|
---|
Category:INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
MONTHYEARML20137N2871986-01-0707 January 1986 Forwards Summary of Review of Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Rept.Detailed Investigations Needed to Identify & Define Extent of Solution Cavities in Bedrock Beneath Site ML20138Q9041985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions IA-85-362, Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions1985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions ML20127C2941984-11-0707 November 1984 Comments on Applicant 841019 Motion to Dismiss Crbr Proceeding.Differences Between NRC Approved 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan & Doe/Tva/Project Mgt Corp Site Redress Planning Task Force Rept Dtd Jan 1984 Encl ML20140C6121984-06-18018 June 1984 Advises That Time for Commission to Review ALAB-761 Expired. Commission Declined Review.Decision Became Final Agency Action on 840611.Served on 840618 ML20127B5921984-04-30030 April 1984 Submits Proposed Mods to 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan. Redress Plan Should Be Revised to Reflect Alternative Use If Site Retained.Doe Should Rept Status of Site Prior to Starting Final Filling,Grading & Redress ML20138Q8991984-03-23023 March 1984 Requests That NRC Contact Be Identified & That Ode Be Advised Who Will Be Responsible for Followup Work Re Commission 820817 Memorandum & Order Concerning Site Redress.W/Three Oversize Encls ML20062G8321982-08-0606 August 1982 Clarifies Previous Response to ASLB Inquiries Re Computer Codes Used in Review of Site Suitability,Atmospheric Transport & Diffusion Calculations ML20062H2701982-07-28028 July 1982 Forwards Revised Crbr Rept,Initially Submitted on 820722 ML20058F7381982-07-26026 July 1982 Notification of 820805 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr PSAR Chapter 9.3, Auxiliary Liquid Metal Sys. Proposed Agenda Encl ML20058E4481982-07-22022 July 1982 Forwards Crbr Plant Rept, Re Request for Authorization to Conduct Site Preparation Activities.Rept Identifies Technical & Policy Issues & Summarizes Background Info & Applicant Position.No Recommendations on Merit Made ML20058E4921982-07-20020 July 1982 Provides Cost Analysis of Crbr Proposal.Applicant Cost of Delay Estimate on Basis of 10% Real Discount Rate Evaluated. Table Depicting Present Worth Analysis of Anticipated Project Expenditures Encl ML20058A8581982-07-16016 July 1982 Notification of 820723 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Probabilistic Risk Assessment Review NUREG-0786, Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable1982-07-13013 July 1982 Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable ML20054M7621982-07-12012 July 1982 Forwards Commissioner Ahearne Questions for Applicants ML20054N0081982-07-0909 July 1982 Provides Status on NRC Preparation of Assessment of New Info Since Fes Issuance in 1977.NRC Still Evaluating New Info. Decision on Whether Suppl Needed to Be Made Shortly ML20055B2011982-07-0202 July 1982 Forwards Testimony in Facility Proceeding on Contention 6 Re Environ Impact of Fuel Cycle,Per 820623 Request ML20054L4271982-06-30030 June 1982 Notification of 820708 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Hydrology Review ML20054H7791982-06-22022 June 1982 Forwards Supplemental List of Questions on Steam Generator Design.Conference W/Applicant on Design Suggested ML20054H3931982-06-16016 June 1982 Notification of 820630 & 0701 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054F7331982-06-11011 June 1982 Forwards Site Sutitability Rept Re Site Suitability from Point of Radiological Health & Safety Concerns.Rept Supersedes NRC Mar 1977 Site Suitability Rept,Reflecting Changes in Info.Conclusions Remain Same.W/O Encl ML20055B2881982-06-10010 June 1982 Forwards Proposed Input to Chapter 9 & 10 to Crbr Fes Suppl. Info Reflects Comments Discussed Re Preliminary Draft ML20054G0271982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of Canceled 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054E8061982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054E7971982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820622-24 Meetings W/Doe,Util & Project Mgt Corp