ML20128E650

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Semiannual Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data for Period Jul-Dec 1992
ML20128E650
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/1993
From: Morgan H
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9302100535
Download: ML20128E650 (9)


Text

.

~

Southem Califomia Edison Company P. O Boaare S AN C L E M E NT E, C A L.if OH NIA 92674 0128 H E MOmoAN

,66t>=ows

.a....................

v..... w February 1.1993

.. o oe..

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docu%nt Control Desk Washington, D.C.

20555

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50 206, 50 361 and 50 362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 28.3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness for Duty program performance data ft,r the period July 1, 1992 to December 31, 1992 (Attachment 1).

Attachment.2 is provided as an annual summary of data and management actions for the 12 month period of January 1, 1992 to December 31, 1992, in order to demonstrate compliance with the testing rate requirement of the rule.

If you require any additional information, please so advise.

Sincerely, Attachments:

10CFR26 Performance Data cci C. W. Caldwell (USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 1, 2 and 3)

J. B. Martin (Regional Administrator, USNRC Region V)

Institute of Nuclear Power. Operations (INPO) s 080080

gg24%B3R?>S8Shg6 s

R

Fitn030 for Duty Program ATTACKKENT 1 Pcrformanco Data Page 1 of 5 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26

, Southern California Edison

_ July 1 to December 31. 1992 ca,.ny a u.usetaame San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ta.w.

T.M.

Calloway. Mar.. Access Authorization (714) 368-9554 Cmtact Nams Ptmue Nundier Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)

Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300

-Methadone 300/200

-Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methan phetamine 10C0/500 Phencyclindine 25/25 Amphetamine-

/200 Alcohol (%BAC)

.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total Average Number with Unescorted Access 2407 1091 3498 Test Types

  1. Tests
  1. Failures
  1. Tests
  1. Failures Pre-Badging 87 1

388 4 __

For Cause 1

0 2

0 l

Post Accident 0

0 0

0 Random 1.286 1

604 3

Follow-Up 50-0

-28 0

Other 62 0

19 0

Total 1.486 2

'1.041 7 -'

Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory. Treatment.

1 Number of Personnel With Access Restored -Employees 2

Contract 4

Total Number of Random Tests _1.890 Random Testing Rate 54%

l

lIIl,

]

15 l

if a

ho t

9 E

o M2 T

ECe Ag l

'e Ta l

a t

TP oT n

A lp l

d i

e na t

s t

c t

S e

a e

s t

t o

u u

E u

h 1 2 3 C

e e R p

N d

S m

A E

a T

s R

h 3

S e

i U

t p

9 B

n e

i 7

c P

L e

9 U

n I

M 1

S a

A t

F C

s e

I m

G 0

F b

6 N

9 u

u u

o I

I s

8 2

C t

t S

4 1 h

S T

E e

U e

s P

g t

l As S

f u

p c

Ce e

s e

5 2

6 R

n 7

4 n

p n s

i 1

E Sy i

t 1

a eB r

R 9

8 O

0 TT a 0 2 2 2 2 l

n F

i S

c 0

f 9

9 2

u a,

1 Mo 1

4 1

m Et o

A S

/

f.

Ts C

R T

5 s

b n

s 2

4 o

o e

S r

sT a

G l

I c

e 4

E a

O 0

T a

w v

Rg l

t f

nl a

4 6

5 t

4 P P 1

2 E

IA i

d d

G V

m u

a u

o m

S e

I N 1 T

b b

u O2 f

u A

a P9 I

1 1

I c

T s

t 9

7 S

l D1 c

/

S 9

1 7

6 O

aa En e

t, E3 1

1 1

c Te P

i M/

l h.

