _ - .' J sf. . . m;J.=s.,n .,~. : r*, = * =
', .a
-* - ~~ r,-~ -<-e s
. t.a v ' e c L J ,.y
~e EY ' s_D1C 5 9 m 7r ,U.".J SA1C . ' .,:.7-
J..$C n mV!a/_.:, -- s,_.?: C U a Oe, l / 'a, ,: L,mI 21' 32.I3RAC3D 03 S?2C._cCAI.'.,7 ADD 23SS2D 1
JUNE 14, 1985
= ---- - - . - . _ - . _ _
C'
. s. s. ..
w .
~
- - C. -
w. .
, ~ .
m ,, t'- ,,,, u -
a -
-r - ..
L -
m
.~
w
. .- u
- - m
~
< m
c. -. ,,,, _- .. -
m, c- - - -
c.I y= L 3- P*'
he a m -
.=r, c =
ba h'**
a= h. y
(*.* -
C -
- tu
. M g h
,2 4.E8* ,
gm s.h 4m er
- L.. , .
. ,a -
E e-
- u ., w. p, e,.r.
p .'
l - %, = - - k e,<. - c-
,; - ,,, - c ,.
e - - e-( ,.: . .
u- -
c..
.u. , .
%=
p --
r
-- , g 7
g
m I' ,,.
w.
e--
p -
.u - - -
+ -
c., - -. .
g. - -. _
c
- - C" - ,. e - <
~ ,. ,
e r- ._, < r e c--
t ,, - '. a..
xa.
= =
P t
- - -+8""
. .. . m ~
s
=
e* ..
(
Wse t,, .
,, at, '
4""*
~~ ~
m
- s'ag
= ** C . - .s u '
bm c y
.1 ir-- - C; "
(-
~
O c < < -
"l ;;;;;;
. e c, L,, i. , . ,)
, . , .,. - r.n . e- ..
er
- L.,
'::a L,.,> - .,
CC
. C%,
b .P
. ,)
m M y
.m
, he e 9 ,
p. .en q,, ,,,, -.
e:: c > =c.<
p N {- J -
.,. e,., ,,
> C, ,O W U
g b.n . /
f.- ,
g '.,! ."'"
c'
==
- L
~ ..,
. mad
.4 N gg P
g
- . m .8 , .-
( ""**
e a.m m w 7p t.re.
e
.==
eum
"."=
,se y
==.
g
Q .mn.
a n - , - e n <***
a.m e' pe .=
f]
_
I.
r*. omg (.*a h 9,5 """
s.
- m f== .
f.* f l'..*.*.
. ( %..
s
..r.
nfk(&&rgg.
.sy m; a y.y.,91 m
.,o..
a:-
.q;5110.Wr' .
M
.g
'i<r'
se**
'4 * . ** g?..
ig * #
50 CC p -
m
@ 2; CD O M 4mlC .
e-O
.,'. 4 E w l2; 4 M L -
l Z M Cf.,
M 3 '
O C Md w h lZ M.,
p - % M Z C4 W M o
C w
g kama i b p9 > 'mmme i
d N9 MmW N9 w g
M A i N-F C t."
w
. 7>
w m 4y ~
i 8
NI m
y ~w smant y C.s V
MI Y, C *W C1! N
=
M
N 8-d N Q"j .-7 n - ~
w m .[. J8
^
=*
TQ
'# .s Q .#."9 N9 b ase
, . m. ,N-* .
A = m
~
d m4
.7 .h m
C
=
Q >....g s
*W W +4 . Jug TEWP =
W
. , . p 2nur 1ms4 A3 anung est as
V 'e o A *i M
1
--Q
,7 w 10
-) $
w
) ) )
l -
l l
l
0FFICE
. OF THE R.B. KELLY VP - GUALITY j ASSURANCE I
. E.J. SISKIM C.E. WATTERS MANAGER OF lilRf 0 PROJECT G.A. PROJECTS MANAGER .
I 2
l I
! OPTIONS R.P. KLAUSE P. IlllHl .Ill' REVIEW PROJECT ENGINEERING G S ll COMMITTEE MANAGER SPONSOR l _
w, 6
K.Y. I:lill PE/ TECH DIRECTOR H. MOSCOW OlllEll n. Willlf:l W A.S. IlllllilICK
?
PROJECT SITE LOCATIONS LIC/ SYSTEMS PROJECT SERVICES AS RE0*D ENGINEER COST S SCHED l
A. BEllilETT Y. CilIll U.S. PATEl~
LEAN - PEC AL LEAD - PSAS LEAD - PSAS LEAD - PSAS ANALYSIS
d'
- FIGURE: A8 CIVIL /SIRUCTURAL DESIGN ADEQUAC9 PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CIVIL /
STP.UCTURAL
. COORDINATOR C. Mortgot
_____- f I
TUCCO CABLE TRAY CONDUlT CPRT SUPPORT SUPPORTS SUPPORTS CONSULTANTS COORDINATOR - - LEADER LEADER -
W. Hall C. Mortgot M. Holley R. Hooton C. Kircher J. Biggs E. Kousel P.Ibenez W. Munse TUCCO SYSTEMS SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS . ANALYSIS AND ANALYSi$ AND _
VERIFICATION VERIFICATION R. Yow ENGINEERS (3)
R.Iotti ENCINEERS (6)
INITIATED AND TRT DESIGN RELATED
