ML20128P258

Discusses Allegation by Util Employee Re Util Personnel Records.Portions Deleted.Supporting Documentation Encl

ML20128P258
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	09/10/1984
From:	Powers D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20128P190	List: IA-84-723, Discusses Allegation by Util Employee Re Util Personnel Records.Portions Deleted.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20128P183 ML20128P198 ML20128P220 ML20128P241 ML20128P258
References
FOIA-84-723 NUDOCS 8507130234
Download: ML20128P258 (35)

Text

_ _ _ - _ . . . _ _ - . - -. . . . _ _ - _ .

~

• • • • % wwrito sTAvis NUCLEAR REQULATCRY COMMIESION l

)

I N ,REON W IV t eH RYAN MAZA DRM.SUfft 500 I. N ,,,,, anunatow.vtxas mm i September l'0,1984 l

l MEMORANDUM FOR: File ~ ~ c.. ,

FROM:

Dale A. Powers, Acting Enf6rcement Officer  ;

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION ~0N KG&E PERSONNEL RECORDS (R4-84-A-85) .

l an employee of Kansas Gas & Electric On August 30,1984, (KG&E), verbally su Witted an allegation to James Kelly who I

sensitive portions of the security plan and methodology used to implement and record such activity.Malleged to the inspector (Kelly) that certain practices by the department head were irregular, in violation.

l illegal, or unethical. These practices related to alterations of applica-tions filed, investigation reports est results, and other personnel t tion. provided unlisted home telephone number

('

I and names of people sted below) who could verifyg legation.

t Contacts for Verification of Allegation

~~

. 5 kelL 0. W

~n Dale A. Powers

'. J Acting Enforcement Officer

," *w S. '

( -

kok71/8y34850429 VARRICCB4-723 pyg , 1

< b e ..

I o, .-

AUDIT stuoutsteuerrS MD FREQUENCY PWmtIX Page 5 Nuclear Dept. Policy Est. No. of rechnical Spec. Manual Atdit Audits steguired OPM-18 OAP W18.1 Estirmated 19 CFR 50 Wdit Frequency Frequency Audits Scheduling to Cover All App. B 6 12 NLuber of Essential 24 6 12 24 6 12 24 6 12 24 Essential Criteria nio. mo. ino, no. mo. mo. mo. me, Elements /

Ino. mo. mo. mo. Elements Attributes Attributes (2 yrs)  %

i "Nch. Specs. & -

X A X X Licensee Conditions Adherence Non-Category I Special A X A X Selmaic Scope D-Aucpnented Special A X Scope A X Process Control -

X A Program A A 1

Per IGC Direction 3 ICGEE QA 2 X - Designated 'requency BE 04, Systens Ehgineer, FP Engineer 4 DE QA, Systems Ehgineer, Outside FP Consultant A - No Specific Frequency Noted o - Independent Agency maammerou F

f

ALDIT HERJIIGHBfrS AIO FHIQURCY ORTRIX Page 4 Nuclear Dept. Policy Est. No. of Nchnical Spec. Manual Audit Audits Required QPM-18 QAP W18.1 Estimated 19 CFR 50 kdit Frequency Frequency Aidits Scheduling to Cover All A[p. B p 12 24 5 Ntaber of Essential 12 24 6 12 24 6 12 24 Essential Criteria mo. me, mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo.

Elements /

nio. mo. mo. mo. Elements Attributes Attributes (2 yrs) Ceaunents Requirenents for -

X X X X 6 21 the Onsite Op. 2 Organization Resp. & Auth. I X X X X 2 6 2 of Ops Personnel Review Activities - X -X X X 3 of Onsite Ops 6 2 Organization Rules of Practia II X X X X 3 9 2 Security ard Special X X A X 4 29

'Vicitor Control Scope 2 Special PAaclear VIII A A A a 19 59 Materials Control 4

& Accountability Special IX X X X X 4 Processes 33 2 Surveillance X and XI X X X X Testing ard 5 23 2 Inspection Test Control XI X X X X 3 39 2 1

2 Per NRC Direction 3 KGEE OA MGEE OA, Systems Engineer, FP Digineer 4 X - Designated Frequency KG&E OA, Systems Engineer, Outside FP Cbnsultant A - No Specific Frequency Noted o - Independent Agency l

e f

MX)IT IIIEUIlusegrrs Ass) FREQUIgCY m11ttX Page 3 Nuclear Est. No. of Dept. Policy Aurlits Required nehnical Spec. Manual Audit QPM-18 QAP W18.1 Estimated 19 GR 59 kulit Prequency Frequency to Cover All Audits Schaduling Ntnber of Essrmtial Arp. B 6 12 24 6 12 24 6 12 24 6 12 24 Essential Criteria mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo.

Elonents/

Inc. mo. ma. mo. mo. Elanents Attributes Attributes (2 yrs) Cbnuments Operating Orders II, V, VI X X X X 3 29

- Special Orders 2 ard Tenp.

Procedures Organization I X X X X 4*

• 3 Procedure & V & VI X X- X X 2 19 2 Instruction Preparation Procedure Review V & VI X X X X 7 18 Approval & 2 Control Procurement IV X X X X 15 I 17 2 -

Docunent Control .

r - ,, s...

Program I & II X X X Description X 2* 6

• Purchased Mat'l VII X X X Equipment & X 4 13 2 Serv. Control Radiation Special X X Protection A X 5 21 2 Inconsistant Req'd.

Scope o Audit Frequency Records XVII X X X X 14 62 2 Management 1 Per NRC Direction 3 KG&E OA 2

MG&E QA, Systens Engineer, FP Ehgineer 4 X - Designated Frequency KG&E OA, Systens FW1inent, Outside FP Consultant A - No Specific Frequency Noted o - Independent Agency l

f

MDIT REQUINNSWrS MO FREQUndCY MuitIX Page 2 Nuclear l Est. No. of Dept. Eblicy rechnical Spec. Maaual Atdit QPM-18 Atdits Required 19 CFR 50 udit Frequency Prequency QAP W18.1 Estimated Agp. B Audits Sc M uling to Cover All

~6 12 24 6 12 24 6 Ntsnber of Essential 12 24 6 12 Criteria mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo.

24 Essential Elenents/

mo. mo. me. mo. mo. Els euts Housekeeping &

Attributes Attributes (2 yrs) Caraments XIII X Cleanliness X X X 3 6 Control 2 Identification VIII X

& Control of X X X 3 8 Mat'1, Parts 2

& Canponents Indoctrination II X

& Trainirrj 6 X X 3 18 4 Should revise Proj.

Policy Manual Sec.

Inspection X III-18 X X X X 3 18 4 Maintenan XIV & V X X X X 5 20 Measuring & 2 XII X Test Equipment X X X 4 13 2

--- m es u Modifications III X X X X 11 91 kmconforming 4 XV X Itens X X X 6 24 4 Offaite Dose C-Iculation Man. - X A A A Essential Element 1

of the Radiation Per NRC Direction 3 Proteieilon Program 2 KG&E 04 KG&E QA, Systens Engineer, FP Engineer 4 EEE QA, Systems Engineer, Outside FP Consultant X - Designated Prequency A - No Specific Frequency Noted o - Irdependent Agency

. . . - - . -- ~~

~

f

ALDIT RRQUIIUDWINFS AM) FRRQUENCY MuitIX Page 1 Nuclear Dept. Policy f:st. No. of rechnical Spec. Manual Atdit Atalits Required QPM-18 QAP W18.1 Estimated 19 CFR 50 Mdit Frequency Frequency Audits Scheduling to Cover All Asp. B 6 12 24 - 6 12 24 6 12 Ntaber of Essential 24 6 12 24 Essentia' Criteria. mo. mo. no. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. mo. Elements Elements /

Attributes Attributes (2 yrs) Cbaunents Assignment of I X X X Authority and X 3* 9 1 *To be performed Responsibility in Cbnjunction with other noted atdits.

Chenical - a a Radiochenical a a 3 15 2 control Corrective XVI X X X X Action 4 14 4 Emergency Special X o Procedures X A X 19 24 2 Scope Enviromental Special X XI a Monitorirg a 6 16 2 Equipment XIV X X X X 3 Control 11 2 Fire Special -- X X2 a X3 Protection Scope X 16 79 4 X4 (36 ATEDC e e@-URO U Mo.)

Handling, XIII X X X Storage & X 6 21 2 Shipping 1

Per NRC Direction 3 nE QA 2

G E QA, Systens Engineer, FP Engineer 4 X - Designated Frequency GE QA, Systerns Engineer, Outside FP Consultant 6 - No Specific Frequency Noted o - Independent Agency F

f

. .. . . a , . u .. .Z _ . .'.2.. ._ . . . , , . . . , , . -

l fm- ) ~

0-

• CHAPIER 14 - SECURITY AUDITS 14.1 PROGRAM AUDITS ,

Review and audit of this plan and implementing procedures will be the responsibility of the Quality Division. An audit will be conducted at l

' least once every 12 calendar months (reference definitions) and a written report of the audit prepared.

The _ audit function will include, but not be limited to: Review of records to determine completeness and accuracy, interviews with security organization personnel, a check of hardware operability and simulation of security contingencies. The audit report shall be sent to the Plant Manager. The 011ef of Security will be responsible for correcting any noted deficiencies.

4 Results of simulated or actual security contingencies that have been '

documented between a current audit and the previous audit can satisfy the security contingency simulation requirement.

i-(.

