ML20128Q542

Notice of Violation from Insp on 910224-0330.Violation Noted:Periodic Surveillance 2-PT-18.61 & PT-53.3 Were Not Performed within TS Period City Requirements

ML20128Q542
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	04/12/1991
From:	Sinkule M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128Q515	List: IR 05000280/1991006 ML20128Q510 ML20128Q542
References
50-280-91-06, 50-280-91-6, 50-281-91-06, 50-281-91-6, NUDOCS 9610210084
Download: ML20128Q542 (16)

Text

. _ _ - - _ __ _ _ -- . _ - - .. _ _ _ -

4 ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Virginia Electric and Power Company Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281 Surry License Nos. DPR-32, DPR-37

! During an NRC inspection conducted on February 24 - March 30, 1991, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1990), the violation is listed below: ,

1 i

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI and the licensee'a Quality Assurance 4 Program (VEP 1-SA, Section 17.2.16) coliectively state, in part, that measures shall be established to ensure that conditions adverse to '

quality are preptly identified and corrected and that, in the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall assure that ,

the corrective action taken precludes repetition. I Contrary to the above, the corrective actions implemented throughout 1990 to preclude repetition of untimely periodic surveillance performances were inadequate, in that, in March 1991, two additional periodic surveil-lances, 2-PT-18.61 and PT 53.3, were identified as not performed within  ;

the Technical Specification periodicity requirements. l This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

1 Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Virginia Electric and Power l company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and if applicable, a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include:

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for oisputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such.other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time, l FOR THE NUCLEAR REGU ATORY COMMISSION (DuML fj 9610210084 910412 Marvin V. Sinkule, Chief PDR ADOCK 05000200 Reactor Projects Branch 2 G PDR Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 12th day of April 1991 i l

2 l