ML20128L806
| ML20128L806 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 07/20/1984 |
| From: | Lahs B, Sinkule M NRC |
| To: | Dube B, Lewis NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20128L415 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-784, FOIA-84-A-79 NUDOCS 8505310462 | |
| Download: ML20128L806 (1) | |
Text
r
\\;
-o
(
R i
E st J
Y. '.
a
\\,;l, l } f [
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
WASHINGTON.D.C. 20555 7.20 -/ C/
kr*/- bO, A&{**
d(;fub.4.u x a
$5 f, f1$l.t 55#"J M
ffj A>.
w.
'yd W
p$,,A d
i
"' As zu m "
Jas referred to this Office V
h 4 e M.
g je of high-enriched uranium er, you indicate that your gf f
M
, should be perfomed which
.e & '- h jA M Mg reposed rulemaking. As you our concerns in that a j'
j mgf g
m e
- on; such an analysis has ise of HEU in rese6rch and
.fx v.
ufaw,
tematic look and more care-i N
ss of several U.S. research by the proposed rule.
An
-~
in the regulatory analyses.
i others, on how to present i
!he flow of HEU should have ts to theft or diversion of ly affected by the proposed HJageg/DI4k[kS30462g41121 s; however, the protection on has been made aware of e4934 PDR onversion as an example to omestic facilities, and has Following these
! policy.
D-D