14-1 Rev . 3 8*R M - -

WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION ~~

UNE.SCORTED ACCESS.. AUTHORIZATION. FORM 1# PAYROLL NAME

..+ '  : 2. 500..SEC. NUMBER s

. e i:- ~~ 'i.lli

~)

'E'

~ .-

LAST FIR $i HIDDLI- .

~~

3. DATE Of BIRTH .. 4. HOME P_ HONE . NUMBER '

- 5. WORK Ph0NE NUMBER Ell,-

/ / - , ,,

)

" * ~ ~

gNO DAY YR --

6. STREET 7. CITY /iOWN -- 8. STATE 9. IIP CODE

10. COMPANY NAME 11. POSIIION-illLE/CRAIT

12. STREET 13. CITY /iOWN 14. STATE 15. ZIP CODE 16t' UNESCORTED ACCESS REQUESTED 17. AUTHORIZED ESCORT Y E S [] N O []

rROM

/ / 10

/ / V I '- Y E 8 [1 "0 [3

_. "M0 DAY YR M0 DAY YR RADIATION HAZARD Y E S {] NO[]

18. AREAS 10.WHICH ACCESS IS REQUESTED ZONE .. C~',CtIPTION YES NO ZONE , DESCRIPTION - YES NO-1 E n t ra'nie ~[ Exit Turnstiles 7 Aur. Bulloino --

2 Control Buildine ' ~

8 Fuel Buildino -

3 Cable Soriadine Roois -- 9 Warehou_se-Gate 10 _ _ _ . ,

4 Computer Room 10 CAS

~'

5 Control Room 11 SAS. Security Buildino 6 ESWS Pumphouse 12 Gates 3.588

• • Includes Communications Corrider, Die sel Generator Rooms, Auxiliary Feed Pump Rooms & RWS1

19. REQUESIING OFFICAL 20. EATE 21. SIGNATURE 22. EX I.

/ /

M0 DAY YR 23 24. DATE 25. SIGNATURE 26. EXI.

PLANT MNG/ DESIGNEE M0 DAY YR

27. COMMENTS FOR ASC/SAS USE ONLY

\EFIFICATION Of UhESCORTED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS PEF SEC 01-204

!.0. h0. EAEGE ISSUED BACKDROP COLOR DDT COLOR EIEGE h0. BADGE COLOR STRAP COLOR MC LAY YR IhIllAL EXPIRATI0h DATE / / TIME ZONE 1 THRU 15 M0 DAY YR IMFL1 TO ACS COMPUTER SENT TO SAS OPERATOR SIGhATURE

/ / / /

M0 DAY YF M0 DAY YR IMFUI 10 SECURITY COMPUTER OPERATOR SIGNATURE

/ /

M0 DAY YR ICRMINATION BADGE FEIRIEVED

/ / / /

M0 DAY YR IIME M0 DAY YR IIME DELETED FROM SECURITY COMPUTER OPERATORS SIGhAIURE

/ /

M0 DAY YR DELETED FROM ASC COMPUTER OPERATORS SIGNATURE

[h- 2)

M0 DAY YR N BG8-r-@11 _

2RR_st-Rah.__ __

t

, '. *^

- *- .iL..D. . 8.iU

. -.. L j Ml v.)

I KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY WICHITA KANSAS 67201 DATE *pril

. i/, l'+. 4

'/ 1 1 3 r.

,G pC h[ vkiplemer.-47 (ea *r -r Corportit s ti's -

i p .* '. * #i.f Teucr , $ui t. 8. 'It { ;:n #

[$ '

A *.b" %uth c..irnett lulss, W f4146 io 0o6 i SHIP TO: geo ; ; ,.1,., . .

@e; M

i43. __ ==.,. _ --- -

- a ar_-  :.. . _ _ _ . . . _ - - - . .---.:..=---____. - - . _ - - - .

8 RAAitfu AL Coot ho 955ut t

inis sup,ilm ent purc Dese oror i s 1 sserr1 t.i l icnr por at e t N- t'ol l r>. i n 3 rer.o i r +. ent s i n t o t h.- (,r:19i s e l ;.urct.,:s z or.:.*r twbr n l .4r- (?;ct .ill allow c.r:ntract r;r ;.ersonnr:I uerscort M ac t.r'st to the WIf Creet f.en.* retin.; Stet 100 ( FLT5 ) . .

A previousl,y on;>lt tod acc4 s scr+-enier;. r aj h.: c c e,; r ab l e inr srantin.; ur.i:scortxd acc ss. For ti.M t ai acct. di tt.. i.ack;rotM inv stiptir n trut jo., in v c .il r any

, a cir'cuctN , i t thA t ras.'t o u t2 re r;91re sent.s unicle i.re as folices:

! i

1. A ; s., ct. ele ;1c > i . v e l o st l wi or .,

• it na tion by a l ic e , soc psy < n w r nt .

psy c hqi u.,i s'. , i.r ; mys i'c i,oi. I!ns e ey t t- .a v .

• 1 f I t.- g rsen E*'- .i (nr.tinuous years lef tr.n r, with yhur c'..^pany vi.i a chec e of e . ploy +nt racer.w n rl i. s that Ienar.

I vas f unrable.

! l

7. f. tiJe g.jr c oi- ir wost19 Nt ien contiuc te1 by pen < or r)th2r -scaris that includes iiotirnqnt.mt icri at ; j

a. . Ihr e - yMrt pra w inus '.'rplDy"ent bl e;t.ory

o. it.r i y.ars educ tlon check in inclu*e nl6t.V level ri ark"R ~

,c. l'ireo y. .irjot.atj rrintoal recorcs f ar all'~1ist< t 'i s r;c t i e s i n a re t t ia b l - -..'r.n r'.~ j

l. i I

.... l 1

.s

,F.O.B. Po".1 m u u.ht

• "L'.'

""."t ! Ar.I, retrav 1" Atit 10 vous "i ^ L

.r. . Ouc t l l R *.*.S . r,I 1 i O 2- 6' O 1 .

s o: .o s..n er... . , ei ma ,, . , i O( 51 t'4 7.i tO . W A K i ni .L.*. i f t:( t u.1 A t t i t..i i . l, l

- j l

H EON. NUP.* BE R a ., p >

. . ' RECEIVED BY _, j CHARGE TO 7)g gy g ,,,g y , g IN DBY h APPROvfD'iW ' ,1 O N) J i'

. Vi11 t ern/.r ,, , g.y j -  ;

INTENDED USE . _ _ .' . . ,...-.. '"*' -.. - - 1 cf : 4 e 1.t s t ;Me *e- f rir .7 t ' s

[ 9.a oioW.Tain_

nr' e

. ' . ' ' c-r6 n7 . e l rt s.<t priafars to j c<nm::v ed .: her t grounr: i n .< c st i sju t c.n e.n t 'il s c ;, lop , i;( t. 5 that cys'nt t h.-

cois urt tnet r titc k g ro.sn'.? inve st i. jet ion ar< psytr.t.ingica l ev,il tnit ion. In 5.U.S .* c c e u Sr.r-enin<j Coe.. ret t'ieter u t i l ;irov ic.' 3 no w l .ti tt.e rircessarf 'n rr' s AN instruttfons ter compla. ting tiirm.

All y:>rsth r.s or cor respor. tenca crrnc:>rning .it. i trein.t scrar :iing of your si. cole te . , r'e res.M to Beti a, ploy.:cs

arner, ricress $r recnic;, '*nceriinetor, r.e.o .v., ras *.

Electric b pe y, l'ol f Crc ok 'irnarating Stat ion , P. ', N A'9, r. r l i n,) ter. , r 'i Sr.t g ,

19.. cortr-< tor sNil ss,Mi r t hr Scrc ning pr.,ce:%ra tn lern,n ras

• Llactric Crepen),'O rali f .ii:.arence Pig.srtrwr.t. P.P. Boy ?ii., Micriit3 K ', *: 7 M i , eitto:

I: ..) . F.n. t c r ,n i or t o ir.,;il nent.ation for revie.o o n'.'

P.r .

o j.,ir ov .. l .

Tii.:- r.nnt r.e tur si,.01 rh i s P. .' . ':n B ',t  : ii.t. i t e , t '.

. r.r.es tes s E i . c t r i c Ca ,urtj , rurc'i4s ir g i <,,ar in n:,

6 N 1,.'.tto: .

• r . s t ' 'A virec t s > f any r.n s t i. plication of *lm cree.

19voit a to  !>.. ea t ro b st'J F.

Fall 8 0 % %Ilred:

rr.'.E/ k.cr s1.

1.ni t l.r . . li I.. i.: rat ing stet t asi i Po, c n.i .i r.,; t i. , . r .

t F.t:. O m Mi:

, kir'iit a , !.5 61;'01 $

1 i'"r C& li 'i l +1 r : p.n. g, ;rcto pg $ 3(s., g;, ,,,y 1 :W tri. l.H,8W';g* 1 - Jr.C.G r. J.F.s Y/i st!E V'!!H/Ff;:'M.51 Wr:Mtr%.

I i I' l l r.c : F a n? 5.i11 '.

} }

i Jacob Cli. rr) .

i l t.tn .:oM wn tM IMter

. l f e..ri e t, t t'ae..L.*.

kg h

"-':=='=-=* E

=-,=,mn___.

_ _ _ _--------.-c_at-

-..a- .

.m_ ,

• = e > ._ . _ . . # .. i r ... .

8 .