in Oradell,Nj to Perform Seismic & Structural Engineering Audit of Calculations ML20054H3371982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. DOE Rebuttal to Rept & Description of Test Program Encl.W/O Encl ML20054H3341982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. Also Forwards DOE Steam Generator Testing Program.W/O Encl ML20054F2771982-06-0808 June 1982 Notification of 820623 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Fuel Failure Monitoring Sys ML20055B2841982-06-0707 June 1982 Forwards Gao Final Ltr Rept Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk, in Response to Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations,House Committee on Energy & Commerce Request.No Response Required ML20054M7861982-06-0202 June 1982 Notification of 820727 Meeting W/Doe in Madison,Pa to Discuss Chapter 5.5 Topics for Crbr.Agenda Encl ML20055B2901982-05-27027 May 1982 Discusses Proposed Changes to Chapter 11 of Fes Re Cost Estimates.Crbr Offers Least Cost Solution in Meeting Programmatic Objectives of LMFBR Program ML20055B2921982-05-10010 May 1982 Forwards Antitrust & Economic Analysis Branch Input to Accident Impact Section of Captioned Des ML20055B2931982-04-16016 April 1982 Responds to Interrogatories Set 19 Re Const Cost of Crbr ML20055B2941982-01-22022 January 1982 Comments on DOE Response to Question 9 of Applicant Responses to Questions Set Forth in Commission 811224 Order Re Estimate of Cost of Delay ML20133C7741981-12-0404 December 1981 Discusses Whether Requested Exemption to Allow Site Const in Advance of Environ Impact Analysis Would Significantly Affect Environ Under Nepa.Definition of Significant Discussed ML20065Q3961981-09-0202 September 1981 Advises That Listed Mods Made to Contac & Concept Computer Codes to Improve Usefulness & Accuracy of Concept Code 1986-01-07
[Table view] Category:MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20137N2871986-01-0707 January 1986 Forwards Summary of Review of Monitored Retrievable Storage Conceptual Design Rept.Detailed Investigations Needed to Identify & Define Extent of Solution Cavities in Bedrock Beneath Site ML20138Q9041985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions IA-85-362, Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions1985-02-21021 February 1985 Submits Board Questions Re Identification of Alternate User for Site.Board Will Reschedule Conference Call or Establish New Procedure for Response to Questions ML20127C2941984-11-0707 November 1984 Comments on Applicant 841019 Motion to Dismiss Crbr Proceeding.Differences Between NRC Approved 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan & Doe/Tva/Project Mgt Corp Site Redress Planning Task Force Rept Dtd Jan 1984 Encl ML20140C6121984-06-18018 June 1984 Advises That Time for Commission to Review ALAB-761 Expired. Commission Declined Review.Decision Became Final Agency Action on 840611.Served on 840618 ML20127B5921984-04-30030 April 1984 Submits Proposed Mods to 840305 Crbr Site Redress Plan. Redress Plan Should Be Revised to Reflect Alternative Use If Site Retained.Doe Should Rept Status of Site Prior to Starting Final Filling,Grading & Redress ML20138Q8991984-03-23023 March 1984 Requests That NRC Contact Be Identified & That Ode Be Advised Who Will Be Responsible for Followup Work Re Commission 820817 Memorandum & Order Concerning Site Redress.W/Three Oversize Encls ML20062G8321982-08-0606 August 1982 Clarifies Previous Response to ASLB Inquiries Re Computer Codes Used in Review of Site Suitability,Atmospheric Transport & Diffusion Calculations ML20062H2701982-07-28028 July 1982 Forwards Revised Crbr Rept,Initially Submitted on 820722 ML20062E2281982-07-26026 July 1982 Staff Requirements Memo Re 820721 Affirmation/Discussion Session Approving Order Directing DOE to Respond by 820728 to Allegations in Petition for Investigation,Filed by NRDC on Sierra Club ML20058F7381982-07-26026 July 1982 Notification of 820805 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr PSAR Chapter 9.3, Auxiliary Liquid Metal Sys. Proposed Agenda Encl ML20058E4481982-07-22022 July 1982 Forwards Crbr Plant Rept, Re Request for Authorization to Conduct Site Preparation Activities.Rept Identifies Technical & Policy