ML20129A131

Advises of Addl Delay in Completion of Integrated Plan Issue 5 Re Dcrdr Due to Personnel Changes.Revised Dcrdr Program Schedule Encl

ML20129A131
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	05/31/1985
From:	Kuemin J CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8506040478
Download: ML20129A131 (6)

Text

.. . . . _ . . .

e a

O Consuniers Power Company General offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, MI 49201 e (517) 788-0550 May 31, 1985 Director, Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-155 - LICENSE DPR BIG ROCK POINT PLANT -

CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW SCHEDULE UPDATE - INTEGRATED PLAN ISSUE 5 Consumers Power Company letter of February 12, 1985 identified a delay in completion of the Big Rock Point Integrated Plan Issue 5, Control Room Design Review. 'The projected completion date stated in that letter was October 31, 1985. Since that time, there has been a-change in the Issue Manager for the project, of which we have notified our NRC Project Manager. With this change in personnel it has been necessary to re-evaluate and reschedule the activities associated with the project resulting in the attached revised schedule (rev. 4, 5/10/85). Based on the projected review and approvals of the final summary report Consumers Power Company would expect to submit the report by April 15, 1986.

During the Issue Manager transition period progress continued on completion of the Symptom Action Sets and drawings for panel demarcation and labeling changes which were already underway.

The walk-throughs (Activity Number 10) are presently scheduled to start about September 1, 1985, however due to refueling outage activities constraints on operators availability may affect start of the walk through. Our NRC Project

~

Manager has informed us that the NRC proposes to conduct an audit of our program during these walk-throughs. Consumers Power Company will maintain contact with the NRC to help support your needs for this audit.

On March 20, 1985 a conference call between members of the NRC staff and their consultants and members of Consumers Power Company staff discussed the control room design review program. A memorandum, with the meeting minutes attached, was issued to the Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Chief from the NRC Project Manager, en April 11, 1985. The memorandum contained information that did not

-reflect our position. The following point has been discussed with the Project Manager and is:

8506040478 850531 PDR F

ADOCK 05000155 pm D

, 0O l

OC0585-0204A-NLO4

r.

~

s Director, Nuclear Reactor-Regulation 2 Big Rock Point Plant CRD Review Schedule Update May 31, 1985 Page 1 bullet 1; "The licensee stated that an outside human factors expert would be contracted." (underlining added). Our position is we may contract a human factors' consultant as recommended by the NRC, however it is our belief that a successful control room design review can be conducted without the use of a consultant. - We base this belief on the relatively small and simplistic ^

control. room at Big Rock Point and the experienced staff conducting the review. Although there has been some turnover in personnel we still maintain it may not be necessary to contract a human factors consultant.

h James L Kuemin Staff Licensing Engineer CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRC Resident Inspecto'r - Big Rock Point Attachment OC0585-0204A-NLO4 E __

r -,

ATTACHMENT

- Consumers. Power Company-Big Rock Point-Plant' Docket 50-155

\

s CRDR PROGRAM SCHEDULE May 31, 1985 3 Pages-IC0585-0204B-NLO4~

o _ .-

i.

e P -CRDR PROGRAM SCHEDULE

= 198L = 1985 = 1986 v .J J A 0 \ V V r

S J < A < < A S 0 \ J < V V i

I '

' i i

' i 1 3 5 l

• 12 11 15 16 17

.-.---------------+-----, --------------j-c 9 o- c o- o--o- o--o l

n  ;

• 2 .

/1 ,' '  :

l 8

14

.::l a  :

l  :: s a .

ll l ,

l 6A '

, l 18 ' 19 20 21  :

l

:------ ./llo---e ,

68 / '

i o--o-c 6; l  !

, e i

-7 ;,. i l 8 10  :

, .' 7-c p- 9. 6  :

l ' , 9/ :  :

l c l 4A l l l e

l6  :

13

---

+--------------------,l------l---------*/ c 6 -

i l ' s 4B l l M8 l 1

g M l i. REFUELING-PROJECT.

TEAM TRANSITION BRP CROR PROGRAM SCHEDULE REV 4 5/10/85

. . . . . . - . . ,1

F 1

4 BIG ROCK POINT CRDR PROGRAM SCHEDULE (Rev 4, 5/10/85)

Activity Activity Activity Number- . Description Status 1 Historical Data Review Completed 2 Operating Experience Questionnaire Completed 3' Follow up Interviews Completed 4A Engineering Dept. Questionnaire Completed 4B Operating Survey Questionnaire Completed 5 Survey Checklists Completed 6A Design Convention Surveys Completed 6B Measurement Surveys Completed 7 Symptom Action Sets Completed 8 Task Identification 6/1/85 Develop form, define accident sequences from OAET by defining inputs, throughputs and outputs by which actions are implemented (No HED's) 9 Verification of I&C .7/1/85 Develop form, based on activity 8 results -

inventory control room to assure existence of l instruments and controls, cross check prior HED's for conflicts, record new HED's

! 10 Walk Throughs 9/1/85 l

Develop forms (inc. summary form) conduct walk-throughs based on those required by NUREG 0700 ,

(3.8.2) using scenarios as described in the OAET.

Validate task identification analysis and I&C verification analysis results. Interview operators regarding layout, arrangement and design, information for HED classification input.

l NUO585-0204C-NLO4

i

~

2 A Activity Activity Activity Number Description Status 11 Assessment of HED's 6/1/85 Compile HED summary, write up prior identified HED's, review and/or modify methodology to categorize HED's, photograph each HED, develop photograph management system. Categorize HED's

-(on. going).

12 Proposed HED Corrective Action 11/15/85 Proposed corrective action logged on HED form.

Resolution can be in form of paint, tape and label (static), backfitting (which may include SPDS), procedures changes and training. Request CRMP perform PRA cost benefit. Analysis on major HED's. Submit summary of proposed resolutions to TRG for further assessment and ranking within plant priorities.

13 Develop ongoing HED Program Establish procedure to use in future projects incorporate requirements in appropriate plant documents assuring compliance (FC, SC, SPC, etc).

14 Develop SPDS Justification 11/15/85 Utilize relevant data extracted from appropriate documents to develop justification. (for or against).

Sources: Operator interviews, walkthroughs, HED's.

Write justification, submit for review to TRG and incorporate into final report.

15 Compile Documentation & Draft Final Report 1/1/86 16 Final Report Review and Comment 3/15/86

, Submit to NRC 4/15/86 17 Project Close out 5/1/86 18 Prepare Panel Drawings 3/15/86 CAD panel drawings, include demarcation and labels, add to panel drawing series, revise nameplate list. Compare with HED's.

19 Review Panel Drawings 6/15/85 Submit to team members and plant for review, discuss with operators.

t 20 Revise panel Drawings 7/15/85 Based on feedback change drawings.

21 Implement 8/1/85 Arrange for label and material to place static changes on panels. Determine who, how and when.

Verify completed per drawings. Implementation will be through use of BRP - FC or SC.

NUO585-0204C-NLO4

_ _ - . _