. .s eoem sin asy. i.c7 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE To Memo for record FMM Acccss Screening Coordinator Daft. 7-18-84 susJ act. Psychological Results The below listed employee has successfully completed a Psychological Evaluation, results of which are acceptable. The Profile _ Summary _ Sheet is maintained by the Human Resources Department, and has been reviewed by the Access Screening Coordinator.

6 s

(

d ',

s j /' / / d ,- 1

($ 6 \

\

' ' / /. I f {

Q a l /- Bobb L1geo T. Garner I (b c~ ' 5

- { C//./ cess _ Screening Coordinator ,

't)1( O [ ' c) { '

\ IP Q~Ccf

. - y - -- . / f;

. f' _ _ _ _

~-

JlL .c c 5 /

SDL- c~ O fp O T $ -

a\

f p f' .

'f D o 1

EyMT+'c t 8 . O C W '~

Gjf M kjf -

v'e CO T uj^ 'n' N% 5

} I,gh i

> i , bt <c c) Yp Q C 9 7 Iu 'c c p -. v.r -g,, , i t' $( l f '.).-

l < - - - - -

. _ . .. e

-. ~ _ _,,

Osu becera %lxs%

% ditch &mcc cf bA . ewapyD  :

Hg ,

' a.nu

~

SEIRITY & VISI'RR GEmu, O ^

d'V ANSI N18.7 -1976, Paragraph 5.2.9 Special Scope g 10CFR73, 10CFR50.54, 10CFR70 /

Audit Frequency: Annual (12 rno.)

ESSDirIAL EIHe7FS/ATTRIBITTES

1. Security Plan A. Background secticn

1. Perceived Dangers ,

2. General Policy on handlir 3 perceived dangers.

3. Scope

4. Definitions B. Planning Base (Generic)

1. Initiation and Termination of a contingency.

2. Decisions affecting the contirx3ency.

3. Identification of signals for contingencies.

4. Objective to be achieved.

C. Licensee Planning Base

1. Site specific factors ,

2. Chain of comand

! 3. Physical layout

4. Iccal law enforcement entry routes

5. Coordination points

6. Modes of transportation

7. Iccal law enforement agencies

8. Corporate policy

9. Jurisdictional boundaries

10. Logistics (equipment)

D. Responsibility Matrix E. Procedures

1. Canpatability to the Responsibility Matrix

2. Detail of instruction l

l 2. Personnel A. Qualifications for Dnployment Rev. 0

- Date 8/01/84

/4-7

N & VISI'IGt GEBE.

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS / ATTRIBUTES

1. Physical Examination

2. Psychological Stability

3. Re-examination annually B. Trainirg

1. Per the Security Plan

2. Weapons

3. Use of deadly force

4. Physical ability

5. Iocal law enforcement C. Records

3. Access A. Procedure for plant workers

1. Picture Badges

2. Card Feaders

3. Authorization list B. Visitor Control

1. Escorted access

2. Unescorted access C. Emergency Situations

1. Badge removed fran the protected area durire an energency.

2. Emergency vehicle access D. lock and Key Control.

E. Records.

4. Desian A. Power Supply in the event of power loss B. Fences and Barriers Rev. 0 g

Date 8/01/84 Page 2 of 3

s

-e ,

SWETEUTY & VIS11tR QNHEI, I

ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS / ATTRIBUTES C. Lightirq D. Bullet Proofirg E. Testing ard Maintenance F. Detection Devices

1. Micrtwave

2. Cameras

3. Intrusion Alanns G. Records 1

i i

i d e 8/01/84 Page 3 of 3

s ,.

s -

r.r vo w e.nuo t

- .', $9 8 1 ,t i KG&E/KCP&L PURCHASE REQUISITION I .

Wolf Creek Generating Station

• P. G. Box 309 '

Ship Te MMIM(Street ES-and City) , Kansas Date. Aunust 6 = ig 814 Ship Via-Sectrity Intended Use - Date Required

.O Nuclear O. A. Approval Required

' KGE LEAVE BLANK FOR PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ou.nm, o, I,.*n't,d u~i u ~.t G.ive

. EowCo,mplete ment. s. .De1,,

criptio.n.

. C.at.lo0.ue s.. t ~ ov tNo . E.tce.

.t.... . inc...n Orderae.v..

6ng Rep.it P rt. Ca. roe f Code No. tion Sent to Conferm V.rts.1 or Oth.r Order i. To se so worded. To o,,,,

H.nd unit g**** ,tice vend 0, o, puren..e 7520 21U)0

'Ihis requisition is issued to provide the emleyees 325.203 bactwrcurd investigation services for the Sectrity .

Departnent of the Wolf Q cek Cenerating Station for crie veer non August 1. 19814 throuch August 1. 1985. 'Ihe -

bnclwmmi reomt includes the fbliowing:

KG&E &g,lelyces:

Past five venrs enplovnmt coverage.

Obtain m11m trnnmrints i.hm hiah nnhm1 in the hinh Invoice Rauting to:

eqt level of education attained. sectre a copy of the Dee Snith /

N7IE: ' Itis PR replaces hinh school transcriot. contact trade schmls he the Jacob 01erry FR #39 W due to be: nR tvna nf_srhnni inriicate a ritract relatien+1n tn cirrent lost in 2.ignattre pecess .

iob reauirenents. If the aoolicant is not a hish school I cc: Duane Snith, John Johnson,5 W%hiifr Issued by _

f _ % riste 19 Approved Date ,19 Apprcy _, Y Date ~~ I---,19 - P Y

- Approved Date 19 ApprevId Date / 19 I ,Y .To be MRR'D by-Appr ved Date ,19 P.O. Coples to:.

. .i4 i. -

T N

E I

R 4 T R

A P

f E e e

D v C_ r G s i

t i

s N a p

,o S I

e i i

A d h as 2 e t s H s C e o u f I i u

3 g R d s t U a i a N P P . l

. R V e t se e r

i R O c F f n t c

. i e e K r r P N r f e i A f o e d L r a B d e l a s E k V r n t e

A o . o a E w 8 i L e 1 t c c y 1 i d

l f 1 P

i r r o n .

m = . i e

g t

n g .

m i r i i

y e f<

i c i n

I' t h s e

l p

i a

i t p r r T A8' T r o r a t E C t

c t u o w e E e k s o e H s c r S e a l k Mr h t a T t c o e s

e i t N ts-e r s t r g

o n y M a i c a o r Pq u a l i a E r e t

n r o t t L aiR o e w i i F p end c t s o

l F Ree s y p p ir U vd a o t

S aGo n

i r & d l i f

n eW y e v i eB 0 v vr N d o t 9 e g r O r sS i o rr Oy d s I ae d a t T nwB e ) c n I e.ao l i t v s r

n n e S tctT u i e

i u m I Eui s s a l k s f. y U .M r n s e o 2 o e o a c e l p

!R B Nod e NO

1. i t

h hc r

u o

i r

r m

e ul g a e r a t n s t 4 r a s d E lo n et h t c d p r n S taso d e i n o a a A a dr l a l e s H Cno e p e y e

C

.al n a t p s v c R oipr eb a a e e e v n t v d e U tp ye s e i i d

P nTV h t d f e em .

e t a n i s

s ezr t l a n e osfn i i a n e i d

r o r o r t h e te ,, C i p

i t e r c

t i v d le ,, o p, a d p w e e m,t u c u e i h

t s

o,tn p o l r f c i C ,, S e p l c x e i

y a l eg a h e h d r v

i,o n

e c ( t e o l e

l

_ G ,, t i h a n t s v l

a t e de i n i l

n e i

n t d t h l r 2 s a i e b o

- to s h d v t o t n

t s

f nN i s o a c e e e e 8 e. d r r h n

o r

o p i d

b r y g MiaW u s n o i i

t si r

ui e

c e

r e

c i

)

s d

i h

n 1

=

a h

d e M Et i

, t r u s u l Gn u r u s l o

r Ku ,, f n b c f l d u m l

' e a r . o i r

r c c ) i i r e t i c s v i s D i l g e ( o r l

p f a E d o r s e c

'[o "iote hc G e r i m a- l t e y k t

y nnnr e c m u s i s

i si t e n o t n

- I' . A UPu d

- e r o n

c l p r e K u

f o

i v l c g i v

u r e d x o e

. b a 7 e b D r p t e r e u l ty t u

l e a s q r e a n

r a

s tni dnn ,

t i

a m r y e r

e e r o e

- n. A, aoa t e i t

v a

o c i t

d e r t

c h i y

,* ou H a b

e k k k d

ir a

t.

b j

o a

r t

t a m

_ r ,

Wa i s

x c

e o l n s m r TzWoo r h r n h r i o C o

P a d E

h t g a C O C p M t 1

o T N N

E 0

t 4 T R

A P

f E 7

1 c D 8 G 9

3 N I

S 3

A H

C e o

3 g R e U a N P P e e R V R O F

. K P N A

L B

E V

A E

L e 6c r

P ge r o T aT h

E C E

H S y y T

N s-4 t

rs y

-- n w

u M ai u Pq - n c i G E t e , t c

L asR -

t a i r p h t r e nd ". n g S tp t

r Ree i g c u vd e r w c L n e e S 0Go t i r & i 1 D l mr eS eW a n t t 0 g E N d o i c r e

a 2 n & 9 O r sS Oy d e r 7 0

I ae l w e 6 i s s n r E o n 3 Ce T iwB x P e a x I , lao O & G 8 t o

S tctT y 0 S c r B I Euis s

g s t k 2 K u

U o e.Mr n t G a i C

e e x o a P a- .

