ML20128Q723
| ML20128Q723 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 07/08/1985 |
| From: | Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128Q727 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8507150068 | |
| Download: ML20128Q723 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000454/1985015
Text
Y
.
.
!
JIJL 0 8 885
Docket No. 50-454
Docket No. 50-455
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. T. Ploski and
others of this office on June 10-13, 1985, of activities at the Byron Nuclear
Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating License NPF-23
and Construction Permit CPPR-131 and to the discussion of our findings with
Messrs. R. Querto, G. Wagner, and others of your staff at the conclusion of
the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
'
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
i
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the
course of this inspection.
However, one weakness was identified which will
l
require corrective action by your staff.
This weakness is summarized in the
appendix to this letter.
As required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F),
,
I
any weaknesses that are identified must be corrected.
Accordingly, please
advise us within 45 days of the date of this letter of the corrective action
you have taken or plan to take, showing the estimated date of completion.
The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures
of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act, PL 96-115.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
l
/
of
\\\\
8507150068 850708
ADOCK 05000454
G
pon
__
,
.
..
p
t
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
-JUL 0 8 1985.-~
.
.We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
q>
s
.
-
,
,
C. J Pap fello,7;hief
Emergency Preparedriess and
Radiological Protection Branch
e
,,
i
.
'
'
'
Enclosures:
/
1.
Appendix - Exercise Weakness
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-454/85015(DRSS)
,
'
No. 50-455/85010(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosures:
\\
r
D. L. Farrar, Director
3
of Nuclear Licensing
t
-
V. I. Schlosser, Project Manager
Gunner Sorensen, Site Project
,s
Superintendent
R. E. Queri_o, Plant Manager
DMB/Documen't Control Desk.(RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII Byron
.
,
Resident Inspector, RIII
' ' ':
t
-
Braidwood
3
Phyllis Dunton, Attodiley
'
<
General's-Office, Environmental
Control Division
'
D. W. Cassel, Jr.',E/ SAFE
Esq.
Diane Chavez,.DAAR
-
'
L
W. Paton, ELD
L. Olshan, NRR LPM
i
C-
H. S. Taylor, Quality Assurance
r
Division
'
'
.
E. Chan, ELD
. (
J. Stevens, NRR.,
.
N
.
-
D. Matthews, EFB, OIE
-
Q
.
W. Weaver, FEMA, RV
c-
,
i
'
s
.,
6
'
.,
g.
RIII
RIII
a]
RIII
R I
RII
RI
j
Plo
ld
Patte
n
PN
p
ey
Pap
110
06/25/85
g
7
f y-
i
k
L_t
[
.
. - . . . .
.. .-.
_-
, _ _ _ . - - _ =
.
..
Appendix
EXERCISE WEAKNESS
Performance demonstrated by the offsite environmental monitoring team was' weak
,
as shown by-the following:
inadequate contamination control practices;
!
uncertainty in operating the SAM II; and failure to follow EG-3 in taking
radiation surveys.
(Paragraph 5.e) (454/85015-01 and 455/85010-01)
.
Y
..
,
,
l
t
._
_.
.
_ _ _ _
- . ,
_
_ _ _
_ _ . -
. -. -