' ISSUES SYSTEMS LEADER ANALYSIS " ~
AND DESIGN J. Ams CIBBS & HILL TESTING SUPERVISOR
"
d -
ENCINEERS (4)
SYSTEM ANALYSi$
DESIGN AND -
ANCO AS-BUILTING EBASCO ENGINEERS (m
SITE ACTIVITIES SUPERVISOR R. White bi 14. il5 ENCINEERS (4)
I l
1
AREA, 5 OF REVIEW
~ AREAS WITH IDENTIFIED ISSUS
CABLE TRAYS SUPPORTS 4-1 '
CONDUlT SUPPORTS
, STEAM CENERATOR RESTRAINTS (TRT ISSUE V.b)
DESIGN OF SEISMIC CATECORY 11 ITEMS (TRT ISSUE II.d)
SELF-INITIATED EVALUATIONS CONCRETE DES!CN
, STEEL DESIGN HVAC iLPPORT5 6/14!85 4
- - , - . , . _ _ _ . . _._m.., , _. - - . . . . . , ,. . . - - - _ .
l APPROACH EMPHASIS DIFFERENT FROM AREA TO AREA I CABLE TRAY / CONDUIT SUPPORTS ;
l e EXTENSIVE REVIEW
CENERIC ISSUES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED
LOW PROBABillTY OF UNIDENTIFIED ISSUES
! ~
EMPHASIS PLACED ON ANSWERING CONCERNS IN COMPREHENSIVE MANNER 11 TRT-RELATED AREAS I
SPECIFIC AREA
FOCUSED ISSUES IDENTIFIED ADDRESS SPECFIC ISSUES
~
CONSIDER ISSUES IN AN INTECRATED MANNER WITH RELATED AREAS i
Ill SELF-INITIATED EVALUATIONS
NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED
~
ORGANIZE REVIEW TO DETECT ANY SIGNIFICANT/CENERIC ISSUES SAMPLE - RANDOM
- ENGINEERING BAS 15 t;/14, U S
CABLE TRAY / CONDUIT SUPPORT BACKGROUND DESIGN PHILOSOPHY SUPPORTS DESIGNED AS ACTING INDEPENDENTLY OF EACH OTHER (NO SYSTEM APPROACH)
LONG1TUDINAL-(LONGITUDINAL LOAD)
TRANSVERSE (TRANSVERSE & VERTICAL LOAD)
MULTI 0lRECTIONAL (LOADS IN THREE DIRECTIONS)
-GENERIC SUPPORTS ENVELOPING SPECTRUM ALL BUILDINGS, ALL ELEVATIONS MAXIMUM DEAD WEIGHT SPECIAL SUPPORTS
-SPECTRuri USE0 VARIES, AT TIMES ENVELOP, AT TIMES SPECIFIC ELE /sTIJN ACTUAL DEA 0 <<EI3ni JUNE 14, 1985 1
)
- - ~ = , , - -a , , w
1 CABLE TRAY / CONDUIT SUPPORTS BACKGROUND THE DESIGN PHILOSOPHY SHOULD PR' OVIDE CONSERVATIVE DESIGN HOWEVER A' NUMBER OF ISSUES HAVE BEEN RAISED THAT DECREASE THE MARCIN PROGRAM DEVELOPED TO CONFIRM THAT EXISTING SUPPORTS HAVE SUFFICIENT MARCIN OR TO MODIFY SPECIFIC SUPPORT TYPES i
1 1
6,14 119 mw - e..e, e e ,7, -.. , - ,- _ , -,.p. ., .,, .,. --, ,. ,, m,,,.,-.-n-- , , ., , .
CPRT PROGRAM APPROACil -
CABLE ' TRAY / CONDUITS SUPPORTS p y t AS BUllllNG/
REVIEW l " '
D P Yl Al MODI IlON E uoDiriCAllONS MO IflCA IONS g If PERFORMED D ID[NT.Of i
ENG! RANDOM SAMPLES IDENTIFY IDENilfY MODifICATlONs MODIFICATIONS NO T itsTINc -
d NO E
YES S r ACCEPTABLE T ANALYSIS r ACCEPTABLE
' ! j, MODillNG N CAPAlilllTY
~
G ; i i &
1[SllNG - SYSTEMS 4 ACCEPTABLE N _ DESIGN L OADS -
L y INST klifil!RL _
$PICIRA S
l 5
ACCIPI ANJE 6/14/85 CRillRIA DEVIiOPMIN1 I
C TIME
CABLE TRAY / CONDUIT SUPPORT '
IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL PARAMETERS AND DIRECT PHYSICAL MODIFICATIONS SAMPLE AS BUILT IN UNIT 1 100% AS BUILT IN UNIT 2 ON COING TESTING PROGRAM ISSUES RAISED BY REVIEWERS ANALYSIS INITIATED TO ANSWER SOME OF THE ISSUES 614 as 9
l TRT RELATED ISSUE 1
STEAM GENERATOR RESTRAINTS SCOPE OF REVIEW
! - UPPER AND LOWER LATERAL RESTRAINTS
- BEAMS
- ANCHORAGE a