!Q i -

n i

Nod r ' s s s Q B t u O.

R e NO e m a a i  : K P e n i

ut giea r r L s s f . h E c r n n a

l o O.

c t t  :

tor et h a a i o

S laSO a dr S

e K K W P W A t

A Cno s D H s y n  : r C

.al n a e a o y o e R epreb c u t t v o

U t p ye c i i

iTv A v- t a t c P e r, n r

c s em n t

S e e e sit r. h 9 s t DSn .o t

c g 3 4 e u

-v tetC y i n 8 6 b e n b r i - r lpmt eo t t 6 o e mpt d c a r

r e t s oin e e e n ue t e r C qS eE n s

e D n e C r a r e w

e ro u & G 9 I

C a d n

Gfoit q s

0 i, b o u e

r r k 3 u o c t G w x t B i n

e o g n

t a e la b s O B t s i

a f i  :

n r

e l s . l m e ta' . l n a

l o O.

r u

t t =

b M" s e

i w K W P B A o t

m s  %

n o s

, o h i Et Gn i

s i ta t t e

KU g, fe 1  :

g dL 4 i

e g i 1 e o v

s d n t s

1 n t n

yt a e i e o a i h t s

l d v c

'nnnrioic i n n e i l h P l a i b p c N' e A U u f h o u a e

O e 4 d e t -x t h r c u e i n f o

. ty t p r s 1, in nn t d e w a s y p

n ,, aOa f r l c s e o u H o n a t c c

- ,, O i r ,

, k a a b r o v e is p w 2 l

e n h TEMoo t Q Q l

A R I C

< . l

1 5 MATERIAUSERVICE REQUISmON CONTINUATION SHEET

' {

,; WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION MR (PR) No. ,

Description:

Provide complete Irdormatkm (e.g. Pari No.. Charge Space for men cuen. umt or n asensi Wanted Pwome Code No. Catalog No., etc.) Spoofy all Todmical requirements Account Storeroom Use No.

Reports are no be mailed to: Kansas Gas & Electric Company

! Wolf Creek Generating Station i P.O. Box 309 Burlington, Ks. 66839 l Attn: Bob Garner-Security Department Invoices in iupli cate with dc cumentation are to be sent to : Kansas Gas & Electric Company I Kansas City Power & Light Company Wolf Creek Generating Station P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Ks 67201 i Attn: Purchasing Dept.

I One copy of each invol'ce is 1 0 be sent under separate cover to: Kansas Gas & Electric Company

! P.O. Box 309 Burlington Ks. 66839 Attn: Bob Garner-Security Dept.

t Not 3: Documentation o'f expenses should include the total number hours spent on each investigation.

Hourl y investigation expense fee $28.75 per hour.

Note: This arder will cance: and supersede Purchase Order 26075.

Ref : Equifax resxrise_ to KG8E bid request WC 04017CC9-12.

f i

( OUR COPIES ONLY: BobfGarner . please approve the invoices you receive from Equifax and send to KG8E Purct asing Department forl processing.

j Aoue m enov.e

- -.- - - . - . - - - - .-~ - . - - . _ - - . . - . - . _ . - . . . - . .- -

j' .

8 .

'.. MATERIAUSERVICE REQUISITION CONTINUATION SNEET WOLF CREEK CENERATING STATION t

i p

MR (M No.

4 j nem um or usaew

Description:

Provide complete informeelen (e.g., Fart'No., charge .Spoos tar Quan. .,

Account Storeroom Ues <

i. No. Womed Pwease Code No. Catalog No., etc.) Spoofy as Technical requirements i Cht:k county crirninal court records at each location the applicant has lived 90 days or more back to age 18.

I lChe

k three )ersc SI J -

rdferenc es provided (exclude relatives and co-workers) develop two logical sources for addit.ional trences. If 1 he thfee provided are not logical, so indicate in the report and develop sources in a good posi".lon lref (now appl l

{ to leani ..

l IMil ltary ser / ices record shot Id be obtained if within five years time frame or if military servlee traini ng indicates ad irect rel itior. ship to job requirements.

I Con tractor Emolovee(s):

Pas :. three y-rars previdus employment history. 's I  !

Edu':ational :hech to include highest level achieved.

Three year c )unty crimi.nal re cords for all listed residences and employments.

4 i Che.:k of three li sted referer ces.

i i Cus Lom repor :. har dling.

4 l

All backgrou 1d ir vestigations will be requested by the Access Screening Coordinator.

t

!i l' i 1 A m o a nov.s , ,

k MA RIAIJSERVICE REQUISITION WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION ,

ROUTG TO: 1.E I^"M 2. Mer'f W

3. N b e/ 4. MR (PR) #

Security Security SYSTEM / EQUIP. DESIGNATOR

' INTENDED USE DATE MATERIAL REQUIRED N/A PROCUREMENT LEVEL O SAFETY RELATED Q NON-SAFETY RELATED O ASME Ill O ASME XI O WESTINGHOUSE PROCUREMENT N/A O SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION O SPECIAL SCOPE O RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL O CHEMISTRY MATERIAL O HP/ CHEMISTRY INI O SPARE PART C STORAGE WAREHOUSE ONLY O REPLACEMENT N/A OF USED SPARES (WAREHOUSE USE ONLY)

ENVIR,0NMENTAL OUALIFICATIONS O HARSH O MILD @ NONE O CONSUMABLES O REPAIR PART(WORK REQUEST NO.)

Description:

Provide complete information (e.g., Part No., Charge Space for nem ouart unn or ua*ertar Account Storeroom Use No. Warted Pweau Code No. Catalog No., etc.) Spoofy all Tedinical requirements This order is issued to provide the employees background investigation services for the Security Departmer t of the Wolf -

the Creek Generat ino Station for one year from August 1, 1984 through August 1. 1985. The backaround report includes foll owing:

7520 KG&E Employees:

22000 325.203 Past five yeaf_s_ employment coverage.

Obtain collece transcripts, when high school is the hiahest level of educati-on attained. secure a copy :of the hia l school transcript, contact trade schools where the type of school indicates a direct relationshio to current iob reautrenients.

If the applicant : snotahickschoolgraduate,provideGEDinformationfromtheacDroDriatestateeducation authority or cantact the security company worked for if it is used as a substitute.

Check available credit bureau records.

Should this be purchased from original supplier? No preference Yes No _

Supplier Original Spec. No. P.O. No.

SpecialInstructions & Remarks Requested by b ~

(Requestor) Date 7)J7/19' Approved by #.# h _ ~~ 1 (Sect. Supt) Date 7 IT /-P W Engr Review - . ' '

/ AM (Results Eng) Date OA Review bD -

-- , 16 ?7 4fer 7///--rf (OA) Dato Aou-os.oss nw. 8 -) ,

T N

• N' C

A R .

T r 4

R x A x P t r E r

7 c D e p

G N 5 I 7 S

4 A 8 .

H 2 g e $ r C o f g R e =

U a n

e P P .

f cs

• R v e s

O n p F e p

' r K x o

' N e f A n t L

B e n e

i E t m t-V  ?

A i t

E L .

c,.

s e

v p

i n g r

f y .

=

i b:

t r g n t

a n u

.r To e H P P a m E c t

. E E

p n &

H c G i f S E m ta g o T y t i t

M ts r i t s

t n

M o. r t e e E Pr aa.v c v s L 9 e n d P p . . 3 S i n

.a 8 P R . a. 6 - h a U g .v or 6 =

c a x S nGo e e a n r N es.w s i n i O d.so r K G

= o u q

I O .v e , t E T a., io s b n n I m o e p r S B I

c, E .ti i.

t s s h t

U o.u r

. i r

s Q Noo l t

n r u ,

w e5

.,o Nr r t o i

t R a u ,

g,,. A h e i

. c E o ,,n r 5 e S l.3o i

e 7 T r

_ A t. b n (

u H C ,,or 6 o

C

.,i u 2 y n ,o. r

_ R U

P to,e pyr i

rirv l

a d r

e 2 1

s e

cs ,, m t n 9

- c e ,r.

o O C i

o t

Ds,en e 0 v n

. ,, Co e s 7 i

t h u 1

_ e ,, . t 0 e

l p

m ,,i, e d 4 0 h a

_ o,.

C o,3 i

z P l

C t

.g, I t

W e v

v, c e G,,,,,

e n t s v W

i

_ e t

r p

c l g e

a

o

.N uo w t r e h s s

_ ino. s d d

i m uo n b 1 p

c m a E y 1 & ,

s e  ; -

E: , p  :

x K t

e x r n GMun 0' ,,, e a o r a

F c t 3

o

. l x b s l e e n i o

- 'O, o iet n i

c w B onr

_ > I' . t u u P f

t t

a d r

e @

i Y o r a o x

• r s f a  %

- r t c i i S

.*3

e. d o h l E

s 3 n" .ninaoe D T E

g I P

u H o  :  :

I

(

e

• t e t f R e

IEu oN b b U t t R O iilI, l i

lJ i

.m

n. .w.