Issues & Summarizes Background Info & Applicant Position.No Recommendations on Merit Made ML20058E4921982-07-20020 July 1982 Provides Cost Analysis of Crbr Proposal.Applicant Cost of Delay Estimate on Basis of 10% Real Discount Rate Evaluated. Table Depicting Present Worth Analysis of Anticipated Project Expenditures Encl ML20058A8581982-07-16016 July 1982 Notification of 820723 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Probabilistic Risk Assessment Review NUREG-0786, Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable1982-07-13013 July 1982 Summarizes ACRS 267th Meeting on 820708-10 Re NUREG-0786, Site Suitability Rept in Matter of Crbr. Crbr Can Be Designed So as to Present No Greater Risk than Lwr.Proposed Site Suitable ML20054M7621982-07-12012 July 1982 Forwards Commissioner Ahearne Questions for Applicants ML20054N0081982-07-0909 July 1982 Provides Status on NRC Preparation of Assessment of New Info Since Fes Issuance in 1977.NRC Still Evaluating New Info. Decision on Whether Suppl Needed to Be Made Shortly ML20055B2011982-07-0202 July 1982 Forwards Testimony in Facility Proceeding on Contention 6 Re Environ Impact of Fuel Cycle,Per 820623 Request ML20054L4271982-06-30030 June 1982 Notification of 820708 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Crbr Hydrology Review ML20054H7791982-06-22022 June 1982 Forwards Supplemental List of Questions on Steam Generator Design.Conference W/Applicant on Design Suggested ML20054H3931982-06-16016 June 1982 Notification of 820630 & 0701 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054F7331982-06-11011 June 1982 Forwards Site Sutitability Rept Re Site Suitability from Point of Radiological Health & Safety Concerns.Rept Supersedes NRC Mar 1977 Site Suitability Rept,Reflecting Changes in Info.Conclusions Remain Same.W/O Encl ML20055B2881982-06-10010 June 1982 Forwards Proposed Input to Chapter 9 & 10 to Crbr Fes Suppl. Info Reflects Comments Discussed Re Preliminary Draft ML20054E7971982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820622-24 Meetings W/Doe,Util & Project Mgt Corp in Oradell,Nj to Perform Seismic & Structural Engineering Audit of Calculations ML20054E8061982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054G0271982-06-0909 June 1982 Notification of Canceled 820616-17 Meetings W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Smbdb Review ML20054H3341982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. Also Forwards DOE Steam Generator Testing Program.W/O Encl ML20054F2771982-06-0808 June 1982 Notification of 820623 Meeting W/Doe in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Fuel Failure Monitoring Sys ML20054H3371982-06-0808 June 1982 Comments on Gao Final Ltr Rept, Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk. DOE Rebuttal to Rept & Description of Test Program Encl.W/O Encl ML20055B2841982-06-0707 June 1982 Forwards Gao Final Ltr Rept Revising Crbr Steam Generator Testing Program Can Reduce Risk, in Response to Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations,House Committee on Energy & Commerce Request.No Response Required ML20054M7861982-06-0202 June 1982 Notification of 820727 Meeting W/Doe in Madison,Pa to Discuss Chapter 5.5 Topics for Crbr.Agenda Encl ML20055B2901982-05-27027 May 1982 Discusses Proposed Changes to Chapter 11 of Fes Re Cost Estimates.Crbr Offers Least Cost Solution in Meeting Programmatic Objectives of LMFBR Program ML20055B2921982-05-10010 May 1982 Forwards Antitrust & Economic Analysis Branch Input to Accident Impact Section of Captioned Des ML20055B2931982-04-16016 April 1982 Responds to Interrogatories Set 19 Re Const Cost of Crbr ML20055B2941982-01-22022 January 1982 Comments on DOE Response to Question 9 of Applicant Responses to Questions Set Forth in Commission 811224 Order Re Estimate of Cost of Delay ML20133C7741981-12-0404 December 1981 Discusses Whether Requested Exemption to Allow Site Const in Advance of Environ Impact Analysis Would Significantly Affect Environ Under Nepa.Definition of Significant Discussed ML20065Q3961981-09-0202 September 1981 Advises That Listed Mods Made to Contac & Concept Computer Codes to Improve Usefulness & Accuracy of Concept Code 1986-01-07
[Table view] |
Text
- ~h' .