1 m

o o

u p

R2 h

D Mc E

I1 i

t L,

F O

2 a

M D

4 t

R N-l N

2 8

6 u

O a

t t

I e

A A F

m n

4 2

3 C2 n

1 1

r R

r e

9 a

n e

g N

s A

s F/

u e

O o

0 1

n e

c O1 j

1 3

4 4

4 e

C 0

0 2

i d

n 0

i eS 9

2 t

F u

N/

r 1

ee 7

s l

te b

l 9

8 4

O n

u W7 a

a e

c r

t J

3 e

1 v

O0 M

b 1

1 2

a o

h a

t n

d D

T N

lu K

I W

o f

O w

A o

2 e

d E

2 D

m R

u 9

a o

2 2

r K

0 3

s c

e

/

o p

B h

A 1

3 1

C E

R 0,

3 t

3 n

/

o B

r.

l e

a 2

l t

9 m

1 u

s 8

A A

A 2

l 1

3 4

ne b

o e

o M.

9

/

/

/

o ar e

a T

v i

1 N

N N

w T

f i

t l

I c,

t 2

L s

t a

d b

9 t

T u

0 3

3 5,

e p

R e

a 5

y

/

1 e s e

l u

bd n

s 1

y r n

C A

t 5

o e s ae o

eT o

/

a l k e Lm i

t 7

d p r r

r t s

s 0

e m o p di a

ts t

e n

l E W ef 2

t n

a a

e in r

c e

s e

u d

d d

e b

e t t f o i

e s

y r

d d

e e

e t'

e a

e c i ic f

e t

i l

t l

r r

h s a s t n

r w

s i

a e

a p

b o.

v i

s i

n n r rS o a

p e t n eM C s

t i

c n o c/

d F

T F

e ca r

n R.

tn la n

i o C

r s

aa

=

e t

f c

I l

L C

I I

L C

  1. #G

,l l

llIl l

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 5 DATA

SUMMARY

(July 1, 1992 - December 31, 1992) 1.

There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.

2.

A total of four (4) individuale (one [1] employee and three (3) contract workers) had unescorted protected area access withdrawn for a minimum of 14 days following a random substance test failure.

Five (5) individuals (one [1] employee and four (4) contract workers) were denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure.

3.

As a reeult of a test failure, one (1) employee was denied Site Access and had employment terminated.

4.

There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) during this time frame as a result of failed substance tests.

5.

One (1) employee was required to enroll in a treatment progr during this period.

[

6.

Two (2) employees and four (4) contract workers were grantet (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.

a 7.

The MRO reviewed a total of 9 appeal results for two (2) employees and seven (7) contract workers.

The original test rer"Its were confirmed.

These individuals were provided with de :dled instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial.

One (1) employee pursued an oppeal through the management review process and, to date, the management actions have been upheld.

8.

Tnere were ao identified deficietcies in the Fitness For Duty program.

9.

One (1) event was reported to the Commission (1 drug find) pursuant to 10 CFR 26 during this reporting period. The text of that report is duplicated below:

A notification was made to the NRC Operations Center -(Mr. Timothy McGinty answering, Cperations Center Log # 24619) on November 18, 1992, at 11:13 PST as follows: This notification is for San Onofre Units 1, 2 and 3 and is being made pursuant to 10 CFR

26. 73 (a) (1).

This is a non-emergency twenty-four hour notifica tion.

A suspect material was discovered in the Protected A Ja at 03 :30 on November 11, 1992.

It was found on an "I" beam approximately 6 feet above the floor in Switch Gear Room AC-504 a t the 85 ' level in Unit 2.

The material was discovered by a k

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 5 9.

(Continued)

Control Operator while he wat performing routine surveillance tasks.

At 11:19 hours PST, November 17, 1992, an offsite laboratory confirmed that it was a controlled substance, marijuana- (the remains of one marijuana cigarette).

There have been no individuals identified as being responsible for the material.

The resident inspectors wil1 be notifled-immediately a

af ter this telephone notification. Unit 1 was operativg at 92%

power, Unit 2 was operating at 100% power and Unit 3 was operating at 65% power when this discovery was made.

ATTACHMENT 1 Page 5 of 5 Random Failure Rate e

1989 -12/31/92 0.8%

0.7%

.8%

0.8%

.5%

0.5%

0.4%

0.3h 0.2%

O.1%

2 1

2 1

2 1

2 1989 l 1990 l

1991 l

1992 1989 represented only two months of testing.

