ML20128D921

Responds to Technical Assistance Request for Review of Industrial Security Plan Submitted by Licensee

ML20128D921
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	02/27/1974
From:	Stello V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Skovholt D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 9212070422
Download: ML20128D921 (2)

Text

- _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __ . . _ _ _

t l

, . DOCh0Me' FLU 2 719l4 i f

j Docket No. 50-263 i

J D. J. Skovholt. Assistant Director for OR's',- L

'5 RESPONSE.TO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST, MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, REVIEW 0FINDUSTRIALSECURITYPLAN'(ORB-1-70)(TAR-769)'

Licensee: Northern States Power Co.--

4 Licensing Stage: . Post-OL.  :

[

Cognizant Project Branch and LPM:: J. Shea, ORB-2

! - Technical Review Branch Involved:= LL:0SB-Requested Completion Date: 3/1/74 Review Status:. Additional Infomation Requested We have reviewed the security plan'for the Monticello. Nuclear. Generating ,

Plant submitted by the licensee; dated 12/28/73. The attached report t l identifies specific omissions or subject areas _which appear to be *

unacceptable departures- from our position as.. stated in Regulatory Guide- #

1.17 of June 1973. The licensee should submit a revision to the security plan which will correct the deficiencies and confom to the Regulatory Gui de. The enclosure is labeled Official Use Only -

e review of a document considered by the . licensee-as,as a resultSection of- the subject'to 2.790 ~of 10CFR2. .

-ossnel sinnea ha ,

wetor SteDo #

i Victor Stello.- Jr., Assistan't Director for Reactor Safety .

Directorate of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated DISTRIBUTION:

Docket -

cc:i L Rdg.

L S.. Hanauer 0SB Rdg.

J.~ Hendrie Eleins A.-Giambusso VStello-W. Mcdonald' D.-Ziemann J. Shea l-R. W.. Houston J. R. Sears -

S. Varga-

, . v ,9 omes* ,,,L,,:0SB h L:0SB//

' L_:4DN - '7)M41W 1 suna.. , JRSeads :id . RWHouston VS,hllo

...- .~ .

l oan* . NX 2/2,6_C_4,,,_2/. H,4 2/27/74 p Aac.u ,in . su aucu oue c.. .. .- .n .

9212070422 740227-PDR ADOCK 05000263.

p. PDR

- -_ .._, , _ , ,, _ ,; _ . .- .._ . ,_ ,,.a ,.2 - ,..:.-._ -,

P l'^ n ti cel l o .Lclear Cwedig i:lunt

= Doctet do. $0-263-Industrici Security Plan -

1. The plan : tam, in 3.1.3, tiet c3rrying or ura of firecrm by suurity ma s is not peraitrea by llartnern Ltrics Power Cc pany ,

It,i: our ?o:i ti5 that the CJards shoole b3 ar.;;d.

inlicy.

. (Me iNgule ~ r" Guica I, I / at Se: tion C. I .a). '

2. Figure 2 of t',e plan-shws 2 railrc. .! lines entering the protected n .o. Discuss your use of cerailtrs ca those lines.

3. The protactcc area physical b8rrier tat',"en the cooling teniers and taa er ster' .at wcrehouse uy b2 w ,1ctely shcoudad in coolinij

- to'-lar e f fl unat .u',91 the wind is bit,;ing fron th" east, You specify no survoilltmc; doviccs 09 the fence. .It is cur 60sitica thst Sedtion 3.3.3 cf KISI M15.17 requires that~ surveillence of the fence surrounding ta protect.cd area by security forces be-supplcrc.cnt;d by electronic surveilicnce of. the protu:-'d cres. It in fut dar our position, in ca funance Oith Regulticry Guide 1.17 at 5 c uco ','. l .b. ,

th? t surveil.lmce' devices on the. propctrd are nhytical b: cric-r,

<,, oc i m vi;rasion-w vicm on extarter e net, sacui:! r >:ccu te in tuo centinunesly : :;n:d alar, s c,tions,-aX that all ps;n albrus should be self-checking and toicper-indicating, t

Y l

l-

....r, ., . ,y e

3 - - ,

W a: . .. s . ..L'

. - . ~ ,,-.-a - . . . , ,,..-.~,.:-,..-,.