.. SHEET NUMBER 1 of s TURNOVER EXCEPTION LIST K3tFCREEKGENERATINGSTATION TURNOVER NUMBER cm3 DATE 8-25 9 SYSTEM DESIGNATOR / TITLE co-3/ Protected Area Bau-ier Fenm ,8 LOCAT. CAT. SUE RESPONS DUE QUALITY T PRIOR. IBILITY DATE SIGN /DATE l , ITEM CODE ORIG DISC DESCRIPTION (BLA) INT /DATE Grading inccuplete and no gravel placed KC YARD

1. KC north of Gate G2. Southwest corner of Guardhouse.

Railroad crossing incu.plete under Gate KC KC YARD

2. G2.

TV2 btrrper post and grade incmplete MW Remove all construction items and debris KC

4. KC from inside and outside of PAB in isola-tion zone all around.

1 KC Isolation zone not the full 20' on insid YARD KC

5. or outside south of Guardhnuse.

gg Zone incouplete (gyavelypreading) south YARD KC

6. _

of Guardhouse. indidOAB.

KC Grass growing in isolation zone south of YARD KC 7

7. Guardhouse inside PAB.

8. KC Tighten bottom strand of barbed wire on south run of Guardhouse.

.. Fence fabric is lapped over to achieve YARD KC

9. KC proper height on fence by cate G9.

Gap under Gate G3 bottom greater than YARD KC

10. KC 4 J Gate G3 lock needs replacement to pro- YARD KC

11. KC tected side.

Bottcxn barbed wire loose above electrical KC KC mnhole south of Guardhouse on east uent

12.

• run.

Fence fabric loose on south fence line YARD KC KC running east-uest starting at electrical 13.

nanhole for about 60'. {

l

'IV 4 guard posts not in and firal grade YARD KC KC

14. finishM .

WQ

~

-Mwnim M '

2 of s E TURNOVER EXCEPTION LIST SHEET NUMBER

!OLF'dREEKGENERATINGSTATION 3YSTEM DESIGNATOR / TITLE Co-3/ Protected Area Barrier Ebnce TURNOVER NUMBER Co-3 DATE 8-25-84 PRIOR. LOCAT. CAT. SUE RESPONS DUE QUALITY

[ TEM CODE ORIG DISC DESCRIPTION (BLA) INT /DATE IBILITY DATE SIGN /DATE Barbed wire south of TV 4 not in the

15. KC kicker arm. YARD KC YARD

16. E Straiohten all 45* kickers to a cermndi r n1nr. KC

17. E Clean-uo around Gate 4.

~

YARD KC

18. E Carplete asphalt on Gate 4 area. YARD KC 19, KC Tighten barbed wire on top of all gates. YARD KC KC L se fabric on west side KC Gravel too high due vest of Fuel YARD KC

21. Building.

KC L se barbed wire fran mid point to north gg

22. corner on vest side.

KC Close personnel opeining in west side off YARD KC

23. of the vest side of the Turbine Bldg.

Cican up near northvest corner near man-YARD KC

24. hole just north of TV9.

Gate G5 lock needs to be moved inside ym KC

25. KC protected side.

Opaning by electrical manhole is 5" x KC ym KC

., g _

8" north side.

Fence height over electrical manhole is ym KC

27. KC less than 8' north side.

I

28. KC GM ps W We hgh at W M m E KC Gap under gate G6 greater than 4" and YARD KC

29. madinn i ne emni nen No rock betueen the rails at gate G6 YARD KC KC Derailer at gate G6 does not allow the YARD gg

31. qate to close.

KC Tension rod on gate G6 broken. YARD 3L KC g Grading inconplete at W 11 on the out- YARD

l. 33. side down to southwest cormr of Mmin. KC

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J

ri a:#m.m i ~a - . . , _ . - -... J e N0LF5REEKGENERATINGSTATION TURNOVER EXCEPTION LIST SHEET NUMBER 3 of 5 SYSTEM DESIGNATOR / TITLE Co-3/ Protected Area Barrier rence TURNOVER NUMBER coa DATE a-2s-84 PRIOR, LOCAT. CAT. SUE RESPONS DUE QUALITY i

! ITEM CODE ORIG DISC DESCRIPTION (BLA) INT /DATE IBILITY DATE SIGN /DATE l

Cover hole by manhole northeast of Aux.

34. KC w_y_ iny4rin ne pan YARD KC i Cover hole by manhole due north of i

35. KC Trailer 87. YARD KC l Ibmove grass in the isolation zone by the

36. KC Mmin Bldq. -

YARD KC l Walkuays on south side of Mmin Bldg are

, 37. KC in the isolation zone. YARD KC Rain downspouts on south of Mmin Bldg

38. KC YARD KC cause erosion of isolation zone aram1.

Fence bottcm south of Mnun Bldg is not

39. embedded 2" into cravel. Ym KC KC Cover vashouts at southeast corner of YMD

40. Mmin Bldq. KC KC Clean up gate corner by gate G8 YARD KC Move lock on gate G8 to inside of the PAB KC YARD KC 42.

E Barbed wire north of warehouse on north- YARD- 1;C

43. south run is loose.

KC Barbed wire and fabric on the trarehouse YARD KC

44. dock is loose.

yc Top rail just south of vrarehouse dock is YARD

45. KC loose.

KC Gravel too high south of vrarehouse dock YARD KC

46. on outside of PAB.

8 Isolation zone is not 20' south of vrare- YARD KC

47. KC house dock.

Barbed wire south of varehouse on north- YARD KC l 48. KC south run 19 loose.

i KC Barbed wire south of vrarchouse on cast- YARD KC

49. west run is loose iust north of Maint Shnn 50 KC Wash outs on slope just north of Maint. YARD KC Shop .

KC Isolation zone less than 20' south of KC

51. vrarehouse on inside of PAB. YARD

52. KC l , Grass grouing inside PAB south of varehous , YARD KC

n ,. - <

n. - , , . - , . . ,

~

SHEET NUMBER 4 or s 10LF tilEEK GENERATING STATION TURNOVER EXCEPTION LIST ]

Co-3/ Protected Area Barrier TURNOVER NUMBER co-3 DATE 8-2s-84

YSTEM DESIGNATOR / TITLE LOCAT. CAT. SUE RESPONS DUE QUALITY PRIOR. IBILITY DATE SIGN /DATE TEM CODE ORIG DISC DESCRIPTION (BLA) INT /DATE Grading incmplete at W 33/22 Ye KC KC Barbed wire loose between W 33/22 and YARD E KC w Gravel incmplete southwest of warehouse YARD KC

55. near vehicle ooenino in fence. -

~

Close vehicle opening on south fence yg

56. near W24.

Isolation zone gravel not 20' wide on out-KC N KC

57. side and inside of fence fann W24 to G.H KC Gravel is contaminated and fabric loose YM KC '

58. at W 25.

n z m ga n sMe is mt iARD KC KC- complete at gate Gl.

59.

'1baporary fence in isolation zone at gate YARD KC KC

60. ,

Gl.

Electrical conduit in isolation zone just KC KC YARD

61. cast of Gate G1 (2 total). j KC Final grading and gravel inew plete on YARD KC l

62. west and north sides of Gtkmihouse. -

KC Btmper posts and grading incmplete at YARD KC

63. w 3.

KG. Tighten fence fabric between W 4 & W 5. YARD KC

64. _

Tighten barbed wire between W 4 & W 5. KC g yg Tighten fence fabric between gate G4 and 7 KC 66.

scuthwest coiis-r of fence.

Tighten fabric and barbed uire between YARD KC KC

67. cate G5 and G6.

Tighten fabric and barbed wire between YARD KC KC

68. W I1 & W 12.

Fabric is not 2" into gravel south of yg KC

69. varchouse.

KC Warehouse weapons cage not installed. YARD KC C

71. G3te G1 is less than 8 feet hich.

i

7, /g,.

• Ad ~-1. se o,, ,fg .. ua.

SHEET NUMBER n me s

• WDLF CREEK GENERATING STATION TURNOVER EXCEPTION LIST SYSTEM DESIGNATOR / TITLE @ 3/ Protected Area Barrier TURNOVER NUMBER co-3 DATE s-2s-m PRIOR, LOCAT. CAT. SUE RESPONS DUE QUALITY ITEM CODE ORIG DISC DESCRIPTION (BLA) INT /DATE IBILITY DATE SIGN /DATE Ebnce fabric and barbed wire loose from YARD KC

72. vehicle onenina on south sido to carn G1_

Tighten barbed wire on gate G9.

KC Barbed wire on perineter of E.S.W. fence YARD KC

74. (all around) is loose.

Rip-rap needs to be placed on outside of E YARD E

75. fence at E.S.W.

Asphalt not placed at E.S.W. and under

76. gate G9. YARD E

g. Gradigg not couplete at TV 26. KC gg Grading too low under fence line just out-l 78. YARD KC i side of E.S.W. causino can under fabric.

KC Gap exists at the norhtwest cornar of E.S. 4. KC 79- ._

by the barbod wire o hnnsinn anr_ YARD KC Fill in around gate post just west of KC

80. nate G9. YARD d.

I

o o' noea eers er.e.sr

/,

M_

,s . -.

inrunoprica cenassposong g m: M. G. Williams KQWLKWO 84-373 Fam: C. G. Patrick [ / M [ j DATE: July 25, 1984 SUBJECr: KG&E QA Audit Report TE 57953-K047 Security and Visitor Control Provided for your imediate attention are the results of a recent KG&E Quality Assurance Audit / Surveillance.

For any Quality Program Violations which affect your organization, please cmplete Section IV of the QPV Form and return the original to me by the scheduled empletion date.

Quality Program Deviations which affect your organization require that you -

provide us notification that the corrective action has been empleted prior to the corrective action due date. .

Although the material contained in this report does not constitute safeguards information, your discretion in the diss mination of information is requested due to the sensitive nature of QPD 7/84-08.

Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me.

CGP/cls Attachment cc: G d,'.L. Koester

.J. Rudolph II

• R.M. Grant F.J. Duddy W.G. Eales R.C. Hagan A.E. Mee QA Comittee y 6- a m y -

., - Yp53%,7; I  !

SIEURITY AIO VISI'f0R CONTROL , ,

I. SCOPE A review of the progra:rmatic aspects of the Security Plan was conducted to determine empliance to federal mandates. The approved Audit Plan and Checklist were used.

II. FIlOINGS Based on the audit sample:

o The training course lesson plans are well structured and detailed.

e The training course content meets federal reconTnendations.

e Documentation of training is adequate. One area was identified as discrepant, however, the problem was corrected during the audit.

QPD 7/84 Contrary to 10CFR50.54, sme of the weapons training (closed) was inadequately documented.

e overall, the training and qualification program for Security personnel is superb, with one exception.

QPD 7/84 Contrary to 10CFR73, documented evidence that on the job evaluations were performed for individuals with hearing and vision impairments could not be provided.

e The Security Plan is emplete and meets federal requirements except for:

QPD 7/84 Contrary to 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, certain corporate policies could not be located.

QPD 7/84 Contrary to 10CFR50.54, a test of response times for law enforcement agencies has not been conducted.

e The issuance of Security procedures has not been completed. A schedule for procedure issuance has been establiched.

e ~ Security Plan and ADM level procedure continuity has been established, o The maintenance program for emponents within the security system has not been finalized. Reference QPD 7/84-11.

7 3ehcorpys%h$=

g Ph .

'. t fa'f6 2 e Concerns relative to design are being tracked by the Licensing group.

III. PERSONS N Name

• Attendance Organization G. Koester 3 KG&E Corporate J. Kelly 2 USNRC F. Rhodes 3 KG&E Operations D. Smith 1,2,3 KG&E Operations M. Williams 1,3 KG&E Operations D. Rich 1,3 KG&E Operations J. Johnson 1,2,3 KG&E Operations D. Rice 1,2,3 KG&E Operations S. Fellers 2 KG&E Startup i R. Parker 2 KG&E Operations M. Hawk 2 KG&E Operations E. Lawson ', 2 KG&E Operations R. Wolle 2 KG&E Operations R. Hoyt 1 KG&E Operations R. Stambaugh 1,2,3 KG&E QA C. Patrick 1,2,3 KG&E QA

.

• 1 - Pre-A it 2 - Audit Process 3 - Post Audit -

5/11/84 through 7/11/84 7/11/84 >

W. EVAWATION ghe Operations Security Program has been well developed and doceented. Based on this audit, the Security Program should prove to

be most effective once it is fully implemented.

L 1

l l

1

'Q1}L>$All!Yrtb'b.' ThlEV - , 7'/P- 94f I R. M. Stambaugh O ' Date i C. G. Patrick .lDate

" M Auditor

~

7 articipating Auditor

('Ibchnical Expert)

/

N . .

l Nos QPD NUNlER 7/84-08 QUALTIY PIOGRAM EATE 7/24/84

--- I D E V'I A T I O N emE 1 w 1 COlsm iLING DUQTrENT 5URVEIIdANCE/ AUDIT SUEUD::T 10CFR50. Anoendix B. Criterion XVII TE: 57953-K047 IOCATICN/CislANIZATION DISCU5aw WTIH 10CFR50 and 10CFR73 WCGS/ Operations Security D. Rice Operations- Security Program INITIA20R TEAM LEADER APPIO/ED BY C.G. Patrick F 4 # 4 M R.M. Stambaugh Woz1 ~-

WI71*lltLMd -7 [N I

1. REQUIRDeft U Records shall be identifiable and retrievable.

II. FI!OIN3 Contrary to the above requirement, neither the Security personnel nor the auditors could locate the Corporate e Securit Plan requires Security personnel to take actions per the Corporate in the event of certain security emergencies.

Ref. Paragraphs 2.2.15 and 2.2.16 of the Contingency Plan.

III. RECDP9ENDATICN:

1. Ensure that the policies have been established.

2. Inform the Plant Superintendent the status of the policies and provide direction on how to obtain the information in the event of a security emergency requiring policy use.

. L$32Ese 6/ J ,.

p x cy y Q.

.aCf TAJE DATE: +

s August 13, 1984 i "4 G.L. Koester REPGC & mRRECTIVE ACTICN  :

S U N: ~

T '.;

-a _

A ITEM CI4 SED J

T TEAM LEADER

,} .

l[l U .- y S l SECTION SUPEWISCR  ; , , (fy,4j ddch A 1

2Qr16 2' RW. 9/83 -

d -**

QPD MJPBER 7/84-09 mmPN DATE 7/p4/g4

--- DEVIATI0N PME 1 0F 1 CONTBOLLDG DOCDENT SURVEIIDNC ' DIT SUBJECT 10CFR50.54, Paragraph 0 (3) TE: 57953- 4 DISOJSSED WI'IH 10CFR50 and 10CFR73 -

IDCATICN/O MANIZATION Operations Security Program WCGS/ Operations Security D. Rice INITIAIDR eyr TEAM LEADER APPMNED BY C.G. Patrick /R.M. Stambaugh R.M. Stambaugh eg g,g g g /g 7 I. REQUIRINEhT e; A test of commitments established for local law enforcement authorities shall be conducted.

II. FDDIN3 Contrary to the above requirement, the response times committed to in the Security Plan have not been demonstrated as valid.

III. REXDMME2H:ATICN:

1. Conduct a test of the local law enfortement response times. If the times are shown to-be invalid, evaluate the impact it will have on the Security Program.

CORRECTIVE ACTI(N 00E DATE: RESPONSIBILITY:

n.'

ni,e + n 14x4 D. Smith "REPORP OF (DRRICIIVE ACTICN COMPIETICN RECEIVED , CCt9ENIS:

S

REFERENCE:

T' l

A ITEN CMEED VERIFIED l_l T TEAM LEADER NOT VERIFIED l[l t u APPROVID f S SECTION SJPERVISCR bu d -

~ -

g - ~ . . . . - - -

QPD lOBER /84-10 acatrW PEGRAM f DEVIATI0N IWrE 7/2 PJGE 1 OF 1 CONIigMNG KOJM2fr 10CFRSO.54. Paracraoh P (3) SURVEILLANCE / AUDIT SUEUlrr IOCATIClyOR3ANIZATION TE: 57953-K047 DISCJSSED WI'IE WCGS/00erations Security 10CFR50 and 10CFR73 D. Rice Operations Security Procram INI.'IA'IORe yp TEAM LEADER APP!GED BY , i C.G. Patrick /R.M. Stambauch I. REQUIREMENT R.M. Stambauch IPld) LB#ndfa mle_yk b /dv O

Security personnel and associated shall be trained to the requirements outlined in the Security Plan procedures.

II. FIEDG Contrary to the above requirement, the following problems are associated with the security training program:

1. The instructor qualifications have not been documented.

2.

The weapons qualification of qualification was made. records do not indicate exactly when, where, and what type a

III. RE m 2 M WIIW:

il/A CORPICIIVE ACTICN DUE DATE: RESPONSIBILITY:

S REPGru OF ODRRECTIVE ACTICE (DMPIETICN RECEIVED (DMPENIS:

Instructor qualifications have now RDT.RENCE: Verbal been documented. Night firing weapons T! 7/11/84 qualification has been rescheduled.

l A ITIN N MID VERIFIE lgl T

TEAM LEADER [/ M- NOT VERIFIED l[l U APPR NED 7-/9-79 1

S SECTION SUPERVISCR  %'FLdA4 [ .7[.2e/t>f

i$sh2 Rw. 9/83 ,

wees

'y oro aneER ,/84-11)

QJALITY PM) GRAM DATE_ 7 DEVIATI0N PAGE_1 OF 1 CXXdiOLLING DOQMNT 10CFR50.54, Paragraph P E-MILIANCE/ AUDIT SUBJEX.T TE: 67953-K047 IDCATICtVORGANIZATION DISCJSSED WrIH Ops. Security Program WCGS/ Operations Maintenance D. Walsh/R. Wollum 10CFR50 and 10CFR73 INITIA'IOR TEAM LEADER APPIGED BY C. Patrick r/ d_ d D M R. Stambaugh WE g g g , g g{ '/2o/g I. REQUIRENENT gg A maintenance program for the security system shall be established.

II. FI2I?G Contrary to the above requirement, a formalized maintenance program has not been finalized for the security system.

III. RECDMME'NDATICN:

1. Ensure that enough attention is given to the security maintenance program so that the program is fully developed and implemented 90 oays prior to fuel load.

l l

CORRECIIVE ACIICN CUE DATE: RESPOtEIBILITY:

Airnoct 13. 1984 G. Bower REPORT OF CDRRECTIVE ACTICN CDMPLETICN RECEIVED CDMPENTS:

S

REFERENCE:

T A ITIN CWSED VERIFIED l,,,,,,l T TEAM IsaoER por VERIFIED C U APPIWED S SECTION SUPERVISr.R -

kQF S.d Rsv. 9/83

" ~ '

• WCGS gg[f . . .7/. _ . -12)

~

QPDISBER

= = -R= -E ,,, m a DEVIATI0N PY,E 1 OF 1 COEwDI1ING rvXLMNT 10CFR73, Appendix B, Paragraph I.8 (a) SURVEIU.ANCE/ AUDIT SUBJELT TE: 57953-K047 IDCATICN/OIG.aNIZATION DISCUSSED WIDI 10CFR50 and 10CFR73 WCGS/ Operations Security D. Rice Operations. Security Program INITIATOR TEAM LEADER APPROVED BY R.M. Stambaugh R.M. Stambaugh fr%i.,

I. RBRUIREMENT L/8,ntdt W e,1,,A 720 h g

10CFR73, Appendix 8: "On the job evaluation shall be used for individuals who exhibit a mild color vision defect."