- WALLS 3
J U N E 14,1985
t STEAM GENERATOR RESTRAINTS .
' DEPTH OF REVIEW
LOADS DEVELOPMENT OF STEAM CENERATOR TO BEAM FORCES (PIPE-RUPTURE, SEISMIC, THERMAL)
LOAD COMBINATION (PIPE-BREAK, SEISMIC, DIFFERENTIAL COMPARTMENT PRESSURES) FOR VORST CASE ANALYSIS OF ANCHORACE
FORCES AND MOMENTS RESULTANT ON BEAM, WALL AND ANCHORACE
REVIEW OF CONCRETE WALL DESIGN
REVIEW OF BEAM DE$1CN ADEQUACY OF BOLT AND PLATE CONNECTION (REQUIRED THREAD ENCACEMENT, MINOR PLATE THREAD DAMACE)
ADEQdACY OF REBARS AND CADWELDS ANCHORING THE EMBEDMENT 6/14/85
w i..
AREAS OF REVIEW AREAS WITH IDENTIFIED ISSUES
' CABLE TRAYS SUPPORTS CONDUlT SUPPORTS STEAM CENERATOR RESTRAINTS (TRT ISSUE V.b)
DE51CN F SEISMIC CATECORY 11 ITEMS (TRT ISSUE II.d) ,
SELF-INITIATED EVALUATIONS CONCRETE DES!CN 4 TEEL DESIGN H\'AC iLPPORT5 6, it 85
.k J
a REASONS FOR SELF INITIATED EVALUATIONS
)
i EXPAND SCOPE TO PROVIDE MORE COMPLETE COVERACE OF THE CIVIL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SCOPE FOCUS ON OTHER AREAS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY THAT HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED 4
5 4
[;
i t
6/1C63-e e
w~w--- .v.-+- ..v- - - -
yr--,.fcc, g,p,-,.,,,n y y.,g,y,%.,_y9,.3 . ,,.,yw n, ,. - - , . _. ,__%s._ ,3_.___ .-_.._-w-.- m..m- rr.w.,---
9
% k i
SELF-INITIATED EVALUATIONS TYPICAL REVIEWS AREAS LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS MODEL AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS COMPUTER CODES USED FOR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN DESIGN PROCEDURES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 4
4 JUNE 14,1985
.,-w, ,-,-,m_
CONCRETE DESIGN INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW l
CONTAINMENT
- SHELL WALL
- THREE AREAS WITH DISCONTINUITIES
- PENETRATION AREA
- WALL / DOME INTERFACE
- WALL / FOUNDATION INTERFACE AUXILIARY BUILDING AND FUEL BUILDING
- FIVE SLAB AND FIVE WALL CALCULATION PACKAGES RANDOMLY SELECTED
- TEN ADDITIONAL CALCULATION PACKAGES SELECTED
- EITHER RANDOMLY
- OR BASED ON FINDINGS (IF ANY) OF PREVIOUS REVIEW JUNE 14,1985
---,,,,.m- , - ,-.---- -. -----.-.---,..- -- --- --- .- - -- .-. - - - - - - .-, -
4 O
4 STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW TWO SECTIONS OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAME OF CABLE SPREADING ROOM APPROXIMATELY TEN STRUCTURAL STEEL COMPONENTS 9
JUNE 14,1985
O o
\
HVAC SUPPORTS INITIAL SCOPE OF REVIEW
- TWO HVAC SYSTEMS SELECTED RANDOMLY
- ONE IN CONTROL ROOM
- ONE ELSEWHERE SUPPORTS INCLUDED IN THESE SYSTEMS WILL B'E REVIEWED i
4
. JUNE 14,1985 '
. - _ . ~ . ~. _ . - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ML20129E728

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

Enclosures:

SUMMARY

=

=

=

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

==

Navigation menu

ML20129E728

Text

SUBJECT:

Enclosures:

SUMMARY

=

=

=

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

==

Navigation menu

Search