APit a u bo4 Docket No. 50-537 -
HD10RANDUf1 FOR: T. Y,ing, Acting Chief CRBR Program Office FR0t:: - Ronald L. Ballard, Chief Environmental & Hydrologic Engineering Branch, DE
SUBJECT:
REVIBl0FPROPOSEDCLINCHRIVERBREEDERREACTOR(CRBR)
SITE REDRESS PLAN We have reviewed the CRBR site redress plan submitted March 5,1984. We find the proposed course of action generally acceptable but reconmend that DOE consider two modifications.
The proposed action addresses site specific concerns in an acceptable nanner.
- Existing erosion and sediment control facilities will remain in place and will be maintained until the site is completely redressed. Site redress will commence this year on those areas that will not foreclose the option of developing the site for generalized industrial use. The site will be subject to inspection by USEPA for compliance with NPDES pemit requirements.
In granting an exemption for 10 CFP. 50.10 pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12 to initiate site preparation the Connissioners' Memorandum and Order of August 17, 1982 accepted DOE's clain that the site was redressable and therefore the Conmission could grant in part the requested exenption. The redress plan sutmitt6d on March 5,1984 is not identical to the site redress plan provided to the Connission in the DOE Site Preparation Activities Report of June 1932, because all facilities proposed at that time and pemitted (by Ccnmissioners' fienorandir and Order of 8/17/82) have not been completed or even begun. The main differences are: (1) the barge facility and sewage treatment plant were not even started; (2) the area for the quarry was cleared and grubbed but quarrying was never started; and (3) the railroad bed was cleared, grubbed and leveled, but the ballast was not applied.
The two reconnended modifications to the redress plan are: (1) DOE should report to NRC on the status of the site prior to starting the final filling, grading and redress since completion of redress will likely be delayed. The report at that tine should include a schedule for specific final redress of the site, and (2) the redress plan should be revised as appropriate to reflect consideration of alternative use if the site is retained by DOE. If another
[999 d.
b g6 P
=
_. - ...- .. u __ !
r . ,
e T. King T.I ' -
user is not found, the immediate use of the site will be to incorporate it into Oak Ridge's Forestry Management Program. This usage might merit some revision to the redress plans. For example, optimal forestry usage might make it desirable to retain one or more of the sedimentation ponds. These ponds would also be beneficial for wildlife. Additionally, for forestry management objectives, certain areas, such as the craft parking lot, might be of greater potential value if covered with soil to an appropriate depth rather than if left covered with limestone aggregate.
A second visit to the site was made on April 24, 1984 to accompany the intervenor's representative, Dr. Edward E. Clebsch. Also,present on this site visit was Mr. John Wojtowicz, a water quality expert with the State of
~
Tennessee, Mr. George Edgar, lawyer for the applicants, Mr. Peter Gross and Mr. Jerry Wing of the CRBR Project Of fice, and Mr. Paul Leech, NRC. This tour did not result in the identification of a need for a change in the redress plan.
This review was performed by G. LaRoche.
,7 01 :: ~ :- :c yy
.n.._. ... ;31 j'v Ronald L. Ballard, Cnief Environmental & Hydrologic Engineering Branch Division of Engineering cc: S. Turk, ELD W. Johnston R. Samworth G. LaRoche DISTRIBUTION:
Docket Files EHEB Rdg EHEB File RBa11ard I
DE:EHEB./
DE:EHEB rih 5'n GlaRoche:ws RBSamworth RLBallar'ft"
! 4/27/ 84 4/ /84 4/i/84 L