ML20128R105

Further Response to FOIA Request for Three Categories of Documents Re Facility.Forwards Documents Listed in App E. Documents Also Available in PDR

ML20128R105
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	06/10/1985
From:	Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Bernabei L GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
Shared Package
ML20128R107	List: ML20128R105 ML20128R114
References
FOIA-85-123 NUDOCS 8507270120
Download: ML20128R105 (2)

Text

PDlDOh fp arro g

,9 g UNITED STATES l

{ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l 5 ej WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 l g . . . . . ,o! )

I Ms. Lynne Bernabei Government Accountability Project 1555 Connecticut Avenue, NW IN RESPONSE REFER Suite 202 TO F0IA-85-123 Washington, DC 20036

Dear Ms. Bernabei:

This is in further response to your letter of February 19, 1985, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of :nformation Act (F0IA), three categories of documents relating to the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.

We provided partial responses to your FOIA request by letters to you dated April 11, 1985, and May 24, 1985. ,

At this time, we are placing the records identified on the enclosed Appendix E in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) in folder FOIA-85-123 under your name.

The staff is continuing to review additional records subject to your request. _

We will notify you upon completion of this review.

Si ely,

= .

t

. M. elton, D rector Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration

Enclosure:

As stated 8507270120 850701 PDR FDIA BERNABE85-123 PDR

APPENDIX E DOCUMENTS IN PDR FILE F01A-85-123 Category 2

~

1. 11/13/77 Drawings by EBASCO Services, Inc., to LP&L, entitled

" Safety Injection System;' (2 pages).

2. Illegible Drawings by EBASCO Services, Inc., to LP&L entitled

" Reactor Coolant" (1 page).

3. 02/13/82 Nonconformance Report No. W3-795/W3-3462 by EBASCO Services, Inc., to LP&L (3 pages).

4. 07/18/83 Nonconformance Report No. W3-6238 by EBASCO Services, Inc., to LP&L (2 pages) with 10 attachments:

Attachment 1 1 page)

Attachment 2 3page)

Attachment 3 1 page Attachment 4 1 page Attachment 5 20pages)

Attachment 6 1page)

Attachment 7 21pags)

Attachment 8 1 page Attachment 9 1 ptge Attachment 10 (1 page)

5. 06/20/83 Nonconformance Report No. 3462 by Mercury Co., to LP&L (9 pages).

6. 06/22/83 Nonconformance Report No. 3482 by Mercury Co., to LP&L(10pages).

7. 06/24/83 Nonconformance Report No. 3508 by Mercury Co., to LP&L (5 pages).

8. undated Handwritten note regarding LP&L Maintenance Welding Program Deficiences (1 page).

9. undated Document with heading " Task: Issue No. 15" regarding staff review of welding of "D" level material for containment attachments (2 pages).

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABlUTY PROJECT 1555 Connecticur Awnue, N.W., Suite 202 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202)232 8550 February 19, 1985 '.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST fBEEDOM OF INFORMATION ACI ItEQUEST Director [ ~ ~

Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

, $ g g,pg Washington, D.C. 20555 To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 5 U.S.C.

S 552, et seq., the Government Accountability Project (GAP),

requests copies of all agency records and information includ-ing but not limited to notes, letters, memoranda, drafts, minutes, diaries, logs, calendars, tapes, transcripts, sum-maries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering analyses, drawings, files, graphs, charts, maps, photographs, agreements, handwritten notes, studies, data sheets, notebooks, books, telephone messages, computations, voice recordings, and other data compilations on which or through which information is transmitted, interim and/or final reports, status reports, and all other records relevant to or generated in tonnection with the following:

(1) Any meetings, discussions or other briefings between or among the following offices of the NRC concerning the decision to grant a low-power license to the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, which was issued on December 18, 1984: Th9 Commissioners or their offices; the Office of General Counsel; the Office of Executive Legal Di_ Otor; the office of Inspec-tion and Enforcem .; Revion V; the NRC Staff; the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation; the Office of Investigations; and the Office of Inspector and Auditor. This request includes all transcripts of briefings of the Commission and/or the Commissioners by NRC, the Waterford Task Force, OI, Darrell Eisenhut or Dennis Crutchfield; 3R (2) Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report No. 9, r,J7 issued concerning Waterford 3 in the December, c 1984-January, 1985 time period. This request jg/g QJ

Page Two FOIA Request l February 19, 1985 includes all documents which support or justify the conclusions found in the SSER 9; all documents discussing the impact of SSER 9 on the motions to reopen the record pending before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board; and all input from witnesses or allegers, including but not limited to George Hill and his document review team.

(3) Any arrangements, agreements, contracts or other

' understandings between or among the Waterford Task Force, the NRC, NRR, Mr. Crutchfield, or OI, on the one hand, and any witness or alleger, on the other hand. This request includes but is not limited to copies of the contracts or agreements; documents related to any OIA investigation into i the issue of retaining and paying witnesses; any briefing of the Commission on this matter; and any proposed or effecte'd action taken as a result of

discussicn of the propriety of paying witnesses or allegers.who make allegations to the NRC about potential safety problems at nuclear power plants.

If any records have been destroyed and/or removed, please provide all surrounding records, including but not limited to a list of all records which have been or are destroyed and/or removed, a description of the action (s) taken, relevant date(s), individual, office and/or agency-wide policies and/or justification (s) for the action (s), identification of all personnel involved with the action (s), and'any and all records relevant to, generated in connection with, and/or issued in order to implement the action (s).

GAP requests that fees be waived, because " finding the informa-tion can be considered as primarily benefitting the general public." 5 U.S.C. S 552 (a) (4) (A) . The Government Accountability Project-is a non-profit, nonpartisan public interest organization concerned with honest and open government. Through legal repre-

sentation, advice, national conferences, films, publications and public outreach, the Project promotes whistleblowers as agents i

of government accountability. GAP requests the above information as part of an ongoing monitoring project on the adequacy of the

! NRC's efforts to protect public safety and health at nuclear power plants.

For any documents or portions that you deny due to a specific FOIA exemption, please provide an index itemizing and describing

Page Three FOIA Request February 19, 1985 the documents or portions of documents withheld. The index should provide a detailed justification of your grounds for claiming each exemption, explaining why each exemption is rele-vant to the document or portion of the document withheld. This index is required under Vaughn v. Rosen (I), 484 F.2d 820 (D. C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1974).

We look forward to your response to this request within ten days.

Sincerely yours, L ne Bernabei I ~ A-General Counsel b

l l

l i

[

l l

t l

l '

t

- -. _.. . _ . .. - - . _-.. . - ., . -. . .-