'L..

.4 e

-Fitness for Duty Program

~ ATTACHMENT 2 -

Performance Data Page 1 of 3

' Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 i

Southern California Edison-January 1 to December 31. 1992 company it u au raios -

' San Onofre Nuclear Generatina Station 1.antirn T.M.

Calloway Mar.. Access Authorization-(714) 368-9554 Cmtat Nanw Nne Numlier Cutoffs: Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)

Marijuana 50-/- 10 Barbiturates 300 / 200 Cocaine' 300?/ 150 Benzodiazepine 300 / 300 opiates.

300 / 300 Methadone

_300 / 200 Amphetamines 1000 / 500' Propoxyphene 300-/-200_

Methamphetamine 1000./ 500 Phencyclidine 25:/

2E-Amphetamines

/-200 Alcohol - (BAC)

.04 Teating Results-

'SCE Employees Contractor-Personnel Total Average Number with Unescorted Access 2443 1242 3685 Test Types

  1. Tests
  1. Positive-
  1. Tests
  1. Positive-Pre-Badging 284 2

1354 16 For Cause--

2 0

4' 2

Post Accident O'

O O'

O Random 2434-2-

1442 6

Follow-Up

-120 1-

__110 l'

Other 116 l'

45 0

Total 2956 6

2955-25 Number--of Employees-Referred To Mandatory Treatment 3

Number'of Personnel-With Access Restored SCE 4~

Contract

'0 2

-Total Number of PERSONNEL Tested One or More Times SCE 2116 Contract'1293 1

Total Number of Random-Teace,3876.

Random Testing' Rate 105.2%

=

-..-........ - - -. - -. - -. ~.... -.. _... -..... -,.... -

Tcblo 1 RANDOM TESTING PROGRA2RESULTS See Attachment 2, Page 3 of 3 Individuals Tested 1989 1990 1991 1992 p

f

  1. Failed 1

30 25 8

  1. Tested 302*

4264 4375 3876

%.. Failed-

.3%

.7%

.6%

.2%

  • ' Represents only two. months of testing.

5

. Table 2-BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES k

01/01/92 - 12/31/92 Includes multiple'submittals/ multiple substances detected.

j Marijunca Cocaw

. Opinte Amphet Ptwacyc Akxdici Barb Iscum Methmeir Prop Rerusals

]

i

'f 10Lk15 50ilO*

Lh:cn-ce 1:riployces 0

2 1

16 1

0 0

5 11 0

11 0

Contract Weiers 8

14 5

13 10 0

0 5

11 1

4 1

Total Totais 8

16 6

29 :

11 0

0 10 22 1

15 1

gig ll

  • If marijuana had been testcJ at 50/13, vesukr for this reportmg perind watdd have been c4i-site presumptivo 1 total confmned d for a

'.4 ratio of 107%.

{

Table-3 BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING' FAILURES 01/01/92.- 12/31/92 All Test Types Marijuana.

Co:.ine. -

Ah:ubat

.%,, i rL.-

Opescs i Meth = ; :--

4 laconce Employses 2

O 1

0 1

Contract Workers Il 2

2 0

1 7

Teemi

-[

Total 15-4 2

8 1

3 3g i

  1. orwitr presumpuve

. 15 6

l i cortard lab

" 16 6

GC/MS confmned -

I confirmau.n.tari.

o7s aw.

i

. += one sampic sue et adunerata= rrescreened =-=its just below the cutoff level but was confirmed positive at the off-site NIDA lahorntory ATTACHMENT 2 Page 2'of 3" i

l r

+

4 A'ITACIDENT 2 Page 3 of 3 1

i 2

4 Random Failure Rate 1989 -1992 O.8%

0.7%

0.8%

05%

0.4%

! 0.ll' O.3%'

4 2%

0.2%

0.1%

989 1990 1991 1992 1989 represented only two months of testing.

L

+.

s

- *