II. FIFOI?G i Contrary to the above requirement, there is little documented evidence that indicates an on the job evaluation was performed for individuals with color vision defects.

III. prmMMENDATIW:

1. Perform on the job evaluations on employees with documented hearing and/or vision impairments. Take appropriate action.

2. Document the results of the evaluation.

3. Ensure that Corporate and legal requirement:: on confidentiality and privacy are not violated.

$,$h WE WE: RES M IBI W :

D. Smith REPORT OF CDRFECTIVE ACTICN COMPLETICN RECEIVED (DPTENIS:

S

REFERENCE:

T A ITEN CI46ED VERIFIED l _ l T tem I.rAoER -

icr vEaIrIro l_l U APPIO/ED S

SECTION SUPERVISCR -

v1.4 '

o Wc)W l -C~t e_XC- "l \

u.s. Nucts An ntoutATony couuissioN DATE '

NRC Fonu 218 l';'!'. s..

30sf 8e ME o .

TELEPHONE OR VERBAL CONVERSATION RECORD IT

, O INCOMING CALL O ouTGolNG CALL 3 _PE E PSON C L L..

GQ Od LQ _ FICE/ADOR mem escurrces bef.

PHONE NUMBER l EXTENS EI' r C- l I

K?us25 G25 2.Y 1VICi OFFICE / ADDRESS PERSON Mi.usu a USNRC: RW SEC Brt- m , Brao wes Ke16,secudg ~

CONVERSATION PC C58'A Me- s ecos'd5 he i OV1 *, hE O-2 o onLS

Su A s w u,s h ac.s,f e ee3 p em - se re of a 4bp(?peurses am %gi. ,cc,idtdeO4Gir consMaceD. L 6e > .'m.agJse w,gacSoe-~4o we yok usl r 2cds'c e-8 concer**D io. er E ifac Ac eP ecso

~

re cones .Wd r mod o fC.c.e_;

j em

.tc , .m c.A3e ao ama -tae_

gCA.aso L.&aa rea-t&s 2dimiuuoLccc,(oog . cedeiJe e&wr, e@= ,

%g apcl 2.dAs,

.c.,d-b <z_ EEL b 4Seac0opM he80 , e.>. ell dx:,

Q(d)gues ' ioe reeA pd cadb a4 &r persOma&

(e,-

n h h 1.om a L 4 ,c0 6 b be, lue es(4,4 a osfd a e,3 ie d J as w edd ,l lL ama gonDeA eut, m(# k .; ashe_,eA b5La ama a us e na~e s 4 emms 4 ac_. nye serEue ee g e wer . bcSeois =cln eredaes me3 be_>ueuC e,LAcagtbe we-s AD.

L.s e sggd o c [,dveeaWe$L h eitweSal'W b,w

,m E EG.E e c gu<.o w TC,(

5wre-td uk '

e d_

'OoDvisE Ms gh g'p,.

, , ACTION TAKEN.

ACTION REQUESTED L

s 4 b <nt 4 P/4 INITIALS ACTION TAKEN .

DATE h ,

Nac Fomu 21s (4.7sl

~

o 7 ', 3 0 .3 M

vocr INPORM ATION SCIENCES. INC.

TECHNICAL.SElllVICES OlVISION got pAmK AvaNuS . NEW YOmK. N.Y.10178 s (3181308-0300 Education:

1982 BA in Applied Sciences (Math & Physics) Edison State College, Trenton, New Jersey 1976-1980 Four years training (Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Physics) West Point (United States Military Academy). West Point, New York Honorable Discharge Received.

M 1976 National Merit Scholar Certifications _:

Certified by Courter & Company, Inc. - ANSI N45.2.23 Auditor

- ANSI N45.2.6 Level II Engineer Summary:

Active Quality More than three years nuclear Quality Assurance experience.

Assurance Auditor. As a Quality Assurance Engineer, conducted documentation reviews of pressure' tests, welding packages, procedures and isometric drawings.

Presently assigned the duty of reviewing ASME N-5 certification reports. .

Related Experience: _,

Ebasco Services Inc. -(Industrial Assistance Corp.)

Quality Assurance Analyst Field Assignment at Waterford III Nuclear Plant Taf t, Louisinna 4/83 to Lead N-5 Review Team: Assist in the development of the ASME N-5 ,

Present Data Report Review Program for the certification of instrument -

lines. Responsible for training and overeeeing a team of 10 reviewers; interfacing with the sub-contractor, client and the Authorized Nuclea,r Inspectors. Additional duties include the research and resolution of generic and code related problems.

LOGISTICS SPECIALISTS 3 OSSIGNESS S ORAFTSMEN e TECHNICIANS e WIREMEN g OPPICS a SHOW TEMPOR ARIES

Courter & Company. Inc._ - Secaucus, New Jersey Quality Assurance Engineer / Auditor Field Assignment at Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Wading River, New York Responsibilities included a detailed 10/81 to N-5 Certification Engineer:

document review of piping isometric drawings and all supporting 4/83 ,

documentation to ensure drawings reflected as-built installation, contained all necessary information, and were in agreement Familiarity with with procedures, codes and engineering directives.The review culminated the ASME Code and Code Cases was required.

in the writing of an ASME N-3 Final Certification Data Report.

Working directly for the QA Techincal 6/81 to Technical Services Engineer:

Services Supervisor, my duties were to research and report 9/81 systematic deficiencies with the " Measuring and Test Equipment" The areas under investigation included calibration procedure. inconsistencies using a numerical analysis, the evaluation of out-of-tolerance conditions and an an analysis of the actual procedure to determine the effectiveness of the procedure in meeting the project specification requirements and intentions.

Duties included a preliminary and 8/80 to Quality Assurance Engineer: Liaison

~

final review of weld and pressure test documentation.

5/81 with other areas (Startup and Construction) to coordinate the pressure testing was required.

i l

l l

e , . --

fo'

.'- #"4 4 UNITE] STATES

+,

NUCLEAR RE2ULATORY CZMMISSION I-

.. $ REZION IV 0, [ PARKWAY CENTRAL PLAZA BUILDING

..... * "IEING . TEX S In Reply Refer To: NOV131984 Docket: STN 50-482/84-31 .

Kansas Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear -

P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. James A. F. Kelly of this office during the period August 27-31, 1984, of activities authorized by NRC Construction Permit CPPR-147 for Wolf Creek Generating Station, and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. F. T. Rhodes and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during the inspection included the security plan and implementing procedures. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with -

personnel, and observations by the inspector. These findings are documented in the enclosed inspection report.  ;

W1 the scope of the inspection, no violations or deviations were sed.

The material enclosed herewith contains Safeguards Information as defined by 10 CFR Part 73.21 and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals is prohibited by Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Therefore, the material, with the exception of the report cover page which is an inspection l summary, will not be placed in the Public Document Room.

l Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

l Sincerely, C :ci -2. 7.cned Ly D. R. Hunter, Chief Reactor Project Branch 2

Enclosure:

Appendix - NRC Inspection Report STN 50-482/84-31 6 -5 wi ww zy -

4, "0 9

^ ^ ' ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Kansas Gas and Electric Company cc w/sumary page:

Kansas Gas and Electric Company Forrest Rhodes, Plant Superintendent ATTN: Gene P. Rathbun . Manager Wolf Creek Generating Station of Licensing P.O. Box 309 P.O. Box 208 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Wichita, Kansas 67201 i

I

?

d 4

e B -5 .

APPENDIX U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV NRC Inspection Report: STN 50-482/84-31 Construction Permit: CPPR-147 Docket: STN 50-482 Category: A2 Licensee: Kansas Gas & Electric (KG8E)

P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Facility Name: Wolf Creek Generating Station Inspection At: Wolf Creek Site, Coffee County, Burlington, Kansas Inspection Conducted: August 27 - 31, 1984 Inspector: , /# 6 ames A. F. Kelly,' Physical Security Specialist Dete '

Approved: / /0 / /

. . Itall, Acting Chief, Nuclear Materials Safety Date ' ' '

and Safeguards Branch

/ D /4$$ V LP T. Martin, ief, Project Section A. Reactor D6tV Project Bra h2 Inspection Sumary inspection Conducted August 27 - 31, 1984 (Report STN 50-482/84-31)

Areas Inspected

Routine, announced inspection of the physical security plan (PSP) and implementing procedures. The inspection involved 32 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.

Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

I

- M N 4 i B --

S-74, Crpy of _ . copies

_. Paces

- , 2 DETAILS

1. Persons Contacted KG&E and Contractors

• W. M. Lindsay, Supervisor, Quality Systems

• C. G. Patrick, Lead Auditor, Quality Assurance (QA)

I

• R. M. Stambaugh, Supervisor, QA Audits

• G. Atwood, Licensing Engineer C. D. Rice, Security Operations Supervisor J. W. Johnson, Chief of Security D. Gober, Bechtel Startup Engineer M. S. Mullen, Nuclear Programs Engineering J. Costello, Startup Test

• F. T. Rhodes, Plant Manager R. Parker, Instruments and Controls Computer M. E. Hower, Lead Computer Engineer R. L. Hoyt, Plant Administration

• G. Bramlett, Instruments and Controls Supervisor ,

• 0. G. Maynard, Supervisor Licensing

• G. L. Koester, Vice President - Nuclear

• W. J. Rudolph II, Manager, QA .

