ML20128D921
| ML20128D921 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1974 |
| From: | Stello V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Skovholt D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9212070422 | |
| Download: ML20128D921 (2) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _. _
t DOCh0Me' l
FLU 2 719l4 i
f j
Docket No. 50-263 i
D. J. Skovholt. Assistant Director for OR's',- L J
'5 RESPONSE.TO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUEST, MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT, REVIEW 0FINDUSTRIALSECURITYPLAN'(ORB-1-70)(TAR-769)'
Licensee: Northern States Power Co.--
Licensing Stage:. Post-OL.
4
[
Cognizant Project Branch and LPM:: J. Shea, ORB-2
- Technical Review Branch Involved:= LL:0SB-Requested Completion Date: 3/1/74 Review Status:. Additional Infomation Requested We have reviewed the security plan'for the Monticello. Nuclear. Generating Plant submitted by the licensee; dated 12/28/73. The attached report t
identifies specific omissions or subject areas _which appear to be l
unacceptable departures-from our position as.. stated in Regulatory Guide-1.17 of June 1973. The licensee should submit a revision to the security plan which will correct the deficiencies and confom to the Regulatory Gui de.
The enclosure is labeled Official Use Only review of a document considered by the. licensee-as,as a result of-the e
subject'to Section 2.790 ~of 10CFR2.
-ossnel sinnea ha,
wetor SteDo i
Victor Stello.- Jr., Assistan't Director for Reactor Safety.
Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION:
Docket L Rdg.
cc:i L
S.. Hanauer 0SB Rdg.
J.~ Hendrie Eleins A.-Giambusso VStello-W. Mcdonald' D.-Ziemann J. Shea l-R. W.. Houston J. R. Sears -
S. Varga-v
,9
,,,L,,:0SB h L:0SB//
L_:4DN -
'7)M41W omes*
1 JRSeads :id.
RWHouston VS,hllo suna..,
l
.~
. NX 2/2,6_C_4,,,_2/. H,4 2/27/74 oan*
p Aac.u,in. su aucu oue c..
.n.
9212070422 740227-PDR ADOCK 05000263.
p.
,,.a,.2 -,..:.-._
P l'^ n ti cel l o.Lclear Cwedig i:lunt
= Doctet do. $0-263-Industrici Security Plan 1.
The plan : tam, in 3.1.3, tiet c3rrying or ura of firecrm by suurity ma s is not peraitrea by llartnern Ltrics Power Cc pany inlicy.
It,i: our ?o:i ti5 that the CJards shoole b3 ar.;;d.
. (Me iNgule ~ r" Guica I, I / at Se: tion C. I.a).
2.
Figure 2 of t',e plan-shws 2 railrc..! lines entering the protected n.o. Discuss your use of cerailtrs ca those lines.
3.
The protactcc area physical b8rrier tat',"en the cooling teniers and taa er ster'.at wcrehouse uy b2 w,1ctely shcoudad in coolinij
- to'-lar e f fl unat.u',91 the wind is bit,;ing fron th" east, You specify no survoilltmc; doviccs 09 the fence..It is cur 60sitica thst Sedtion 3.3.3 cf KISI M15.17 requires that~ surveillence of the fence surrounding ta protect.cd area by security forces be-supplcrc.cnt;d by electronic surveilicnce of. the protu:-'d cres.
It in fut dar our position, in ca funance Oith Regulticry Guide 1.17 at 5 c uco ','. l.b.,
th? t surveil.lmce' devices on the. propctrd are nhytical b: cric-r,
<,, oc i m vi;rasion-w vicm on extarter e net, sacui:! r >:ccu te in tuo centinunesly : :;n:d alar, s c,tions,-aX that all ps;n albrus should be self-checking and toicper-indicating, t
Y l
l-
....r,
.,.,y e
3 - -
W a:... s
...L'
. -. ~
,,-.-a
,,..-.~,.:-,..-,.