• D. L. Erbe, Security C. Stinert, QA D. McNaughton, Startup Engineer

• S. Fellers, Startup Engineer

• C. J. Hoch, QA

• D. R. Smith, Superintendent Plant Support

• D. L. Gober, Startup Engineer

• S. L. Potter, Supervisor Vendor Surveillance

• W. Nelson, Manager Administration Services ,

• J. Mack, Administration Clerk

• R. Wollum, Instruments and Controls Coordinator

• M. Hawk, Lead Computer Engineer

• K. Ellison, Startup Supervisor Other Accompanying Personnel S. Brown, NRC Plan Reviewer, Nuclear Materials and Safeguards Office

• B. Bartlett, NRC Resident Inspector

• H. Bundy, NRC Resident Inspector

• Denotes those present at the exit interview.

The NRC inspector also interviewed a number of other persons onsite.

REVIEWED BY (1ULE) (SIGNAnRE)

(CROANIuT19ti) (DATE) .

[ W4.R.,

2. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings The following open items were closed during this inspection:

(Closed)OpenItem(482/8417-01): Plan Revisions - During the NRC Inspection 50-482/84-17, the response to plan revisions required by Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards (NMSS) were discussed. On August 15, 1984, G. L. Koester forwarded Revision 4 of the Wolf Creek PSP to satisfy this requirement.

(Closed) Open Item (482/8417-03): Law Enforcement Response - During the period after NRC Inspection 50-482/84-17 was completed, the QA group caused a drill to be conducted to verify the response capability of the local law enforcement agency.

l (Closed) Open Item (482/8317-05): Security Program Audit - The QA group l completed the Special Scope QA Program Startup and Operations Phase t

Security System Audit. All items identified within the report requiring a _

(Closed)OpenItems(482/8417-07)and(482/8340-03): Physical Barrier -

Protected Area - The height of the fence line has been corrected through the use of replaced.

tended outriggers. F barbed wire strings have been ,p b

These matters will be tracke in the testing and maintenance area.

(Closed) Open Items (482/8417-08) and (482/8340-04): Security System -

Power Supply - The uninterruptable power supply and emergency security generator were successfully tested and observed e NRC i or to g,s3 i

have carried the load for over 30 minutes.

I

~

will be tracked in the testing and maintenance area.

l (Closed)OpenItem(482/8417-09): Lighting - The adequacy of the light covera as reviewed to verify that it was effectinin providing support g Q for t Li This will be tracked in the testing and maintenance M area, ed)OpenItem(482 7-10 : Assessment Aids ( ,A nd is ade uate. OT '

be trac in the testing and maintenance area.

l 43 e.,.

---~~,----wc-._a...-- ,----n-

i

)

l (Closed) Open Item (482/8417-11): Detection Aids Protected Areas - The startup testing for _the detection aids in the protected area is complete

'~

and the lo s filed. F '

ra--

(

~

' TEis'willTe~ tracked in the testing and' maintenance area.

(Closed) Open Item (482/8417-12): Detection Aids - Vital Areas - The startup testing fjtr the detection aids in the vital area is complete and

~'~ '

the 1 s filed. r T T . - - -

, . . _ . . - ._ .}

_____ _ s: --

(Closed)OpenItem(482/8417-13): Alarm Stations - A random test was conducted by the NRC inspector to verify that the computer software provided data to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e)(1).

3. Open Items Identified Ouring This Inspection Open Item Description Par 69raph 482/843. 4 482/8431 s 4 482/8431-03 5 482/8431-04 6 482/8431-05 6'

482/8431-06 7

, 482/8431-07 '8 482/8431-08 9 482/8431-09 9

482/8431-10 9 482/8431-11 9

482/8431-12 9 482/8431-13 9

482/8431-14 9

482/8431-15

.. 9 482/8431-16 9 l

4. Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The NRC inspector and the HMSS security plan reviewer verified by discussion and observation that the licensee was responsive to the coments provided by the NRC staff concerning Revision 3 which was replaced by Revision 4. Several other items still remain to be resolved and are reflected in paragraphs within this report that specifically relate to the subject of testing and maintenance.

3g .e.

-S-NRC Inspection Report 50-482/84-17, defined an open item (482/8417-02) concerning IE Infomation Notice 83-36. This notice relates to

, emergency access and related key con 01. The licensee had ag, reed to_ _ '

consider a review of this subject. '

{; .

. This remains an open item. 1 48 a

Iwo other categories of pr6cedures need ic be finalized and implemented by

..the.1,1cen.see. ,,The first area is th f '

a jandth'is'issetupasanopen 7 item (482/8431-02).

No violations or deviations were identified.

5. Management Effectiveness TJe~licenseeiscommittedtof

~

f L,

The'NRC inspector was informed program was in its final stag N of 3 (A J hat t i completion and would be ready for inspection in early October. This is -

set up as an open item (482/8431-03).

No violations or deviations were identified. I

6. Security Organization The NRC inspector reviewed the matter [ . , }

g.

JwiIhthelicensee. The Wolf Creek PSP' define's 'sicurity p'ersonnel to include security-trained personnel.

The definitions go on to describe security-trained personnel to be:

r i A j Y L . . -., . - - . - - - . . 2 10 CFR 73.2(d) defines a " watchman" who serves in a security capacity as:

"An individual, not necessarily unifomed or amed with a firearm, who provides protection for a plant and the special nuclear material therein in the course of performing other duties."

. From a regulatory point of view, persons assigned specific security functions are subject to the selection, training, and reporting requirements of the security organization. The NRC inspector determined

. T., o '

nter 9 as is requ by10CFR(&j This is set up as an open item (

73.55(b . /8431-04).

In Section 1.4.1.1 of the PSP, which relates to the suitability of Plant Security Personnel, it is stated:

In 10 CFR 73, Appendix B, Criteria I.A.I.a., " Educational Development,"

it is stated:

)'  :

! " Possess a high school diploma or pass an equivalent performance examination designed to measure basic job-related mathematical, language and reasoning skills, ability, and knowledge required to perform security job duties."

l reso u on and is set up as an open item (482/8431-05).

No violations or deviations were identified.

7. Security Program Audit l The QA unit stationed at KG&E corporate headquarters in Wichita has the responsibility for conducting audits of contractors. KG8E Procedure ,

ADM 10-006 provides the guidance. The purchase order format prescribes that i those contractors who supply personnel for work at the site with  !

1

(

Wunescorted item (482/8431-06 .

This is an open t

8. Records and Reports The licensee is required to keep certain records categorized in 10 CFR 73.70 and as detailed in other sections of 10 CFR. Among those records are reports of theft and sabotage, physical security events, security personnel training and qualification, records, access control program records, and testing and maintenance program records. Chapter 13 of the PSP sets out specific records to be retained about activities explained e

%3 2 - s. -

[

• K- ,; .

i in other sections of the plan. Anong these specific records are personnel files for security personnel and other KG&E employees. Guidelines for this activitiy are contained in Section 1.3, " Facility Personnel." of the PSP. '

t

~

Thisisanopenitem(482/B431-07).

l

9. Testing and Maintenance The NRC inspector interviewed operations maintenance personnel to verify that the licensee is developing a program for testing and maintenance that l

will ensure that physical protection related equipment meets the general perfonnance requirements 10 CFR 73.55(a) and the objectives of 10 CFR i

73.55(g)(1)through.(4).

er specific physical security devices.

f These startup tests h been tracked through the data sheets within the I respective startup procedures. Chapter 12 of the PSP, " Tests Inspections and Maintenance," generalizes the methods to be em)loyed by the licensee to meet the regulation. References are made to ot1er sections in the plan I ich relate to specific items that require testing and maintenance.

This is an open item (482/8431-1 (482-8431-09).

\'

L

%3 e

l l

' Subsections 5.2.2.3 and 3.1.4.1 of the PSP establish the methods by which the licensee will meet the requirements for emergency power for the security system. ins ector verified that the s stems work accordi j.I S)

' This is an open item 482/8431-11).

l-Section 3.1.3.2, " Surveillance " of the PSP discusses the The NRC inspector verifie y o servation M i they meet he requirements of 10 CFR 55 e and W

' his clos en I 8417-

' This is an open item (482/8431-12).

Section 3.1.4, " Intrusion Detection Hardware," of the PSP discuss the methods to be emp rotect the protected area of the site. g l

This is an open item (482/8431-13).

The NRC inspec or was nformed 3 that such a design was being prepared. TfHs is an open item (482/8431-14).

4 Section 5.2.2, " Intrusion Detection Hardware," of PSP discusses the vital

! sector electrical, electronic, and physical protection against unauthorized access into this area. Section 12.1, " Physical Barriers and Access Points," of the PSP states that functional tests 1b done in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions statement appears for the other forms of physical secur ty hardware.

The same ki f

)  !

l This l 1s an open item (482/8431-15 .

This matter will be reviewed w en t e installation is complete. Thsisanopenitem(482/8431-16).

10. Exit Interview

• The NRC inspector met with Mr. Forrest Rhodes and other members of the Wolf Creek staff at the conclusion of the inspection on August 31, 1984, j

to sumarize the scope and findings of the NRC inspection, i

l e_ .m -